Colgate-Palmolive’s latest earnings show that it is delivering steady financial performance while adapting to a changing global economy. Beyond the numbers, the results also point to how the company is preparing for a lower-carbon future. This opens the door for a closer look at its net-zero goals, emissions cuts, and long-term climate strategy.
Earnings Snapshot: What the Numbers Say
Colgate‑Palmolive reported its fourth quarter and full-year 2025 results on January 30, 2026. Q4 adjusted earnings were $0.95 per share, above the $0.91 expected. Net sales reached $5.23 billion, up 5.8% from last year. Organic sales rose 2.2%, showing steady growth in oral care and pet nutrition.
For the full year, net sales were about $20.38 billion, up 1.4% from 2024. GAAP diluted EPS was $2.63, while base business EPS grew 3% to $3.69. Gross profit margins stayed above 60%. Operating cash flow hit $4.2 billion, and free cash flow before dividends was about $3.6 billion. The company returned roughly $2.9 billion to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks.

Management expects 2–6% net sales growth in 2026, despite consumer spending pressures. These results show Colgate’s core businesses remain strong while supporting its long-term climate strategy. Following the results, Colgate’s stock price rose sharply, reflecting positive investor reaction.

These financial results are a great way to see how Colgate balances its business performance with its long-term climate strategy.
The Road to Net Zero: Colgate’s Climate Blueprint
Colgate-Palmolive has a detailed climate strategy that guides how it plans to reduce emissions and reach net zero. The company’s climate plan follows the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) Net Zero Carbon Standard. This ensures that its emissions targets align with limiting global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels.
Colgate’s long-term goal is to achieve net-zero carbon emissions across its full value chain by 2040. This means the company aims to reduce emissions as much as possible and balance any remaining emissions with removals by that year.

The company’s climate commitment covers a broad range of emission sources, including:
- Scope 1: Direct emissions from fuels and combustion sources under the company’s control.
- Scope 2: Indirect emissions from purchased electricity for operations.
- Scope 3: Upstream emissions such as purchased goods and services, capital goods, logistics, business travel, employee commuting, and leased assets. The strategy excludes only certain optional Scope 3 categories per the SBTi Net Zero Standard.
Targets That Matter: From 2025 to 2040
Colgate aims to reduce emissions with targets for both the near term (2025 and 2030) and a long-term net-zero plan.
-
By 2025:
- Reduce Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions in operations by 20% versus a 2020 baseline.
- Reduce Scope 3 emissions from purchased goods and services by 20% versus a 2020 baseline.
- Reduce GHG emissions from consumer use of products by 20% versus a 2016 baseline.
- Reduce manufacturing energy intensity by 25% versus a 2010 baseline.
-
By 2030:
- Reach 100% renewable electricity across global operations.
- Reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 42% versus 2020 levels.
- Reduce Scope 3 emissions from purchased goods and services by 42% versus 2020 levels.
-
By 2040:
- Achieve Net Zero carbon emissions across Scope 1, Scope 2, and most Scope 3 categories.
- Reduce Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions* by 90% from a 2020 baseline (*excludes certain Scope 3 categories per SBTi Net Zero Standard).
Colgate’s climate plan breaks down the net-zero effort into key areas: product design, manufacturing, logistics, and business operations. This way, responsibility is shared among teams.

In addition to targets, the plan highlights the distribution of Colgate’s carbon footprint based on its 2024 Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 data. Most of the footprint comes from using and disposing of products, followed by supplier sourcing. This shows how important it is to involve suppliers and customers in cutting emissions.
These numbers and goals show that Colgate has set measurable, science-based climate targets and continues to develop strategies to reach them. The consumer giant aligns its climate strategy with well-known frameworks like the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). This adds transparency to how it evaluates climate risks and opportunities.
Where Emissions Come From, and Why It Matters
Colgate has taken steps toward achieving its emissions goals. The company is focusing on all areas, operations, factories, warehouses, and offices, to cut energy use and lower supply chain emissions.
Renewable Electricity and Energy Projects
Colgate plans to reach 100% renewable electricity by 2030. It has started investing in renewable energy projects, including virtual power purchase agreements for wind energy in Europe. These agreements are expected to meet a large part of the region’s electricity needs. This change helps lower emissions from power used at factory sites and main offices.
Supply Chain Engagement
Colgate recognizes that most of its emissions come from its supply chain and purchased goods. The company engages with suppliers to reduce emissions, improve energy efficiency, and support the use of low-carbon materials and processes. This includes encouraging suppliers to set their own science-based climate targets.
Operational Reductions
The consumer product firm aims to reduce energy use and emissions by 2025 and 2030. It seeks to cut energy intensity at factories and lower emissions from purchased goods. The company also reports progress against these goals in annual sustainability reports.
So far, the consumer giant has achieved the following milestones in tackling its climate footprint:

Beyond Carbon: Packaging, Plastics, and Water
Colgate also addresses environmental impacts beyond carbon emissions. The company has clear goals for packaging and resource use:
- Transition all plastic packaging to recyclable, reusable, or compostable materials by 2025.
- Improve water stewardship and reduce waste in operations.
- Achieve zero-waste operations at all manufacturing sites.
- Target net zero water impact at water-stressed sites by 2025 and across all sites by 2030.
By the end of 2024, about 93% of Colgate’s packaging was recyclable, reusable, or compostable. The company now uses recyclable toothpaste tubes in over 70 countries. It has also boosted the share of sustainable tubes in key markets.
Source: Colgate-Palmolive
Colgate’s Climate Actions Going Forward
Colgate’s climate goals are part of a broader strategy that links environmental sustainability with business performance. The company’s net-zero by 2040 goal shows a long-term focus on reducing emissions across its entire value chain.
Progress follows science-based benchmarks. The company updates its targets to align with changing climate science standards. Colgate faces challenges with indirect emissions from suppliers and products. Still, its targets and actions show a clear path for future reductions.
The sustainability strategy also helps with other goals. These include waste reduction, water conservation, and better packaging. In these areas, measurable progress boosts Colgate’s environmental profile. For example, high recyclable packaging rates play a key role.
Investors, customers, and community partners are increasingly watching how companies like Colgate balance growth with climate action. Colgate’s earnings and environmental efforts show how it stays competitive and supports its long-term climate goals.
- READ MORE:
The post Colgate-Palmolive’s 2025 Earnings: Solid Profits and Clear Path to Net Zero by 2040 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story
Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.
For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.
As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.
A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use
Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.
That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.
The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.
When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls
Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.
Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.
This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.
Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter
Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.
A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.
Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.
The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.
Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies
Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:
- Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
- Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
- Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.
These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.
- MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold
Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System
Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.
This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.
On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.
In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.
Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future
Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.
Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.
Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.
As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.
The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.
The post Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up
The post LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Chanel Reveals First Climate Transition Plan: How the Luxury Giant Aims to Hit Net-Zero
Chanel has unveiled its first comprehensive climate transition plan, charting a clear path to net-zero emissions by 2040. Building on its earlier “Mission 1.5°” strategy, the plan aligns with global climate standards and follows the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means Chanel must reduce at least 90% of its emissions and remove the remainder.
The move shows a bigger change in luxury brands. They face more pressure from investors, regulators, and customers to take real climate action. Many companies now publish detailed transition plans to show how they intend to meet their net-zero commitments.
For Chanel, climate considerations are no longer immaterial—they now inform core business decisions, from risk management to opportunity assessment.
Breaking Down Chanel’s 1M Tonnes Carbon Footprint
In its Climate Transition Plan, Chanel reported total emissions of about 1.12 million tonnes of CO₂e in 2024. Most of these emissions do not come from its own stores or offices. Instead, they come from its supply chain.
- Scope 1 and 2 emissions: 2% of total (about 24,071 tonnes)
- Scope 3 emissions: 98% of total (about 1.1 million tonnes)

This shows a key challenge. Like many fashion brands, Chanel’s biggest impact is upstream. That includes raw materials, manufacturing, and logistics. The largest source is purchased goods and services, which account for over 626,000 tonnes of CO₂e.
Other major sources include:
- Capital goods: about 222,000 tonnes
- Transport and distribution: over 114,000 tonnes
- Business travel: over 53,000 tonnes
These figures highlight how complex the fashion supply chain is. It also shows why cutting emissions is harder than in other sectors.
Clear Targets: 2030 and 2040 Milestones

Chanel has set both near-term and long-term net-zero targets to tackle its carbon footprint. By 2030, the company aims to:
- Cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50%, and cut Scope 3 emissions by 42%.
By 2040, the goal is deeper:
- Cut all emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3) by 90%, and remove the remaining emissions through carbon removals.
Specific targets also cover land-based emissions associated with raw materials like leather and cashmere, with reductions of 30.3% by 2030 and 72% by 2040.
Importantly, Chanel does not rely on carbon offset credits to meet its targets. Instead, it focuses on real emissions cuts. This aligns with stricter global standards. Many frameworks now limit the use of offsets in net-zero plans.
Progress So Far: Renewable Energy and Supply Chain Improvements
The French luxury brand has already achieved measurable progress. Direct emissions have fallen 22% since 2021, driven primarily by the use of renewable energy. By 2024, 99% of the company’s electricity came from renewable sources, and the goal is to reach 100% by 2025.

Long-term power purchase agreements, including solar projects across Asia and Europe, have supported this transition.
Scope 3 emissions have also improved, declining 10% relative to 2021. Raw material emissions dropped 20% in 2024, thanks to changes in sourcing and the adoption of lower-impact inputs such as sustainable leather and cashmere.
How Chanel Plans to Cut Emissions and Reach Net Zero
The company’s strategy to tackle its emissions focuses on six main areas:
- optimizing operations,
- adopting lower-impact materials and packaging,
- implementing sustainable design in construction and events,
- shifting to low-emission logistics,
- promoting electric mobility, and
- engaging closely with suppliers.
Since Scope 3 emissions dominate the total footprint, supplier engagement is crucial.

Innovation also plays a key role. Chanel supports initiatives that reduce energy consumption in manufacturing, such as a project that lowered energy use by 27% at a supplier site. Circular design is another focus, with investments in repair services and durable products to extend product life.
Beyond Emissions: Climate Investment and Social Impact
Chanel’s climate plan extends beyond emissions reductions. The company invests in nature and climate projects, including the LEAF Coalition for forest protection, sustainable agriculture programs, and community-based climate initiatives.
In 2024, Chanel committed $125 million to Fondation Chanel, part of which funds women-led climate programs, tying environmental action to social impact. This approach embodies a “just transition,” ensuring that climate action also benefits workers and communities.
The Luxury Sector Shifts: Chanel Sets the Bar for Fashion
Chanel’s plan reflects a wider shift in the fashion and luxury sector. The industry faces growing pressure to act on climate. Fashion accounts for an estimated 2% to 8% of global emissions, based on various global studies.

Supply chains are complex and global, making change harder. At the same time, regulations are tightening. New rules in Europe and other regions require companies to disclose emissions and transition plans.
Many brands are now setting net-zero targets. But not all have detailed plans. Chanel’s transition plan stands out because it includes:
- Full emissions data
- Clear reduction targets
- A roadmap for action
Still, challenges remain. Cutting Scope 3 emissions is difficult. It depends on suppliers, technology, and costs. There is also a risk of slow progress. New materials, clean energy, and circular systems take time to scale.
Looking Ahead: A Long Road to Net-Zero
Chanel’s transition plan represents a significant step in addressing over 1 million tonnes of emissions. Progress in operations and energy use is evident, but the supply chain remains the most difficult hurdle.
Achieving net-zero by 2040 will require transforming material sourcing, deep collaboration with suppliers, and investment in new technologies.
As consumer demand for low-carbon products grows and investors increasingly scrutinize climate risks, transition plans have become a business imperative. Chanel’s strategy highlights a key trend: climate action is no longer a peripheral responsibility—it is integral to growth, risk management, and long-term value creation.
The post Chanel Reveals First Climate Transition Plan: How the Luxury Giant Aims to Hit Net-Zero appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy2 years ago
GAF Energy Completes Construction of Second Manufacturing Facility







