Connect with us

Published

on

Welcome to Carbon Brief’s China Briefing.

China Briefing handpicks and explains the most important climate and energy stories from China over the past fortnight. Subscribe for free here.

Key developments

Climate on agenda at post-two sessions forums

‘UNWAVERING’ ON CLIMATE: “China will “unwaveringly” follow a low-carbon pathway, said environment vice-minister Li Gao at the China Development Forum (CDF) – a high-level and business-focused event traditionally held after China’s two sessions – according to business news outlet China Economic Times. Wang Jinsong, deputy director of the National Energy Administration, said China’s energy system will feature both “multi-energy” sources and “risk resilience”, reported industry news outlet BJX News. Liu Shijin, advisor at the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development said China must develop “accountability mechanisms” and “quantitative” emissions reduction targets, said finance news outlet Sina Finance. CDF attendees included Chinese premier Li Qiang, Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) head Huang Runqiu and National Development and Reform Commission chairman Zheng Shanjie, according to CDF organisers.

‘DEAL WITH IT’: Regarding international tensions over Chinese industrial exports, Bloomberg quoted Premier Li saying “we take our trading partners’ concerns seriously”, adding China has made “positive progress” in tackling the intense competition plaguing several industries, including clean-energy technologies. Nevertheless, consultancy Trivium China said in a note that the broad message at CDF was: “Yes, we’ve got an export-oriented growth model. Deal with it.”

上微信关注《碳简报》

IRAN IMPETUS: Meanwhile, Chinese climate envoy Liu Zhenmin attended the Bo’ao Forum for Asia in Hainan province, where he told Bloomberg that he “expects” the US will return to the Paris Agreement after the Trump administration. He added that the Middle East conflict will “definitely” not cause an oil or gas crisis in China, but had “convinced the government, at all levels, to speed up the energy transition”. (See Spotlight below.)

KOREA COOPERATION: The Bo’ao forum, a high-level platform for policymakers, business leaders and academics often compared to Davos, also featured a China-South Korea climate roundtable, where China Daily quoted former UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon calling for climate solutions that “transcend borders”. A few days earlier, China and South Korea held their first climate dialogue in seven years, said the World Korea, where talks included this year’s COP31 climate talks in Turkey, renewable energy and carbon markets.

Sinopec says cleantech pushed down profits in 2025

PRE-IRAN SQUEEZE: All of China’s three-largest oil and gas companies saw profits fall in 2025, with Sinopec seeing a 36.8% decline last year due to “rising substitution by new energy” and “weak” margins, according to Reuters. PetroChina’s net profits fell 4.5% year-on-year, said Securities Times, despite an increase in production. CNOOC’s profits were down 11.5% year-on-year, said Reuters, largely due to low oil prices. (These figures predate the impact of the Iran war. Oil and gas firms have been enjoying windfall gains since the start of the conflict.)

EV PROFITS: Meanwhile, a “growing roster” of electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers are becoming profitable, reported industry outlet Inside EVs, with Leapmotor, Nio and XPeng announcing they have recently made profits for the first time. This has come partially at the expense of BYD, which saw its profits fall “for the first time in four years” due to price wars in China reaching a “fever pitch”, reported the Financial Times. A growing number of Chinese car dealerships are focused on EVs, said finance news outlet Yicai. Yicai also reported that dealerships around the world are seeing a “surge” in demand for Chinese EVs as the conflict in the Middle East raises petrol prices.

Ming Yang factory plans rejected

‘UNWISE DEPENDENCIES’: The UK government has rejected plans by Chinese wind turbine manufacturer Ming Yang to invest up to £1.5bn in a factory in Scotland, citing national security concerns, reported the Financial Times. In a statement to the UK parliament, energy minister Michael Shanks said the government “will always act to protect our national security” and is “committed” to developing “resilient and sustainable offshore wind supply chains”. Liam Byrne, chair of the parliamentary business and trade committee, said in a statement that the UK cannot “create…new and unwise dependencies”.

Subscribe: China Briefing
  • Sign up to Carbon Brief’s free “China Briefing” email newsletter. All you need to know about the latest developments relating to China and climate change. Sent to your inbox every Thursday.

‘MISSED OPPORTUNITY’: In a response reposted by energy news outlet China Energy Net, Ming Yang said the government has “missed a critical opportunity” to partner with a company that has “no comparable [European] alternatives”. It said it had attempted to address security concerns through proposals such as only processing data onshore. An analysis in the Scotsman said that, while there were “genuine” concerns, “alignment with Japan and the EU on cybersecurity and energy” and US opposition drove the decision. The South China Morning Post cited an unnamed source saying the move was “likely” due to direct US pressure. On the same day, an investment by Danish turbine manufacturer Vestas was approved, reported BBC News, with Maf Smith, director of advisory firm Lumen and previously deputy chief executive of Renewable UK, asking on LinkedIn: “Coincidence?”

‘SKYROCKETING’ SOLAR: Elsewhere, Chinese solar exports to Cuba “skyrocketed” from $5m to $117m between 2023 and 2025 – even before the intensification of the US oil blockade, reported the Washington Post. China and the Philippines are “exploring” oil and gas ​cooperation in the disputed South China Sea following supply disruptions caused by the Middle East conflict, said Reuters. China has also “exported cargoes of diesel and other fuels” across south-east Asia, said Bloomberg, although Reuters said China would “extend its ban on refined fuel exports into April”.

More China news

  • IPCC’S ‘LONGER TIMELINE’: Governments failed to agree if a key climate report should be published in 2028, ahead of COP33, with China among the countries arguing for a “longer timeline”, said Carbon Brief
  • SICHUAN SOJOURN: Premier Li toured several clean-energy sites in a visit to Sichuan province, urging officials to “continuously expand” capacity and “focus” on developing a “new-type power grid”, reported state news agency Xinhua.
  • ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS: The central government has said small hydropower projects must stay within the limits of what the local environment can tolerate, reported the Communist party-affiliated People’s Daily.
  • MEE INVESTIGATES: In recent inspections, the MEE criticised several bodies, including steel, power and coal firms, on “reckless” development of ”dual-high” projects and poor execution of “their…low-carbon transitions”, said the People’s Daily
  • TRADE WAR POSITIONING: China has “launched a sweeping investigation” into US cleantech trade barriers, said Bloomberg.
  • ENERGY EFFICIENCY: The Chinese government has published an action plan for high-quality “energy-saving equipment”, including a focus on hydrogen electrolysers and other power equipment, said Xinhua.

Captured

Electric arc furnace use in China could rise to 73% by 2060

Steel produced by electric arc furnaces (EAFs), as opposed to burning coking coal, could account for at least 73% of China’s total steel production in 2060, according to a report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clear Air (CREA). Under this scenario, EAF uptake could cause steel-sector emissions to fall to 1.3bn tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2035, “representing a nearly 37% reduction” from peak levels.

Spotlight

How Chinese media has been covering the Iran energy crisis

As the closure of the Strait of Hormuz wreaks havoc on fossil-fuel supplies across the world, a prominent narrative in western media has been that low-carbon energy has helped mitigate the worst of the impact on China. While Chinese-language media has featured similar arguments, it has also highlighted China’s coal industry and broader energy security narratives.

In this edition, Carbon Brief looks at how Chinese news outlets have covered the implications of the US and Israel war with Iran on energy use.

As the conflict intensified, several Chinese-language outlets put the spotlight on China’s clean-energy infrastructure.

The tensions highlight the “importance” of energy security and the energy transition, wrote Bo’ao forum secretary-general Zhang Jun in a commentary for the Communist party-affiliated People’s Daily.

The China Youth Daily, a party-run newspaper oriented towards younger readers, said the conflict has “exacerbated” fragile energy supply chains, underscoring the need to “develop new energy sources for energy security”.

Building “localised” clean-energy capacity is a “strategic necessity”, as well as an important aspect of climate action, wrote Wang Ning, associate researcher at the government-affiliated Institute of World Economy in the state-supporting Global Times.

Meanwhile, Liu Ying, research fellow at Renmin University’s Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, told Xinhua that China is well-placed to benefit if the crisis catalyses a “restructuring of the global energy order” and hastens uptake of solar and wind power.

Echoing this sentiment, WeChat account Photovoltaic News, which is run by an unnamed individual, said: “New energy is precisely the core of China’s strength.”

Coal is king?

However, the broader commentary on the war has tended to emphasise China’s “all-of-the-above” approach to the energy transition.

A “sharp commentary” in the People’s Daily – a designation for comments that the newspaper finds important – said that a range of initiatives, from “diversified energy imports” to “vigorous development of green energy” allowed China to “secure its energy supply” and “take the initiative in energy security”.

Similarly, an editorial in commercial news outlet 21st Century Business Herald said that China is “less likely to face direct impacts from this oil crisis” because of its reliance on both coal and renewables.

It also noted the opportunity that the conflict represented in terms of greater global demand for Chinese clean-energy technology.

Coal’s role in the energy mix as a “ballast” and “peak-shaving” tool “continues to strengthen”, said economic news outlet Jiemian – although the outlet also acknowledged China’s “vigorous” clean-energy additions.

Pro-coal accounts on WeChat especially emphasised the fuel’s role in the crisis.

Coal will “continue to serve as the cornerstone of energy supply”, said Coal Vision, a WeChat account run by Xiamen Zhengzhuo Trading, a firm that trades coal and other commodities.

Similarly, Guizhou Coal Data argued: “When a real emergency strikes, you have to ask: which energy source do we truly control? There’s only one answer: coal.” The account is run by the information services firm Guizhou Yuteng Coal Industry Big Data Information Center.

Several outlets also highlighted China’s efforts to secure gas supplies from elsewhere.

Wen Shaoqing, columnist at nationalist outlet Guancha, wrote that an agreement between China and Turkmenistan shortly after the conflict began that reaffirmed plans to develop a new gas pipeline represented a “strategic” move to secure the “nation’s survival”.

Notably, two articles in Guancha summarising foreign outlets’ coverage of China’s response – both emphasising the role renewable energy played in insulating China from the energy shock – also received more than 100,000 views.

Security in coal chemicals

Meanwhile, Xinhua published an article on “turning China’s advantage in coal resources into an advantage in developing natural gas”, although it did not explicitly mention Iran. It added that the head of China’s state-owned PetroChina Coalbed Methane Co argued that coalbed methane could “propel China from [being] an energy giant to an energy powerhouse”.

Shortly after the Xinhua article was published, Jiemian said China had a responsibility to develop coalbed methane to “secure our energy self-sufficiency”.

Similarly, several news outlets covered the “boon” that the war might be for China’s coal-chemical industry.

An article posted by WeChat account Xinghai Intelligence Bureau argued that China’s development of a coal-chemical industry, rather than “new energy”, is what prepared it for “worst-case scenarios” such as the war. The account is run by technology media company Beijing Lightspeed Time Network Technology.

Finance news outlet EastMoney said that the “strategic value” of China’s coal-chemical industry will likely rise “against the backdrop of growing global instability”.

Watch, read, listen

RURAL SOLAR: New Security Beat published an on-the-ground look at how a rooftop solar push is playing out in a rural village in China.

TARGET TESTED: 21st Century Business Herald examined China’s new 17% carbon-intensity target, noting that projects already underway will take up a “significant portion of the carbon-emission growth allowance for the five-year plan”.

ELECTRON PIVOT: Redefining Energy spoke to the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies’ Dr Michal Meidan on the factors driving China’s energy transition.

GEOTHERMAL LIMITS: ChinaTalk outlined the evolution of China’s approach to geothermal energy and the constraints that have limited uptake.


470%

How much Chinese solar exports to the Middle East grew year-on-year in the first quarter of 2026, according to WeChat news account Photovoltaic Box.


New science

  • “International climate policy actors” play an “overlooked yet critical” role in fostering climate policy “stability” in China through their links with policymakers | Environmental Politics
  • Climate change will degrade peatlands in Sichuan province over the coming century, driving biodiversity shifts and a decline in species richness | Frontiers in Plant Science

Recently published on WeChat

China Briefing is written by Anika Patel and edited by Simon Evans. Please send tips and feedback to china@carbonbrief.org 

The post China Briefing 2 April 2026: EV profits rise | Ming Yang rejected | Iran war appeared first on Carbon Brief.

China Briefing 2 April 2026: EV profits rise | Ming Yang rejected | Iran war

Continue Reading

Climate Change

UN chief warns climate crisis “in overdrive” as El Niño threatens to fuel the fire

Published

on

The United Nations Secretary-General and foreign ministers from the UK, France and Spain have blamed the deadly wildfires engulfing Europe on climate change, using the disaster to renew calls for faster cuts to greenhouse gas emissions.

António Guterres told journalists on Friday that the “climate crisis is in overdrive”, adding that global heat seen so far is just a “warm up act” as a phenomenon known as El Niño intensifies “adding fuel to a planet already on fire”.

A new World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) report published on Friday predicts that the weather pattern will grow into a “strong event” between now and October, increasing the risk of higher than normal temperatures across much of the world and disrupted rainfalls.

“That risks shattering every seasonal record – and driving even more severe effects worldwide,” Guterres said.

El Niño builds on top of an already warming world, driven primarily by the burning of fossil fuels. A WMO scientist, who did not want to be named, told journalists that all the heatwaves and other climate impacts seen so far this year are “before the effects of El Niño are really kicking in at a global scale”.

Fossil fuellling the fires

Fires have broken out across much of Europe but are threatening the most people in the south-west of France near Bordeaux and in Central Spain near Madrid. Nearly a quarter of a million people have been evacuated in France with hundreds of homes destroyed while in Spain 80,000 people have had to leave their homes and at least 13 died in one village.

A scientific study published on Friday by the World Weather Attribution group found that man-made climate change made deadly fires in France twice as likely and those in Spain twenty times more likely. Smaller fires in the UK were not analysed by the study.

UN Climate Change leader Simon Stiell blamed fossil fuels for the fires, as well as storms in Chile and heatwaves in North America and Japan in recent weeks. “The climate alarm is blaring”, he said on Wednesday.

Guterres criticised new fossil fuel production projects and fossil fuel subsidies for causing hardship across the world. Discussing his speech, a senior UN official – who did not want to be named – said the subsidies amounted to trillions of US dollars a year and criticised pension funds and institutional investors, including insurance companies, for continuing to invest in fossil fuel projects.

The head of the United Nations Antonio Guterres (right) with the head of the UN’s climate arm Simon Stiell (left) at COP30 (Photo: Kiara Worth/UNFCCC)

Asked why world leaders and the public are not prioritising climate action, Guterres said they are distracted by wars in Ukraine, the Middle East, Sudan and elsewhere and sometimes forget “other aspects that are a sometimes even more dangerous threat”.

Also the fossil fuel industry and “some countries” are campaigning to pretend that climate change does not exist, he said, adding that the UN should be more active in “naming the situations as they are and the responsibilties as they are and mobilising the public opinion”.

After meetings in Paris and Madrid earlier in the week, the UK’s new foreign minister Ed Miliband issued joint statements with his French and Spanish counterparts – Jean-Noël Barrot and José Manuel Albares Bueno – calling on the world to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels.

They promised to do more to reduce emissions and protect their people and encouraged other governments to do the same.

The UK-French statement called on governments to publish UN climate plans, known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs), which are aligned with the Paris Agreement’s goal to limit global average temperatures to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels.

According to Climate Action Tracker, only three countries – the UK, Nigeria and Norway – have submitted NDCs with 2035 emissions reduction targets which are compatible with 1.5C. Fifty-two countries – including Egypt, Vietnam and Argentina – have yet to submit an NDC at all.

Defending science

Beyond action on emissions, the ministers also intervened in an ongoing dispute over the timing of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC)’s next flagship assessment.

Miliband and Barrot’s statement said they “underline the importance” of scientific report feeding into governments’ next global stocktake of progress on climate action in two years’ time, calling it a “critical input” to that process.

The timing of this report has been a contentious issue in government negotiations at the IPCC and at June’s climate talks in Bonn. While a group of nations calling themselves the “friends of science” want the report before the stocktake, others like Saudi Arabia and India have argued that this would make the report of a worse quality and less inclusive of developing countries’ scientists.

Science ‘under attack’ from fossil fuel interests at UN climate talks

The UK-Spanish statement weighed in less explicitly on this issue but said that they “recall the importance of scientific evidence and acknowledge the work of the IPCC in this respect.”

The British and French ministers said they would seek to accelerate reductions of emissions in methane, a particularly potent greenhouse gas, at COP31 in November. They encouraged governments “to work jointly to develop a marketplace for fossil fuels with near-zero methane intensity.”

Methane leaks from oil, gas and coal production are a major contributor to global warming. Over a 20-year period, methane traps around 80 times more heat than carbon dioxide.

Ed Miliband meets José Manuel Albares Bueno in Madrid on 29 July 2026. (Picture by Ed Morris / FCDO)

The UK and Spanish statement emphasised the importance of supporting the Global South and underlined the need to mobilise sustainable financing “at scale with the challenge we face”. The previous UK government, in which Miliband was energy minister, cut climate finance to developing countries to pay for increases in military spending.

The UK government led by new Prime Minister Andy Burnham has yet to outline any major changes to climate finance in its two weeks in power but has announced it will convert some finance from grants to loans in order to free up money to subsidise bus travel in England.

More adaptation needed

Guterres said that “it is time to stop treating each disaster as an isolated tragedy and recognise the systemic risk that is unfolding before our eyes.” A recent study found that three-quarters of UK media reports about the British June heatwave did not mention climate change.

As well as reducing emissions, the UN Secretary-General called for measures to adapt vulnerable people to extreme heat. Specifically, he said that buildings should be built and retrofitted for extreme heat and that every city and country should have heat-health action plans and early warning systems. Over 250 cities have joined the UN’s ‘beat the heat’ initiative, he said.

The Portuguese diplomat called for governments and employers to do more to protect their workers from heat, criticising global fashion brands for not setting heat standards for the factories that supply them. “No one should have to risk their life to earn a living,” he said.

The post UN chief warns climate crisis “in overdrive” as El Niño threatens to fuel the fire appeared first on Climate Home News.

UN chief warns climate crisis “in overdrive” as El Niño threatens to fuel the fire

Continue Reading

Climate Change

‘Ride the wave of momentum’: Australia announces once-in-a-decade Marine Parks Network review

Published

on

In response to the federal government announcing its once-in-a-decade review of Australia’s Marine Parks Network, the following lines can be attributed to Elle Lawless, Senior Campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific:

“Greenpeace Australia Pacific welcomes today’s announcement that the Albanese Government will review Australia’s Commonwealth Marine Parks Network. This is a rare, once-in-a-decade opportunity to strengthen our marine parks and ban industrial fishing in Australia’s marine protected areas.

“Australians would be appalled to know that more than half of Australia’s Marine Parks Network currently allows for extractive industries, like longlining, bottom trawling and oil and gas mining. These so-called ‘protected’ areas were designed to safeguard our beloved ocean wildlife and underwater ecosystems – that is what Australians expect. Damaging industrial industries should not be given a free pass to trawl, fish, drill or extract from our marine parks.”

“With the first Ocean COP just around the corner, and off the back of Australia’s move to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty earlier this year, the Australian government has a unique opportunity to ride the wave of this momentum and solidify itself as a true global ocean leader.

“Greenpeace Australia Pacific is calling for industrial activities to be banned from our protected waters and for at least 30% of Australia’s ocean to be protected as ocean sanctuaries. This review presents a rare opportunity to create more ocean sanctuaries, true blue havens where ocean life can recover, thrive and repopulate the surrounding waters.”

—ENDS—

‘Ride the wave of momentum’: Australia announces once-in-a-decade Marine Parks Network review

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Factcheck: No, Europe is not having its ‘quietest’ year for wildfires

Published

on

In recent days, prominent climate sceptics and rightwing commentators have shared charts on social media incorrectly implying that Europe is having its “quietest” year for wildfires in 2026.

These include Dr Matthew Wielicki, a former University of Alabama geochemist and self-described “professor in exile”, who was recently appointed by the Trump administration to lead the US Global Change Research Program.

However, these charts paint a misleading picture as they are skewed by encompassing the entirety of Russia in the data – including the vast plains of Siberia.

These charts also use data that include fires that are deliberately lit to manage cropland, which is a declining practice across much of Europe.

In this factcheck, Carbon Brief shows that the area burned by wildfires across the European Union in 2026 is second only to 2022 for this time of year.

The latest data from the European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS) also shows that France has set a new modern record for area burned and Spain’s wildfire season is among the worst on record.

The fires have displaced more than a third of a million people across south-western Europe, while an impending heatwave has also raised fears of the fires worsening in the coming days.

‘Quietest year’

On 27 July, as wildfires raged across multiple European countries, former Conservative peer and climate-sceptic commentator Matt Ridley posted on Twitter that “2026 is the quietest year for wildfires in Europe by some distance”.

Misleading social media post by Mitt Ridley that says" er...2026 is the quietest year for wild fires un Europe by some distance."

Ridley, who sits on the academic advisory council of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), a UK-based climate-sceptic lobby group that refuses to reveal the sources of its funding, was responding to an article by Daily Telegraph columnist Tim Stanley.

Stanley’s column, headlined: “Climate change is real – and the right needs to get serious about it”, warned:

“This is no longer a matter of speculation: the wildfires of Europe, pitiless and persistent, are the way we live now.”

Ridley included a chart from Our World In Data, showing the cumulative area burned by wildfires by week for Europe. The chart puts 2026 as having the smallest area for this time of year in a dataset going back to 2012.

Ridley’s post was widely shared by prominent rightwing figures – including Richard Tice, deputy leader of the hard-right, climate-sceptic Reform UK party, former Conservative cabinet minister Jacob Rees-Mogg and multiple commentators.

Separately, Wielicki also shared a chart on Twitter to imply that wildfires in Europe are declining. Wielicki has previously claimed that the “science is not settled on climate change”.

The charts posted by Ridley and Wielicki both use data from the Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS). The GWIS category for “Europe” encompasses all the countries on the continent and includes the whole of Russia.

As a result, Russia accounts for about 74% of the area included in the GWIS definition of “Europe”.

Wildfires in Russia typically account for 80-90% of the burned area in the GWIS Europe dataset. In 2026, fires in Russia are substantially below average. Therefore, including Russia in this comparison creates the false impression that wildfire activity across Europe is unusually low.

Dr Calum Cunningham, a research fellow at the University of Tasmania’s Fire Centre, says that such claims are “highly misleading”, noting that “they rely on aggregating fire activity across an enormous and climatically diverse region”. He tells Carbon Brief:

“A relatively quiet season in Russia can easily mask an exceptionally active season in France or Spain. If the analysis is focused on the regions actually experiencing the current fires, the picture is very different.

“The reality is that western Europe has experienced an extraordinary sequence of climate conditions this year.”

In contrast, the EFFIS provides a subset of wildfire data specifically for the area covered by the 27 nations of the EU, which, therefore, excludes Russia.

Another difference between the two datasets is that GWIS monitors all fires – including those on agricultural land that are intentionally set alight. The burned area as measured by GWIS contains significant cropland area.

By contrast, EFFIS uses land-cover data and other information to filter specifically for forest fires.

Looking at the EU-only data from EFFIS reveals that Europe is far from having its “quietest” year. The bloc’s burned area, as of 29 July, is almost 435,000 hectares (ha) – second only to 2022 for this time of year.

The area burned by wildfires in the EU in 2026 by end of July is second only to 2022. Weekly cumulative burned area (hectares). Line graph shows 2026 burned area reaching over 400,000 hectares by late July, far exceeding the 2006-2025 average. Source: EFFIS - (alt text generated by Google Gemini)

Notably, Wielicki has actually continued to post charts based on GWIS data, even after acknowledging that “includ[ing] all of Russia, including vast areas of Siberia…isn’t a good proxy for Europe”.

French fires

Even looking at EU-wide data misses the scale of this year’s wildfires for some individual countries.

The chart below shows the surge in burned area in France since mid-July.

For much of the first half of the year, the country was having a wildfire season that was only slightly above average in terms of total burned area. However, a notable uptick began in the first week of July.

The third week of the month saw France break its previous cumulative annual record by more than 19,000ha. That gap has widened as the fires continue to burn; as of 29 July, the cumulative burned area in France during 2026 was nearly 24,700ha above the previous record.

France's wildfires in 2026 are the most widespread in modern records. Weekly cumulative burned area (hectares). A line chart shows 2026 burned area sharply rising by August to over 90,000 hectares, well above the 2006-2025 range maximum of around 65,000 and average of 15,000. Source: EFFIS - (alt text generated by Google Gemini)

The fires in France follow a record-breaking June heatwave that “dried out vegetation across the region, allowing fires to spread quickly”, wrote the New York Times.

On 27 July, French president Emmanuel Macron called a “crisis cabinet meeting” in order to address the fires “ravaging several areas of south-west France”, said France 24.

More than 220,000 people have been evacuated due to the Gironde fire, west of Bordeaux, in “what may be France’s largest peacetime evacuation”, reported the Associated Press.

In the Conversation, Cunningham and two other University of Tasmania researchers write that evacuation orders “protec[t] human lives, but makes it more likely houses and other structures will burn if there’s no one to defend them”. They add:

“There is little doubt climate change has made France and Spain’s wildfires worse. They represent yet another reason to redouble our efforts to tackle climate change and stabilise our climate.”

Central Spain scorched

While Spain’s fire season has not broken records in the same way that France’s has, it is on track to be among the worst since EFFIS began reporting data in 2006.

The chart below shows the rapid increase in burned area in Spain since 8 July. The latest data from EFFIS reveal that, as of 29 July, Spain has almost matched its previous record at this point in the year. It is also nearly five times the average area burned for this time of year.

Line chart titled "Spain's 2026 wildfires are among the worst in modern records", subtitle "Weekly cumulative burned area (hectares)". By August, 2026 burned area surges past 200,000 hectares, rising far above the 2006-2025 average and near the upper historical range. Source: EFFIS - (alt text generated by Google Gemini)

In Spain, the wildfires have been concentrated in the central part of the country, near Madrid.

BBC News reported that the fires outside the capital have burned “an area more than twice as large as the city itself”.

Nearly 90,000 people were forced from their homes in central Spain by the fires, said the Associated Press.

Pedro Sánchez, Spain’s prime minister, called the fires a “painful expression” of climate change.

Meanwhile, the UK, French and Spanish governments have issued joint statements this week in response to the fires. The UK/Spain statement begins:

“This summer’s wildfires demonstrated that climate change was now a national security emergency facing Europe and threatening our way of life.”

The post Factcheck: No, Europe is not having its ‘quietest’ year for wildfires appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Factcheck: No, Europe is not having its ‘quietest’ year for wildfires

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com