Welcome to Carbon Brief’s China Briefing.
China Briefing handpicks and explains the most important climate and energy stories from China over the past fortnight. Subscribe for free here.
Key developments
China released draft of long-awaited Energy Law
FULL TEXT: The latest draft of China’s long-awaited Energy Law has been issued for public comment following approval by China’s top legislative body, the National People’s Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC), economic newswire Jiemian reported, in an analysis of the text. The law, which was initially drafted in 2005, will likely be “considered at three [NPCSC] meetings before being put to a [final] vote”, the outlet said, which means it could be formally enacted “within the year”.

PRIORITISING RENEWABLES: Jiemian added that the law “clearly supports prioritising the development of renewable energy; rational development of clean and efficient use of fossil energy; and orderly promotion of non-fossil fuel energy instead of fossil fuel energy and low-carbon energy instead of high-carbon energy”. Chinese energy news site International Energy Net noted that the draft law calls on the state to “establish a mechanism to promote green energy consumption and encourage energy users to prioritise using renewable energy and other clean and low-carbon energy sources”. Elsewhere, Chen Xinghua, associate professor at North China University of Technology and deputy secretary-general of the China Law Society’s energy law research group, told China Environment News that, until now, the “development of the energy industry…has relied more on dividends from reform of the energy system”. He added that a unified Energy Law is “urgently needed” to resolve the “intricate and complex” interests of various stakeholders, as well as the challenges of a modern energy system and meeting China’s carbon neutrality goals.
LONG ROAD: The Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post said that the law “has been [on] one of the longest [journeys] for any piece of Chinese legislation”. It quoted an unnamed Tsinghua University law professor attributing the delays to staunch resistance from energy sector stakeholders, who “lobbied extensively” to “[try] to hold onto their territory”. The professor speculated that this resistance may have been broken by president Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign.
Leaders and targets plot ‘realistic’ path
2024 TARGET: The Ministry of Environment and Ecology (MEE) is aiming for carbon emissions per unit of GDP – also known as carbon intensity – to fall by 3.9% in 2024, according to state broadcaster CCTV. Previous Carbon Brief analysis found that carbon intensity would need to fall by 7% per year to meet China’s 2025 climate commitments. This was echoed by consultancy Trivium China, which said in a recent newsletter that the target for 2024 “isn’t enough to get China emissions intensity reductions back on track”.
-
Sign up to Carbon Brief’s free “China Briefing” email newsletter. All you need to know about the latest developments relating to China and climate change. Sent to your inbox every Thursday.
‘BE REALISTIC’: Meanwhile, Chinese president Xi Jinping called on policymakers to both “be realistic, by not slowing the pace of green and low-carbon development, and not be too idealistic, above all guaranteeing energy supply”, International Energy Net reported. At a technology-focused forum in Beijing, National Energy Administration director Zhang Jianhua said China would “lead the innovation of the clean energy industry…further strengthen the foundation of energy security [and] continue to improve the scale and quality of non-fossil energy supply”, according to state news agency Xinhua.
COAL CAPACITY: Following an announcement that China will establish a coal production capacity reserve system by 2027, Xinhua published an analysis stating that the move will allow China to “quickly release reserve capacity in extreme situations, such as fluctuations in the international energy market, instances of severe weather and [other] drastic changes to supply and demand”. It added that this measure was not intended “to significantly increase coal production capacity”. (Read more in Carbon Brief’s China Briefing from 18 April).
US-China methane cooperation continued
BLINKEN TRIP: With US secretary of state Anthony Blinken visiting Beijing last week, the “two superpowers continued dialogue to manage a growing list of differences”, reported Bloomberg. Citing a Chinese foreign ministry statement, the outlet said Xi told Blinken that “China and the US should be partners rather than rivals”. The Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi also told Blinken that China “urged” the US “not to interfere in China’s internal affairs, not to hold China’s development back, and not to step on China’s red lines on China’s sovereignty, security, and development interests”, according to a report from the Associated Press. Blinken responded by saying that “the Biden administration places a premium on” the bilateral dialogue even “on issues of dispute”, according to the newswire.
EASIER FUTURE?: Despite several areas of disagreement, the Communist party-affiliated newspaper People’s Daily mentioned the two sides reached an agreement on further “cooperation” on climate change. China Environment published an announcement by the MEE that a US-China climate action working group held a virtual meeting, at which they pledged to “strengthen communication” and cooperation on controlling methane emissions. Meanwhile, China enacted a tariff law during Blinken’s visit to strengthen China’s “trade defence capabilities”, Reuters reported. The outlet said the law was passed amid US and EU industrial “overcapacity” concerns and outlines “a range of legal provisions related to tariffs on Chinese imports and exports”. It quoted Henry Gao, a professor at Singapore Management University, who described the law as “a nuclear weapon” to show the US and EU “that this is our prerogative: If you’re going to hit us with tariffs, we can do the same”.
Chinese climate envoy announced US visit
MAY VISIT: In an interview with Bloomberg, China’s climate envoy Liu Zhenmin announced that he plans to visit the US in May for his first formal face-to-face meeting with US counterpart John Podesta. Liu stated that China aims to “extend cooperation on issues including energy, the circular economy and efforts to curb greenhouse gases beyond carbon dioxide”. He added that the US and China “have to cooperate as far as possible” on climate, and that the two nations “also need to respect each other on all issues”. Another Bloomberg article on the Liu interview said: “Efforts by the US and Europe to stem China’s dominance in green technologies risk stalling the fight against global warming, according to [Liu].”
‘DIFFERENT LENS’: Elsewhere, Liu raised four challenges to global resilience at a forum hosted by the thinktank Center for China and Globalisation. Notably, he listed these challenges in the following order: geopolitical conflicts; setbacks to economic globalisation; climate change; and unease around artificial intelligence. In an earlier article, the Diplomat had suggested that Liu – given his Ministry of Foreign Affairs background – may see climate “more as a lever in China’s overall diplomatic strategy, rather than a critical, standalone issue to address”.
Spotlight
Media reaction: Guangdong flooding and the role of climate change
Guangdong province in southern China has been pounded by heavy rains since 19 April, causing flooding that has left at least four dead and seen more than 110,000 people evacuated.
Guangdong is China’s most populous province and an economic powerhouse driving China’s manufacturing industry and exports.
In this issue, Carbon Brief examines the impact of climate change on the flooding and the response from Chinese and international media.
How has flooding affected Guangdong?
“Intense” rainstorms began in the northern and western regions of Guangdong province on 19 April, with the ensuing rainfall breaking records for the month, according to the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post (SCMP).
Originally, floodwaters from the Bei River, a major tributary of the Pearl River, were expected to peak on 22 April, the newspaper added.
The heavy rainstorms continued, however, and by 28 April three separate floods had been recorded, according to the Communist party-affiliated People’s Daily and regional newspaper Southern Daily.
On 30 April, state broadcaster CGTN announced that China issued a severe weather warning for further torrential rain, thunderstorms, gales and hail for parts of Guangdong, as well as five other provinces.
Four people were reported dead and 10 missing during the initial flood, BBC News said, adding that at least 110,000 people were evacuated.
The worst-hit areas included the provincial capital Guangzhou – home to almost 19 million people – as well as the cities of Zhaoqing, Shaoguan, Qingyuan, Jiangmen, Huizhou and Heyuan, according to various media outlets.
Guangzhou Daily reported that the provincial government announced a relief fund of 90m yuan ($12.4m) to be used to recover from the damage caused by the flood.
Meanwhile, Chinese vice-premier Zhang Guoqing and Guangdong governor Wang Weizhong both called on local governments to improve monitoring of extreme weather, the China Daily and Southern Daily reported.
In addition to the floods, CNN reported that a tornado, which appeared after “multiple days of heavy rains”, killed “at least five people” in Guangzhou on 27 April.
On 1 May, the collapse of a highway near Meizhou city in Guangdong killed at least 48 people, the Associated Press reported, adding that ongoing torrential rainfall was hampering rescue efforts.
Separate Associated Press coverage noted that heavy rains “pose a special risk to mountain roadways and highway bridges”, although an official cause of the accident had not yet been established.
Is climate change a contributor to the flooding?
While the Pearl River delta is prone to summer flooding, the rains this year were unusually early, according to Reuters.
Agence France-Presse reported that Yin Zhijie, chief hydrology forecaster at the Chinese Ministry of Water Resources, told state-run China National Radio that “intensifying climate change” raised the likelihood of early heavy rains.
Xu Xiaofeng, executive vice-chairman of the Chinese government’s China Meteorological Work Development Advisory Committee and president of the China Meteorological Services Association, told economic newswire Jiemian that recent warm and humid currents in the north-west Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean have created significant water vapour in southern China, contributing to the rainfall.
According to the outlet, Xu said: “Recent record-breaking precipitation…occurred precisely against the backdrop of global warming.”
The outlet also quoted another expert, Zhang Qiang from the Gansu Meteorological Administration, saying heavy and abnormal rainfall in the region is becoming “a normal phenomenon” due to the influence of global warming.
While there is, as yet, no formal “attribution” study of whether the flooding was made worse by human-caused global warming, one rapid analysis found that the “somewhat uncommon event” was “exacerbated” by both human-caused climate change and natural variability.
It concluded that weather systems similar to those that caused the floods are 8-12% wetter over Guangdong province in the present climate than they were in the past.
Previous Carbon Brief analysis has also identified a number of attribution studies that have quantified the influence of climate change on flooding in southern China.
For example, record-breaking rainfall in the June-July period of 2020 was found by one study to be more than five times more likely in the present-day climate – “80% of which can be attributed to climate change”.
How has the Chinese media responded?
While most local media coverage focused on individual stories and local responses, several Chinese media outlets have pointed to links between the floods and climate change.
In its reporting, China Daily cited a China Meteorological Administration (CMA) interview with Chinese Academy of Engineering member Ding Yihui, who said: “The world has entered a new phase of climate change, which is characterised by an increased frequency of extreme weather events, resulting in the occurrences of sudden climate and weather-related disasters.”
The municipal newspaper Guangzhou Daily made a connection with extreme rainfall in Dubai and quoted Zhang Xingying, deputy director of the CMA’s science, technology and climate change department, saying that, due to “global warming and El Niño”, China will see more extreme weather, including floods, in 2024.
“Chinese and foreign scientists”, the Guangzhou Daily article said, “remind us that new features of extreme weather and climate events are emerging globally.”
It added that “our generation will witness more and more extreme weather…All we can do now is leave a better future for future generations.”
On 28 April, the Guangzhou Daily also reposted an article by Shanghai-based newspaper the Paper, in which China Academy of Meteorological Sciences scholar Sun Shao argued that “recent extreme weather events are closely linked to climate change”.
Sun said that, in the face of this challenge, the international community must strengthen global cooperation to combat climate change.
Meanwhile, an SCMP editorial said that both the flooding and an emerging drought in nearby hydropower-producing Yunnan province, “illustrate just how critical the climate-change issue is – not just for China but globally”.
It added: “While the flooding is a reminder to be prepared for sudden climate-linked extreme events, including fires and violent storms, the drought is a wake-up call about longer term consequences for the climate of failure to rein in carbon emissions.”
Watch, read, listen
2035 NDC: Project Syndicate published an article by the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Li Shuo and Lauri Myllyvirta about how setting ambitious commitments in its “nationally determined contribution” (NDC) for 2035 could both spur China’s energy transition and boost its profile as a climate leader.
GLOBAL COMPETITION: The substack High Capacity explored the “paradox” of how several Chinese clean-energy technology industries were able to overtake competitors in Germany, despite Germany’s significant industrial advantages.
JUST TRANSITION: Dialogue Earth reported on the need for China to give “higher priority to a just transition” in coal-producing provinces such as Inner Mongolia and Shanxi.
NAVIGATING OVERCAPACITY: Bloomberg: The China Show interviewed a representative of polysilicon producer GCL Technology on how the industry survives cycles of overcapacity.
23
The amount of battery storage capacity added in China in 2023, in gigawatts, according to a new report by the International Energy Agency. This was triple the amount added in 2022, according to the report, and accounted for 55% of global growth.
New science
Co-production of steel and chemicals to mitigate hard-to-abate carbon emissions
Nature Chemical Engineering
New research examined how co-producing steel and chemicals in China could mitigate greenhouse gases and lower costs. The study found that co-production, by itself, would cut greenhouse gas emissions for the steel and chemical sectors by 36m tonnes of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2e, 7%) and reduce costs by 1.5bn yuan ($21m, 1%), compared to independent production. However, it found that if a carbon price of 350 yuan ($48) per tonne of CO2 were enacted in addition to co-production, emissions would drop by 113 MtCO2e (22%) and costs by 25.5bn yuan ($3.5bn, 10%).
Increased harvested carbon of cropland in China
Environmental Research Letters
A new study collected statistical data on crop production for ten crop types in China from 1981 to 2020 to assess trends in carbon stored in harvested crops, which “significantly [influence] the carbon budget of the cropland ecosystem”. It revealed that harvested crop carbon increased from 0.185 gigatonnes (Gt) of carbon in 1981 to 0.423Gt in 2020. It also found that the average annual removal of carbon sink capacity through harvesting crops totalled 0.32Gt of carbon, which it said was greater than the net carbon sink of China’s entire terrestrial ecosystem – “substantially impact[ing]” calculations of China’s carbon budget.
Large methane mitigation potential through prioritised closure of gas-rich coal mines
Nature Climate Change
Methane emissions from China’s abandoned coal mines have been underestimated, according to a new study. The authors constructed a “coal mine database” to estimate China’s coal methane emissions between 2011 and 2019, and calculated future emissions based on different mine closure policies. They estimated that by 2035, abandoned mines will be China’s largest sources of coal methane emissions – larger than emissions from active coal mines. The authors also developed a “coal mine closure strategy”, which they say could “reduce cumulative methane emissions by 67m tonnes (26%) to 2050, potentially reaching 100m tonnes (39%) with improved methane recovery and utilisation practices”.
China Briefing is compiled by Wanyuan Song and Anika Patel. It is edited by Wanyuan Song and Dr Simon Evans. Please send tips and feedback to china@carbonbrief.org
The post China Briefing 2 May: Energy Law draft; 3.9% carbon intensity target; Guangdong floods appeared first on Carbon Brief.
China Briefing 2 May: Energy Law draft; 3.9% carbon intensity target; Guangdong floods
Climate Change
Marine Parks Explained
Australia’s network of marine parks is the largest in the world, covering more than half (52%) of Australia’s Commonwealth waters. You could be forgiven for assuming that a marine park is much like a national park on land: a highly protected place where people can enjoy nature while conservation efforts help habitats recover and wildlife thrive. You wouldn’t expect someone to bulldoze a national park, so why should they be allowed to bottom trawl in a marine park?
The reality is that not all marine parks are equally protected. Australia’s Marine Parks Network is divided into different zoning categories, with each zone determining which activities are permitted and the level of protection provided.
More than half of the Commonwealth Marine Parks Network allows industrial activities like oil and gas mining, and industrial fishing.
Our survival, and the survival of our planet, depends on the ocean. The ocean produces more oxygen than all of our forests combined, sustains communities and regulates the earth’s temperature. It’s home to wondrous wildlife and important ecosystems like coral reefs and kelp forests.
We love our big blue backyard
Australia’s ocean is teeming with life that is found nowhere else on earth. Schools of colourful fish, vibrant coral reefs, endemic shark nurseries, pods of dolphins, families of whales, playful seal pups and threatened Jurassic-era turtles call Australian waters home.
Since time began, from the turquoise waves to the deep blue, the ocean has connected our shorelines and communities, fed us, guided us and grounded us. We are intrinsically connected to our big blue backyard – more than 85% of us live within 50km of the shoreline. For tens of thousands of years, people have lived in harmony with the ocean and the wildlife within it, caring for and being sustained by its rich waters. Australia’s waters are some of the most unique and abundant places on Earth but our Marine Parks Network is falling short to properly protect them.
Australia’s marine parks aren’t living up to their name

The Australian Commonwealth Marine Parks Network covers commonwealth waters 5.5km from the coast. The network is divided into 7 regional management areas, overall the network contains 60 marine parks. Zoning types determine what activities are allowed in each area. Over half of the network allows industrial activities, risking our most precious and threatened ocean wildlife.
Within many of our marine parks, destructive industries are allowed to fish, trawl, dig and mine using barbaric and cruel methods. Here are some of the zones explained:
- Bottom Trawling: Special Purpose (trawl) zones allow bottom trawling. This covers 10 marine parks totalling almost 13 million hectares. Bottom trawlers bulldoze the seafloor with weighted nets, deforesting our underwater forests; a cruel, indiscriminate and inefficient way to fish.
- Other Industrial Fishing: Includes “Habitat Protection Zones, ““Multi Use Zones” and “Special Purpose Zones.” Fishing methods vary from park to park but many marine parks in these zones allow industrial fishing like longlining. Longlining involves setting lines that can be 100km long, bristling with deadly hooks designed to catch a specific fish species. But longlining is not a selective method of fishing – significant numbers of sharks, rays, turtles, dolphins and seabirds can be harmed or killed as bycatch in the process.
- Oil and Gas Mining: Many “Special Purpose” and “Multi Use” zones allow seismic blasting and oil and gas mining. 30 marine parks or 65 million hectares of Australia’s highest conservation value areas for ocean wildlife are open for mining and exploration of oil and gas.
- Ocean Sanctuaries: National Park and Sanctuary zones are fully and highly protected marine parks designed to conserve wildlife and their habitat, where fishing, mining, and other industrial activities are not allowed.
Industrial fishing is one of the biggest threats to the ocean

In May, Greenpeace Australia Pacific sailed our campaigning vessel Oceania through some of Australia’s most beautiful and threatened marine parks. Our crew visited Jervis and Hunter marine parks to document their beauty, showcase what’s at risk and aim to expose the industrial fishing activities in these protected waters. Both of these marine parks allow bottom trawling and longlining methods of industrial fishing.
Industrial fishing is ripping the ocean apart across the planet. Longlining, also known as longline fishing, is an industrial fishing method that involves the use of a fishing line with thousands of baited hooks. These fishing lines can stretch over 100 kilometers in length and are set to capture a fish species, often tuna or billfish species. But it is not a selective method of fishing and often results in significant bycatch. This includes a range of non-target species like sharks, rays, sea turtles, marine mammals, and seabirds which are often injured or killed as bycatch.
Bottom trawling involves dragging heavy weighted nets along the ocean floor. This fishing method is popular with commercial fishing companies, because it makes it easy to catch large quantities of fish in one go. But it also damages the seafloor, releasing carbon and can kill or injure non-target ocean life like coral, fur seals, dolphins and seabirds. You may have watched the reality of bottom trawling (and the benefits of ocean sanctuaries) in Ocean with David Attenborough, if not, add it to your watch list!
Fully protected ocean sanctuaries that ban industrial fishing and mining can protect ocean wildlife and underwater wonderlands for generations to come. Vast, robust sanctuaries create blue havens where ocean wildlife are safe from nets and hooks, and can truly rest, recover, thrive and replenish out into the surrounding waters. Ocean sanctuaries ensure a healthy ocean full of life.
A once-in-a-decade chance to fix what’s falling short
We have a unique opportunity to turn the tide.
The Australian Government is asking for your feedback on how our Commonwealth Marine Parks Network is managed. This is our once-in-a-decade chance to protect ocean wildlife, ban industrial fishing and create more ocean sanctuaries.
As part of the review the Government is asking for submissions from the public to hear from you on what improvements are needed to better protect our vast network of marine parks. Writing a submission is a powerful way to influence government decisions and create real change.
This is the moment to ban industrial activities like bottom trawling and oil and gas mining. But only if they hear from YOU. Add your name!
Greenpeace is calling on the Australian government to:
1. Ban industrial activities from Australia’s Marine Parks Network: Ban industrial activities, such as industrial fishing, seismic blasting and oil and gas mining, from Australia’s marine parks.
2. Create more ocean sanctuaries: Increase fully protected sanctuaries in Australia’s marine parks based on science principles.
3. Connect Australia’s Marine Parks Network to the High Seas: mCreate seascape connectivity by linking Australian marine parks to new high seas ocean sanctuaries.
References
Substantiation that more than half of the Marine Parks Network permits industrial activity comes from a peer-reviewed systematic literature review (Phillips et al. 2025, PLOS One, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307324). The study found that within the Commonwealth Marine Parks Network specifically, “all zones are considered partially protected areas, meaning areas where extractive activities are permitted, except ‘Pink zones’ (Preservation Zones; IUCN Ia) and ‘Green Zones’ (IUCN II).” In other words, every Commonwealth marine park zone type other than the network’s strict no-take sanctuary and national park zones (IUCN Ia and II) permits some form of extractive industrial activity. Since no-take zones are the minority zone type across the network by area, this supports the conclusion that the majority of the network’s area is zoned to permit industrial activity.
DCCEEW Australian Marine Parks spatial dataset (https://fed.dcceew.gov.au/datasets/erin::australian-marine-parks/explore), filtered by zone type. This confirms that 38.43% of the network’s area is zoned as Sanctuary or National Park zones (IUCN Ia and II). These are the no-take categories excluded from the peer-reviewed study’s definition of partially protected/industrial-permitting zones. The remaining 61.57% of the network falls within the zone categories the study classifies as permitting industrial activity (per The MPA Guide definition of “industrial” applied in Phillips et al. 2025), directly corroborating the peer-reviewed finding with current Commonwealth-specific spatial data.
For further information on activities permitted within the Marine Parks Network Zoning, you can refer to the Management Plans zoning and rules for each Marine Parks Network area, for example: Temperate East, Coral Sea, North.
Climate Change
Report: Trawling the Bottom Line
A new report from Greenpeace Australia Pacific advocates for the closure of bottom trawling in Australia’s Commonwealth Marine Parks Network. Bottom trawling continues to be a pervasive threat to ocean life in Australia, with 10 marine parks totalling almost 13 million hectares, allowing bottom trawling.
Australia’s network of marine parks, which is the biggest in the world, covers more than half (52%) of Australia’s Commonwealth domestic waters, but not all parks are created equal. Australia’s Marine Parks Network is divided into different zoning categories, with each zone determining which activities are permitted and the level of protection provided. More than half of the Marine Parks Network allow industrial activities like industrial fishing and oil and gas mining. This includes zoning types that allow destructive fishing by longliners and bottom trawlers, who pillage underwater wonderlands, rip up coral and indiscriminately and violently catch any animal in their path, including turtles, seals and dolphins, all within areas labelled a marine park.
The Federal government has commenced a review into the majority of Australia’s Commonwealth Marine Parks Network management plans. This presents an opportunity to ban industrial activities from our marine parks and create more ocean sanctuaries.

Climate Change
Sewing and Painting the Future

© Harriet Spark / Grumpy Turtle Film / Greenpeace
The banner drop is a distinctive part of the Greenpeace repertoire.
The moment of the unfolding is intrinsically dramatic. It is the reveal; when the moral and scientific truth of a situation is unveiled to the world. The wrong is being labelled—not through a written submission, or a social media post, or a statement in a meeting—but in words emblazoned in real physical space, chosen and occupied with precision, for all to see. There is jeopardy and transgression. And there are consequences—for the activists and for Greenpeace, as well as for the target of the communication. One of the reasons the banner remains such an effective tool in our toolbox is because of its undeniable clarity in cutting through, driving change and accountability in a way that few other tactics can. It is naming the wrong: in giant, clear letters.
We’ve hung these massive messages at environmental crime scenes, corporate headquarters, and iconic landmarks; on government buildings, ships and planes—in locations all around the world, for years.
My own memories unfurl even as I write this, but because the campaign to stop Woodside at Scott Reef is so pressing, what immediately springs to mind are two of our banners in that campaign: one on a crane outside their Perth HQ, and another on some of their corroding industrial junk at sea. What about you? Is there a particular banner that you picture when you think of Greenpeace?
The banners can attract global attention, but they have quiet beginnings. Each one is made by hand, often by volunteers. It is the invisible labour behind each spectacular public moment. One of the key pieces of equipment in our workshop at Rainbow Warrior House is the sewing machine. Sometimes our workshop is full of people and noise; at others it is quiet, the only sound being the gentle, purposeful, whir and buzz of a banner being sewn. It is usually our warehouse manager, Kieran Holmes, on the tools, head over the machine, carefully pouring over the raw canvas or tarp as the banner takes shape. Kieran’s one of those people who seems to be able to turn his hand to almost anything, but you wouldn’t know it because he’s old-school modest. In addition to being incredibly skilled, Kieran’s an all-round beaut human to have in the heart of our headquarters; never too busy to take the time to show a newcomer, or curious visitor, around his domain.
Once the banner is sewn up, the lettering needs to be outlined. This is done on a magnetic wall—a fit-for-purpose feature at Rainbow Warrior House, where the banner is held up with magnets, and the edges of the letters neatly traced from a projection.
Next comes the painting. It usually starts late in the afternoon, sometimes going into evenings and weekends, with volunteers, staff, mates crowded around, brushes in hand. It is a calming meditative feeling of shared purpose, giving each letter its visual heft, the colour building power and presence with each stroke.
Then you stand back, stretch, and look at the message, now ready.
S A V E S C O T T R E E F
Throughout history, every great push for social change has required some form of invisible labour; preparation in the form of quiet things seldom seen, but vital. It is the enabling work of love instantiated in action. And of course, so much of the time it has been women who have done this labour, so that the men could get the chance to make the speeches and stand on the podiums. The inaugural Greenpeace voyage to stop nuclear testing in 1971 had a male-only crew, but wouldn’t have happened without the ideas and work of women behind the scenes.
It is what we do together, after all, that changes the world. Sometimes that work happens on a stage, a ship on the wild seas, or up the side of a building. But mostly, it is the hidden diligence of those who care and contribute to all the enabling work that makes a change once thought impossible, inevitable. It is Kieran at his sewing machine. It was Dorothy Stowe doing the administrative work of the ‘Don’t Make A Wave Committee’ that became Greenpeace.
When we think of social change, it is the sturm and drang that we remember. The drop of the banner, the chant of the crowd, the raising of the new flag. But look behind the curtain, and there’ll be a crew of people who are taking responsibility for the administration, the sewing and the painting, making the food, checking the bus timetables, getting stuff done. And behind them are even more handsinvisibly donating time and trust; the financial, material and expert resources that make it all possible. There’s love, camaraderie and know-how at every stage.
We are social and cooperative creatures by nature. And we human beings have been stitching for millenia, sewing the possibilities of our common future. Political and corporate bullies and algorithmically manipulative platforms would have us forget this, and abandon who we are. But we should be in no doubt that the brighter prospects for ourselves and life on earth continue to be stitched and painted; collaboratively and with love, by the diligent hands of millions of people who care, each day, in every community and city across the world.
With Love,
David
Q & A
I always get great questions when interviewing prospective new team members. One that came up again recently was: “Is Greenpeace actually one organisation?”
Around the world, people know Greenpeace by our one global name, united by a shared mission: securing an Earth capable of nurturing life in all its magnificent diversity, with a particular focus on climate and biodiversity. Behind the scenes, though, we’re organised as a network of 25 legally autonomous national and regional offices, including Greenpeace Australia Pacific, working alongside Greenpeace International.
That structure gives us the best of both worlds: we work together leveraging the power of a global network on the issues that matter most, while each office remains legally independent and deeply connected to the communities, cultures and political realities where we’re embedded. Local knowledge informs global action, and global collaboration strengthens and supports local campaigns.
It’s a model that has enabled Greenpeace to take on some of the world’s biggest challenges for over five decades–while withstanding challenges and attacks from governments and corporations. Global enough to tackle global problems, local enough to understand our communities and the natural places we love.
If you’re curious to learn more, you can read about the Greenpeace Global Network structure here.
-
Climate Change12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy10 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits


