Connect with us

Published

on

 

White Holes: The Universe's Elusive

White Holes: The Universe’s Elusive Counterparts to Black Holes?

Black holes, with their immense gravity that engulfs everything that ventures near, are some of the most fascinating and mysterious objects in the cosmos. But what if there were celestial entities that operated in the opposite way, spewing out matter and energy rather than sucking it in? Enter the realm of white holes, theoretical regions of spacetime shrouded in mystery and ongoing scientific debate.

The Hypothetical Mirror Image:

White holes are often described as the hypothetical counterparts of black holes. While black holes are thought to have incredibly strong gravity, pulling in anything that crosses a point of no return called the event horizon, white holes, if they existed, would function in reverse. They would supposedly expel matter and energy outward with such force that nothing, not even light, could enter.

A Product of Equations, Not Observations:

The concept of white holes arose from Einstein’s theory of general relativity. The same equations that describe the formation and behavior of black holes also mathematically predict the possibility of white holes. However, there’s a crucial distinction: black holes have been observed, their existence confirmed through various methods, while white holes have never been directly observed.

The Challenges of Existence:

Several factors make the existence of white holes highly improbable:

  • Violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics: This law states that entropy, a measure of disorder, always increases in a closed system like the universe. White holes, constantly spewing out matter, would seemingly contradict this fundamental law.
  • Impossibility of Formation: Current understanding of stellar evolution and gravitational collapse doesn’t suggest any natural processes that could create a white hole.
  • Time Travel Paradox: Some theoretical models envision white holes connecting to black holes through wormholes, creating a time travel paradox. However, the feasibility and implications of such scenarios remain highly speculative.
White Holes: The Universe's Elusive

Types of White Holes

Due to the highly theoretical nature of white holes, there aren’t different “types” in the conventional sense. However, there are different ways to conceptualize them based on our current understanding of physics and the limitations they present.

Here are some key points to consider:

1. Classical White Holes:

  • This is the most basic concept of a white hole, arising directly from the mathematical solutions of Einstein’s theory of general relativity.
  • It depicts a region of spacetime with an event horizon, similar to black holes, but with the singularity (a point of infinite density and gravity) located in the future instead of the past.
  • Matter and energy would theoretically erupt from this singularity and be expelled outwards forever, violating the second law of thermodynamics.
  • The existence of classical white holes is considered highly improbable due to the violation of fundamental physical laws.

2. Primordial White Holes:

  • This concept proposes that white holes might have formed during the Big Bang, emerging from the incredibly dense and hot conditions of the early universe.
  • Unlike classical white holes, these wouldn’t violate the second law of thermodynamics as the universe’s entropy was very low at its beginning.
  • However, the immense energy required for their formation and the lack of any observational evidence make this scenario highly speculative.

3. Quantum Fluctuations:

  • This intriguing idea suggests that tiny fluctuations in the quantum vacuum, the space filled with virtual particles constantly popping in and out of existence, could give rise to white holes.
  • These white holes would likely be extremely small and short-lived, existing only for a fraction of a second before evaporating due to Hawking radiation.
  • While the concept is theoretically possible, it’s beyond our current technological capabilities to detect or observe such phenomena.

4. Wormhole Connection:

  • Some theoretical models propose that white holes might be connected to black holes through wormholes, creating a bridge between two points in spacetime.
  • Matter entering the black hole on one side could theoretically emerge from the white hole on the other, potentially enabling travel through space and time.
  • However, the existence of wormholes and the feasibility of such time travel scenarios remain highly speculative and require further exploration of the fundamental laws of physics.

It’s important to remember that white holes are still purely theoretical, and their existence hasn’t been confirmed through scientific observation. However, they continue to be a captivating topic in astrophysics, prompting further research and discussion about the universe’s mysteries.

White Holes: The Universe's Elusive

The Construction of White Holes

Due to the highly theoretical nature of white holes, currently, there isn’t a known method to construct them. They haven’t been observed in the universe, and our understanding of physics doesn’t suggest any feasible way to create them artificially.

Here are some key points to consider:

  • Theoretical Challenges: As previously mentioned, classical white holes violate the well-established second law of thermodynamics. Additionally, current theories of stellar evolution and gravitational collapse don’t predict scenarios that could lead to their natural formation.
  • Technological Limitations: Even if we had a better theoretical grasp of white holes, creating them would likely require manipulating gravity at an extreme level, which is beyond our current technological capabilities. We lack the necessary technology to understand and control gravity to the degree required for constructing such an object.
  • Hypothetical Scenarios: While building a white hole in the real world seems unrealistic, some theoretical models have explored their possible existence in specific circumstances:
    • Primordial White Holes: These are purely hypothetical and thought to have formed in the very early universe under extreme conditions, not something we can replicate.
    • Quantum Fluctuations: These potential white holes would be extremely short-lived and tiny, making manipulation or construction impossible with current technology.

Given these limitations, it’s safe to say that constructing white holes isn’t achievable with our current knowledge and technology. However, research into fundamental physics and the nature of spacetime could potentially lead to new insights in the future.

It’s important to distinguish between scientific inquiry and science fiction. While the concept of white holes is fascinating and sparks imaginative possibilities, it’s crucial to base discussions on the current state of scientific understanding and avoid making claims that are not supported by evidence.

White Holes: The Universe's Elusive

How to Detected White Holes

Unfortunately, due to the highly theoretical nature and current limitations of our technology, we do not currently have a known method to detect white holes if they exist. Here’s why:

  1. Lack of Observable Properties: Unlike black holes which have observable effects like gravitational pull and accreting disks, white holes wouldn’t have any readily detectable signatures. They wouldn’t emit light or other forms of radiation, making them difficult to pinpoint in the vast expanse of space.

  2. Highly Energetic and Unstable: Theoretical frameworks suggest white holes would erupt with immense energy at a constant rate. This intense energy release would likely be in highly exotic forms like Hawking radiation, which we currently lack the technology to effectively detect.

  3. Short-Lived Existence: Some models, like those involving quantum fluctuations, propose white holes with extremely short lifespans, lasting mere fractions of a second. This fleeting existence makes them incredibly difficult to catch in the act of emitting energy.

  4. Technical Limitations: Our current telescopes and instruments aren’t designed to detect the specific characteristics associated with hypothetical white holes. Even if they existed, our technology might not be sensitive enough to pick up on their faint signals, if any.

However, the search for white holes continues:

  • Indirect Observations: Scientists are exploring the possibility of indirect detection by studying the effects of hypothetical white holes on their surroundings. For example, if a white hole existed within a large structure like a galaxy, the unusual properties of the surrounding material or unusual energy signatures might hint at its presence.
  • Theoretical Progress: Advancements in our understanding of physics, especially quantum gravity, might shed light on the true nature of white holes and suggest new avenues for detection.
  • Technological Development: Future advancements in telescope capabilities and the development of new instruments could potentially provide the sensitivity needed to detect faint signals associated with hypothetical white holes.

Remember, the existence of white holes remains unconfirmed, and our current inability to detect them doesn’t necessarily mean they don’t exist. As science progresses, our understanding of the universe might change, and new methods for detecting white holes might emerge.

White Holes: A Spark for Further Exploration:

While their existence is currently considered highly unlikely, white holes continue to be a topic of scientific discussion and exploration. They offer valuable insights into the complexities of general relativity and the nature of spacetime. Further research into the universe’s fundamental laws might shed light on their true nature and potential role in the grand cosmic scheme.

The takeaway: White holes represent a fascinating and elusive concept within astrophysics. While their existence remains unconfirmed, they continue to fuel scientific inquiry and inspire exploration into the deepest mysteries of the universe.

https://www.exaputra.com/2024/02/white-holes-universes-elusive.html

Renewable Energy

Biggest Threat to Human Civilization

Published

on

Until Donald Trump rose to power, I probably would have said climate change.

Now, I would say it’s world fascism, as the world’s power powerful nation, at least at this point, is no longer a democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.

The planet is faced with rule by sociopathic dictators with absolute authority.

Biggest Threat to Human Civilization

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

EchoBolt’s BoltWave Makes Bolt Inspections Easy

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

EchoBolt’s BoltWave Makes Bolt Inspections Easy

Pete Andrews from EchoBolt joins to discuss ultrasonic bolt inspection, the Bolt Wave device, and blade stud defect detection.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Welcome to Uptime Spotlight, shining light on wind. Energy’s brightest innovators. This is the Progress Powering tomorrow.

Pete Andrews: Pete, welcome to the program. Good to be back. Yeah. See you face to face. Yeah. Yes. This is wonderful. It’s a really great event to catch it with loads of the. UK innovation that are happening in the supply chain. So it’s, yeah, really nice to be here.

Allen Hall: This is really good to meet in person because we have seen a lot of bolt issues in the us, Canada, Australia, yeah.

Uh, all around the world and every time bolt problems come up, I say, have you called Pete Andrews and Echo Bolt and gotten the kit to detect bolt issues? And then who’s Pete? Give me Pete’s phone number. Okay, sure. Uh, but now that we’re here in person, a lot has changed since we first talked to you probably two years ago.[00:01:00]

You’re a bootstrap company based in the UK that has global presence, and I, I think it’s a good start to explain what the technology is and why Echo Bolt matters so much in today’s world.

Pete Andrews: Yeah, absolutely. So, um, as you said, we’re a uk, um, SME, there’s a team of 13 of us based here in the uk. Yeah. But we do deliver our services internationally, but really focused on Northern Europe.

Yeah. But increasingly we’ve done more in the US and North America, a little bit in Canada. Um, but our big offering really is to help wind turbine operators and owners reduce the need to routinely retire in bulks. So we have a quick and simple inspection technology that people can deploy, find out the status of their bolt connections, and then.

Reti them if necessary, but the vast majority of the time we find that they’re static and absolutely fine and can be left [00:02:00] alone. So it’s a real big efficiency boost for wind operators.

Joel Saxum: Well, you’re doing things by prescription now, right? Instead of just blanket cover, we’re gonna do all of this. It’s like, let’s work on the ones that actually need to be worked on.

Let’s do the, the work that we actually need to, and instead of lugging, like we’re looking at the kit right here, and I can, you can hold the case in one hand, let alone the tools in a couple of fingers. As opposed to torque tensioning tools that are this big, they weigh a hundred kilos, and those come with all of their own problems.

So I know that you guys said you’re, you’re focused here. You do a lot of work, um, in the offshore wind world as well. Yeah. I mean, offshore wind is where you add a zero right? To zeros. Yeah. Everything else is that much more complicated. It costs that much more. It’s you’re transitioning people offshore to the transition pieces.

Like there’s so much more HSE risk, dollar risk, all of these different spend things. So. The Echo Bolt systems, these different tools that you have being developed and utilized here first make absolute sense, but now you guys are starting to go to onshore as well.

Pete Andrews: Yeah, that’s right. So I mean, as as you said, that there’s really [00:03:00] three main benefit areas we focus on.

The first one is the health and safety of technicians, right? As you said, some of the fasteners used offshore now are up to MA hundred. So a hundred millimeter diameter bolts,

Joel Saxum: four inches for our American friends. Yeah, absolutely.

Pete Andrews: And they probably weigh. 30 kilos plus per bolt. Yeah. Um, so just the physical manual handling of that sort of equipment and the tightening equipment for those bolts is a huge risk for people.

If you think 150 bolts lifting or maneuvering, the tooling around on on its own can cause all the problems. So as well as the inherent risk of the hydraulic kit failing. So occasionally we see catastrophic tool failure. Is, which have really high potential severity, you know, sort of tensioner heads ejecting or crush injuries from Tor.

So that is really a key focus for our customers, just to [00:04:00] keep their teams safe, but also you have to be the cost effective and the the major cost benefit we allow is that we don’t have to revisit every bolt and every turbine like you’d have to do if you were retyping. So we believe there’s something of the order of a million pounds per installed gigawatt saving.

By moving from a routine REIT uh, maintenance strategy to a focused condition based inspection, you significantly reduce the amount of intervention you make and keep your turbines running more and reduce the boots on the ground on the turbine. So three real kind of, um, key. Benefits for people adopting our technology

Allen Hall: because we routinely see tower bolts being reworked or retention depending on who the manufacturer is.

And I’m watching this go on. I’m like, why are [00:05:00] we doing this? It seems, or the 10% rule, we’re tighten 10% this year, and they’ll come back and see how it’s going. That’s a little insane, right, because you’re just kind of. Tensioning bolts up to see if one of them has a problem and then you just do more of them and we’re wasting so much time because echo bolts figured this out years ago.

You don’t need to do that. You can tell what the tension is in a bolt ultrasonically, which was the original technology, the first gen I’ll call it, uh, that you could tell the length of the bolt. If the length of the bolt is correct within certain parameters, you know that it is tension properly. If it’s shrunk, that probably means it’s not tensioned properly.

That’s a huge advantage because you can’t physically see it. And I know I’ve seen technicians go, oh, I could take a hammer and I can tell you which ones are not tensioned properly wrong. Wrong. And I think that’s where equitable comes in because you’re actually applying a a lot of science simply [00:06:00] to a complex problem because the numbers are so big.

Pete Andrews: Yeah, I mean that, that, that’s been the real. Driving force between our offering is to simplify it. So ultimately we’re based on a non-destructive testing technique. It’s an ultrasonic thickness checking technique, but when from the non-destructive testing background, it’s crack detection, people have time, they can be, it’s a very precision measurement.

People have to be trained in the wind industry. We’re trying to inspect. A thousand, 2000 bolts a day at scale. It’s a completely different, um, ask of the technology and the way the technology has been developed historically has required too much technician expertise, too much configuration and set up time, and hasn’t delivered on the, on the speed that’s needed to be efficient in wind.

And that’s where our bolt wave [00:07:00] unit we’ve, that we’ve developed over the last. 18 months, let’s say, where all of our focus has gone to make it as slick and as easy for a client technician to pick up with minimal training. It’s through an iOS interface. Everyone understands it intuitively. Um, it’s a bit like using the camera app on your phone.

You know, you’re just hitting measure, measure, measure, measure, measure 10 seconds a bolt as you move the, um, ultrasonic transducer across, and then the data gets moved. Automatically to the cloud, to our bolt platform. And customers can view it in near real time. The engineer in the office can see the inspections happened.

They can see if there are any anomalous bolts, and then there can be communication there and then whether an intervention is necessary. So it’s sort of really changed the way our customers think about managing their, um. They’re bolted joints.

Joel Saxum: Well, I think these are, these are the kind of innovations that we love to see, right?

Because [00:08:00] we regularly talk about a shortage of technicians, and this isn’t, I was just learning this this week too, like this is not a wind problem. This is a everywhere problem. No matter what industry you’re in. Use are short of technicians. But we’re seeing like a tool like this is developed to be able to scale that workforce as well.

Right. You don’t need to be an NDT level three expert to go and do these things. ’cause there’s a very few of those people out there. Right? Right. We know the NDT people, a lot of NDT people, and that’s a hard skillset to come by. Yeah. This can be put in the hands of any technician. Yeah, a quick training course.

Just, Hey, this is how you use your iPhone. You can check Instagram, right? Yeah. Okay. You can off figure. Yeah, have fun. See you at lunch. Um, but they can, they can make this happen, right? They can go do these inspections and you’re getting that, that, uh, data collected in the field. Centralized back to an SME that’s looking at it and you don’t have to put that SME in the field and try to scale their ability to go and travel and do all these things.

They can be in the office making sure that the, the QA, QC is done correctly. I love it. I think that that’s the way we need to go with a lot of things. [00:09:00]Uh, and you’re making it happen.

Pete Andrews: Yeah. And it’s a real kind of. F change in mindset for us. So originally when we started Ebot, we were using third party hardware.

Yeah. Which required a bit of that specialism. Yeah. A bit of care about the setup of the project, getting multiple parameters configured before you got going. And it wasn’t really something we could put in the hands of a customer.

Joel Saxum: Yeah.

Pete Andrews: Which meant Ebot scale was limited to what our own team could go and do, and regionally as well.

You know, so we’re UK based. Probably 60% of our customers are uk, but now we have this Northern Europe offshore wind is obviously on our doorstep, but then increasingly we’ve done more and more in North America, so we’ve probably been to five or six sites now in North America and expect that to be a growth market because we can, we can now ship the devices over there, give some virtual training help.

Uh, [00:10:00] people set themselves up and then that opens up that market, you know, so it’s been a real change in strategy for us, but has allowed us to have far more impact than we otherwise would just try to be a pure service.

Allen Hall: Well, let’s talk about the big problem in the states of a minute, which are the root bushing or inserts that are loose in some blades.

When you lose that pushing, you also lose the tension on the bolt that can be measured. Is that something you’re getting involved with quite a bit now because of just trying to determine how many bolts are affected and, and where we are on the safety scale of can we run this turbine or not? Is that something that EE bolt’s been looking into?

Pete Andrews: Yeah, absolutely. So I, I’d say there’s sort of two halves of what we do. There’s the, there’s the bulk wholesale monitoring of. Typically static connections to eliminate this routine retitling where it’s not needed typically, typically. But then we have these edge cases of certain [00:11:00] connections and certain platforms that have known bolt integrity problems, and we are working with clients to really, um, manage those integrity risks.

Blade stud is an absolute classic, you know, sort of, I think almost every turbine OEM on some, if not all of their platforms has got. Embedded risk into their blades, pitch bearing connections. Um, so yeah, exactly as you said, our customers are using the technology for two things really. One is to ensure the bolts have been tightened to the preload that was specified or the target window.

And quite often we find there is an opportunity to increase the preload and therefore increase the resistance to fatigue failure. So. You know, particularly on older sites where the bolts perhaps not in the condition they were on day one. Well, they definitely won’t be. Um, when people have gone and retti them, they haven’t got back to where they, they should be.[00:12:00]

So we can prove that and increase a bit of that resilience, but then also start to look for the segments around the joint where, um, the bolt might start loosening or failures are occurring, and find areas where they can really hone in. And actively manage risk. And that sort of leads to what we’ve decided to do for the next year, particularly with Blade Stud in mind, is evolve this technology.

So whilst it’s also measuring the elongation, we will do a defect scan at the same time. So you’ll monitor your blade stu, um, connection and we’re hoping that we can set the device to flag to you there and then. We believe this bulk has got a defect while you’re here, get it changed out before it fails and, and all the knock on problems, um, from there.

Joel Saxum: So what you’re just pointing to there is a, is a workflow, right? So to me that is typical [00:13:00] of some of the amazing, innovative companies in the UK that I’ve run into throughout my career. And that is, you’re a group of SMEs, you know, bolted connections. That’s what you do, right? But then you’re like, hey. If there’s a tool, we could make a tool that would make our lives a bit easier, then it’s like, well, we could make the entire industry’s lives a little bit easier as well.

So let’s iterate on that. And now you’re able to send these kits around the world to look at these things. Hey, you have a problem with this specific model. We can help you with this because we know the failure mode and we know how to look for it. Let’s do that for you. Also here, you’re doing bolt bulk measurements.

We got that for you. But it all kind of flows back to the fact that Echo Bolt is a team. A bolted connection, SMEs that are making tools and being able to also provide consulting if need be. Yeah. Right. Um, to, to an entire industry. And I think that, um, this is my take on it, right? Wind is stop number one. I think you guys are gonna do a fantastic year, but there’s a lot of, uh, opportunity out there in bolted [00:14:00] connections as well.

Allen Hall: A tremendous amount blade bolts being broken from defects in the crystalline structure. What appears to be a more. Rapidly developing issue across fleets that I’ve seen. I went to a farm this summer and the number of blade bolts that were there on the table that were broken on the conference room table was And the whiteboard office.

Yeah. Yeah. This one,

Joel Saxum: this one.

Allen Hall: Your hard head is not gonna protect you from this one. It’s, it’s, it was this, um, I couldn’t imagine the amount of time they were spending hunting these things down. And of course, the only way they were finding ’em was they were broken. You like to catch ’em before they break because it becomes

Joel Saxum: a safety risk.

Just not too long ago we saw an insurance case where there’s an RCA going on and it is pointing at an entire tower came down. Right. And it is pointing at a mid, mid tower section bolted connection. How often do you guys run into those problems? Or are you contacted by insurance companies or anything like that to, to take a peek at those?

Pete Andrews: We haven’t done anything directly for insurance [00:15:00]companies, but we have been engaged by. Engineering consultancies that are doing RCA type activities. Okay. Um, things like at the end of defect liability periods mm-hmm. A customer has, has seen, they’ve had a lot of, uh, issues from an OEM, maybe an OE EM has offered a modification or an upgrade, assessing whether that upgrade is actually solved the problem or not.

We’ve got involved in, um, but the tower. Issue specifically. It’s actually very rare we find, um, problems with tower connections, but where we do is often where they haven’t achieved good flange flatness, ah, during installation or the bolts have been, let’s say, left out in the elements for a period and lubrication has been, has deteriorated before the bolt’s been installed.

So there are cases out there, but what I would say is. [00:16:00] To think about your whole life cycle, so ensure the bolt’s installed correctly and we can help with that with a QA to say, yes, this torque or tightening method has got you to the load that you want. Do some through life monitoring, but often if you install it correctly, it will it’s operational life.

You will have very little concern. But then in the UK market, we’re increasingly getting involved again at the end of life, right? Life extension where life extension turbines are 20, 25 years old. How does an operator make a decision to carry on running without replacing all bots? Um, and that’s where increasingly we being asked to use the technologist just to say, actually the joint is fine.

The bolts have run in a good, um, operational envelope. Run them on. Don’t replace a hundred percent of them like you might have been recommended to from your, um, yeah. Turbine supplier side. [00:17:00]

Allen Hall: So Pete, if someone’s doing a repower where they’re basically putting a new one in the cell on an existing tower, they’re making a lot of assumptions about all the bolts from the ground up that they’re gonna be okay.

And I know we’re talking about that. We’re in a lot of installations where. If the turbine has gone through a repowered or two. So now those bolts are 20 years old. Yeah. And trying to get ’em to

Joel Saxum: 30 35. 35

Allen Hall: 40. Yeah. I don’t know what they’re doing. By those bolted connections. Are they just like replacing the bolts?

Are they hitting ’em with a hammer again? Is that the, yeah,

Pete Andrews: I mean, they might replace ’em, but you’ve got a problem with the foundation bolts. ’cause they’re obviously often anchor bolts set into concrete, so you have to reuse them and. With the projects, both in wind and in process power industry with the chimney stacks to try and ascertain whether foundation bolts that are set into concrete are still suitable for operations.

So look for corrosion losses, look for [00:18:00] defects. Um, so yeah, they’re all things that need thinking about before you just make the snap decision to repower. But I think

Joel Saxum: a lot of that, uh, going back to a couple minutes ago, you were talking about at the commissioning phase, making sure that you have proper qa, QC of how these things were installed day one, and then making sure that before commissioning of a turbine, they’re checked.

I think that’s really important. We’re starting to see that in the blade world now too, where we’ve been talking about it for a long time, and now when you talk to operators, they’re like, we’re getting inspections done on the blades before they’re hung. Or at the factory before they’re hung. After they’re hung.

Like they want a good foundation baseline. Are you seeing that in the bolted connection world too?

Pete Andrews: Yes. Sort of. It’s just emerging for us. What we’ve found is, so most of our customers are in the operational phase ’cause they are the ones feeling the pain. Yeah. Of the routine retitling work. When they do major components, they sometimes engage us to come and say, can you check [00:19:00] before and after the blade was removed?

What was it? Before we took it off from a a bolt load perspective, what is it afterwards? Can you then recheck after 500 hours When we retalk it? And what we’ve seen there often is the initial install hasn’t got them to where they needed to be and they’ve had to go and do the break in maintenance or the 500 hour REIT to get the bolts to the right load.

So one of the questions that we have is whether. Some of the defects are actually being initiated very early on in that initial running in period and whether if, if actually you’d taken the time at, at the point of assembly to make sure you were correct, whether that avoids some of the knock on integrity concerns.

So yeah, it’s interesting area.

Allen Hall: Well, bolts are what hold wind turbines together and you better know you have the right. Tension and [00:20:00] torque on your bolts to get to the lifetime of the wind turbine and to, and to check it once in a while. And I know there’s a lot of operators I can think of right now in the United States that are sort of doing that job somewhat.

I I think they have missed out on opportunities to save a lot of money and to call it echo bolt. How do people get ahold of you? Because that’s one thing I run into all the time. Like, Hey, hey, you gotta talk to Ebol, call Ebol. How do they get ahold of you?

Pete Andrews: So the easiest ways are via our website. Which is echo bolt.com.

Um, LinkedIn, you’ll find us at Echo Bolt on LinkedIn. Reach out. Our email would be info@cobolt.com. So any of those route and you’ll, uh, reach me and the team and more than happy to speak to you about any of your faulting concerns or problems. We are, uh, yeah, we’re passionate about your problems.

Allen Hall: Pete, thank you so much for being on this podcast.

I, it is great to actually see you in person and see the bolt wave technology. It’s really [00:21:00] impressive. So anybody out there that needs bolt tensioning to checking tools, you need to get ahold of Pete at Echo Bolt and get started today. Thank you Pete. Thanks guys. It’s great to be here.

EchoBolt’s BoltWave Makes Bolt Inspections Easy

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Carbon Capture and Synthetic Fuels

Published

on

As we’ve noted in the past, the idea of capturing CO2 from the atmosphere is completely unfeasible, since 99.96% of the air around is something other than CO2 (mostly nitrogen).  However, there are environments that change this equation radically, cement plants being one of them, where the concentration of CO2 emissions is as high as 30% (versus .04%).

Now, this brings the subject of synthetic fuels into the realm of possibility.  Sure, if you want to make gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, you’ll need two other things: hydrogen (which can come from electrolyzing water), and a considerable amount of energy, as these processes are heavily endothermic, meaning that energy must be supplied from external sources.

The good news is that we have enormous amounts of off-peak wind and nuclear that are wasted every day.  Please see: Doty WindFuels.

Carbon Capture and Synthetic Fuels

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com