SHEIN, the global online fashion and lifestyle retailer, has taken a new step in cutting the climate impact of its logistics. The company signed an agreement with DHL Group to use DHL’s GoGreen Plus service. This service allows corporate customers to support the use of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) in air cargo operations.
SAF is blended into regular jet fuel to reduce carbon emissions from flights. This move is part of SHEIN’s broader work to explore low‑carbon solutions for its air transport footprint.
Mustan Lalani, SHEIN’s Head of Sustainability, remarked:
“Working with partners such as DHL allows us to better understand how sustainable aviation fuel solutions may be incorporated into air cargo logistics. Initiatives like this are part of SHEIN’s broader efforts to explore how emerging approaches across the aviation sector may contribute to addressing carbon emissions associated with air transport.”
What Sustainable Aviation Fuel Is: Cutting Emissions at the Source
DHL’s GoGreen Plus service gives customers lifecycle emissions reductions from SAF. It uses recognized accounting and certification methods. This means SHEIN can include a share of SAF‑related emissions reductions in its corporate reporting.
The collaboration follows earlier deals. In 2025, SHEIN signed a memorandum of understanding with Lufthansa Cargo to explore sustainable air freight technologies and fuel use.
Sustainable aviation fuel comes from renewable or low-carbon sources. These include used cooking oil, agricultural waste, and non-fossil carbon materials. Compared with conventional jet fuel, SAF can cut lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80%. This is because SAF feedstocks carry less net carbon when burned, considering their origin and life cycle.
Air transport remains a significant source of emissions as global trade and e‑commerce grow. SAF is one of the few scalable solutions available today that can work with existing aircraft engines and fuel infrastructure. It reduces emissions at the source rather than offsetting them after the fact.
SAF is still a small part of global aviation fuel. However, demand and investment are rising due to the industry’s push for net-zero goals. The chart below shows how much SAF is necessary to meet the air transport net-zero target.

Growing Market for SAF: A $16 Billion Industry by 2030
The global sustainable aviation fuel market is expanding rapidly. A recent report by Grand View Research estimates the market was worth US$1.04 billion in 2024. It projects that the industry could reach US$15.85 billion by 2030, growing at a 57.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2025 to 2030.

This growth is driven by several factors:
- Rising corporate and airline decarbonization targets,
- Stronger environmental regulations,
- Supportive government policy, and
- Increasing investment in SAF technologies.
Airlines and logistics providers are under pressure to cut emissions and invest in cleaner fuel alternatives.
Bio-based SAF comes from plants, waste oils, or renewables. It leads the market since it blends easily with jet fuel, needing few changes to aircraft.
Despite strong projected growth, SAF still accounts for less than 1% of global jet fuel use today. Industry groups, like the International Air Transport Association (IATA), estimate that SAF will supply about 0.7% of aviation fuel by 2025. This is due to slow production growth. By 2030, SAF production ranges from 17 to 20 Mt.

Governments in some regions are introducing mandates to increase SAF usage. For example, the UK requires airlines to blend at least 2% SAF starting in 2025, rising to 10% by 2030 and 22% by 2040. These rules aim to spur SAF production and adoption.
- SEE MORE: Heathrow Boosts 2026 Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Incentive 2% Above UK Government Mandate
SHEIN’s Sustainability Goals and Progress
SHEIN has publicly committed to reducing its environmental impact and aligning with climate science goals. The company’s science‑based, net‑zero target has been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Under this plan, SHEIN aims to reach net‑zero greenhouse gas emissions across its value chain by 2050.

The approved targets include reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 42% by 2030 and reducing Scope 3 emissions by 25% by 2030. SHEIN also plans to source 100% renewable electricity by 2030 as part of its energy transition.

SHEIN developed a decarboniZation roadmap in 2024 with support from external sustainability consultants. This roadmap guides the company’s emissions reduction efforts and is designed to align with the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting warming to 1.5 °C.
The logistics footprint — especially Scope 3 emissions from transportation and deliveries — is a major contributor to SHEIN’s overall emissions profile. Exploring low‑carbon fuels like SAF is a practical step in addressing these emissions categories.

Pilots, Traceability, and Carbon Accounting
DHL’s GoGreen Plus service lets customers increase the share of SAF blended into the fuel used in its air cargo network. Under the SHEIN agreement, partners like logistics providers, airlines, and certification frameworks team up. They work to allocate emissions reductions clearly for SHEIN’s reports.
SHEIN’s SAF initiatives include pilot programmes with cargo partners. In 2025, SHEIN procured 187.3 tonnes of SAF for use on 14 Atlas Air charter flights. This reduced an estimated 579.1 tonnes of CO₂ equivalent emissions compared with conventional aviation fuel.
The company is also participating in a SAF pilot in China alongside China National Aviation Fuel (CNAF) and the Second Research Institute of Civil Aviation of China. SHEIN plans to procure SAF through Air China Cargo, using traceability systems to document SAF usage and related emissions benefits.
Moreover, SHEIN joined the World Economic Forum’s Green Fuel Forward campaign. This campaign works to speed up SAF adoption in the Asia-Pacific region. It does this by building capacity, raising awareness, and encouraging collaboration.
Limited Supply, High Costs, Big Potential
Sustainable aviation fuel holds promise but also faces hurdles. Current SAF production capacity is limited, and costs remain significantly higher than conventional jet fuel. This makes widespread adoption difficult for many companies and airlines.
Because SAF is still a small part of the global aviation fuel supply, its current emissions impact is modest. SHEIN acknowledges that the emissions reductions from its initial SAF activities are limited relative to its total air transport footprint. But these pilots will help build experience and partnerships for broader future deployment.
Looking ahead, SAF market growth could ramp up as production capacity rises and regulatory and corporate demand increase. With strong annual growth rates, more companies might add SAF to their supply chains. This helps them meet climate goals and satisfy stakeholders.
For SHEIN, expanding SAF use through partnerships like DHL’s GoGreen Plus could help the company gain operational insights, shape emissions accounting frameworks, and position itself as a participant in emerging low‑carbon logistics solutions.
The post SHEIN Teams Up with DHL to Cut Air Cargo Emissions with Sustainable Fuel appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

