Connect with us

Published

on

 San Francisco International Airport

Introduction Sustainability in San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is committed to sustainability, implementing initiatives to reduce environmental impact

From energy-efficient infrastructure to waste reduction programs, SFO aims to be a model for eco-friendly aviation practices. Through partnerships and innovative strategies, the airport strives to balance growth with environmental responsibility, contributing to a greener future for air travel.

San Francisco International Airport

Get to know San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is a major hub located 13 miles south of downtown San Francisco, California. Handling over 50 million passengers annually, it ranks as one of the busiest airports in the United States. SFO serves as a gateway for both domestic and international flights, connecting travelers to various destinations worldwide.

Key features of SFO include state-of-the-art terminals, such as the iconic International Terminal, which reflects the region’s cultural diversity. The airport is renowned for its commitment to sustainability, with initiatives ranging from energy-efficient facilities to waste management programs.

SFO provides a wide array of amenities for travelers, including diverse dining options, shopping outlets, lounges, and art installations. Efficient ground transportation options, such as the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and shuttle services, link the airport to the city and surrounding areas.

As a technology and innovation hub, SFO continues to adapt and enhance its services to meet the evolving needs of passengers, making it a crucial hub for both business and leisure travel on the West Coast.

San Francisco International Airport

San Francisco International Airport, USA Profiles Data

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is a major international airport situated in San Mateo County, near San Bruno and Millbrae, 13 miles south of downtown San Francisco, California. Opened in 1927, SFO has grown into one of the busiest airports in the United States.

Key Features:

1. Passenger Traffic: SFO handles over 50 million passengers annually, serving as a crucial hub for domestic and international travel.

2. Terminals: The airport consists of multiple terminals, with the iconic International Terminal showcasing cultural diversity through art and design.

3. Sustainability: SFO is recognized for its commitment to sustainability, implementing various eco-friendly initiatives, such as energy-efficient buildings and waste reduction programs.

4. Amenities: Travelers at SFO enjoy a range of amenities, including diverse dining options, shopping outlets, lounges, and art installations.

5. Transportation: Efficient ground transportation options like BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) and shuttles connect the airport to the city and surrounding areas.

6. Innovation Hub: Located in the tech-savvy San Francisco Bay Area, SFO continues to embrace technology and innovation to enhance passenger experience.

San Francisco International Airport

History of San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) has a rich history dating back to its opening in 1927. 

Here are key points in its development:

1. Establishment: SFO was established as Mills Field Municipal Airport in 1927, named after the Mills Field Flying School of the early 1920s.

2. Expansion in the 1930s: The airport expanded during the 1930s, with new terminal buildings and runway developments.

3. Military Use during World War II: SFO played a crucial role during World War II as a major military airfield.

4. Post-War Growth: After the war, the airport returned to civilian use and experienced significant growth in the post-war era.

5. Name Change: In 1955, it was renamed San Francisco International Airport to reflect its growing international air traffic.

6. Jet Age and New Terminal: With the advent of jet travel in the 1960s, SFO built a new terminal to accommodate the increased demand for air travel.

7. Expansion and Modernization: Throughout the latter half of the 20th century and into the 21st century, SFO underwent multiple expansion and modernization projects to keep pace with the evolving aviation industry.

8. Innovation and Sustainability: SFO has become a leader in airport sustainability, implementing initiatives such as energy-efficient facilities and waste reduction programs.

9. International Terminal: The International Terminal, opened in 2000, is a notable architectural landmark that reflects the cultural diversity of the San Francisco Bay Area.

10. Current Status: Today, SFO continues to be a major international gateway, known for its commitment to sustainability, technological innovation, and providing a diverse range of services for millions of passengers each year.

San Francisco International Airport

Renewable Energy and Sustainability in San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) has been a pioneer in implementing renewable energy and sustainability initiatives, reflecting its commitment to environmental responsibility. 

Key features include:

1. Solar Power: SFO has integrated solar power extensively, with solar panels installed on various facilities and structures. These solar installations contribute to the airport’s energy needs while reducing its carbon foounergy-Efficient Buildings:** The airport has focused on constructing and retrofitting buildings with energy-efficient technologies to optimize energy usage and decrease overall environmental impact.

3. Waste Reduction: SFO has implemented comprehensive waste reduction programs, including recycling initiatives and waste diversion strategies, to minimize the amount of waste sent to landfills.

4. Water Conservation: The airport has adopted water conservation measures, including efficient irrigation systems and water-saving technologies, to minimize water usage and promote responsible water management.

5. Green Building Practices: SFO incorporates green building practices in its infrastructure projects, emphasizing sustainability and environmentally friendly construction materials.

6. Alternative Transportation: The airport encourages the use of alternative transportation modes by providing efficient access to public transit, including the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) system, reducing the environmental impact of passenger travel to and from the airport.

7. Carbon Offset Programs: SFO may have carbon offset programs in place, allowing passengers and airlines to invest in projects that reduce or capture an equivalent amount of carbon emissions to offset their own environmental impact.

8. Partnerships and Certifications: Collaborations with environmental organizations and industry partnerships help SFO stay at the forefront of sustainability practices. Certifications such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) may be pursued for new construction or major renovations.

San Francisco International Airport

Energy-Efficient Buildings Implementation in San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) has demonstrated a commitment to sustainability by implementing energy-efficient building practices. 

Key aspects of this implementation include:

1. Technology Integration: SFO incorporates advanced technologies and design strategies in its buildings to enhance energy efficiency. This includes efficient lighting systems, HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) solutions, and smart building management systems.

2. LEED Certification: SFO may pursue LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification for its new constructions or major renovations. LEED certification signifies a high level of environmentally conscious building practices, covering energy efficiency, water conservation, and overall sustainability.

3. Green Design Principles: The airport likely follows green building principles in its construction projects, emphasizing sustainable materials, energy conservation, and environmentally responsible practices.

4. Renewable Energy Integration: In addition to energy-efficient measures, SFO may integrate renewable energy sources, such as solar panels, on or around its buildings to further reduce its environmental impact.

5. Collaboration and Partnerships: SFO may collaborate with energy experts, architects, and sustainability consultants to implement cutting-edge practices in energy-efficient building design.

6. Continuous Improvement: The airport is likely committed to continuous improvement in energy efficiency, regularly evaluating and updating its buildings to align with the latest advancements in green building technology.

San Francisco International Airport

Green Design Principles in San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) incorporates green design principles in its infrastructure projects, emphasizing sustainable and environmentally responsible practices. 

Key elements of green design at SFO include:

1. Energy Efficiency: Buildings and facilities at SFO are likely designed to maximize energy efficiency, utilizing technologies such as energy-efficient lighting, HVAC systems, and insulation to minimize energy consumption.

2. Renewable Energy Integration: Green design principles may involve the integration of renewable energy sources, such as solar panels, to generate clean and sustainable power for the airport’s operations.

3. Water Conservation: SFO likely incorporates water-efficient technologies and practices, such as low-flow fixtures and efficient irrigation systems, to minimize water usage and promote responsible water management.

4. Sustainable Materials: The airport likely prioritizes the use of environmentally friendly and sustainable materials in construction and renovation projects, minimizing the environmental impact of its infrastructure.

5. Waste Reduction and Recycling: Green design involves strategies to reduce waste generation and promote recycling. SFO likely implements waste reduction programs, diverting materials away from landfills.

6. Natural Lighting and Ventilation: Design principles may emphasize the incorporation of natural lighting and ventilation to reduce the need for artificial lighting and air conditioning, contributing to energy savings.

7. Landscaping for Sustainability: Landscaping practices at SFO may follow sustainable principles, including the use of native plants, efficient irrigation, and green spaces that enhance the overall environmental impact of the airport.

8. LEED Certification: SFO may pursue LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification for its buildings, which sets standards for environmentally sustainable construction.

These principles collectively contribute to SFO’s commitment to sustainability and align with broader efforts to minimize the airport’s ecological footprint. 

San Francisco International Airport

Sustainability Certifications for San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) has been proactive in obtaining sustainability certifications that demonstrate its commitment to environmental responsibility. 

Some relevant certifications may include:

1. LEED Certification: SFO may pursue LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification for its buildings and infrastructure projects. LEED is a widely recognized green building certification that considers factors such as energy efficiency, water conservation, and sustainable materials.

2. Airport Carbon Accreditation: This program, initiated by Airports Council International (ACI), assesses and recognizes airports’ efforts to manage and reduce their carbon emissions. SFO might participate in this accreditation to showcase its commitment to carbon reduction.

3. ISO 14001 Certification: ISO 14001 is an international standard for environmental management systems. It involves a systematic approach to environmental management and could indicate SFO’s commitment to minimizing its environmental impact.

4. Green Business Certification: SFO may pursue local or regional green business certifications, demonstrating adherence to environmentally friendly practices in its day-to-day operations.

5. Sustainability Reports: While not a certification, SFO may regularly publish sustainability reports outlining its environmental initiatives, achievements, and goals. These reports provide transparency and accountability in the airport’s sustainability efforts.

San Francisco International Airport

Carbon Offset Programs in San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) may offer carbon offset programs as part of its sustainability initiatives. Carbon offset programs allow travelers to compensate for their flight-related carbon emissions by investing in projects that reduce or capture an equivalent amount of carbon elsewhere. 

Key points related to carbon offset programs at SFO may include:

1. Voluntary Participation: SFO’s carbon offset program is likely voluntary, giving passengers the option to participate in mitigating the environmental impact of their air travel.

2. Project Types: The airport may collaborate with environmental organizations to support a variety of carbon offset projects. These projects could include renewable energy initiatives, reforestation efforts, or methane capture programs.

3. Financial Contributions: Travelers interested in offsetting their carbon footprint may make financial contributions at designated points within the airport or through online platforms. The funds are then directed towards verified carbon reduction projects.

4. Awareness Campaigns: SFO may run awareness campaigns to inform passengers about the carbon offset program, emphasizing the importance of sustainable travel practices.

5. Tracking and Reporting: The airport may track and report on the success and impact of its carbon offset program, ensuring transparency and accountability in environmental initiatives.

San Francisco International Airport

Renewable Energy Integration in San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) has demonstrated a commitment to renewable energy integration as part of its sustainability initiatives. 

Key aspects include:

1. Solar Power Installations: SFO has implemented solar power systems across various facilities, including parking structures and terminal buildings. These solar installations contribute to the generation of clean and renewable energy.

2. Energy-Efficient Technologies: The airport incorporates advanced energy-efficient technologies in its infrastructure to optimize energy consumption. This includes efficient lighting, HVAC systems, and other technologies designed to reduce overall energy demand.

3. Renewable Energy Procurement: SFO may engage in renewable energy procurement agreements, sourcing a portion of its energy from renewable sources such as wind or solar farms. This helps reduce reliance on traditional energy sources and lowers the carbon footprint of the airport’s operations.

4. Partnerships with Renewable Energy Providers: Collaborations with renewable energy providers and initiatives may play a role in sourcing and integrating renewable energy into the airport’s energy portfolio.

5. Innovative Projects: SFO may explore innovative projects to harness renewable energy, potentially utilizing its infrastructure for energy generation while maintaining functionality and safety standards.

6. Carbon Reduction Goals: Renewable energy integration aligns with SFO’s broader sustainability goals, contributing to efforts to reduce carbon emissions and environmental impact.

San Francisco International Airport

Commercial Activity in San Francisco International Airport, USA

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is a major hub with a vibrant commercial environment offering a range of services and amenities for travelers.

Key aspects of commercial activity at SFO include:

1. Diverse Retail Outlets: SFO features a variety of retail options, including duty-free shops, luxury boutiques, and souvenir stores. Travelers can find a wide range of products, from electronics to clothing and local specialties.

2. Dining Options: The airport offers diverse dining choices, including restaurants, cafes, and fast-food outlets. Passengers can enjoy a mix of international cuisine and local flavors while waiting for their flights.

3. Lounge Services: SFO provides lounges for various airlines and premium passengers, offering amenities such as comfortable seating, Wi-Fi, refreshments, and business services.

4. Rental Car Services: Travelers have access to rental car services, allowing for convenient transportation upon arrival at their destination.

5. Airport Hotels: SFO may have on-site hotels or nearby accommodations, providing convenience for passengers with layovers or early departures.

6. Transportation Services: Commercial activities extend to transportation services, including taxis, rideshare services, shuttles, and public transit options, facilitating easy connectivity to and from the aaaiu

7. Business and Conference Facilities: SFO may offer business and conference facilities, providing spaces for meetings, conferences, and other business-related activities.

8. Art Installations: The airport’s commercial environment often includes art installations and exhibitions, showcasing local and international artists and contributing to the cultural atmosphere of the airport.

These commercial activities collectively enhance the overall travel experience for passengers at San Francisco International Airport, making it a dynamic and well-equipped hub. 

San Francisco International Airport

Conclusion for Exploring Sustainability in San Francisco International Airport

San Francisco International Airport (SFO) stands as a notable exemplar of sustainability in the aviation industry. 

Through a comprehensive approach, SFO has implemented various initiatives to minimize its environmental impact and promote responsible practices. From renewable energy integration, energy-efficient buildings, and waste reduction programs to the commitment to green design principles, the airport is dedicated to balancing growth with environmental responsibility.

SFO’s emphasis on sustainability extends beyond infrastructure to include commercial activities, with diverse retail, dining, and service offerings designed to enhance the traveler experience. The airport’s commitment to renewable energy, coupled with its support for carbon offset programs, reflects a holistic approach to environmental stewardship.

As a vital transportation hub in the San Francisco Bay Area, SFO not only connects people worldwide but also serves as a model for how airports can embrace sustainability without compromising operational efficiency. Continued innovation and collaboration with environmental organizations position SFO as a leader in the pursuit of a greener and more sustainable future for air travel.

https://www.exaputra.com/2023/11/exploring-sustainability-in-san.html

Renewable Energy

Vestas Shares Jump 20%, UK Blocks Ming Yang Factory

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Vestas Shares Jump 20%, UK Blocks Ming Yang Factory

Vestas doubles second quarter profit and adds €4.7 billion in market value overnight. Plus EnBW finishes He Dreiht after a V236 blade break, the UK blocks Ming Yang’s Scottish factory, and India rules turbines are movable goods.

The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast is brought to you by Weather Guard Lightning Tech, creators of the StrikeTape Ultra LPS retrofit. Subscribe to Uptime’s Substack newsletter. And check out Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” Youtube channel. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

The Uptime Wind Energy podcast, brought to you by StrikeTape. Protecting thousands of wind turbines from lightning damage worldwide. Visit StrikeTape.com. And now, your hosts

Allen Hall: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall, and I’m here with Rosemary Barnes, Matthew Stead, and Yolanda Padron. And three out of the four of us will be in Melbourne Australia talking to a number of operators and interested parties about WOMA 2027. Matthew, where will we be the couple of days we’re in Melbourne?

Matthew Stead: So, um, first of all, we’ve got the Pullman, uh, East Melbourne, which is, uh, where the venue will be for, for 2027. Um, so that’ll be our home base. Um, we’ve got around about eight meetings planned already. So what we’re doing is we’re talking to the operators and a few other industry, um, players about [00:01:00] what we need to talk about, how we’re gonna move the industry forward in Australia.

Uh, so it’s gonna be jam-packed, but there’s a little bit of time left on the Friday afternoon if there’s any late-minute, um, people that wanna get in contact and catch up with us, um, for next Thursday, Friday, or actually Friday. Uh, so yeah, it’s gonna be a, a jam-packed time. I think we’re gonna be tired, too many coffees, and talking to all the key, all the key operators, uh, about what they wanna hear about and how we can move the, the industry forward.

Allen Hall: And if someone wants to put an input into the WOMA panel about what will be discussed at WOMA 2027, Matthew, how would they do that? How do they get ahold of you?

Matthew Stead: Well, we have a wonderful website, and that’s got all the details you could ever want. Um, you can also register on the website, so please register.

Otherwise, um, I’m sure we’re gonna be a sellout this year for sure. So woma2027.com.

Rosemary Barnes: I just wanna add that when people talk to [00:02:00] me about the event, they always say how they love that the topics are so relevant, and the reason why that they’re so relevant is because we make sure to go around to operators and find out what are the issues that they’re really dealing with.

So anybody that’s thinking of attending, even if you can’t, you know, meet us up, meet up with us in Melbourne, get in touch and tell us what are the, yeah, what are the topics that you’re struggling with that you’re not, um, you’re having trouble finding enough information, having trouble finding the people that can help you.

And y- yeah, like we take all of that information, and that’s how we come up with our agenda each year. And yeah, I mean, for us, that’s the, the main thing is that this has to be really relevant, up-to-date information for the industry, and we need your help to make sure it stays that way. I

Matthew Stead: mean, that’s what we’ve done the last two years, so this is– we’re just repeating the formula, um, listening to the operators and getting the good topics and the good speakers.

Allen Hall: Well, Vestas has had a good quarter. Uh, the, for the last couple of years, honestly, s- [00:03:00] Vestas has been really thin on margins. There was questions about it continuing on. Rising costs mostly, uh, supply chains, especially during COVID, were bad. Uh, and, uh, but for the most part, the shareholders stayed attached.

Well, that story is changing rapidly. The world’s largest turbine maker posted second quarter operating profits of $400- €46 million, more than double what the analysts had expected, and it’s raised its full-year margin guidance alongside half-year results for the first time in a decade. The shares climbed about 20% in Copenhagen, adding roughly €4.7 billion of market value in a single session.

Now, the chief executive, uh, Henrik Andersen, ha- put it plainly to, uh, uh, in a couple of news sources that something much bigger is happening and Vestas is gonna be the, the leader in wind. That’s how I read it, that everybody [00:04:00]at Vestas was super happy with the, the change in direction and things were moving up steadily.

But a 20% jump in a day is remarkable. You don’t see that in large industrial businesses like wind energy. Matthew, this has real implications on what happens next for Vestas because success like this usually means more orders.

Matthew Stead: Yeah, I wonder what’s going on under the hood there. Um, I mean, Vestas is a quality company, although, although can I just do a quick segue?

How many turbines were installed in Denmark in the last, uh, two years? Like last year and the year before?

Allen Hall: I don’t know. How many?

Matthew Stead: I believe it was eight turbines installed onshore in Denmark last year, and the year before it was 12. So, you know, maybe, maybe Vestas needs to focus on their own backyard a little bit as well.

Allen Hall: I’m not sure there’s a lot of opportunity there. Yeah, onshore.

Matthew Stead: How can you ever be full? I mean, there’s always, um, [00:05:00] uh, you know, um, you know, resiting or, um, you know, upgrades and-

Rosemary Barnes: You know what? Allen and I are probably gonna get some time in Jutland, uh, later this year, um, and that area and the old wind turbines there was actually the inspiration for my whole YouTube channel.

It just, ’cause there’s, you know, there’s turbines there from, the earliest one is, um, from the ’70s and still going. I think it’s one and a half megawatts, actually huge for, for that time. Um, and it was like community made, um, at Tvind. But anyway, I’m interested to revisit the site and have a look and see are these, you know, all these old turbines still there.

It’s only, like six years since I went through and did the experience but for the most part, they don’t seem to be yet pulling down the, the small old ones and putting up big ones. There’s a lot of, a lot of them are community owned. Um, and yeah, I mean, Danish people love wind turbines, but there’s only so many that you can have onshore.

Like, people are happy to live near them by, you know, the standards of people in other countries, but you don’t want [00:06:00] one in your literal backyard. I think that there is, there, there is a, a limit to how many more onshore wind turbines that you can get in that area and offshore expansion is the more likely way to go.

Um, and also I think it’s, it’s, it’s good to recognize that if you have a domestic only or a domestic first strategy, that will only get you so far and then you have to expand, and I think Denmark did that really well. I think Germany a little bit less. I think that Enercon were a bit surprised, um, by their strategy.

It, uh, they had a real hard time anyway when they had to transition away from mostly Germany to getting overseas. And obviously, like if you look at China, they have most of their installations are in China. They are trying so hard to get outside of China because it’s not, like even a market as big as China, it’s got decades to go before it will be full.

Um, you can still recognize that that’s not your, like long-term strategy for growth has to involve expansion, I think.

Allen Hall: I think Vestas, regardless of what happens in Denmark, is making a play for the United States. That seems to be [00:07:00] where a significant effort is happening at the moment and on offshore. Their– Vestas seems very excited about the offshore opportunities.

Of course, there’s a ton of wind turbines gonna be installed in the UK and, and all around Northern Europe. Offshore, the opportunities to buy turbines, there’s only a couple that you could get today. Uh, uh, the GE Vernova offerings I, I don’t think are gonna fit the mold, and I don’t know if GE’s even actively selling.

So their competitor realistically is Siemens Gamesa, which does seem like the smaller player at the minute versus Vestas, which is heavily pushing the V236 and will fill order books like crazy, I think, uh, just based upon the, the history they’ve had and everybody knowing who they are. So Also on the move in Australia, right?

Vestas is huge in Australia right now.

Rosemary Barnes: I think it’s really good that their, um, yeah, finances, uh, are [00:08:00] looking a bit better ’cause it’s been funny. Like, I tried early on in my wind career to invest in, you know, wind turbine manufacturers knowing that there would be immense growth, and I was right. There, there was immense growth.

Not that that was so hard to figure out that there would be, but it did not lead to any kind of, um, return on, on anything, you know. Like, that did not keep pace with the just general market. Um, so I, I stopped trying to, stopped trying to invest to that. But it has been really, really hard for the companies to, you know, raise money or y- you know, do any of the things that they need to do because they’ve always, like, they’re growing, growing, growing, but finances has been so tight that it has been a real constraint on the amount of engineering that they could do, and I really hope that Vestas are gonna take this opportunity that they’ve got compared to, you know, a lot of the other manufacturers.

Vestas do have really strong, um, innovation and, yeah, engineering capabilities for doing– you know, developing new technologies and improving them, and I really hope that they’re taking this opportunity to build that up. There are a lot [00:09:00] of very good engineers with a lot of experience in the industry in that area that are working in other fields at the moment because, you know, there’s been a lot of contraction in Denmark.

So I don’t know, it seems like a really good time to hire back some of that really in-depth knowledge and, yeah, get a- get ahead of, you know, some of the future quality problems. We’re going through such a hard time at the moment from the fast development that happened in the 20-teens when there wasn’t a whole lot of money around.

We’re dealing with quality problems now, so, you know, maybe we can get ahead and not have the next round of them if we can invest in just a lot more, uh, engineering capacity.

Allen Hall: When you have success like Vestas has, usually the upper level management and some of the executive team starts getting pilfered, that they’ll get offers to repeat that success at another company, and it sounds like that process has started already.

There’s a couple of executives that have recently departing or are in the midst of departing from Vestas. [00:10:00] I would see that continuing f- at least for the next six months, uh, because everybody wants to repeat that, right? If you can get a 20% increase in your valuation overnight, uh, I can, I can list a number of companies, regardless of industry, that would love to participate.

Even in a 5% increase, that would be remarkable. So, um, Vestas is gonna have a hard time holding onto this. That’s just the nature of the business where things are successful, people will wander. And Rosemary, I, I think they’re– And Yolanda In, in my book, Vestas should sort of s-stand down and just make quality products.

I’m not sure you sh-should tinker too much at the time being and just make the good stuff better. That seems like a way to really increase profits.

Yolanda Padron: Yeah, I mean, solving a lot of the issues that– And, and that’s not just a Vestas exclusive thing, right? All of these OEMs have some sort of issue that maybe– I know Rosie’s touched a lot on, on it, where [00:11:00] you build this version A and then version B solves one of the small little issues, but now it creates another little problem, and then you have version C, and then everything just kinda has its own niche little issue, um, that really expands over time.

So if they could solidify what they already have in, in a, in a model that, that would help them just even keep a lot of their customers, I think that’d be great, and it would help, certainly help them, um, not continuously, like, rotate around the customers, ’cause it almost feels like, at least in the States, right, you, you get GE to be really, really strong and have a huge market share, and then GE starts focusing more on gas turbines, so then they all go onto Vestas, and then they all go onto Ontara now.

Um, and then just, you know, just kind of everybody starts cycling through them because they just kind of want something that’s better quality than what they’re getting in the long haul.

Matthew Stead: Allen, you, you talked about you think there’s something big under the hood. I think you, you [00:12:00] thought that maybe Vestas was angling towards something or being quite bullish.

Do you think that they might take over GE Vernova?

Allen Hall: I don’t think they’re gonna grab Vernova, and I don’t think Vernova is for sale at the minute, but I wonder if Siemens Gamesa is, or Nordex. I mean, Nordex has done terrific the last couple of quarters and is making inroads in places that I didn’t think possible three, four years ago.

Uh, the European marketplace is be- becoming really unique in that sense that there’s a lot of money being put out. But is there a sole perfect solution for Europe? Not at the minute, ’cause you got two competitors there, and then China trying to, to work its way in. Will the Europeans come together and form something more united, even if it’s just a partnership, a loose partnership, versus letting China on the shores?

We’ll see. 64 of the largest machines that Vestas has builds are standing off the German coast, but one blade is missing a [00:13:00] piece. We’ll talk about that when we come back.

Speaker: Are you overspending on lightning repairs? Most operators are because solving lightning damage is complicated. Weather Guard Lightning Tech helps operators reduce lightning damage. Our innovative StrikeTape lightning diverter protects over twenty thousand blades worldwide. Now, StrikeTape Ultra installs faster than ever.

StrikeTape Ultra cures uptower in just fifteen minutes, even in cold weather. Visit weatherguardwind.com to schedule a call.

Allen Hall: Well, Germany’s largest offshore wind farm is now fully installed, and EnBW confirmed this, uh, past week that all 64 of the Vestas V236 15-megawatt turbines are s- standing at the He Dreiht wind farm about 85 kilometers northwest of Borkum. Uh, 960 megawatts, [00:14:00] 2.4 billion euros invested. Man, these offshore projects are expensive to get installed.

Uh, so it’s power for roughly 1.1 million households, and there’s no state subsidy behind any of it. And so this is a little bit of a u- unique situation. Uh, th- well, the one footnote about the wind farm is they had a V236 blade break and fall into the North Sea, and they had fished it out and I think I passed along s- pictures that I saw online of, uh, one of the police boats pulling the shear web out of the water I don’t know what to think anymore about some of these offshore blade issues.

Obviously, Vestas is very conscientious about it and will be doing RCAs and engineering reviews and all the above to go identify what the problem is. But it does just lead to a little bit of a pause of do– what is going on for some of these offshore [00:15:00] wind blade installations or, or whatever’s causing these blades to break?

Do we have a good handle on it? Yolanda, is– are we following up on all the design details so that we can prevent these things in the future?

Yolanda Padron: I mean, I’d, I’d hope you’d be following up on the design, right? Like, and, um, but I think there is still a little bit of a disconnect from, from what we’ve seen, and again, not just Vestas exclusive, um, between the people who are designing and the people who are manufacturing, the people who are in operations, right?

So, uh- The, from what we’ve heard, uh, this could have potentially been a, um, partially because of a transportation issue, which is what happens a lot in onshore. It’s a lot more common than we would like it to be. Um, and so that even goes beyond what would go on in the design studio and what would go on in the manufacturing and what would [00:16:00] go on even just for the people that are running the site, right?

So, so some sort of, um, in between, uh, EPC error. Um, but yeah, I just think that, like in a lot of industries, there should be a lot more communication between all of these teams on the lower level, so that way a lot of these problems can, can be avoided.

Allen Hall: I’m wondering if it’s actually an issue on the, the testing side.

And, uh, the one question that just popped up, and we saw from the ORE Catapult, uh, survey that’s being conducted at the moment, and if you haven’t participated in that, you just visit ORE Catapult and answer some of the survey questions. But torsion on a blade, which is very difficult to test for, and it really isn’t tested for today, but does happen during the move and the transportation of these big offshore blades.

Is it one area that we need to do a little more work in or maybe spend some more time focusing on it to see what is happening as blades are [00:17:00]moved?

Rosemary Barnes: The thing about te- torsion is that it is much more significant as blades get longer. I can’t, I can’t remember the equation off the top of my head, which is, um, bothering me.

But I think it scales with, like, the fourth power or something of, of length. And so whilst it was always a bit of a problem, it’s much more of a problem as it gets, as blades get bigger. I mean, they’ve never, like, fully tested a blade, and there was always a lot of reliance on, hey, y- you know, like we’ve tested certain things that is possible to test in a test facility on the ground.

But they also rely on their decades of experience of how blades actually behave in the field. But, you know, remember, that’s a real lagging, lagging indicator because y- you know, their decades of experience is mostly with lots smaller blades. Now, blades are really different because they’re longer and different effects are, are taking over.

It’s not just, uh, torsion, but it’s also the laminates get much thicker, and then y- you know, you, you have issues with the way that they’re curing, [00:18:00] and there’s a lot more just space for, um, defects to be present in a really thick laminate All of those things add up. Oh, yeah, then add in addition, like new materials, carbon fiber is new, and then new ways of producing it, you know, pultrusions, um, all kinds of different materials like balsa’s being replaced with foams and, um, like, you know, 10 times that number of what sounds like a small innovation, but all of these things have the potential for damage and don’t have a really long track record in the field to be able to kind of calibrate.

We do need to remember that, like, when you do something new, things are gonna break, uh, sometimes, they’re gonna fail sometimes. If they don’t, then you’re definitely being too conservative, and your product is costing more than it should, and nobody wants more expensive wind energy, right?

Matthew Stead: Rosie, Rosie, I, I know you’re doing some, some excellent work on, um, industry studies around erosion and temperature and so forth.

Um, I just wanted to let a little secret out of the bag that, um, in the future there will also be some [00:19:00] other studies on torsion and blade twist and blade dynamics. So, um, just a few things are in, in train at the moment, which I can’t share, share, but, uh, watch this space around better understanding blade twist.

Allen Hall: The Hydride wind farm runs on European turbines, but the next one might not. Two governments with two very different answers on who gets to build Europe’s wind fleet.

Delamination and bondline failures in blades are difficult problems to detect early. These hidden issues can cost you millions in repairs and lost energy production. CIC NDT are specialists to detect these critical flaws before they become expensive burdens. Their nondestructive test technology penetrates deep into blade materials to find voids and cracks traditional inspections completely miss.

CIC NDT maps every critical defect, delivers actionable [00:20:00] reports, and provides support to get your blades back in service. So visit cicndt.com because catching blade problems early will save you millions

Well, two countries and two decisions, one question. In Scotland, the UK government blocked plans for the Chinese manufacturer Mingyang to build a turbine factory, uh, near Inverness on national security grounds. 1.5 billion pounds of investment, up to about 1,500 jobs. And First Minister John Swinney has asked the new prime minister to reconsider.

And the UK energy secretary minister called that request irresponsible. Meanwhile, up in Denmark, Vattenfall has just won two offshore wind farms and will not say whether it will buy European turbines. Danish suppliers are not taking that quietly. So [00:21:00] the Scotland question about the Mingyang factory is at least being discussed again with the new prime minister in the UK.

It does seem like there’s a lot to do and get the government formed and make all this stuff happen. But I don’t see a Burnham administration changing the outcome for Mingyang, but I could be wrong. At the, the same time, Vestas is pushing for a more Eurocentric focus and to really keep out the Chinese.

Uh, something has to give here pretty soon.

Matthew Stead: I actually think Mingyang should, um, set up a factory in Scotland. I, I mean, what’s wrong with that? I mean, uh, why is that a security issue?

Rosemary Barnes: Set up the factory and put the, like, whatever you’re worried about, put protections in place for it, require it to be a local joint venture or whatever.

You know, we’ve seen the blueprint in many of what used to be, you know, less rich countries. That’s how they, you know, got a head start on some of these technologies. It’s not like, I don’t think that China [00:22:00] has a head start on wind, wind turbine technology, but they certainly have different ways of doing things that, um, yeah, we could, we could learn from.

But I think across the board, wind turbines, batteries, solar panels, whatever, let them set up factories, put the rules in place that mean that your country benefits from it and you’re getting the, you know, the information transfer.

Yolanda Padron: Do you think that’ll, like, impulse a lot of these more established European companies to maybe start fixing some of the issues that they’ve known about for, for a while, um, particularly regarding the blades and everything that we’ve talked about earlier?

Like, there’s enough competition there, so maybe they need to start looking a little bit more deeply into their problems.

Allen Hall: Do we think that Chinese operations have been out front, forward, honest, I’ll even use, about their blade issues?

Rosemary Barnes: No, but this is a good way to find out, isn’t it?

Allen Hall: Governments decide who is allowed to build a turbine after a discussion on Scotland.

Uh, but, but [00:23:00] occasionally, a court decides what a turbine legally is. India has just settled that question, and the reasoning should be of interest to anybody who ships machines across a border right after this. As wind energy professionals, staying informed is crucial and let’s face it, difficult. That’s why the Uptime Podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine.

PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high-quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit peswind.com today. A tax fight in India has produced a definition every turbine supplier should read.

Is a wind turbine bolted to a concrete foundation movable goods, or is it immovable property? State tax authorities argued immovable, which would have [00:24:00] taxed erection and commissioning contracts at 18% instead of 5%. The Andhra Pradesh, uh, High Court disagreed, and on the 12th of August, the Supreme Court declined to interfere.

The reasoning rests on something this whole industry takes for granted. A turbine can be taken down, moved, and put back up. So a turbine is a movable object, and it has less taxation. Bonus. So this is a really interesting discussion that’s happening in India because it’s probably symptomatic of things we’re seeing elsewhere across the world about taxation for wind turbines, right?

That, um, if there’s a way to tax a wind turbine, we’re gonna try to do it. This is a unique way, uh, that happens in India where depending on if it’s permanent or movable, the tax rates are different. I, I guess that would apply to a lot of components inside a wind turbine too, Matthew, don’t you? Like the, the generator, the, the big heavy things, [00:25:00] gearbox, generator, blades, rotors, tower sections, would be taxed at a, a lesser rate.

Matthew Stead: I agree with the court case that it’s all movable and, uh, you can actually buy turbines on the secondhand market, can’t you? I mean, if I wanted to buy, yeah, whatever, whatever, I could buy one and, and put it up in my backyard if I had a bigger backyard. Um, so yeah, I vote for movable. I vote for lower taxes.

Yolanda Padron: The way that it would work a lot of times in the US is, I mean, it’s, you pay, the company itself pays a lot less than they would’ve over time, right? Just by pure, the, the regular kind of tax laws. Um, but the community, there’d be just direct donations to the community, so then they’d get, uh, like money would actually come into the community where the turbines were being built instead of just distributed around the state, which I mean, in a state as big as Texas, it gets, um, but easier for that c- um, that county to get a lot more, uh, funding than they would typically get if it was [00:26:00] through a big enough area.

Um, but yeah, no, I agr- I completely agree with you guys that, that this should be a movable good. I mean, how many times have we seen, uh, even just a blade, um, that it looks like it’s, uh, just a, a failed blade that they have to go in and replace, and then they take it out, fix it, and then just bring it back to the same site or take it to another site across the country.

And, and to that point, like if you were to h- judge it as something that’s immovable, would then any blade replacement just not be taxed? Because then it’s, you’re moving that one component and two, but it’s essentially the same turbine. Like, I don’t know how that all would make sense.

Allen Hall: I think the Uptime Supreme Court agrees with the Indian Supreme Court that wind turbines are movable, and that’s good.

Well, that wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy podcast. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas, we’d love to hear from you. [00:27:00] Reach out to us on LinkedIn. And if you found value in today’s conversation, please leave us a review. It really helps other wind energy professionals discover the show.

And don’t forget to subscribe so you never miss an episode. For Rosa, Yolanda, and Matthew, I’m Allen Hall. We’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy podcast.

Vestas Shares Jump 20%, UK Blocks Ming Yang Factory

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Vermont and Florida: A Key Difference

Published

on

Can’t swear that the story here is authentic, but it sure rings true.

Vermont is a somewhat quirky state, but it protects its citizens very well. FWIW, this is where I want MY tax dollars going too.

Florida is a deeply red state that, true to form, wants as much ignorance as it can possibly produce. Educated people aren’t voting for people like Ron Desantis.

Vermont and Florida: A Key Difference

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Republicans: Will This Work?

Published

on

The GOP is asking American voters to believe that “radical left Democrat extremists” are leading the country into socialism/communism. They’re hoping that this fear will outweigh the electorate’s understanding of the damage that Trump, with help of congressional Republicans, is inflicting on this nation in the form of the war in Iran, destroyed relations with allies, inflation, shoddy education, environmental collapse, and threats to Social Security and Medicare.

As we all know, the rate at which a lie becomes accepted as true is a function of the frequency that it is repeated.  And God knows, we see this crap about communism every time we turn around.

But this looks like an unwinnable battle.  Virtually no one wants to abandon free enterprise.  Moreover, Trump’s abysmal polling numbers reflect the fact that is largely despised as a criminal–the most corrupt figure in U.S. history.

How would you like to be campaigning to retired baby boomers on the platform that we cannot afford Social Security any longer, because we’ve siphoned off huge amounts of money, like our president’s “vanity war,” with only further downside in sight, that is costing $1 billion a day?

Republicans: Will This Work?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com