Connect with us

Published

on

More than 450 scientists, civil servants, journalists and climate experts took part in the ninth annual Carbon Brief quiz on Wednesday 8 November 2023.

Carbon Brief hosted more than 200 guests in London, with hundreds more playing online.

This is the second year in a row the quiz has been hosted in London. In 2021, the event was held in Glasgow during COP26, while in 2020, the quiz was held entirely online due to Covid-19 restrictions.

In total, 53 teams participated this year – 22 teams in person and 31 teams joining via Zoom.

Teams competing reflected a wide range of climate change and energy professionals. The list included journalists, civil servants, climate campaigners, policy advisers, energy experts and scientists.

Organisations represented included: UK Parliament; Met Office; Committee on Climate Change; WWF-UK; UCL; E3G; Imperial College’s Grantham Institute; University of East Anglia; HM Treasury; Wellcome Trust; BusinessGreen; Department for Transport; Danish Meteorological Institute; Ember; Climate Analytics; Bloomberg; DeSmog; University of Surrey; Oxford University’s Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment; and the Sunrise Project.

Before the quiz, Carbon Brief’s editor and director Leo Hickman paid tribute to friends of Carbon Brief, veteran climate negotiator Prof Pete Betts CBE, climate scientist Prof Saleemul Huq OBE and former Guardian environment editor John Vidal, who sadly passed away this year.

Prof Pete Betts with the winning BEIS ICE team at the 2018 Carbon Brief quiz
Prof Pete Betts with the winning BEIS ICE team at the 2018 Carbon Brief quiz

Teams were tested with five rounds of questions – general knowledge, policy, science and two picture rounds. (See a slideshow of the questions and answers below).

After two hours of competitive quizzing, this year’s winners were announced. “The Climate Justice League”, which was made up of policy experts and journalists from the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) and Down to Earth in India, won the coveted Carbon Brief trophy for the second year running, dropping only four points out of a total 100 available. The team accepted the trophy over Zoom at 2am local time in New Delhi. 

The 2020 and 2021 champions, the University of East Anglia (UEA), placed second, with 64 points.

Tied in third place with 60 out of a total 100 available points were “Call me Mabey” from E3G and “Who You Gonna Call? Coalbusters?” from Ember.

See the full leaderboard here.

All the questions and answers can be found in this PDF document. (Carbon Brief also tweeted throughout the event using the #CBQuiz hashtag.)

In an always-tricky quiz, one of the least correctly answered questions in the general knowledge round was: where in England was the 2023 hit movie Barbie mostly filmed? Just four teams gave the correct answer of “Leavesden”. And in the science round, just 10 teams knew – or guessed correctly – that the occupation of George Hadley, the amateur meteorologist after whom the Hadley Cell is named, was “lawyer”.

Carbon Brief would like to thank all the teams who took part and we look forward to hosting the quiz again in the autumn of 2024. If you would like to participate in next year’s quiz, please contact us in advance.

Picture gallery by Carbon Brief

The post The Carbon Brief Quiz 2023 appeared first on Carbon Brief.

The Carbon Brief Quiz 2023

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Southern Right Whales Are Having Fewer Calves; Scientists Say a Warming Ocean Is to Blame

Published

on

After decades of recovery from commercial whaling, climate change is now threatening the whales’ future.

Southern right whales—once driven to near-extinction by industrial hunting in the 19th and 20th centuries—have long been regarded as a conservation success. After the International Whaling Commission banned commercial whaling in the 1980s, populations began a slow but steady rebound. New research, however, suggests climate change may be undermining that recovery.

Southern Right Whales Are Having Fewer Calves; Scientists Say a Warming Ocean Is to Blame

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Analysis: Constituency of Reform’s climate-sceptic Richard Tice gets £55m flood funding

Published

on

The Lincolnshire constituency held by Richard Tice, the climate-sceptic deputy leader of the hard-right Reform party, has been pledged at least £55m in government funding for flood defences since 2024.

This investment in Boston and Skegness is the second-largest sum for a single constituency from a £1.4bn flood-defence fund for England, Carbon Brief analysis shows.

Flooding is becoming more likely and more extreme in the UK due to climate change.

Yet, for years, governments have failed to spend enough on flood defences to protect people, properties and infrastructure.

The £1.4bn fund is part of the current Labour government’s wider pledge to invest a “record” £7.9bn over a decade on protecting hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses from flooding.

As MP for one of England’s most flood-prone regions, Tice has called for more investment in flood defences, stating that “we cannot afford to ‘surrender the fens’ to the sea”.

He is also one of Reform’s most vocal opponents of climate action and what he calls “net stupid zero”. He denies the scientific consensus on climate change and has claimed, falsely and without evidence, that scientists are “lying”.

Flood defences

Last year, the government said it would invest £2.65bn on flood and coastal erosion risk management (FCERM) schemes in England between April 2024 and March 2026.

This money was intended to protect 66,500 properties from flooding. It is part of a decade-long Labour government plan to spend more than £7.9bn on flood defences.

There has been a consistent shortfall in maintaining England’s flood defences, with the Environment Agency expecting to protect fewer properties by 2027 than it had initially planned.

The Climate Change Committee (CCC) has attributed this to rising costs, backlogs from previous governments and a lack of capacity. It also points to the strain from “more frequent and severe” weather events, such as storms in recent years that have been amplified by climate change.

However, the CCC also said last year that, if the 2024-26 spending programme is delivered, it would be “slightly closer to the track” of the Environment Agency targets out to 2027.

The government has released constituency-level data on which schemes in England it plans to fund, covering £1.4bn of the 2024-26 investment. The other half of the FCERM spending covers additional measures, from repairing existing defences to advising local authorities.

The map below shows the distribution of spending on FCERM schemes in England over the past two years, highlighting the constituency of Richard Tice.

Flood-defence spending on new and replacement schemes in England in 2024-25 and 2025-26. The government notes that, as Environment Agency accounts have not been finalised and approved, the investment data is “provisional and subject to change”. Some schemes cover multiple constituencies and are not included on the map. Source: Environment Agency FCERM data.

By far the largest sum of money – £85.6m in total – has been committed to a tidal barrier and various other defences in the Somerset constituency of Bridgwater, the seat of Conservative MP Ashley Fox.

Over the first months of 2026, the south-west region has faced significant flooding and Fox has called for more support from the government, citing “climate patterns shifting and rainfall intensifying”.

He has also backed his party’s position that “the 2050 net-zero target is impossible” and called for more fossil-fuel extraction in the North Sea.

Tice’s east-coast constituency of Boston and Skegness, which is highly vulnerable to flooding from both rivers and the sea, is set to receive £55m. Among the supported projects are beach defences from Saltfleet to Gibraltar Point and upgrades to pumping stations.

Overall, Boston and Skegness has the second-largest portion of flood-defence funding, as the chart below shows. Constituencies with Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs occupied the other top positions.

Chart showing that Conservative, Reform and Liberal Democrat constituencies are the top recipients of flood defence spending
Top 10 English constituencies by FCERM funding in 2024-25 and 2025-26. Source: Environment Agency FCERM data.

Overall, despite Labour MPs occupying 347 out of England’s 543 constituencies – nearly two-thirds of the total – more than half of the flood-defence funding was distributed to constituencies with non-Labour MPs. This reflects the flood risk in coastal and rural areas that are not traditional Labour strongholds.

Reform funding

While Reform has just eight MPs, representing 1% of the population, its constituencies have been assigned 4% of the flood-defence funding for England.

Nearly all of this money was for Tice’s constituency, although party leader Nigel Farage’s coastal Clacton seat in Kent received £2m.

Reform UK is committed to “scrapping net-zero” and its leadership has expressed firmly climate-sceptic views.

Much has been made of the disconnect between the party’s climate policies and the threat climate change poses to its voters. Various analyses have shown the flood risk in Reform-dominated areas, particularly Lincolnshire.

Tice has rejected climate science, advocated for fossil-fuel production and criticised Environment Agency flood-defence activities. Yet, he has also called for more investment in flood defences, stating that “we cannot afford to ‘surrender the fens’ to the sea”.

This may reflect Tice’s broader approach to climate change. In a 2024 interview with LBC, he said:

“Where you’ve got concerns about sea level defences and sea level rise, guess what? A bit of steel, a bit of cement, some aggregate…and you build some concrete sea level defences. That’s how you deal with rising sea levels.”

While climate adaptation is viewed as vital in a warming world, there are limits on how much societies can adapt and adaptation costs will continue to increase as emissions rise.

The post Analysis: Constituency of Reform’s climate-sceptic Richard Tice gets £55m flood funding appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Analysis: Constituency of Reform’s climate-sceptic Richard Tice gets £55m flood funding

Continue Reading

Climate Change

US Government Is Accelerating Coral Reef Collapse, Scientists Warn

Published

on

Proposed Endangered Species Act rollbacks and military expansions are leaving the Pacific’s most diverse coral reefs legally defenseless.

Ritidian Point, at the northern tip of Guam, is home to an ancient limestone forest with panoramic vistas of warm Pacific waters. Stand here in early spring and you might just be lucky enough to witness a breaching humpback whale as they migrate past. But listen and you’ll be struck by the cacophony of the island’s live-fire testing range.

US Government Is Accelerating Coral Reef Collapse, Scientists Warn

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com