Connect with us

Published

on

Nigerian environmental activists are trying to stop Shell selling off its Nigerian onshore oil business without making amends for hundreds of oil spills.

Last month, Shell announced it had agreed to sell its land-based oil business to a consortium of five mainly Nigerian oil companies while keeping its offshore oil and its gas businesses in the country.

But the $1.3bn deal is dependent on the Nigerian government’s approval and will face legal challenges. Nigeria’s oil regulator stopped a similar sale by ExxonMobil in 2022.

Nigerian environmentalists and local residents want Shell to clean up land and water ruined by oil spills and to pay compensation before it sells of its assets.

“It would be unconscionable for Shell to pack up its onshore operations in Nigeria without cleaning up its mess and paying compensation” said some of the oil spill victims’ lawyer Steve Bilko.

Oil in the water in the Niger Delta in 2015 (Photos: Lilieudefensie)

Toxic history

The UK-Dutch company Shell has been drilling oil in Nigeria since the 1950s. In the southern Niger Delta region, many local residents have complained that their land is polluted while they are left out of the economic benefits. 

This has led to sometimes violent conflict with Shell and the Nigerian government including the government’s hanging of local activist Ken Saro-Wiwa in 1995.

The National Oil Spill Detection Agency (Nosda) reports that Shell is responsible for hundreds of oil spills, mostly from pipelines around the city of Port Harcourt. These spills ruin farmland and kill the fish which many rely on for food and their livelihoods.

A map of oil leaks from Shell’s oil pipelines around Port Harcourt (Photos: Nosda)

The Nosda says over 95% of these spills to sabotage or theft of the oil. This is a big illegal business in the region. But Shell is legally responsible for the leaks, a headache which is pushing them to want to sell up.

In March 2022 though, Nigeria’s second-highest court issued an order preventing the company from selling any assets in Nigeria until a decision was reached on whether the company should pay over $2 billion in compensation for oil spills.

But last month, this court was overuled by Nigeria’s Supreme Court, who told them to look at it again. Soon after, Shell announced again that it was selling these assets.

Don’t let them sell

Bilko said many of his clients are “worried that the sale could affect [the Shell Petroleum Development Company’s] ability or willingness to fulfill the terms of any judgment which may be made against it, including in relation to orders to clean up and remediate the polluted areas”.

“We consider that Shell, having made billions of pounds over decades from extracting oil resources from Nigeria, should fulfill its legal responsibilities and not leave behind an environmental catastrophe as it seeks to exit the Niger Delta”, he added.

Bilko said he was also concerned that Shell “is leaving behind a vast network of crumbling infrastructure after decades of neglect and failures to properly maintain their pipelines and other assets”.

Chima Williams is the head of Nigerian campaign group Environmental Rights Action. He told Climate Home that citizens could take legal action against Shell to stop the sale “until there is a restoration of the spoilt environment to its original state”.

“Shameful”: Shell uses carbon credits under investigation to meet climate targets

Local groups like the Alliance for the Defence of Eleme have also opposed the sale and the leader of the Ijaw Nation leader ethnic group said he would explore legal options to halt the sale.

The consortium Shell is trying to sell its assets to is called Renaissance. It is made up of four Nigerian companies and a firm called Petrolin, co-founded by Gabon’s former oil minister Samuel Dossou-Aworet. The group’s CEO is former Shell employee Tony Attah.

The compensation could amount to nearly $2 billion. While Shell brought in revenues of $381 billion last year, the potential buyers are much smaller. Petrolin is headquartered in Switzerland, where revenue figures are not made public and Aradel Energy’s annual revenues are well under $1 billion.

Shell declined to comment but pointed Climate Home to a webpage which says that the new owners of Shell’s onshore oil business “will continue to be accountable” for that businesses share of any commitments to cleaning up oil spills.

It says the new owners have “significant combined experience” including in the Niger Delta, where four of the companies currently operate oil fields and that Shell is selling to “focus future investment in Nigeria on our Deepwater and Integrated Gas positions”.

The post Shell accused of trying to wash hands of Nigerian oil spill mess appeared first on Climate Home News.

Shell accused of trying to wash hands of Nigerian oil spill mess

Continue Reading

Climate Change

A Tiny Caribbean Island Sued the Netherlands Over Climate Change, and Won

Published

on

The case shows that climate change is a fundamental human rights violation—and the victory of Bonaire, a Dutch territory, could open the door for similar lawsuits globally.

From our collaborating partner Living on Earth, public radio’s environmental news magazine, an interview by Paloma Beltran with Greenpeace Netherlands campaigner Eefje de Kroon.

A Tiny Caribbean Island Sued the Netherlands Over Climate Change, and Won

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Greenpeace organisations to appeal USD $345 million court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit

Published

on

SYDNEY, Saturday 28 February 2026 — Greenpeace International and Greenpeace organisations in the US announce they will seek a new trial and, if necessary, appeal the decision with the North Dakota Supreme Court following a North Dakota District Court judgment today awarding Energy Transfer (ET) USD $345 million. 

ET’s SLAPP suit remains a blatant attempt to silence free speech, erase Indigenous leadership of the Standing Rock movement, and punish solidarity with peaceful resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Greenpeace International will also continue to seek damages for ET’s bullying lawsuits under EU anti-SLAPP legislation in the Netherlands.

Mads Christensen, Greenpeace International Executive Director said: “Energy Transfer’s attempts to silence us are failing. Greenpeace International will continue to resist intimidation tactics. We will not be silenced. We will only get louder, joining our voices to those of our allies all around the world against the corporate polluters and billionaire oligarchs who prioritise profits over people and the planet.

“With hard-won freedoms under threat and the climate crisis accelerating, the stakes of this legal fight couldn’t be higher. Through appeals in the US and Greenpeace International’s groundbreaking anti-SLAPP case in the Netherlands, we are exploring every option to hold Energy Transfer accountable for multiple abusive lawsuits and show all power-hungry bullies that their attacks will only result in a stronger people-powered movement.”

The Court’s final judgment today rejects some of the jury verdict delivered in March 2025, but still awards hundreds of millions of dollars to ET without a sound basis in law. The Greenpeace defendants will continue to press their arguments that the US Constitution does not allow liability here, that ET did not present evidence to support its claims, that the Court admitted inflammatory and irrelevant evidence at trial and excluded other evidence supporting the defense, and that the jury pool in Mandan could not be impartial.[1][2]

ET’s back-to-back lawsuits against Greenpeace International and the US organisations Greenpeace USA (Greenpeace Inc.) and Greenpeace Fund are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs — lawsuits attempting to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees, push them towards bankruptcy and ultimately silence dissent.[3] Greenpeace International, which is based in the Netherlands, is pursuing justice in Europe, with a suit against ET under Dutch law and the European Union’s new anti-SLAPP directive, a landmark test of the new legislation which could help set a powerful precedent against corporate bullying.[4]

Kate Smolski, Program Director at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “This is part of a worrying trend globally: fossil fuel corporations are increasingly using litigation to attack and silence ordinary people and groups using the law to challenge their polluting operations — and we’re not immune to these tactics here in Australia.

“Rulings like this have a chilling effect on democracy and public interest litigation — we must unite against these silencing tactics as bad for Australians and bad for our democracy. Our movement is stronger than any corporate bully, and grows even stronger when under attack.”

Energy Transfer’s SLAPPs are part of a wave of abusive lawsuits filed by Big Oil companies like Shell, Total, and ENI against Greenpeace entities in recent years.[3] A couple of these cases have been successfully stopped in their tracks. This includes Greenpeace France successfully defeating TotalEnergies’ SLAPP on 28 March 2024, and Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace International forcing Shell to back down from its SLAPP on 10 December 2024.

-ENDS-

Images available in Greenpeace Media Library

Notes:

[1] The judgment entered by North Dakota District Court Judge Gion follows a jury verdict finding Greenpeace entities liable for more than US$660 million on March 19, 2025. Judge Gion subsequently threw out several items from the jury’s verdict, reducing the total damages to approximately US$345 million.

[2] Public statements from the independent Trial Monitoring Committee

[3] Energy Transfer’s first lawsuit was filed in federal court in 2017 under the RICO Act – the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a US federal statute designed to prosecute mob activity. The case was dismissed in 2019, with the judge stating the evidence fell “far short” of what was needed to establish a RICO enterprise. The federal court did not decide on Energy Transfer’s claims based on state law, so Energy Transfer promptly filed a new case in a North Dakota state court with these and other state law claims.

[4] Greenpeace International sent a Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer on 23 July 2024, informing the pipeline giant of Greenpeace International’s intention to bring an anti-SLAPP lawsuit against the company in a Dutch Court. After Energy Transfer declined to accept liability on multiple occasions (September 2024, December 2024), Greenpeace International initiated the first test of the European Union’s anti-SLAPP Directive on 11 February 2025 by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against Energy Transfer. The case was officially registered in the docket of the Court of Amsterdam on 2 July, 2025. Greenpeace International seeks to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of Energy Transfers’s back-to-back, abusive lawsuits demanding hundreds of millions of dollars from Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US. The next hearing in the Court of Amsterdam is scheduled for 16 April, 2026.

Media contact:

Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org

Greenpeace organisations to appeal USD $345 million court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump

Published

on

The Trump administration’s relentless rollback of public health and environmental protections has allowed widespread toxic exposures to flourish, warn experts who helped implement safeguards now under assault.

In a new report that outlines a dozen high-risk pollutants given new life thanks to weakened, delayed or rescinded regulations, the Environmental Protection Network, a nonprofit, nonpartisan group of hundreds of former Environmental Protection Agency staff, warns that the EPA under President Donald Trump has abandoned the agency’s core mission of protecting people and the environment from preventable toxic exposures.

Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com