Equinor announced that its Empire Wind 1 offshore wind project in the United States has secured a financing package exceeding $3 billion. A financial close was reached in December 2024 that bolstered the company’s renewable energy initiative. Empire Wind 1 will provide clean energy to 500,000 homes in New York after being fully operational in 2027.
Jens Økland, acting executive vice president for Renewables in Equinor noted,
“This is an important milestone for Equinor, in line with our plan to enhance value and reduce exposure in the Empire Wind 1 project. As we now enter full execution mode, we continue our efforts to increase robustness and value-creation in the project.”
Equinor Powers Up New York’s Green Future
Equinor further revealed that the total capital investment for Empire Wind 1 is $5 billion, inclusive of fees related to the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal (SBMT). The investments rely on future tax credits (ITCs) to strengthen financial viability. Construction has already begun on the 80,000-acre project that is located 15-30 miles southeast of Long Island.
Moving on, the company finalized the project’s investment decision earlier in 2024 and has planned to farm down its stake in Empire Wind 1 to a new partner. This strategy aims to enhance project value while minimizing risk exposure.
Additionally, Equinor executed a 25-year Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) in June 2024. Under this agreement, power will be supplied at a strike price of $155 per megawatt-hour to ensure stable revenue flow for the project.
Job Creation and Economic Impact
Empire Wind 1 will significantly boost local employment and infrastructure. The redevelopment of the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal as a state-of-the-art offshore wind hub will support over 1,000 union jobs during the construction phase.
On completion, the terminal will serve as the project’s operations and maintenance hub. It will also house the onshore substation connecting Empire Wind 1 to the New York City grid. This arrangement will make Empire Wind 1 the first offshore wind project to integrate directly into the city’s power network.
Molly Morris, senior vice president for Renewables in Equinor Americas said,
“Today’s financial close maintains our momentum toward bringing a significant source of power to the grid. Empire Wind 1 will strengthen US energy security, build economic growth and fuel a new American supply chain. Our redevelopment of the South Brooklyn Marine Terminal is already putting more than 1,000 people to work. Equinor is proud to play a part in advancing domestic energy solutions safely, efficiently, and for the long term.”
Strong Financial Backing
The financing package for Empire Wind 1 reflects strong lender confidence in the project’s viability. Furthermore, leading financial institutions showed keen interest that helped in achieving competitive terms.
The press release also mentioned that the final group of lenders included some of the most experienced players in the renewable energy sector, as well as several of Equinor’s long-standing banking partners.
Empire Wind Supporting New York’s Renewable Energy Goals
New York State has set ambitious renewable energy targets, and Equinor’s offshore wind projects are playing a pivotal role here. Empire Wind is being developed in two phases: Empire Wind 1 and Empire Wind 2. While Empire Wind 1 has a contracted capacity of 810 MW, Empire Wind 2 has the potential to generate 1,260 MW. Together, the two projects are expected to supply clean energy to more than one million homes.
Empire Wind 2 is currently being re-evaluated for future solicitations. Meanwhile, Empire Wind 1’s first power delivery is anticipated in the mid-2020s which will further advance New York’s transition to renewable energy.
History of Empire Wind
- 2017: Equinor acquired the Empire Wind lease area after the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s auction in December 2016.
- 2020: BP acquired a 50% stake in Equinor’s Empire Wind and Beacon Wind assets for $1.1 billion.
- 2022: Equinor signed an agreement to transform South Brooklyn Marine Terminal (SBMT) into a premier offshore wind hub.
- April 2024: Equinor assumed full ownership of Empire Wind projects, while BP took over the Beacon Wind assets, through a cash-neutral transaction.
- June 2024: Equinor secured the PSA with New York State for a 25-year power supply agreement at $155/MWh.

Source: Equinor: Empire Wind
South Brooklyn Marine Terminal: A Game-Changer for Offshore Wind
The South Brooklyn Marine Terminal is set to become the largest dedicated offshore wind port facility in the U.S. This redevelopment underscores Equinor’s commitment to fostering local economic growth and advancing renewable energy infrastructure.
The terminal will handle staging, pre-assembly, and long-term maintenance operations for Empire Wind 1. This will certainly solidify its support for New York’s clean energy transformation goals.
Future Prospects for the U.S. Offshore Wind Energy
NYSERDA President and CEO Doreen M. Harris noted in the earlier press release,
“Major renewable energy infrastructure projects such as Empire Wind 1 are a crucial component in reaching toward New York’s climate goals. NYSERDA applauds Equinor for its ongoing commitment to investing in New York’s green economy, including the redevelopment of South Brooklyn Marine Terminal, and helping to stand-up New York’s offshore wind industry one significant milestone at a time.”
Thus, Equinor’s investment in Empire Wind aligns with the U.S. offshore wind industry’s growing momentum. The project’s integration into the New York City grid highlights its importance in meeting urban energy demands sustainably. By harnessing strong wind resources off Long Island’s coast, Empire Wind 1 is taking a huge step to decarbonize the energy sector.
Source: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Offshore Wind Market Report
With a reliable financing backup and proper construction plans, Empire Wind 1 is all set to deliver renewable energy to New York. Equinor is hopeful that the project’s success could lead by example for future offshore wind initiatives across the U.S.
- INTERESTING: Gone with the Wind: Is This the End for Wind Energy?
The post Equinor’s $3B Financing Deal for Empire Wind 1 Project: A Turning Point for U.S. Offshore Wind? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

