With over 80% of world trade moved by sea, the demand for eco-friendly alternatives is more urgent than ever. The maritime industry is under pressure to adopt cleaner, more sustainable transport solutions to lower carbon emissions.
VELA, a trailblazing French company offering 100% wind-powered maritime transport, has secured €40 million ($43 million USD) from various investors. The funding round is led by Crédit Mutuel Impact, 11th Hour Racing, and the French Public Investment Bank (BPI). This substantial capital injection represents a major milestone for VELA as it aims to revolutionize international cargo shipping with sustainable, wind-powered vessels.
The maritime company plans to use this funding to begin construction on its first sailing cargo trimaran officially. It will also utilize the fund to expand its operational and sales teams in both France and the United States.
Michael Fernandez-Ferri, Managing Director and Chairman of VELA, remarked on the fundraising, saying that:
“This major fundraising marks a key step in VELA’s development. This sailing cargo trimaran symbolizes our vision of a world combining innovation, sustainability, and humanity.”
VELA’s Eco-Friendly Approach to Maritime Transport
The French startup’s development is underpinned by a strong transatlantic vision. It has the ultimate goal of providing fast, reliable, and eco-friendly shipping services that will reduce carbon emissions and create a more sustainable maritime industry.
Since its founding in November 2022, VELA has positioned itself as a key player in addressing both the climate crisis and social responsibility in the shipping sector. The industry contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions.
Shipping accounts for over 80% of global trade and emitted over a billion tons of CO2 in 2018, according to the International Maritime Organization. And this emission will continue to rise as shown below. The maritime regulator has taken measures to cut the industry’s GHG emissions and reach net zero emissions goal by 2050.

Many shipping companies are already embracing green initiatives to reduce carbon emissions and bring the sector to net zero. Some are investing in cleaner fuels like methanol, using technologies such as wind propulsion and hull-cleaning robots, and adopting energy-efficient ship designs.
VELA steps in to help mitigate the industry’s impact with its wind-powered ships. In a market where fast, reliable service is paramount, the startup stands out for its unique combination of sustainability and speed.
Traditional cargo ships can take weeks to complete transatlantic crossings. But VELA’s innovative trimaran aims to reduce this time to under 15 days, including loading and unloading. The trimaran, which draws inspiration from offshore racing technology, will operate 100% under sail, offering a genuinely carbon-neutral transport solution.
Additionally, VELA’s services cater to shippers of high-value goods such as industrial parts, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare equipment. The trimaran’s cargo holds will be temperature-controlled to meet the stringent needs of these industries, ensuring the integrity and safety of goods during transport.
A Greener Route With Groundbreaking Ship Design
The centerpiece of VELA’s ambitious plans is its first vessel—the world’s largest sailing cargo trimaran known as “L’avion des Mers” or “The Sea Plane”. This cutting-edge ship will be built by the renowned Australian shipyard Austal, with additional technical input from the offshore racing experts at MerConcept. Construction is set to begin soon, with delivery expected in the second half of 2026.

The trimaran will feature groundbreaking technology and design, allowing it to cross the Atlantic with unprecedented speed and reliability. The vessel will measure 220 feet in length, with a height of 200 feet and a width of 82 feet. The hull will be constructed from aluminum, while the masts will be made of carbon to ensure both durability and lightweight efficiency.
To further enhance its eco-friendly profile, the ship will feature over 3,230 square feet of photovoltaic panels and two hydro-generators. They will supply renewable energy to support the vessel’s operations.
Other Notable Green Innovations on the High Seas
VELA’s first trimaran will service a dedicated maritime line between the Atlantic coast of France and the eastern seaboard of the United States. This route is strategically important for VELA’s business model, as it will connect two major economic regions while offering a decarbonized, reliable, and secure shipping option for high-value goods.
The company’s clients come from diverse sectors, including fashion, wines and spirits, custom-made artisanal products, food, medical supplies, and high-tech industries. VELA expects to see increased demand for its services as more companies seek sustainable transport options, especially for products that cannot afford long shipping times.
Normandy and New Aquitaine, two key regions in France, will play vital roles in VELA’s operations. These strategic territories will host departure ports, ensuring that VELA’s decarbonized maritime solutions are accessible to customers across France.
Another company operating in the maritime sector, Vision Marine Technologies is leading emission reduction with its electric boats. The company specializes in manufacturing fully electric boats that produce zero emissions, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional gasoline-powered vessels. The Canadian-based company commits to advancing clean energy in the marine industry.
Maersk made history by implementing the first green bunkering service with methanol, positioning itself as the world’s first shipping line to operate a container vessel on green fuel. Last year, COSCO Shipping launched an electric container vessel with a 700 TEU capacity.
Additionally, MSC joined SEA-LNG, advocating for LNG’s role in decarbonization. Wallenius Wilhelmsen is prepping for both green methanol and ammonia-powered ships, while DB Schenker and Hapag-Lloyd have partnered to use biofuels for emissions reduction.
Evergreen Marine is tracking greenhouse gas emissions, and major ports globally are setting up green methanol bunkering services.
Now Vela, with this funding round and strategic partnerships in place, is well on its way to becoming a leader in sustainable maritime transport. As the world shifts towards greener practices, VELA’s wind-powered ships could represent the future of global shipping.
- READ MORE: Can Nuclear Power Propel Maritime into a Zero-Emission Era? Maersk to Explore Nuclear for Ships
The post French Startup Secures $43M For 100% Wind-Powered Cargo Trimaran appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

