Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Mingyang UK Manufacturing, RWE Cargo Drones
Register for the next SkySpecs Webinar! Allen, Joel, Rosemary, joined by Yolanda Padron, discuss RWE’s pilot project using drones to transport equipment uptower. Plus Mingyang has announced plans to invest $2B into a UK offshore wind manufacturing center. And Renvo’ article in PES Wind Magazine highlights the needs for a convenient spare parts marketplace in the wind industry.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
You are listening to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast brought to you by build turbines.com. Learn, train, and be a part of the Clean Energy Revolution. Visit build turbines.com today. Now here’s your hosts, Alan Hall, Joel Saxon, Phil Totaro, and Rosemary Barnes. Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m your host, Alan Hall in the Queen city of Charlotte, North Carolina.
And I. Have everybody else on the podcast is in the same state. Rosemary is in Texas, in Houston, Texas. Joel’s in Austin, Texas, and our newest employee, Yolanda Barone, is in Austin, Texas. Yolanda, welcome to the podcast. You’re, uh, just joined us a couple of days ago and we’re super excited to have you.
There’s been a lot going on in the wind business. Uh, Rosemary’s actually over here for a conference and Joel’s been helping [00:01:00] out at that conference. Just so everybody knows, Yolanda’s gonna be our blade expert at Weather Guard helping us with a, a number of issues that operators have around the world, uh, for things that Rosie can’t take care of.
Call in Yolanda. So leading off this week, an interesting story from RWE and a big press release about it. Joel, uh, RDB has achieved a breakthrough in offshore wind logistics. By successfully testing cargo drones at its German wind farms, and, uh, the first time in German offshore airspace. Both long range autonomous drones and short distant cargo drones have been used in daily wind farm operations.
Uh, the pilot project demonstrated how different drone types can deliver spare parts, tools, and supplies to turbines. Uh, they were able to move up. About 10 kilograms, which is like roughly 25 pounds over about 40 kilometers. [00:02:00] That’s a pretty good rate. Uh, this is unique though to Europe because I think in the United States we’re not even allowed to do this, right?
Um, you can, it just depends on getting special permits. So it’s called a bv, LOS or BV loss, uh, beyond visual line of sight. Uh, so you can get, if you have specific, uh, software packages and you’re not over a major city and certain things, you can get those kind of, um, certificates from the FAA, but they’re not easy.
Uh, the, the cool thing about this is, I mean, let’s just put our technician hat on for a second. Even an onshore wind farm. I’m up tower and I go, oh, Alan and Rosemary and Yolanda and I are up tower and, and I go, who brought up the 10 millimeter socket? And none of us did. Now we have to draw short straws to see you, has to climb all the way down and get the 10 millimeter and come all the way back up.
Whereas with a drone, you could just fly up, land on the nelle and you have your tool, but it also means that you don’t have to [00:03:00] bring everything that you might conceivably need with you up there. So like when you are climbing towers every day, you’ve, you’re taking so much junk with you every time you go up, every time you go down and.
Like it sounds easy. Oh, they’ve got elevators in there. And that’s true. You don’t have to like put it in a backpack and climb up a ladder with it. Um, in towers that have a lift, but it’s still, once you get to the top of the lift, you still have to climb up a ladder to get into the nasal. And then if you’ve gotta get out into the hub.
And so you are still like picking up huge bags of stuff and um, yeah. Hauling them above your head. Always definitely exceeding the limit that you’ve just done your special training to promise that you’ll never lift more than 20 kilos. Um, you, yeah, it’s just like, it’s crazy the amount of stuff that you go schlep around with you because you don’t wanna have to go back down if you forget something.
So this means you can take up your toolkit for what you’re expected to need. Of course, you’ve got a lot of bulky safety [00:04:00] equipment that you have to take up ’cause you don’t know when you’re gonna need that. Um, but yeah, it’s gonna massively reduce the amount of stuff that you need to take up. Rosa, you bring up a lot of good points.
Right? And that’s just the, the daily active operations. And we’re, and we’re, I’m just thinking right now with Onshore Wind Farm, now go offshore and it’s, it’s boat landings into transition pieces. The, the amount of HSE risk just to transfer onto, uh, a tower or off of a tower to get components. It’s that much more complicated.
It’s that much more HSE risk. So. This makes absolute sense and these technologies have been kind of floating around for a while. Um, and one of the big things was, you know, of course it’s just the basics of drone stuff. So it’s can we safely lift this much, can we get the permits to lift this much?
Because like the CAA over in the EU there, they had a limit for a long time as well of, I think it was. 25 kilograms or something like that for like the whole drone setup couldn’t, it, couldn’t exceed that. Um, so you have to get certain permits [00:05:00] to do all these different things, but then it was, how do we safely precision land and take off and deliver the stuff?
So new advancements in, um, LOC localization, so like slam technologies, um, simultaneous location and mapping. So not just relying on GPS, but actually sensing what’s around you, whether it has, you know, a QR type. April, April tag codes that the drone camera follows and then kind of maps itself onto. Or if it’s has that, uh, the ability to see the blades and make sure it doesn’t run into them autonomously.
So the, the drone world has matured enough where this technology is like something that’s pretty normal now. You can see these things, drones, landing autonomously on boats that are driving by themselves and on the back of cars. Like it’s pretty cool stuff. Uh, but it was only gonna be so long until it made its way into industrial uses.
And this is a great one. You’re reducing risk, you’re reducing time, uh, saving money, all of the, you’re, you’re literally ticking [00:06:00] every box for operations. That makes this cool. I, I really like this. Uh, kudos to R to B for, for making this happen. Well, Yolanda, they should be doing this onshore too, right?
Because a lot of o and m buildings are not necessarily close to the wind farm. How many wind farms in Texas have we driven? Ooh. Five, 10 miles just to get to the turbine. Man, it would be a lot easier just to have a drone, wouldn’t it? Yeah, absolutely. I mean, it, it would save the team so much time and just so much effort.
Like Rosie was saying, to climb those turbines. The way we’re doing it now is with electric truck, right? Isn’t that, uh, RWE was doing a lot of the Ford, what’s the Ford Electric pickup truck, Joel? Wasn’t that RWE or was that Orad? That was Vestas. The Ford Lightning, we could just buy a bunch of cyber trucks and they could drive themselves out to the site, I suppose, if they can last through all the potholes on these sites.
That’s another thing you have to think about is technician time and the wear and tear on vehicles and stuff. If you at these o and m buildings, if you could, yeah, grab that piece of kit and, oh, I’m at, I’m at, uh, [00:07:00] tower, you know, WTG 17, but also the drone delivers you, your, your nuts and bolts or your package or whatever your name may or your lunch maybe.
That would be a good one too. Cup of coffee. What do I feel like the majority use of this drone technology will be for lunch? Hot lunch to the top of the tower. Come on. I’m sure I’ve told this story before, but I think it was New Brunswick when I climbed there, everybody had this specific electric crockpot that they would bring up with them and they would plug it in first thing, like as soon as they got up to the um, miss Cell, they would plug in their crockpot and then they would have a hot lunch.
And I had something that I had bought from the seven 11 ’cause that’s all there was in town. It was, it was miserable every single day. Here’s a question for you. I’m gonna ask this one. Maybe we should ask Alex Forer from Enertech this one. But, um, so as a, as a, um, a, a young worker in northern Wisconsin, I learned how to warm up my lunch and or breakfast on the intake manifold of a log [00:08:00] skidder by wrapping it in tinfoil and putting it into a certain puff spot in the motor.
Is there a thing in the tower up tower in the Nelle that gets hot enough? If you had a tinfoil wrapped, say a panini or something, that you could actually warm it up up there. The gearbox is warm. If it was running overnight, if the turbine was running overnight, you can sit some somewhere on the drive train.
It’s all pretty warm. That was my hot tip. When I, um, uh, when I was commissioning, uh, some turbines in Sweden, uh, the client demanded that I was, that we had an engineer there. Of the whole every day for the commissioning period of several months. So me and an electrical engineer traded off. He had actual work to do, but I was just there to satisfy the client.
So I just brought my laptop on and sat on the. Sat on the gearbox and um, I did get to see the Northern lights on some of those trips, so, you know, maybe it was worth it. Are you worried about unexpected blade root failures and the high cost of repairs? Meet eco Pitch by Onyx Insight. The standard in blade root monitoring Onyx iss [00:09:00] state-of-the-art sensor tracks blade root movement in real time, delivering continuous data to keep your wind farm running smoothly and efficiently.
With Eco Pitch, you can catch problems early, saving hundreds of thousands of dollars. Field tested on over 3000 blades. It’s proven reliability at your fingertips. Choose Eco Pitch for peace of mind. Contact Onyx Insight today to schedule your demo of Eagle Pitch and experience the future of blade monitoring.
Well over in the uk, China’s Ming Yang Smart Energy, has announced plans to invest up to 1.5 billion pounds. That’s about $2 billion into a. Offshore wind turbine manufacturing facility and, and that’d be the UK’s first fully integrated offshore wind turbine manufacturing facility. Uh, a three phase project would provide up to 1500 new jobs and create an offshore wind hub.
Which would serve the UK and the rest of Europe. [00:10:00] Uh, phase one was supposed to include up to 750 million pounds to build a manufacturing facility for turbine to sell some blades with the first production planned in late 2028, and, and it would grow on from there. This is a big story in the UK and I’ve seen a little bit back and forth in editorials regarding whether the UK should allow Ming Yang to build this factory.
Obviously the, the Vestas of the world and Siemens ESAs would not be happy. Intercon Nordex would not be happy with this. And I would think that, uh, there’d be pressure on the UK government not to allow for a myriad of reasons. But, uh, a lot of articles more recently are. Proponents of this saying it will be the cheapest way to develop offshore wind in the UK and around Europe is to use a, a lower cost manufacturer like Min Yang and [00:11:00] Rosemary.
You probably have the most, uh, direct hand knowledge of Chinese manufacturing since you’ve been over in China. Looking at some of the manufacturing capabilities. What is the chance of this kind of facility being built in Scotland? Um, I’m not sure. I think that there’s two issues. The first is that the UK has or at least wants to have its own manufacturing capabilities.
Then there’s factor two, which is that they have legitimate, like they have real net zero goals that, you know, the government seems to be legitimately, um, trying to achieve. It’s a reverse situation of what happened 10, 20 years ago when, you know, wind energy came out of Europe. They developed the, the technology.
Yeah, there was a little bit of stuff going on in America too, but predominantly it was Europe that, you know, like developed, um, modern wind turbines as we know them today, and the manufacturing methods for the hard stuff like blades. [00:12:00] Um, and then all of the manufacturers, uh. Um, opened factories in China where at the time it was a lot cheaper to manufacture.
Um, and, you know, close to some other markets. China got really, really great at building wind turbines. Um, and then, you know, they started, um, developing their own companies, their own designs, but they had lots of labor that knew, knew how to do it ’cause they’d worked in the factories. You know, they, they had those skills.
So this is the opportunity to learn from, um, this company. Uh, you know, there’ll be UK workers working there and they’ll learn some things and there’ll be a bit of information sharing. It doesn’t even, you don’t even have to believe that China has surpassed the west in wind turbine technology, which I personally don’t believe that they have yet.
Um, but it is different and, you know, you can always learn something from, um, yeah, from, from getting a bit of a, you know. A little bit of diversity of ideas and, uh, going and seeing how somebody else does it, it’s [00:13:00]always gonna help. I would say China is not really open to sharing information. You, we know very little of how, uh, China operates as turbines or how they manufacture ’em, or what their performance is, or how they have done over long periods of time or.
What upgrades have been made and there’s just so many unknowns there. How can they avoid that if they, like, do you think the UK government is gonna let them staff it entirely by, um, temporary Chinese workers? Like there’s no way. I mean, and they definitely shouldn’t. So how can they possibly avoid the knowledge getting out if they have a factory that is stuffed by, um, UK.
Uh, people, then they’re gonna learn some things, and that’s, you know, if you, the more that they also, China is selling more and more turbines outside of China and they don’t usually maintain even, you know, do the full service agreement themselves. So people necessarily have to learn about it. They, they, there is no option if you wanna sell outside of China and manufacture outside of China, but that [00:14:00] knowledge is gonna get shared.
I mean, we all, we, we all learn that. 20 years ago, you know, is it knowledge worth having? I don’t know if we know that yet. I don’t think we can say that we, yes, yes or no. I don’t think we know that yet. I’ve got no doubt that it’s worth having. I think that this, this is an interesting point though with people, if you say the people thing, right, you’ve got, you know, they’re gonna, they’re saying three phase project, providing up to 1500 new jobs, and right now they’re looking at Inverness, which is way north in Scotland, and 1500 jobs up there would be man, huge for that, that local area.
And you’re, you’re correct in saying that there’s no way they’re gonna staff this with like, transient workers. So that leads me to, to this question. One of the reasons Ming people even look at a Ming Yang turbine, in theory it during a TSA or an RF PS style, time of the project is because of cost. Well, one of the reasons that the cost is way lower is because raw materials and manpower is way cheaper in China.
Well now if you have to get your raw materials to or [00:15:00] from, uh, you know, Northern Europe, into the, into uk and you’re paying local wages, are those turbines still gonna be as advantageously cheap? To even think about. Does that make sense? You’re right. But how could they possibly have got past the back of the envelope calculation for whether they should proceed if they weren’t sure that it was gonna be cheaper?
Yeah. And that, and that’s what I’m, that’s what I’m, yeah. What I’m, what I’m asking like in when they go to the uk, so we’ve heard the number before that if you were to buy a megawatt to megawatt onshore turbine, it’s, it was 30% of the cost of a Western one. And if you’re, and if that still is rings true, great, but there’s no way it’s still gonna be that cheap it, but it might only, it might be 70% of the cost of offshore turbine made by Siemens or Vestas.
That 30% savings might get just some people to pull the trigger. Well, it isn’t like a European manufacturers don’t have facilities. UK Vestas has the Isle of White facility. Siemens has a big Blade factory and Hull. Right. So [00:16:00]does GE have any facilities in the uk? Maybe there’s a research facility in the uk.
Rosemary, they had isle of some stuff on, um, on Southampton, uh, but not major manufacturing. We’ve talked about great British energy of them being the lead and, and developing energy in the uk. Why don’t they just start their own wind turbine manufacturing facility? They have the resources to do it. You could bring in people to, to obviously to help run it and, uh, use technology.
You know, we, we, even if you had a hire a, a vest as to come in and take over the plant and to do the day-to-day stuff. It’s all being built in country, which is ultimately the goal right? Is to try to get jobs in Scotland. Yeah. I mean the, the cool thing about this project, the way they’re proposing it is, is that it is going to be, um, fully integrated.
It’s going to be everything. It’s not gonna be a Blade factory and ne it’s gonna be everything in one spot. I think that’s great because that doesn’t exist elsewhere in the world. [00:17:00] Super plan. Um, but. What is the, what’s the catalyst here? What is the kickoff? What’s the trigger? How does Ming Yang end up doing this?
Is it, do they have to get an order for 400 megawatts of offshore turbine? Or they’re not just gonna build a, it’s not gonna be, if you build it, they will come. That’s not gonna happen. I thought, uh, they had been shortlisted for a couple of offshore projects. They’re shortlisted for Green volt. For green volt, but I thought there was a second one.
But Rosie, you, you would know this more than any of us. If, if someone says, if, uh, you now got the turbine supply agreement, great. Now you have to start a factory. Is that even plausible from turbine supply agreement to a maybe, I don’t know, 18 months, some year down the line, are you gonna have a fully integrated wind turbine manufacturing facility ready to kick out a turbine?
I know that, um, the general, you know, um, off the record opinion from people that I’ve talked to is that they’re totally doubtful whether it’s going to go ahead, that it just kind of keeps on kicking along as a [00:18:00] maybe indefinitely. It’s all global companies that are involved. Everyone’s gonna be once bitten, twice shy.
It’s, it’s hard to open. Wind turbine factories. I mean, something that I’ve worked on a fair bit in Australia with governments here that wanna have wind turbine manufacturing, but nobody wants to make sure that companies have certainty about their pipeline. And so no one wants to build a factory. Like you don’t even need to induce someone that much to build a factory.
Like you don’t need to give them huge tax, tax breaks or free land. Like all that stuff is is nice, but the critical thing that you have to have is. You need to know that you’re gonna be able to sell whatever you’re making. It’s gonna, you know, if you can make one every day, you need to be able to sell one every day.
You can’t, um, you know, sell one every day for eight months, and then you don’t know when your next project is gonna be. Like, that’s just, you need a decade’s worth of pipeline that’s pretty certain. And nowhere in the world really has that. But you know what, if there’s anywhere that has the, um, [00:19:00]like the size of the economy and the, you know, like tendency to place.
Big bets, it’s the Chinese government. And I wouldn’t be surprised if they, you know, saw it. If they think it’s strategic for them to have factories outside of China, then they will give whatever guarantees they need to make sure it happens. And that’s something that, like in the West, we’re not prepared to make those kind of commitments.
We’re gonna lose. And it’s not, it’s not by any means just wind energy. It’s everything that China is dominating at the moment. That’s how they do it. They do it by going big. Early, not worrying about losing money, not worrying about that. You know, 990 of the thousand startup companies are gonna fail. You know, they only care that they’re gonna have the 10, or, you know, the one or two left at the end.
And, um, they’re the only ones that have the, you know, that are playing that strategy. Yolanda, on the development side, the wind turbine history for Min Yang is not well known. How [00:20:00] much risk is that put into a project? And as a developer, what would you be thinking about if this factory is built? Is it something that you would try to mitigate with extra insurance, or could you even get insurance?
Would you look for additional funding for repairs that you just haven’t thought about? How would this even be approached without having a lot of information available to your teams? Right. You can’t really. See what the full risk profile of a project like this would be. Right. So it would be a little bit difficult to get the funding to, to put in all those values to a forecasting for a site.
So would the Ming Yang have to fund the project in a sense? Would they have to provide the financing for their own turbines or find someone that’ll provide the financing? I think, yeah. I think your traditional bank, your traditional banks would be hard to come by. Right. The people that are, that are.
Backstopping, all these other programs. I think that you would have to have someone in the [00:21:00] Chinese government, like Rosie was kind of mentioning, or Ming Yang themselves, offer the credit facility to get one of these things off the ground. ’cause insurance isn’t gonna play with it either. You gotta get the insurance and the finance to agree that the risk profile is low enough to make it happen.
And I don’t think you’re gonna have the traditional, like, like downtown London isn’t gonna jump on this. I think you’re gonna have to have some, someone from China or Minging themselves, backstop it. So we’re not talking about a million and a, or sorry, a billion and a half pounds. We’re now thinking it’s somewhere north of 5 billion pounds.
Yeah. Wouldn’t binging have to know that before they decided to move forward that it’s not one and a half, it’s 3, 4, 5 times that probably. But that goes right along with what Rosie said. They’re willing to, you’ve seen that, you’ve seen ’em take on industries elsewhere in Africa, in South America. Where they’re just pouring money into these places to get ’em off the ground and not worried about the losses as much.
’cause they know that [00:22:00] I, you say it way, way, said it way better than I did, Rosie. But they know they need to just kind of get their foot in the door and they’re gonna have to maybe lose some money. And take some risk by doing it themselves. As wind energy professionals, staying informed is crucial, and let’s face it difficult.
That’s why the Uptime podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine. PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need. Don’t miss out.
Visit PES wind.com today. Well in this quarter’s, PES WIN Magazine, of which you can download yourself@pswin.com, a number of great articles. I’ve been reading one on Revo, which is a slightly different company. Joel and I were talking about it before we were recording today, and Joel described it as the eBay of wind turbines.
So I guess that’s sort of true, Joel, but [00:23:00] they connect sellers of decommissioned turbines with buyers and seeking basic cost effective solutions for repurposing those wind turbines, which is great. Uh, obviously Rosemary talks a lot about recycling of wind turbines. This is an easy way to do it, but it’s, it’s a difficult problem, right, trying to connect buyers.
Uh, uh, to sellers of older wind turbines. Where is this data? Where is this Amazon? Where is this eBay of spare parts? And then there’s the complications behind that, and the complications behind that being valuations of them. Um, how do we get the right people in, in line to make a a transaction happen? How do we get the logistics completed?
Is this a, you know, down to the serial numbers of certain things? Is it compatible with my wind farm? Do I need a different invert or are we at, you know, I mean there’s the basic questions. Is it 50 hertz or 60 hertz? Like, but that’s, those are things that not everybody’s thinking about. And me, uh, from a, my personal standpoint, I’ve been a part of some of these transactions from a, from a distance just [00:24:00] watching and, and seeing the moves.
And they get really complicated. And I think that’s what Revo ISS trying to solve here is access to these parts. Uh, access to the consultants that can, you know, help evaluate or value your equipment, and then tailor made support to making the transaction happen. And that’s what’s really, really needed in the marketplace because there is capability of this.
We heard from the insurance industry about how they can’t find obsolete parts, and we’ve heard from, uh, people that are extending, doing life asset extensions. And like right now, if you need a, I don’t know, send me on mm. 92 blade. Good luck. Unless you know the right people who know the right people who know the right people, you’re not gonna find it.
’cause it’s not like you can just go down to Home Depot and buy one. Uh, so that’s what Red Vote’s trying to do here is, um, solve some of those problems in the industry. And Yolanda, having worked for a large operator in the United States, is this something that even the larger operators could use? It does seem like it is difficult to find.
[00:25:00] Parts for older turbines or just to replace an older turbine? Yeah, absolutely. I think especially as operators start moving towards using ISPs a lot more, they can’t necessarily get things from the factory level that you would typically see from an OOEM, right? So even if you’re replacing something as small as like a LPS receptor, it’s really, there are parts that are really difficult to come by.
So if there could be an eBay type. Forum for people to get those things from site to site, that would definitely help out and help lessen the downtime that you have from just not having, uh, a part to replace on site in Rosemary. In Australia, there’s a lot of, uh, rural businesses, farms across the country.
They could buy a turbine for about 600,000 euros per megawatt. That’s a pretty good discount. It may make sense in a lot of smaller. Operations, not big industrial wind farms, but if you had a, a cattle farm or [00:26:00] mines. And mines. Yeah. Yeah. Mines are starting to generate more and more of their power from.
Solar because Australians are familiar with and comfortable with solar. Um, not so many mines getting into wind energy. There’s a few, there’s a gold mine, um, I think it’s called Agnew Gold Mine. And of course there’s recent news about Fortescue. They’re moving ahead on their plans to put a whole lot of, uh, wind power into Western Australia.
But smaller mines, I think it could make sense. I think one of the issues with, um, wind energy for mines is that. It’s not easy for them to get wind turbine techs out there, right? They do a lot of fly in, fly out work and um, they don’t wanna add probably another specialized kind of, um, employees. So some of these older wind turbines were much more the kind that any, you know, anybody who can maintain mine equipment would be able to maintain a wind turbine.
So I do think it makes a lot of sense. Well, you should check out the Revo article in PES Wind. Just go to ps wind.com. [00:27:00] And download your copy. So when this episode comes out, it will be next week. Uh, and so I’m saying this as next week, but future me, I will be in Copenhagen. So I’ll be visiting some, some local, uh, vendors, clients, friends, uh, the wind industry operators as a whole.
Uh, so reach out to me, uh, Joel dot saxon@wglightning.com or shoot me a text, uh, 832-593-2782. We’ll grab a cup of coffee, talk wind, uh, but I will be in Copenhagen all week. So, uh, hit me up. That wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas, we’d love to hear from you, and you can reach out to us on LinkedIn.
Even Yolanda, you can reach on LinkedIn, so don’t forget to subscribe. And if you found. Value in today’s conversation, please leave us a review. It really helps other wind energy professionals discover the show and we’ll catch you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy [00:28:00] Podcast.
https://weatherguardwind.com/mingyang-rwe-drones/
Renewable Energy
EchoBolt’s BoltWave Makes Bolt Inspections Easy
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

EchoBolt’s BoltWave Makes Bolt Inspections Easy
Pete Andrews from EchoBolt joins to discuss ultrasonic bolt inspection, the Bolt Wave device, and blade stud defect detection.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Welcome to Uptime Spotlight, shining light on wind. Energy’s brightest innovators. This is the Progress Powering tomorrow.
Pete Andrews: Pete, welcome to the program. Good to be back. Yeah. See you face to face. Yeah. Yes. This is wonderful. It’s a really great event to catch it with loads of the. UK innovation that are happening in the supply chain. So it’s, yeah, really nice to be here.
Allen Hall: This is really good to meet in person because we have seen a lot of bolt issues in the us, Canada, Australia, yeah.
Uh, all around the world and every time bolt problems come up, I say, have you called Pete Andrews and Echo Bolt and gotten the kit to detect bolt issues? And then who’s Pete? Give me Pete’s phone number. Okay, sure. Uh, but now that we’re here in person, a lot has changed since we first talked to you probably two years ago.[00:01:00]
You’re a bootstrap company based in the UK that has global presence, and I, I think it’s a good start to explain what the technology is and why Echo Bolt matters so much in today’s world.
Pete Andrews: Yeah, absolutely. So, um, as you said, we’re a uk, um, SME, there’s a team of 13 of us based here in the uk. Yeah. But we do deliver our services internationally, but really focused on Northern Europe.
Yeah. But increasingly we’ve done more in the US and North America, a little bit in Canada. Um, but our big offering really is to help wind turbine operators and owners reduce the need to routinely retire in bulks. So we have a quick and simple inspection technology that people can deploy, find out the status of their bolt connections, and then.
Reti them if necessary, but the vast majority of the time we find that they’re static and absolutely fine and can be left [00:02:00] alone. So it’s a real big efficiency boost for wind operators.
Joel Saxum: Well, you’re doing things by prescription now, right? Instead of just blanket cover, we’re gonna do all of this. It’s like, let’s work on the ones that actually need to be worked on.
Let’s do the, the work that we actually need to, and instead of lugging, like we’re looking at the kit right here, and I can, you can hold the case in one hand, let alone the tools in a couple of fingers. As opposed to torque tensioning tools that are this big, they weigh a hundred kilos, and those come with all of their own problems.
So I know that you guys said you’re, you’re focused here. You do a lot of work, um, in the offshore wind world as well. Yeah. I mean, offshore wind is where you add a zero right? To zeros. Yeah. Everything else is that much more complicated. It costs that much more. It’s you’re transitioning people offshore to the transition pieces.
Like there’s so much more HSE risk, dollar risk, all of these different spend things. So. The Echo Bolt systems, these different tools that you have being developed and utilized here first make absolute sense, but now you guys are starting to go to onshore as well.
Pete Andrews: Yeah, that’s right. So I mean, as as you said, that there’s really [00:03:00] three main benefit areas we focus on.
The first one is the health and safety of technicians, right? As you said, some of the fasteners used offshore now are up to MA hundred. So a hundred millimeter diameter bolts,
Joel Saxum: four inches for our American friends. Yeah, absolutely.
Pete Andrews: And they probably weigh. 30 kilos plus per bolt. Yeah. Um, so just the physical manual handling of that sort of equipment and the tightening equipment for those bolts is a huge risk for people.
If you think 150 bolts lifting or maneuvering, the tooling around on on its own can cause all the problems. So as well as the inherent risk of the hydraulic kit failing. So occasionally we see catastrophic tool failure. Is, which have really high potential severity, you know, sort of tensioner heads ejecting or crush injuries from Tor.
So that is really a key focus for our customers, just to [00:04:00] keep their teams safe, but also you have to be the cost effective and the the major cost benefit we allow is that we don’t have to revisit every bolt and every turbine like you’d have to do if you were retyping. So we believe there’s something of the order of a million pounds per installed gigawatt saving.
By moving from a routine REIT uh, maintenance strategy to a focused condition based inspection, you significantly reduce the amount of intervention you make and keep your turbines running more and reduce the boots on the ground on the turbine. So three real kind of, um, key. Benefits for people adopting our technology
Allen Hall: because we routinely see tower bolts being reworked or retention depending on who the manufacturer is.
And I’m watching this go on. I’m like, why are [00:05:00] we doing this? It seems, or the 10% rule, we’re tighten 10% this year, and they’ll come back and see how it’s going. That’s a little insane, right, because you’re just kind of. Tensioning bolts up to see if one of them has a problem and then you just do more of them and we’re wasting so much time because echo bolts figured this out years ago.
You don’t need to do that. You can tell what the tension is in a bolt ultrasonically, which was the original technology, the first gen I’ll call it, uh, that you could tell the length of the bolt. If the length of the bolt is correct within certain parameters, you know that it is tension properly. If it’s shrunk, that probably means it’s not tensioned properly.
That’s a huge advantage because you can’t physically see it. And I know I’ve seen technicians go, oh, I could take a hammer and I can tell you which ones are not tensioned properly wrong. Wrong. And I think that’s where equitable comes in because you’re actually applying a a lot of science simply [00:06:00] to a complex problem because the numbers are so big.
Pete Andrews: Yeah, I mean that, that, that’s been the real. Driving force between our offering is to simplify it. So ultimately we’re based on a non-destructive testing technique. It’s an ultrasonic thickness checking technique, but when from the non-destructive testing background, it’s crack detection, people have time, they can be, it’s a very precision measurement.
People have to be trained in the wind industry. We’re trying to inspect. A thousand, 2000 bolts a day at scale. It’s a completely different, um, ask of the technology and the way the technology has been developed historically has required too much technician expertise, too much configuration and set up time, and hasn’t delivered on the, on the speed that’s needed to be efficient in wind.
And that’s where our bolt wave [00:07:00] unit we’ve, that we’ve developed over the last. 18 months, let’s say, where all of our focus has gone to make it as slick and as easy for a client technician to pick up with minimal training. It’s through an iOS interface. Everyone understands it intuitively. Um, it’s a bit like using the camera app on your phone.
You know, you’re just hitting measure, measure, measure, measure, measure 10 seconds a bolt as you move the, um, ultrasonic transducer across, and then the data gets moved. Automatically to the cloud, to our bolt platform. And customers can view it in near real time. The engineer in the office can see the inspections happened.
They can see if there are any anomalous bolts, and then there can be communication there and then whether an intervention is necessary. So it’s sort of really changed the way our customers think about managing their, um. They’re bolted joints.
Joel Saxum: Well, I think these are, these are the kind of innovations that we love to see, right?
Because [00:08:00] we regularly talk about a shortage of technicians, and this isn’t, I was just learning this this week too, like this is not a wind problem. This is a everywhere problem. No matter what industry you’re in. Use are short of technicians. But we’re seeing like a tool like this is developed to be able to scale that workforce as well.
Right. You don’t need to be an NDT level three expert to go and do these things. ’cause there’s a very few of those people out there. Right? Right. We know the NDT people, a lot of NDT people, and that’s a hard skillset to come by. Yeah. This can be put in the hands of any technician. Yeah, a quick training course.
Just, Hey, this is how you use your iPhone. You can check Instagram, right? Yeah. Okay. You can off figure. Yeah, have fun. See you at lunch. Um, but they can, they can make this happen, right? They can go do these inspections and you’re getting that, that, uh, data collected in the field. Centralized back to an SME that’s looking at it and you don’t have to put that SME in the field and try to scale their ability to go and travel and do all these things.
They can be in the office making sure that the, the QA, QC is done correctly. I love it. I think that that’s the way we need to go with a lot of things. [00:09:00]Uh, and you’re making it happen.
Pete Andrews: Yeah. And it’s a real kind of. F change in mindset for us. So originally when we started Ebot, we were using third party hardware.
Yeah. Which required a bit of that specialism. Yeah. A bit of care about the setup of the project, getting multiple parameters configured before you got going. And it wasn’t really something we could put in the hands of a customer.
Joel Saxum: Yeah.
Pete Andrews: Which meant Ebot scale was limited to what our own team could go and do, and regionally as well.
You know, so we’re UK based. Probably 60% of our customers are uk, but now we have this Northern Europe offshore wind is obviously on our doorstep, but then increasingly we’ve done more and more in North America, so we’ve probably been to five or six sites now in North America and expect that to be a growth market because we can, we can now ship the devices over there, give some virtual training help.
Uh, [00:10:00] people set themselves up and then that opens up that market, you know, so it’s been a real change in strategy for us, but has allowed us to have far more impact than we otherwise would just try to be a pure service.
Allen Hall: Well, let’s talk about the big problem in the states of a minute, which are the root bushing or inserts that are loose in some blades.
When you lose that pushing, you also lose the tension on the bolt that can be measured. Is that something you’re getting involved with quite a bit now because of just trying to determine how many bolts are affected and, and where we are on the safety scale of can we run this turbine or not? Is that something that EE bolt’s been looking into?
Pete Andrews: Yeah, absolutely. So I, I’d say there’s sort of two halves of what we do. There’s the, there’s the bulk wholesale monitoring of. Typically static connections to eliminate this routine retitling where it’s not needed typically, typically. But then we have these edge cases of certain [00:11:00] connections and certain platforms that have known bolt integrity problems, and we are working with clients to really, um, manage those integrity risks.
Blade stud is an absolute classic, you know, sort of, I think almost every turbine OEM on some, if not all of their platforms has got. Embedded risk into their blades, pitch bearing connections. Um, so yeah, exactly as you said, our customers are using the technology for two things really. One is to ensure the bolts have been tightened to the preload that was specified or the target window.
And quite often we find there is an opportunity to increase the preload and therefore increase the resistance to fatigue failure. So. You know, particularly on older sites where the bolts perhaps not in the condition they were on day one. Well, they definitely won’t be. Um, when people have gone and retti them, they haven’t got back to where they, they should be.[00:12:00]
So we can prove that and increase a bit of that resilience, but then also start to look for the segments around the joint where, um, the bolt might start loosening or failures are occurring, and find areas where they can really hone in. And actively manage risk. And that sort of leads to what we’ve decided to do for the next year, particularly with Blade Stud in mind, is evolve this technology.
So whilst it’s also measuring the elongation, we will do a defect scan at the same time. So you’ll monitor your blade stu, um, connection and we’re hoping that we can set the device to flag to you there and then. We believe this bulk has got a defect while you’re here, get it changed out before it fails and, and all the knock on problems, um, from there.
Joel Saxum: So what you’re just pointing to there is a, is a workflow, right? So to me that is typical [00:13:00] of some of the amazing, innovative companies in the UK that I’ve run into throughout my career. And that is, you’re a group of SMEs, you know, bolted connections. That’s what you do, right? But then you’re like, hey. If there’s a tool, we could make a tool that would make our lives a bit easier, then it’s like, well, we could make the entire industry’s lives a little bit easier as well.
So let’s iterate on that. And now you’re able to send these kits around the world to look at these things. Hey, you have a problem with this specific model. We can help you with this because we know the failure mode and we know how to look for it. Let’s do that for you. Also here, you’re doing bolt bulk measurements.
We got that for you. But it all kind of flows back to the fact that Echo Bolt is a team. A bolted connection, SMEs that are making tools and being able to also provide consulting if need be. Yeah. Right. Um, to, to an entire industry. And I think that, um, this is my take on it, right? Wind is stop number one. I think you guys are gonna do a fantastic year, but there’s a lot of, uh, opportunity out there in bolted [00:14:00] connections as well.
Allen Hall: A tremendous amount blade bolts being broken from defects in the crystalline structure. What appears to be a more. Rapidly developing issue across fleets that I’ve seen. I went to a farm this summer and the number of blade bolts that were there on the table that were broken on the conference room table was And the whiteboard office.
Yeah. Yeah. This one,
Joel Saxum: this one.
Allen Hall: Your hard head is not gonna protect you from this one. It’s, it’s, it was this, um, I couldn’t imagine the amount of time they were spending hunting these things down. And of course, the only way they were finding ’em was they were broken. You like to catch ’em before they break because it becomes
Joel Saxum: a safety risk.
Just not too long ago we saw an insurance case where there’s an RCA going on and it is pointing at an entire tower came down. Right. And it is pointing at a mid, mid tower section bolted connection. How often do you guys run into those problems? Or are you contacted by insurance companies or anything like that to, to take a peek at those?
Pete Andrews: We haven’t done anything directly for insurance [00:15:00]companies, but we have been engaged by. Engineering consultancies that are doing RCA type activities. Okay. Um, things like at the end of defect liability periods mm-hmm. A customer has, has seen, they’ve had a lot of, uh, issues from an OEM, maybe an OE EM has offered a modification or an upgrade, assessing whether that upgrade is actually solved the problem or not.
We’ve got involved in, um, but the tower. Issue specifically. It’s actually very rare we find, um, problems with tower connections, but where we do is often where they haven’t achieved good flange flatness, ah, during installation or the bolts have been, let’s say, left out in the elements for a period and lubrication has been, has deteriorated before the bolt’s been installed.
So there are cases out there, but what I would say is. [00:16:00] To think about your whole life cycle, so ensure the bolt’s installed correctly and we can help with that with a QA to say, yes, this torque or tightening method has got you to the load that you want. Do some through life monitoring, but often if you install it correctly, it will it’s operational life.
You will have very little concern. But then in the UK market, we’re increasingly getting involved again at the end of life, right? Life extension where life extension turbines are 20, 25 years old. How does an operator make a decision to carry on running without replacing all bots? Um, and that’s where increasingly we being asked to use the technologist just to say, actually the joint is fine.
The bolts have run in a good, um, operational envelope. Run them on. Don’t replace a hundred percent of them like you might have been recommended to from your, um, yeah. Turbine supplier side. [00:17:00]
Allen Hall: So Pete, if someone’s doing a repower where they’re basically putting a new one in the cell on an existing tower, they’re making a lot of assumptions about all the bolts from the ground up that they’re gonna be okay.
And I know we’re talking about that. We’re in a lot of installations where. If the turbine has gone through a repowered or two. So now those bolts are 20 years old. Yeah. And trying to get ’em to
Joel Saxum: 30 35. 35
Allen Hall: 40. Yeah. I don’t know what they’re doing. By those bolted connections. Are they just like replacing the bolts?
Are they hitting ’em with a hammer again? Is that the, yeah,
Pete Andrews: I mean, they might replace ’em, but you’ve got a problem with the foundation bolts. ’cause they’re obviously often anchor bolts set into concrete, so you have to reuse them and. With the projects, both in wind and in process power industry with the chimney stacks to try and ascertain whether foundation bolts that are set into concrete are still suitable for operations.
So look for corrosion losses, look for [00:18:00] defects. Um, so yeah, they’re all things that need thinking about before you just make the snap decision to repower. But I think
Joel Saxum: a lot of that, uh, going back to a couple minutes ago, you were talking about at the commissioning phase, making sure that you have proper qa, QC of how these things were installed day one, and then making sure that before commissioning of a turbine, they’re checked.
I think that’s really important. We’re starting to see that in the blade world now too, where we’ve been talking about it for a long time, and now when you talk to operators, they’re like, we’re getting inspections done on the blades before they’re hung. Or at the factory before they’re hung. After they’re hung.
Like they want a good foundation baseline. Are you seeing that in the bolted connection world too?
Pete Andrews: Yes. Sort of. It’s just emerging for us. What we’ve found is, so most of our customers are in the operational phase ’cause they are the ones feeling the pain. Yeah. Of the routine retitling work. When they do major components, they sometimes engage us to come and say, can you check [00:19:00] before and after the blade was removed?
What was it? Before we took it off from a a bolt load perspective, what is it afterwards? Can you then recheck after 500 hours When we retalk it? And what we’ve seen there often is the initial install hasn’t got them to where they needed to be and they’ve had to go and do the break in maintenance or the 500 hour REIT to get the bolts to the right load.
So one of the questions that we have is whether. Some of the defects are actually being initiated very early on in that initial running in period and whether if, if actually you’d taken the time at, at the point of assembly to make sure you were correct, whether that avoids some of the knock on integrity concerns.
So yeah, it’s interesting area.
Allen Hall: Well, bolts are what hold wind turbines together and you better know you have the right. Tension and [00:20:00] torque on your bolts to get to the lifetime of the wind turbine and to, and to check it once in a while. And I know there’s a lot of operators I can think of right now in the United States that are sort of doing that job somewhat.
I I think they have missed out on opportunities to save a lot of money and to call it echo bolt. How do people get ahold of you? Because that’s one thing I run into all the time. Like, Hey, hey, you gotta talk to Ebol, call Ebol. How do they get ahold of you?
Pete Andrews: So the easiest ways are via our website. Which is echo bolt.com.
Um, LinkedIn, you’ll find us at Echo Bolt on LinkedIn. Reach out. Our email would be info@cobolt.com. So any of those route and you’ll, uh, reach me and the team and more than happy to speak to you about any of your faulting concerns or problems. We are, uh, yeah, we’re passionate about your problems.
Allen Hall: Pete, thank you so much for being on this podcast.
I, it is great to actually see you in person and see the bolt wave technology. It’s really [00:21:00] impressive. So anybody out there that needs bolt tensioning to checking tools, you need to get ahold of Pete at Echo Bolt and get started today. Thank you Pete. Thanks guys. It’s great to be here.
Renewable Energy
Carbon Capture and Synthetic Fuels
As we’ve noted in the past, the idea of capturing CO2 from the atmosphere is completely unfeasible, since 99.96% of the air around is something other than CO2 (mostly nitrogen). However, there are environments that change this equation radically, cement plants being one of them, where the concentration of CO2 emissions is as high as 30% (versus .04%).
Now, this brings the subject of synthetic fuels into the realm of possibility. Sure, if you want to make gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, you’ll need two other things: hydrogen (which can come from electrolyzing water), and a considerable amount of energy, as these processes are heavily endothermic, meaning that energy must be supplied from external sources.
The good news is that we have enormous amounts of off-peak wind and nuclear that are wasted every day. Please see: Doty WindFuels.
Renewable Energy
What Trump Is Actually Doing
With each passing day, there are fewer and fewer American voters who believe the bullshit at left.
Is Trump working hard to stay out of prison? Enrich himself and his family? Of course.
Could be possibly care less about anything else? Obviously not.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
