SolarBank Corporation, a pioneer in clean and renewable energy in Canada and the U.S., is entering the battery energy storage market by securing $3 million in project financing. The loan, provided by RE Royalties Ltd., marks a significant milestone in SolarBank’s growth strategy, which includes battery energy storage system (BESS) projects.
A Milestone for SolarBank’s Battery Energy Storage Goals
The company aims to capitalize on the market forecast by Fortune Business Insights that predicts project growth at a 16.3% annual rate and reaching $31.2 billion by 2029.
Matthew Wayrynen, Chair of SolarBank commented,
“We are thrilled to continue our partnership with RE Royalties to secure this financing for our BESS projects in Ontario. Having worked with RE Royalties on previous projects, we value their expertise and shared commitment to sustainability. This financing is a key step toward a cleaner future and the further diversification of SolarBank’s growing project portfolio.”
Mergers & Acquisitions Opportunistic Expansion
Source: SolarBank
Unlocking the BES Project Loan Agreement
RE Royalties Ltd. will issue the entire $3 million loan to SolarBank’s in a single installment and the company has to repay by November 26, 2025. The loan carries an annual interest rate of 11%. To secure the financing, SolarBank agreed to a 0.40% royalty on the gross revenue from the projects. Notably, if they can repay the within six months, the royalty will drop to 0.25%.
Bernard Tan, CEO of RE Royalties, stated
“We are excited to be working with the SolarBank management team again on this transaction. The SolarBank team has a long proven track record in developing, building and operating renewable energy assets in North America. These BESS projects will help the province of Ontario support renewable electricity generation, build resiliency in the grid, and help lower emissions compared to conventional sources.”
The press release further revealed some critical details of the loan, illustrated below:
- The loan is backed by a first-ranking security interest on all assets of the borrower, excluding shares in the ProjectCos.
- The borrower, a fully-owned subsidiary of SolarBank, holds a 50% indirect interest in the ProjectCos. The remaining 50% is owned by a partnership with First Nations communities in Ontario.
This financing will cover development and construction costs for the projects. Additionally, SolarBank is also working on securing a larger financing package to fully fund the construction of their projects.
SolarBank’s Achievements
Source: SolarBank
Factors Driving Market Growth
Although Asia Pacific is the key player in the BESS market, U.S., the market is also booming. One main reason is the adoption of renewable energy sources like solar and wind. Fortune Business Insights says:
- The global market size was USD 18.20 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 114.05 billion by 2032. Essentially, the U.S. battery energy storage market is projected to reach $31.36 billion in the same forecast period.

Efforts to improve grid stability and resilience through clean energy solutions will further fuel demand for battery energy storage systems (BESS). This includes merging lower carbon emissions options like BESS with renewable energy sources like solar and wind. Together they can become the prime alternatives to fossil fuels.
Additionally, a surge in investments and supportive government policies is driving significant growth in the industry. These factors are creating a strong foundation for the expansion of battery energy storage systems worldwide.
Another reason behind renewable energy companies turning to battery energy storage is the cost advantages. In today’s energy transition, solar and wind are abundant and often more affordable than coal and other fossil fuels. Additionally, the cost of solar and battery energy storage has dropped by 85% over the past decade, making these solutions even more feasible and demanding.
SolarBank noted,
- The North American solar PV market was valued at US $25.02 billion in 2019 and is projected to reach US $120.74 billion by 2027; it is expected to grow at a CAGR of 21.7% from 2020 to 2027.
Assessing Potential Project Risks
While the BES project presents growth opportunities, it also has certain risks. Development depends on securing necessary permits and maintaining access to third-party financing. Construction risks and potential delays could also impact progress.
Additionally, changes in government policies and reductions in incentives for battery energy storage could make such projects less viable in the future. Despite these challenges, SolarBank is determined to advance its renewable energy goals.
SolarBank Corporation: Powering the Future with Solar Energy
SolarBank Corporation is a full-service solar energy developer driving innovation and sustainability across North America. With over 250 MW of development opportunities in New York and Maryland since 2017, the company is a leader in commercial, industrial, and community solar solutions in the U.S.
In Canada, the company made huge progress by participating in the Ontario Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) Feed-in-Tariff (FIT) program under the Green Energy Act. Most importantly, their success came from small FIT solar projects, including rooftop and ground-mounted installations.
Strong Visibility to Continued Growth
Source: SolarBank
Expanding Renewable Horizons
SolarBank is now part of IESO’s first Long-Term Request for Proposals (E-LT1 RFP and LT1 RFP). This initiative targets 4,000 MW of new, year-round dispatchable electricity capacity from cutting-edge technologies like BESS.
The company has already entered the electric vehicle (EV) charging market as a service provider to business and residential customers. Thus, with years of expertise, they have become a trusted partner for ESG-focused businesses, driving advancements in energy storage, EV charging, and solar solutions to support their Net-Zero goals.
A Decade of Strong Revenue Growth
Source: SolarBank
In conclusion, the financial backup and a clear growth trajectory SolarBank can make a remarkable impact on the battery energy storage sector.
The post SolarBank Charges Ahead with $3M Boost for Battery Energy Storage System Projects appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

