As the plastics talks staggered towards a close without a deal on a new global treaty in sight on Friday, Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez had a straightforward request for the petrostates seen as blocking progress: “Get out of the way” if you’re not ready to compromise.
The stern message from Panama’s special representative pointed to a ramp up in political rhetoric from the large coalition of countries that is pushing for the inclusion of plastic production cuts in a UN pact designed to end plastic pollution.
A group of oil and gas-producing countries – led by Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran – have remained resolute in their opposition to manufacturing curbs. After half a day of backroom bargaining and closed-door sessions proved largely futile, delegates waited for a breakthrough, with fewer than 36 hours to go until the gavel is due to come down in the South Korean city of Busan.
In a bid to break the stalemate, the chair of the talks, Luis Vayas Valdivieso of Ecuador, penned a new draft text and released it mid-afternoon. The 23-page proposal is more fully formed than previous iterations, but still features wide-ranging options on several issues. For example, there are eight different definitions to choose from for what the word “plastic” should mean in the context of a future treaty.
Fossil fuel lobby secures “record” access to crunch talks on new plastics pact
On the fraught question of plastic production cuts, however, Valdivieso offered a stark binary choice: either nothing at all or an agreement to adopt “a global target to reduce the production of primary plastic polymers to sustainable levels”, which would be set at the first plastics COP (conference of the parties) after the deal in Busan.
The first option reflects the position of the petrostates arguing that manufacturing curbs fall outside the scope of the pact. That’s despite the fact that the original resolution underpinning the talks indicated the treaty should address “the full lifecycle of plastics” – meaning from production through to consumption and waste.
The second option is lifted straight from similar proposals put on the table on Thursday by an alliance of 102 countries across the developing and developed world, representing nearly 60% of all nations engaged in the talks.
This option would see all countries “take measures across the full lifecycle of plastics” and report data on their plastic supply chains. It also calls for the creation of a five-year review process similar to the global stocktake of climate action under the Paris Agreement.
‘Forget red lines’
Panama’s negotiator Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez. Photo: IISD/ENB – Kiara Worth
Appearing after the text’s release in his trademark hat, Panama’s Monterrey Gómez told reporters that the high-ambition group had already made compromises by dropping stricter targets and it was time for others to also “forget about red lines”.
“We are not here to negotiate a greenwashing recycling global treaty,” he added.
Sitting next to him, Andrew Yatilman, secretary of the department of environment and climate change for the Federated States of Micronesia, pleaded with petrostates to “give us a break”.
“The Gulf states want to protect their economy with fossil fuels,” he said, “but what about us? Our economy is based on fishing and that is getting destroyed by plastic pollution.”
Earlier in the day, campaigners stood in front of an art installation depicting a sperm whale stuffed with plastic waste for their most vocal action during the week so far. Holding signs with messages like “courage not compromise”, the activists warned that members of the “High Ambition Coalition” were “sleepwalking into a treaty that will not be worth the paper it will be written on”.
Campaigners deliver a statement in front of the venue for the UN talks in Busan, South Korea. (Photo: Markus Winkler)
“They must not compromise under pressure exerted by a small group of low-ambition states and hinge the life of our planet on unachievable consensus,” their spokesperson shouted, calling for countries to make decisions at the talks by voting rather than relying on consensus.
While the possibility of invoking a two-thirds majority vote remains open, on Friday night heads of country delegations were still trying to find a common path to a joint deal.
China could play a decisive role in building a bridge with the petrostates, three negotiators told Climate Home, adding that they are seeing encouraging signs from the Chinese delegation’s willingness to engage with discussions on plastic production.
Reliable finance sought
Money is the other – crucial – side of the coin. Developing and developed countries came into the final round of negotiations with polar-opposite views of what the finance package should look like.
The former united behind a proposal for a new independent multilateral fund financed by developed countries, with others only contributing on a voluntary basis. Rich governments want a mechanism within the Global Environment Facility (GEF) with all countries contributing voluntarily and money coming from “all sources”, including potential levies and the private sector.
The new text released on Friday calls on every country to provide funding “within its capabilities”. It also indicates that those “with capacity to do so shall take the lead”, while contributions from other sources “are encouraged”.
Production curbs needed for strong global pact on plastic pollution, campaigners say
Several observers think finding a finance text that unites ambitious developed and developing countries is critical to unlock a strong agreement.
“The current text is a starting point that gives us a chance,” Florian Titze, senior policy advisor for international biodiversity policy at WWF, told Climate Home. “But it needs to give assurances that the financial flows will be reliable and predictable if [developing countries] are asked to take stringent measures on production and waste management”.
As the clock ticked down, many wondered whether it would be possible to find the breakthrough solution that is sorely needed, or whether the only deals struck in Busan in the coming days will be at the International Children’s Book Fair hosted in the same sprawling convention centre as the UN talks.
(Reporting by Matteo Civillini; editing by Megan Rowling)
The post New plastics pact text reflects stark divide on production cuts appeared first on Climate Home News.
New plastics pact text reflects stark divide on production cuts
Climate Change
Trump Administration Abandons Fight Against Wind Energy as Clean Energy Output Surges
The clean energy sector is showing resilience despite challenges thrown at it by a hostile White House, a recent report found. A string of legal victories has further dampened the Trump administration’s efforts to halt wind and solar power.
The Trump administration has abandoned its effort to halt wind energy projects across the United States and dropped its challenge to the court ruling that tossed President Donald Trump’s order freezing federal permitting and leasing for wind projects. States that challenged the order hailed the development as one of the most significant legal victories against the Trump White House’s campaign against the energy transition.
Trump Administration Abandons Fight Against Wind Energy as Clean Energy Output Surges
Amid reports that the government could weaken the UK’s electric vehicle (EV) targets, Carbon Brief analysis reveals the nation’s EV drivers are saving more than £1,100 a year in fuel costs, compared with running a petrol car.
Battery EVs (BEVs) are roughly four times more efficient than combustion-engine cars, making them far cheaper to run – particularly since the Iran crisis caused a spike in fossil-fuel prices.
The savings from driving BEVs are also more than three times higher than for “plug-in” hybrids (PHEVs), which evidence shows are mostly driven with their combustion engines.
In total, the more than 2m BEVs, 1m PHEVs and 100,000 electric vans on UK roads are saving drivers around £3bn a year, Carbon Brief’s analysis shows, as illustrated in the figure below.
In addition, these EVs are avoiding the need for nearly 2.5bn litres of fuel and cutting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by nearly 7m tonnes each year.
Despite recent news that EVs are now cheaper to buy than petrol cars, as well as having far lower running costs, BBC News says the government is “set to water down” its EV sales targets.
The broadcaster explains that the current goal, under the UK’s “zero-emissions vehicle” (ZEV) mandate, is for 80% of new car sales to be BEVs by 2030.
It says that the government is set to consult on weakening this to between 50% and 70%, following “lobbying” by carmakers and trade unions.
According to the Sunday Times, prime minister Keir Starmer “is understood to have overruled the energy secretary [Ed Miliband] after sustained pressure from industry, the Unite union and Peter Kyle, the business secretary”.
The car industry has consistently claimed there is insufficient demand for BEVs to meet the targets under the ZEV mandate, yet the government says manufacturers have “over-complied” to date. Independent analysts say the industry is on track to continue beating the ZEV mandate goals.
The industry has been able to beat its targets by using a wide range of “flexibilities”, which were introduced after a previous round of lobbying. These allow carmarkers to meet part of their EV targets by selling more efficient combustion cars, such as hybrids and plug-in hybrids.
The ZEV mandate is the single-largest part of the government’s plans to meet its legally binding climate goals over the next decade.
The advisory Climate Change Committee (CCC) previously warned that the extra flexibilities would result in a larger number of hybrids being sold, at the expense of battery EVs.
When it consulted on the ZEV mandate in 2023, the then-Conservative government noted that PHEVs do not deliver the cost and CO2 savings they are advertised with.
It pointed to “dramatic” differences between the performance of PHEVs in test cycles and what they deliver under real-world conditions.
In practice, less than a third of miles driven in PHEVs are fuelled by electricity, with petrol making up the rest. As a result, cost and CO2 savings from BEVs are three times larger than for PHEVs.
The post Analysis: UK’s EV drivers are now saving £1,100 each a year – and £3bn in total appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Analysis: UK’s EV drivers are now saving £1,100 each a year – and £3bn in total
Civil society groups have called for an investigation into the first carbon credits approved under a new UN mechanism, alleging the project is linked to Myanmar’s military junta – which the UN says is guilty of human rights abuses – and has “massively” overstated its climate impact.
The programme, which aims to cut emissions by distributing efficient cookstoves across Myanmar, received approval to issue around 650,000 carbon credits from the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body in February, in a landmark moment for the Paris Agreement’s carbon market. Only two projects have been given the green light by the mechanism’s regulator so far.
But two reports published last week, led by the Global Forest Coalition and Brussels-based NGO Carbon Market Watch, raised serious concerns about the project’s implementation in conflict zones where civilians have faced airstrikes and mass displacement as well as its emission-reduction calculations.
Project continued after military coup
Myanmar has been ravaged by a brutal civil war since the country’s military overthrew the democratically elected government in a coup d’état in February 2021. The military regime has attacked civilian populations, persecuted ethnic minorities and committed widespread sexual violence, among other serious human rights violations, the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar said in April.
The cookstove programme started in 2018 under the previous UN-run carbon offsetting scheme – the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) – as a partnership between Myanmar’s Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation (MONREC) and the Climate Change Center (CCC), a South Korean NGO, with investment from private South Korean firms.
-
European, island states seek clear future for global roadmap to cut fossil fuels
Some European, small island and other nations argue the forthcoming roadmap should be part of UN climate talks, while Russia has resisted this idea
The project continued operating after the coup. For most of the period between 2021 and 2022 in which the issued credits were generated, MONREC was led by Colonel Khin Maung Yi, who was sanctioned by the European Union in 2021 for supporting the military regime, the Global Forest Coalition report said.
CCC acknowledged engaging with government authorities after the coup but said this “should not be interpreted as political endorsement” of the junta. The South Korean NGO added that abandoning the programme when political circumstances changed “would not necessarily have been the most responsible outcome for the households involved”.
Conflict prevents on the ground verification
The Global Forest Coalition report raised particular concerns about the project’s implementation in Myanmar’s central Dry Zone, including Sagaing Region, an anti-junta resistance stronghold that has been most heavily affected by the conflict and routinely targeted by airstrikes and violent attacks. The region accounts for more than a third of Myanmar’s 3.8 million internally displaced people.
The NGOs said that, in addition to ethical concerns about carbon credits being produced by the military government in an area actively affected by its attacks, this raises questions over the ability to effectively verify the climate integrity of the projects.
Before carbon credits are issued, external auditors need to validate the claims made by project developers and confirm that the emission reductions claimed are correct. This process usually includes site visits to a representative sample of households to check how the improved cookstoves are being used.
But, because of the “volatile political situation” in Myanmar, the auditing team was not able to leave the capital Yangon and could only speak to project participants remotely via Zoom, project documents show.
“Due to ongoing armed conflict on the ground, the data currently used to justify carbon credit issuance in Sagaing by the Burmese military junta is unverifiable and highly likely fraudulent,” said Zaw Tuseng, founder and president of the Myanmar Policy Institute, which contributed to the report, in a written statement. “This demands an immediate suspension of credit transfers until a neutral, conflict-sensitive audit can be conducted.”
“Exceptional circumstances”
CCC told Climate Home News that, although it recognises that on-site verification is “generally preferable, particularly in complex operating environments”, the decision to opt for remote controls was not taken “as a discretionary shortcut, but as an approved alternative under exceptional circumstances”.
The South Korean NGO added that it reviewed the feasibility of the project at community level “on an ongoing basis” and it “did not identify conflict-related incidents that directly affected project implementation activities in participating communities during the monitoring period”.
A spokesperson for the UN climate change body told Climate Home News that, when site access is not possible, the UN carbon credit mechanism allows for “alternative verification approaches while still maintaining conservative assumptions and environmental integrity safeguards”. “These provisions ensure that crediting can only proceed where evidence is reliable,” they added.
Contested methodology
Carbon markets are seen as an important channel to raise money to help low-income communities in developing countries switch to less polluting cooking methods, both reducing CO2 emissions and improving air quality. But several cookstove offsetting projects have faced criticism from researchers and campaigners who argue that climate benefits are often exaggerated and weak monitoring can undermine claims of real emission reductions.
The project in Myanmar uses a contested methodology developed under the earlier Kyoto Protocol that was rejected last year by The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM), a watchdog that issues quality labels to carbon credit types, because it found it “insufficiently rigorous”.
EU carbon credits could supercharge world’s clean cooking push, France says
After transitioning from the CDM to the new mechanism, the project was required to apply “more conservative” assumptions to calculate emission reductions, which resulted in 40% fewer credits being issued, according to the UN climate change body.
“The result is consistent with environmental integrity requirements and ensures that each credited tonne genuinely represents a tonne reduced and contributes to the goals of the Paris Agreement,” Mkhuthazi Steleki, the South African chair of the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, which oversees the mechanism, said in February.
Too many credits issued
But Carbon Market Watch claimed in a second report last week that, despite the adjustment, the project is still likely to issue seven times more credits than its real climate impact justifies, comparing its calculations with values from peer-reviewed scientific literature.
The biggest driver of the credit inflation, the group said, is the failure to account for “stacking” – the widespread practice of households using multiple stoves at the same time, including more polluting ones the project does not monitor.
Peer-reviewed science considers a stacking rate of 68% a conservative assumption, but the methodology used by the Myanmar programme makes no allowance for it at all, the report said.
CCC disputed those findings. In a written response to Climate Home News, it said the project was developed under methodologies approved within the UN climate framework and that external recalculations by researchers are not “determinative of the level of crediting achieved”.
The credits are expected to be used primarily by major South Korean polluters to meet obligations under the country’s emissions trading system – a move that will also enable the government to count those units toward emissions reduction targets in its nationally determined contribution (NDC), the UN climate body told Climate Home News.
Myanmar will use the remaining credits to achieve in part the goals of its own national climate plan under the Paris Agreement.
“Over-crediting, at any magnitude, cannot be compatible with the climate ambition of a world striving to limit global warming to 1.5ºC,” said Isa Mulder, an expert at Carbon Market Watch.
The post UN’s first Paris Agreement carbon credits face human rights and climate concerns appeared first on Climate Home News.
UN’s first Paris Agreement carbon credits face human rights and climate concerns
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy8 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测