On September 23, Uranium Energy Corp (UEC) made a historic announcement to buy 100% of Rio Tinto’s Wyoming assets. These assets include the fully licensed Sweetwater Plant and several uranium mining projects with about 175 million pounds of uranium resources. This huge acquisition must have a huge price tag attached. So, what is it worth?
Unlock below.
Unlocking the UEC and Rio Tinto Deal Value
The total cost of the deal is $175 million, which UEC will pay using its available funds. UEC disclosed in the press release that it is buying 100% of the shares in two Rio Tinto subsidiaries that hold its Wyoming uranium assets. As part of the deal, UEC will replace $25 million in surety bonds for future reclamation costs. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2024 after fulfilling all the standard conditions.
Amir Adnani, President and CEO, stated:
“Expanding our production capabilities with the acquisition of highly sought after and fully licensed uranium assets in the U.S. is an important and timely milestone, especially in Wyoming, where we have recently restarted ISR production. These assets will unlock tremendous value by establishing our third hub-and-spoke production platform and cement UEC as the leading uranium developer in Wyoming and the U.S.”
UEC Expands Its Uranium Portfolio, Builds the 3rd Hub in the U.S.
Donna Wichers, Vice President of Wyoming Operations remarked exuberantly,
”In my 46 years of operating experience in Wyoming, this is the first time that such a large portfolio of assets has been consolidated with one company, offering a pathway to near-term production, development and untapped exploration potential.”
UEC has gained 12 uranium projects in Wyoming’s Great Divide Basin. By acquiring Rio Tinto’s Sweetwater Plant and uranium projects, UEC creates its third U.S. hub-and-spoke production platform, unlocking the potential of its extensive assets. It includes access to licensed uranium facilities and mining resources.
Notably, The Sweetwater Plant, capable of processing 3,000 tons per day and 4.1 million pounds annually, offers flexibility for both ISR and conventional mining. As said before, a complete acquisition adds around 175 million pounds of uranium resources. Half can be mined using cost-effective ISR methods, which UEC will prioritize, while conventional mining will provide future growth opportunities. Thus, there’s a lot of flexibility in the production process.
On September 15, 2022, UEC filed the S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary, revealing resources for its Wyoming Hub-and-Spoke ISR Platform.
A MESSAGE FROM URANIUM ROYALY CORP.
NASDAQ’s Sole Uranium Focused Royalty Company
The company is Uranium Royalty Corp., trading as (NASDAQ: UROY, TSX: URC), holding a strong portfolio includes strategic acquisitions in uranium interests with royalties, streams, equity in uranium companies, and physical uranium trading. Their strategic approach aims to support cleaner, carbon-free nuclear energy while fostering long-term relationships based on sustainability principles.
Learn about the company’s portfolio of royalty assets and uranium holdings >>
NASDAQ: UROY | TSX: URC
*** This content was reviewed and approved by Uranium Royalty Corp. and is being disseminated on behalf of Uranium Royalty Corp. by CarbonCredits.com for commercial purposes. ***
Other Uranium Projects Bolstering UEC’s Resource Base in The Great Divide Basin
UEC also gains 53,000 acres of land and valuable geological data from Rio Tinto, increasing its exploration footprint to 108,000 acres in Wyoming’s Great Divide Basin. Other than the Sweetwater Plant, UEC will be adding Red Desert and Green Mountain uranium projects to its portfolio.
Red Desert Uranium Project
The Red Desert Project covers 20,005 acres in Wyoming’s Great Divide Basin. The project has about 42 million pounds of uranium resources across three deposits, with potential for more discoveries near the Sweetwater Plant. These deposits are conducive for ISR mining, as the uranium lies below the water table in sands confined by impermeable layers.
Green Mountain Uranium Project
Located 22 miles from the Sweetwater Plant, the Green Mountain Project spans 32,040 acres of mining and exploration rights. It holds an estimated 133 million pounds of uranium resources across five deposits. Some areas are suitable for ISR mining, while others are better for conventional methods.
Adnani further added,
“With this Transaction, we are building upon our transformative acquisition of Uranium One Americas in 2021, which added a large portfolio of holdings in the Great Divide Basin of Wyoming. We recognized early on that there are meaningful development synergies with the Rio Tinto assets, particularly the Sweetwater Plant.”
Map: Shows the position of Rio Tinto’s assets relative to the existing UEC portfolio in the Great Divide Basin

Source: UEC
Empowering America’s Uranium Future: A Stronger Domestic Supply
On May 13, President Biden signed the Prohibiting Russian Uranium Imports Act, a significant law to enhance America’s energy and economic security by reducing reliance on Russian nuclear power. This legislation reestablishes U.S. leadership in the nuclear sector and secures the country’s energy future. With $2.72 billion in funding, it increases domestic enrichment capacity and demonstrates a commitment to long-term nuclear growth while promoting a diverse market for reliable commercial nuclear fuel.
With growing clean energy demand and a U.S. ban on Russian uranium, UEC is well-positioned to meet the increasing need for domestic uranium. Another recent big news was Microsoft’s partnership with Constellation Energy to revive Three Mile Island by 2028, generating over 800 megawatts of carbon-free energy.
Three Mile Island (TMI) in Pennsylvania is a significant site in nuclear energy history, known for the severe accident in 1979 that led to the closure of TMI-Unit 2. TMI-Unit 1 continued operations until 2019 when it was shut down due to economic reasons. However, this is a huge initiative amid the surge in nuclear energy, uranium demand, and of course AI expansion.
- With global growth in nuclear energy and demand for uranium, the US is currently the largest consumer of uranium.

Source: UEC
In conclusion, this recent acquisition of Rio Tinto showcases UEC’s dedication to establishing itself as the leading uranium company in North America, while also strengthening domestic supply chains to meet the rising demand for clean energy.
- MUST READ: The Atomic Awakening
The post Uranium Energy Corp (UEC) Fully Acquires Rio Tinto’s Wyoming Assets—What’s the Deal Value? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测


