Westinghouse Electric Company has successfully finished the front-end engineering and experiment design (FEEED) phase for its eVinci microreactor prototype. This phase is part of preparations for testing at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), scheduled as early as 2026. The eVinci microreactor is one of three innovative designs selected for evaluation at the world’s first nuclear microreactor test bed.
The FEEED phase is critical for developers like Westinghouse to plan and design the fabrication, construction, and potential testing of the reactor at the DOME test bed. The test bed is operated by the National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC), a U.S. Department of Energy initiative.
A MESSAGE FROM URANIUM ROYALY CORP.
The First and Only Pure Play Uranium Royalty Company
Uranium Royalty Corp is the first company to apply the successful royalty and streaming business model exclusively to the uranium sector.
With interests in advanced, permitted and producing uranium projects, the company is well positioned as a capital provider to meet the growing need for uranium as fuel for carbon free, nuclear energy.
Discover first mover pure-play uranium royalty exposure >>
[ Disseminated on behalf of Uranium Royalty Corp.] NASDAQ: UROY | TSX: URC
What Are Nuclear Microreactors?
Nuclear is getting smaller and smaller. Nuclear microreactors are a prime example.
Several microreactor designs are being developed in the U.S. These small reactors are portable, fitting on a truck, and could address energy needs in remote locations, both commercial and residential, as well as military bases.
Microreactors are distinguished by 3 main features rather than their fuel or coolant, according to U.S. DOE’s Office of Nuclear Energy:
- Factory Fabrication: All components are pre-assembled in a factory and shipped to the site, reducing construction challenges and capital costs, and allowing quick deployment.
- Transportability: Their small size allows easy transportation via truck, ship, airplane, or train, making deployment versatile.
- Self-Adjustment: They are designed to automatically adjust operations with minimal operator involvement, using passive safety systems to prevent overheating or meltdowns.

Westinghouse’s completion of its prototype microreactor’s FEEED process moves the project a step closer to the testing and commercialization phase. The process involves creating a detailed schedule, budget, and design for the experiment, along with a preliminary safety report to ensure safe testing. This phase helps developers prepare for the eventual fabrication and installation of the reactor.
Westinghouse, along with Radiant and Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation, was competitively selected to complete the FEEED process last year. Jon Ball, President of eVinci Technologies at Westinghouse, emphasized the significance of completing this phase:
“This marks a critical step in bringing the Westinghouse eVinci Microreactor to commercial operation. We are targeting deployment of multiple eVinci microreactors worldwide by the end of the decade. The strong partnership with NRIC, INL, and the Department of Energy is instrumental to our efforts.”
What is the eVinci Microreactor?
The eVinci microreactor is one of several designs funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program. This heat-pipe cooled reactor can generate 5 megawatts of electricity and is designed for sites as small as two acres. It can operate for 8+ years before needing to be refueled.
Unlike conventional reactors, the eVinci uses heat pipes to transfer heat out of its core, allowing for air cooling instead of water or pressurized gas. This makes it more efficient and suitable for various environments, especially remote areas where water is not easily accessible.
The microreactor has a wide range of applications, including:
- Powering remote communities
- Supporting mining operations
- Supplying energy to data centers
In 2023, Westinghouse announced an agreement to deploy an eVinci microreactor in Saskatchewan, Canada, showcasing its potential in cold, remote areas.
The Role of NRIC and the DOME Test Bed
Westinghouse will continue to work with NRIC to finalize the design and planning for the eVinci experiment. The company is also preparing for long-lead procurement items in anticipation of potential installation at the DOME test bed.
The NRIC, a program under the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy, is dedicated to advancing the development of next-generation nuclear reactors. By bringing together industry and national labs, NRIC aims to help new reactor technologies move from the concept stage to demonstration and, eventually, commercialization.
The DOME test bed is a critical facility in this process. It provides a controlled environment where reactor developers can test fueled experiments with reduced risks. This collaboration between industry players like Westinghouse and national laboratories like INL accelerates the safe development of advanced reactor designs.
Radiant and Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation are also expected to finish their FEEED processes by the end of the year. These companies are gearing up to test their own microreactor designs at DOME.
A Significant Step for Microreactor Innovation
Completing the FEEED phase is a major milestone in bringing microreactor technology closer to reality. Westinghouse is positioning itself as a leader in the next wave of nuclear technology.
The development of nuclear microreactors like the eVinci could have far-reaching impacts, providing a new, sustainable energy source for various industries and remote communities. It is a perfect example of how nuclear innovation is evolving to meet the energy demands of the 21st century.
With testing expected at the DOME test bed by 2026, and the continued support of the Department of Energy, these projects represent significant progress toward clean, reliable, and versatile nuclear power. As the world transitions to low-carbon energy sources, microreactors could play a critical role in the future of global energy.
The post Westinghouse is Pioneering Nuclear Microreactor for Remote Energy Needs appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

