Rimba Raya, the world’s largest carbon offset REDD+ project developer, has won a legal victory in Indonesia. This win is a significant step towards resuming operations at their expansive site in Borneo. As reported by Bloomberg on July 11, the Jakarta State Administrative Court overturned Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry’s decision, thereby restoring the license for the Rimba Raya Conservation project.
Rimba Raya: Absorbing Carbon Emissions and Generating Carbon Credits
The Rimba Raya project in Indonesian Borneo generates carbon credits by conserving a forest area nearly the size of Las Vegas. These credits mainly come from its High Conservation Value (HCV) peat swamp forest, making it one of the world’s largest REDD+ projects. This unique area separates oil palm plantations from Tanjung Puting National Park, which hosts a vast orangutan sanctuary and has a rich biodiversity. This makes Rimba Raya an excellent conservation project.
Another notable feature of Rimba Raya is its extensive coastal tropical heath and peat swamp forest, which once blanketed much of southern Borneo. This vast swamp area actively removes approximately 130 million tonnes of carbon emissions.
Rimba Raya project was the first REDD+ initiative to be validated under the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) and achieved triple-gold validation from the Climate Community and Biodiversity Alliance Standard (CCBA).
CarbonPlan, the climate data provider has reported that Rimba Raya has issued more than 30 million credits since 2013 and more than 25 million of those have been retired. This makes it the world’s largest single source of offsetting.
The Epic Legal Victory Fuels Rimba Raya’s Revival
The legal case continued for almost a year, after which the Jakarta State Administrative Court gave its ruling in favor of Rimba Raya. From various credible media resources, we discovered that Rimba Raya can now operate across 36,000 hectares of tropical peat swamp forest in Central Kalimantan, the largest Indonesian province by area.
Rusmin Widjaja, President of The Board of Directors at PT Rimba Raya Conservation
Rimba Raya Conservation will now focus on rebuilding its capacity and is also working to resolve a separate dispute with its partner, Hong Kong-based InfiniteEARTH Ltd.

Going Back in Time of License Revocation and Legal Battle
In April carboncredits.com reported that The Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry cited three main violations by PT Rimba Raya Conservation: The main allegation was the unauthorized transfer of the permit to a third party without approval from the Minister of Environment and Forestry. The second accusation was conducting carbon trading transactions beyond its licensed area, violating its agreement with Tanjung Puting National Park. The company also faced criticism for failing to pay Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP) as required by the law.
According to Bloomberg, this decision had put the future of the Rimba Raya project at risk. It was significantly worrisome for prominent carbon traders like InfiniteEARTH Ltd and Carbon Streaming Corps who have heavily invested in Rimba Raya’s credits. The situation showcased how complex supply chains and uncertain regulations pose challenges, even though carbon offsets are crucial for projects like Rimba Raya.
The Future of Rimba Raya: A Bloomberg Analysis
However, the recent court ruling lets Rimba Raya restart activities, rebuild capacity, and resolve disputes with InfiniteEARTH. How will this decision affect the Indonesian carbon credit market and Rimba Raya’s investors? Let’s read the Bloomberg analysis.
Will carbon credit demand rise?
BloombergNEF predicts that demand for these credits could rise sharply, possibly reaching a market value of $1 trillion by 2050. Despite turbulence and differing opinions on credibility, the demand for carbon offset credits is expected to increase in the future. Analysts at BloombergNEF (BNEF) foresee a significant expansion in VCMs, even as companies like Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company, reassess their involvement.
Bloomberg tried to reach the Indonesian government and the CEO of PT Rimba Raya Conservation for their views but in vain.
Impact on partners and investors
The uncertainty around Rimba Raya’s future has impacted its partners and investors. Verra has temporarily suspended InfiniteEARTH’s account while clarifying its role with PT Rimba Raya. This consequently affected the fair value of the Rimba Raya stream, nullifying it to zero on March 2024.
On May 31, 2024, the company announced major management and board changes. Christian Milau, the former CEO of Equinox Gold, has been appointed as the new interim CEO, with Olivier Garrett taking on the role of board chairman.
However, on a positive note, Carbon Streaming, which has an agreement with InfiniteEARTH for Rimba Raya credits, is evaluating the situation. They are communicating with partners and considering the legal options to protect their investment. The company promised to continue the project, despite unclear regulations in Indonesia, as noted in its Annual Information Form on the SEDAR+ platform. Meanwhile, InfiniteEARTH argued that Indonesia’s legal framework for carbon projects lacks clarity and denied any wrongdoing.
Indonesia plans to lift its ban on overseas credit sales to boost revenue, ensuring compliance with carbon trading rules and the Paris Agreement. All in all, this epic ruling on Rimba Raya is going to etch a history in Indonesia’s carbon credit market.
- FURTHER READING: What Makes Forest Project a High-Quality Carbon Removal?
Disclaimer: Data and facts have been collected primarily from Bloomberg.
The post Rimba Raya Resumes Operations in Borneo with Epic Legal Victory appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

