In breaking news, the Saskatchewan government announced its successful court injunction to stop the Canada Revenue Agency from collecting the federal carbon tax in the province. This came as a joy for the Saskatchewan residents, amid all the tax burden they were carrying these years.
Court Halts Federal Collection Amidst Heated Constitutional Dispute
Releases from Global News stated that Bronwyn Eyre, the Satkatchewan provincial justice minister, and attorney general declared just a day before that,
“The court ruled in our favor, blocking the federal government from unconstitutionally garnishing money, pending the full hearing and determination of the continuation of the injunction by the Federal Court.”
She further argued that garnishing a provincial bank account violates Section 126 of Canada’s constitution. The issue is pressed for a full court hearing. Dustin Duncan, the minister of Saskatchewan’s Crown Corporations said that the application was successful. He said,
“The court has ruled in our favor and has blocked the federal government from – in our view – unconstitutionally garnishing money from the province of Saskatchewan. The injunction will be in effect pending a full hearing.”
He expressed hope that they would be in court this week to argue the merits of the successive steps. He was also confident of winning.
In defense, Minister of National Revenue Marie-Claude Bibeau said that the Canada Revenue Agency is actively collecting taxes as required by law. She emphasized their strong commitment to following the law. Bibeau pointed out that Saskatchewan did not comply, even though the Supreme Court of Canada said the carbon tax was okay. She affirmed that their goal is to treat everyone fairly and equally and to encourage environmental responsibility across Canada.
However, the legal tussle ended with Saskatchewan winning the battle against the federal carbon tax. Following this, the provincial government announced its successful court injunction to stop the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) from collecting the federal carbon tax within the province.
In April, the CRA announced plans to audit Saskatchewan for not paying the carbon levies. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau defended the exemption for home heating oil users, citing its higher cost compared to natural gas. He wished Premier Moe “good luck” for this stance on CRA. Trudeau has further ruled out extending similar exemptions to other fuel users.
Saskatchewan Faced Increased Energy Costs in 2023
Last year, came heavy on Saskatchewan residents and businesses. They saw increases in their power and energy bills, as well as at the gas pumps. In 2022, the federal government approved Saskatchewan’s output-based performance standards (OBPS) for industrial emitters. This saved the industry an estimated $3.7 billion in federal carbon taxes by 2030 compared to federal carbon pricing.
As reported by top media agencies, the federal carbon tax also increased from $50 to $65 per tonne, with plans to reach $170 per tonne by 2030. In April 2023 the federal fuel charge raised gasoline costs to $0.14/litre. This carbon pricing system raised their bills.
SaskPower president & CEO Rupen Pandya remarked in a news release on December 9, 2023,
“We are striving to achieve these goals while keeping rates as low as possible while complying with a federal regulatory framework that requires us to collect additional carbon tax revenue.”
Thus, we can see that all the turmoil began a year back… It escalated when Scott Moe, premier of Saskatchewan opposed the federal decision to exempt home heating oil from the carbon tax in Atlantic Canada. He downrightly called it unfair. He demanded a similar exemption for natural gas in Saskatchewan, but Ottawa refused. That time Bronwyn Eyre also warned that the federal government has threatened to remove these rebates, impose fines, or even press charges against Saskatchewan officials. Consequently, residents continued to receive carbon rebate checks.
Significantly, the independent rate review panel in Saskatchewan suggested that the provincial government should postpone planned increases in rates for 2023-2024 and 2024-2025. They recommended keeping SaskEnergy’s 31% increase in gas prices from August and an 8% rise in delivery fees for the year. The provincial government is currently reviewing the panel’s report carefully. The carbon tax scenario, however, transformed this year and for the betterment of the Canadian province.
source: Government of Saskatchewan (www.saskatchewan.ca)
Saskatchewan Families Enjoy Relief from Carbon Tax in 2024
Starting January 1, 2024, SaskEnergy and SaskPower removed the federal carbon tax from home heating. This decision can save ~98% of Saskatchewan families who were previously excluded from the federal exemption on home heating oil.
Dustin Duncan once again expressed himself by saying,
“We ensured fairness by removing the federal carbon tax on natural gas and electric heat, similar to what the federal government did for heating oil in Atlantic Canada,” said Crown Investments Corporation Minister. By extending this relief, we helped Saskatchewan families afford to heat their homes this winter.”
The removal of the carbon tax from SaskEnergy bills saved the average family about $400 in 2024. Heating accounted for ~60% of power consumption in winter for electric heat users. So SaskPower reduced the carbon tax rate on bills by 60%. This reduction lowered power bills by an average of $21 monthly for around 30,000 customers.
In January, customers still saw a federal carbon tax charge for natural gas or electricity used in December. However, bills for usage from January 1, 2024, onward showed the tax as both a charge and a reversal credit, effectively making it zero. This was a huge win for Saskatchewan, paving the way for carbon tax revocation.
The post Saskatchewan Achieves Legal Win Over Canada’s Federal Carbon Tax appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Reliance and Samsung C&T $3B Green Ammonia Deal Powers India’s Hydrogen Exports
The post Reliance and Samsung C&T $3B Green Ammonia Deal Powers India’s Hydrogen Exports appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Who Will Drive the Next Wave of Carbon Credit Demand? Insights from AlliedOffsets
The voluntary carbon market (VCM) lets companies buy carbon credits to offset their greenhouse gas emissions. AlliedOffsets, a data and technology firm for carbon offsetting, tracks this market closely. Their database covers more than 36,000 projects, over 28,000 buyers, and billions of tons of carbon that have been issued or retired.
The VCM is growing fast. Over the last five years, most buyers have come from technology, telecommunications, and energy. Other sectors, like industrials, manufacturing, financial services, and aviation, also participate, though in smaller amounts.
The United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Japan have the most buyers, showing that developed countries lead the market.
As the market grows, new companies and sectors are expected to join. AlliedOffsets studied over 130,000 companies to predict who will likely buy carbon credits next. This helps sellers, project developers, and policymakers focus their efforts where demand is likely.
LtB Model: Predicting the Next Wave of Credit Buyers
AlliedOffsets uses a model called Likelihood to Buy (LtB). It looks at companies active before and since 2024, and even those that have never bought credits publicly. The company stated:
“Ranking specific companies’ likelihoods and identifying patterns in their unifying traits informs market suppliers and intermediaries about who to pivot engagement towards. Understanding the features that play the greatest roles in determining companies’ likelihoods, meanwhile, is vital for highlighting wider drivers for the growth of the market, which serve as levers for policymakers and signals for companies themselves.”
The model includes data from 36 global registries, covering both non-anonymous purchases and retirements. It looks at several key factors that affect a company’s likelihood to buy, including:
- Abatement potential – how easy it is for the company to reduce emissions.
- Data center usage – companies with large data centers use more energy and may buy more credits.
- Headquarters country – companies in the US, UK, and China lead predicted purchases.
- Internal carbon pricing – companies with higher carbon costs buy more credits.
- Net-zero targets – companies with short-term or long-term climate goals are more likely to buy.
- Sector – aviation, energy, and tech tend to buy more due to rules and public pressure.
- Annual profit or loss – profitable firms are more able to purchase carbon credits.

The model also uses SHAP analysis to show which factors influence predicted buying the most. Companies that recently bought credits are weighted higher. Some sectors, like aviation, are manually marked as high-likelihood because of rules like CORSIA, which requires airlines to offset emissions.
AlliedOffsets also separates companies into new entrants and returning buyers, helping track demand trends.
Forecasted Carbon Credit Demand
AlliedOffsets predicts that new and returning buyers will need about 281 million credits per year. This comes from over 11,500 companies with characteristics similar to current buyers.
The demand by project type is expected to have this composition:

Demand for forestry projects is rising, partly because of forward contracts, which made up 55% of the 147 million credits negotiated in 2025.

By country, the greatest demand will come from the U.S., China, UK, France, Germany, and Brazil.

Aviation will be a big factor because airlines must offset emissions under CORSIA rules. Energy and technology companies in the US, like AT&T, IBM, and Ingram Micro, are likely to enter or re-enter the market.
Moreover, new entrants will expand the buyer base, per AlliedOffsets analysis. These include consumer goods, professional services, healthcare, and industrial firms. Many come from countries with fewer buyers so far, like Turkey and Belgium.
Financial Impact of Returning and New Buyers
AlliedOffsets estimates that new and returning buyers will spend around $2.27 billion per year. Sector contributions are expected as follows, with aviation and energy leading the pack:
- Aviation: over $800 million per year (about one-third of total).
- Energy and Technology & Telecommunications: substantial ongoing purchases, over $300 million a year.
- Consumer services, industrials, financial services, professional services: smaller but steady spend.

Returning buyers bought nearly 7 million credits in previous years. ExxonMobil accounted for 66% of these purchases through both forward contracts and OTC deals. Other companies, like ArcelorMittal, invest in low-emission technology, reducing the need to buy credits.
New entrants, especially airlines, will increase activity. Credits purchased for CORSIA compliance must match emissions for international flights to and from ICAO member states.
Overall, growth in both returning and new buyers shows that corporate demand for carbon credits is likely to rise sharply. Companies that belong to initiatives like RE100, SBTi, Race to Zero, or NZBA are more likely to participate in the voluntary carbon market.
A Turning Point and Future Forecasts: Supply, Demand, and Policy Drivers
In 2025, the voluntary carbon credit market saw big changes. Total retirements fell to about 168 million tonnes, and new issuances dropped to around 270 million tonnes, the lowest since 2020.
Despite this, spending rose to roughly $1.04 billion, up from $980 million in 2024. The average price per credit also climbed to about $6.10, showing that buyers are paying more for high-quality, trusted credits rather than just buying large amounts.

Companies are now choosing credits with strong monitoring and real climate impact. Nature-based projects, like afforestation and reforestation, did better than older REDD+ credits.
Forward contracts also grew, with over $12 billion signed in 2025, even though these will deliver only about 10 million credits a year through 2035. This shows that many companies want to secure the future supply of trusted credits. These trends match forecasts from AlliedOffsets, where demand is expected to rise for durable, high-quality carbon credits.
AlliedOffsets keeps expanding its database, now covering over 60,000 companies. Adding historical emissions data and checking with initiatives like the Forest Stewardship Council and Science Based Targets will improve forecasts.
Analysts expect supply limits may appear in forestry and land use projects as demand grows. Engineered removals, chemical processes, and industrial projects will also get more attention. Large investments by companies like Google and Amazon, which pledged $100 million to superpollutant removal projects by 2030, are expected to drive this.
Returning and new buyers, led by aviation, energy, and tech, will shape the next wave of demand. Understanding these patterns helps policymakers, intermediaries, and project developers plan supply and engagement strategies.
The voluntary carbon market is entering a new growth phase, driven by rules, climate commitments, and better forecasting tools. With models like Likelihood to Buy, market participants can plan ahead. Forestry, renewable energy, and industrial projects are likely to see the biggest benefits as corporate demand grows worldwide.
- READ MORE: The Carbon Credit Market in 2025 is A Turning Point: What Comes Next for 2026 and Beyond?
The post Who Will Drive the Next Wave of Carbon Credit Demand? Insights from AlliedOffsets appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
How carbon project developers quantify biodiversity and community impact
The verified carbon market is changing. Buyers are asking harder questions. A carbon credit’s value is increasingly defined not just by the carbon it represents, but by what the project delivers alongside it and by how rigorously those outcomes are measured.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits







