Connect with us

Published

on

The government of New Zealand has been labelled a “disgrace” after it released a new climate plan which barely requires it to reduce emissions between 2030 and 2035.

Under the previous Labour government of Jacinda Ardern, the country committed to cut net emissions by 50% by 2030, compared to gross 2005 levels.

The new climate plan, which is known as a Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) towards global climate goals, was announced by the right-wing government of Christopher Luxon on Thursday. It says the country will reduce emissions by 51-55% by 2035 against the same 2005 baseline.

Climate campaigners in the Pacific nation immediately slammed the poor ambition. Alva Feldmeir, co-director of 350.org Aotearoa, said the government’s “relentless dismantling of climate policies, expansion of fossil fuel extraction, and now this pathetic NDC signal a catastrophic future”.

“How do we, as Pacific Islanders living in Aotearoa New Zealand, reconcile our government’s decisions with the survival of our island homes?” asked Pacific Climate Warriors Council Elder Inagaro Vakaafi.

Rosemary Harris, a campaigner at Oil Change International, said New Zealand was “retreating on ambition and shirking responsibility, raising their emission reductions by a pathetic 1%”.

Since coming to power in 2023, Luxon’s government has attempted to reverse its predecessor’s ban on offshore oil and gas exploration, despite advice from civil servants that doing so would breach the COP28 climate agreement reached in Dubai and could endanger trade deals. The plan doesn’t mention fossil fuels, nor the need to transition away from oil and gas.

In addition, the government has removed incentives for electric vehicles, promised to postpone putting a price on farming emissions and scrapped other climate programmes.

The new 51-55% target compares favourably with Canada’s 45-50% but is less than Brazil’s 59-67% and the 61-66% target set by Joe Biden’s administration before Donald Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office to again pull the United States out of the landmark Paris Agreement.

Other nations like the United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates have set 2035 targets using different baseline years, making comparisons with New Zealand difficult.

Signatories to the Paris Agreement are supposed to submit a plan for how they intend to reduce greenhouse gas emissions every five years, with each update supposed to be more ambitious than the last.

This year marks 10 years since the Paris Agreement was adopted and countries are expected to submit 2035 emission reduction targets by a UN deadline of February 10. But most countries are expected to miss the deadline. New Zealand is the seventh nation to have submitted its plan to the UN so far.

(Reporting Joe Loe; editing Chloé Farand) 

The post “Pathetic” – New Zealand plans to barely cut emissions between 2030 and 2035 appeared first on Climate Home News.

“Pathetic” – New Zealand plans to barely cut emissions between 2030 and 2035

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Georgia Hasn’t Had a Consumer Advocate for Electric Ratepayers for 18 Years

Published

on

A bill to restore the state’s consumer utilities counsel failed to move forward, meaning Georgia will remain one of only a handful of states without a statutory advocate representing ratepayers.

Eighteen years after Georgia eliminated its consumer utility advocate, the fight to bring the office back recently resurfaced at a Senate hearing.

Georgia Hasn’t Had a Consumer Advocate for Electric Ratepayers for 18 Years

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Wondering How to Talk About Climate Change? Take a Lesson from Bad Bunny

Published

on

Discussing climate change can make a difference. Focusing on the impacts in everyday life is a good place to start, experts say.

When Bad Bunny climbed onto broken power lines during his Super Bowl halftime show, millions of viewers saw a spectacle. Climate communicators saw a lesson in how to talk about climate change.

Wondering How to Talk About Climate Change? Take a Lesson from Bad Bunny

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Greenpeace response to escalating attacks on gas fields in Middle East

Published

on

Sydney, Thursday 19 March 2026 — In response to escalating attacks on gas fields in the Middle East, including Israeli strikes on Iran’s giant South Pars gas field and Iranian retaliations on gas fields in Qatar and Saudi Arabia, the following lines can be attributed to Solaye Snider, Campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific:

The targeting of gas fields across the Middle East is a perilous escalation that reinforces just how vulnerable our fossil-fuelled world really is.

Oil and gas have long been used as tools of power and coercion by authoritarian regimes. They cause climate chaos and environmental pollution and they drive conflict and war. The energy security of every nation still hooked on gas, including Australia, is under direct threat.

For countries that are reliant on gas imports, like Sri Lanka, Pakistan and South Korea, this crisis is just getting started. It can take months to restart a gas export facility once it is shut down, meaning the shockwaves of these strikes will be felt for a long time to come.

It is a gross and tragic injustice that while civilians are killed and lose their homes to this escalating violence, and families struggle with a tightening cost-of-living, gas giants like Woodside and Santos have seen their share prices surge on the prospect of windfall war profits. 

We must break this cycle. Transitioning to local renewable energy is the way to protect Australian households from the inherent volatility of fossil fuels like gas.

-ENDS-

Images available for download via the Greenpeace Media Library

Media contact: Lucy Keller on 0491 135 308 or lkeller@greenpeace.org

Greenpeace response to escalating attacks on gas fields in Middle East

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com