Connect with us

Published

on

He may be dubbed “Carbon Tax Carney” by his political rivals, but upon becoming Canada’s prime minister last Friday, Mark Carney cancelled the unpopular carbon levy on consumers.

The former governor of the central banks of England and Canada, who has never before held elected office, will lead the world’s second-largest country amid a punishing trade war with Washington and threats from US President Donald Trump to annex Canada.

His first order of business? With the cameras clicking, Carney slashed the carbon tax rate to zero for consumers, effectively ending what had been the governing Liberal Party’s signature climate change policy since its national launch in 2019.

“This will make a difference to hard-pressed Canadians, but it is part of a much bigger set of measures that this government is taking to ensure that we fight against climate change, that our companies are competitive, and the country moves forward,” Carney, 60, said on his first day in office after replacing Justin Trudeau.

The move signals an about-face for Carney, a former UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance, raising broader questions about the best policy tools for cutting greenhouse gas emissions in today’s tricky geopolitical environment.

“Meaningful carbon prices are a cornerstone of any effective policy framework,” the former investment banker wrote in his 2021 book Value(s): Building a Better World for All. “To meet the 1.5C [global warming] target, more than 80 per cent of current fossil fuel reserves (including three-quarters of coal, half of gas, one-third of oil) would need to stay in the ground, stranding these assets.”

Analysts said Carney’s backpedalling on the carbon tax highlights the success of political attacks by the opposition Conservatives. But, they added, it does not undermine a broader strategy of asking large polluters to pay for their climate-damaging behaviour.

Industrial carbon price remains

While individuals, farmers and small businesses will no longer pay a carbon tax at the gas pump, industrial emitters will still be charged for their carbon footprint under national regulations launched in 2019.

“When it comes to reducing emissions, Canada’s industrial carbon pricing system has done most of the heavy lifting,” said Colleen Kaiser, program director of governance and policy innovation with the Smart Prosperity Institute, a Canadian research group. “It makes sense to continue this program.”

To get voters onside, Carney’s team ditched carbon levies on gasoline and heating oil for consumers – some of whom previously got rebates according to their income – in favour of increased support to go green by retrofitting homes or installing heat pumps.

Experts say using a carrot rather than a stick to catalyse energy-saving behaviour still needs to be funded somehow.

“My sense is the money to pay for that, instead of coming from a consumer carbon price, will come from large heavy emitters,” Chris Severson-Baker, executive director of the Pembina Institute, a clean energy think-tank, told Climate Home. “Something will need to be done to replace what the consumer carbon price was designed to do.”

Popular attitudes on who should pay for climate action have shifted since the carbon tax was announced. In 2020, when asked to choose between protecting the environment and creating jobs, 50 percent of Canadians said jobs should come first, according to polling data from the Consortium on Electoral Democracy, a research group.

Today, amid a cost-of-living crisis, 60 percent prioritise jobs over climate action.

Election politics in play

Against this backdrop, the opposition Conservative Party has rallied around the slogan “axe the tax,” suggesting Carney isn’t serious about doing that beyond a national election expected in the next few months.

“Carbon Tax Carney is pausing the carbon tax until after the election when he no longer needs your vote but still needs your money,” Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre posted on social media on March 14, when Carney became PM. “He’s flip-flopping on his beliefs to trick Canadians into a 4th Liberal government.”

The Conservatives had been far ahead in opinion polls prior to Carney coming onto the national scene and Trump’s tariffs. However, polling data released by Angus Reid this week, indicates a major shift in the political landscape. 

“With the Liberals at 42 percent in vote intention, what was a tired, discardable brand just three months ago would be on its way to a fourth term, this time with a majority,” the pollster said.

Aside from ending the consumer carbon tax, specifics on Carney’s green policies remain sketchy. In his first speech after being sworn in as prime minister, he did not mention climate change or carbon taxes.

A spokesperson for Carney referred Climate Home to his official website but did not immediately provide responses to detailed questions about his proposals.

A spokesperson for Environment and Climate Change Canada, the national government department responsible for climate policy, said it “is currently in a period of transition”.

The oil lobby

In his acceptance speech to lead the Liberal Party, Carney said he wants to make Canada “an energy superpower in both clean and conventional energy”, echoing phrasing from a former Conservative prime minister who had close ties to the oil patch.

Canada is the largest foreign oil exporter to the US and fossil fuels are its most valuable export by far, worth $152 billion CAD in 2023, according to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), the main oil industry lobby group.

Much of this crude comes from the Alberta tar sands, which environmentalists consider some of the world’s dirtiest oil for carbon dioxide emissions. Expanded tar sands production stands in direct opposition to Canada’s pledge to hit net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, analysts say.

But public discussions around building new pipelines from western Canada’s tar sands to consumers in the country’s east have intensified amid Trump’s annexation threats.

The Pembina Institute’s Severson-Baker expects “lots of talk” about new pipelines in the coming months, even though he said “there is no actual economic case behind them”.

“The government truly has failed to reduce emissions from the oil sands sector,” he said. “That highlights how difficult it is for any government in Canada to regulate that sector.”

The CAPP did not respond to specific questions on Carney’s record and Canada’s shifting climate policies, but provided a statement.

“Canada is in a precarious position partly because for too long the federal government neglected the importance of our own energy and economic security,” said the group’s president and CEO, Lisa Baiton. “Following the imminent federal election, the next Government of Canada will need to address these critical issues with urgency, both for Canadians and for the oil and natural gas industry.”

Shifting business priorities

In what analysts consider an olive branch to the oil sector, Carney has removed carbon tax supporter Steven Guilbeault from the environment ministry, shuffling the former Greenpeace activist who regularly drew ire from Alberta politicians to culture minister and other roles.

The new environment minister is Terry Duguid, a lawmaker from Manitoba province who had not previously held a cabinet role.

Carney may also feel the need to appease members of the financial elite he once courted, as they jettison their support for net-zero investment goals.

Back in 2021, the central banker helped spearhead the the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, an initiative of major investors that pledged to support companies with clear climate goals.

After the election of Trump, US stalwarts including J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and BlackRock quit the initiative. Most of Canada’s big banks followed later in another sign of shifting commercial priorities.

Back in 2021, making the financial case for investing in net-zero, Carney told an interviewer at the UN: “Don’t assume that your politician cares about this issue as much as you do.”

How much Canada’s new prime minister cares about the climate today – and the amount of political capital he’s willing to invest in protecting it – will be tested in the coming months by electoral pressures and businesses emboldened by the US dumping its climate promises.

The post Canada’s new leader culls carbon tax seen as burden on voters  appeared first on Climate Home News.

Canada’s new leader culls carbon tax seen as burden on voters 

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule

Published

on

The Trump EPA’s repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding revokes the agency’s authority to regulate climate pollution. Environmental activists are mourning the loss while vowing to resurrect it.

A procession of mourners representing sea level rise, melting permafrost, ecocide and other climate calamities grieved the demise of a groundbreaking climate rule outside the Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 9 headquarters in downtown San Francisco on Tuesday.

Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule

Continue Reading

Climate Change

IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day

Published

on

Global oil demand is expected to be almost one million barrels per day less than was forecast before the Iran war, as shortages and soaring costs prompt drastic cutbacks by consumers and businesses, a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Wednesday.

With the closure of the Strait of Hormuz choking off supplies and keeping prices high, less oil is being used to make products such as jet fuel, LPG cooking gas and petrochemicals, the Paris-based IEA said in its monthly oil report, forecasting the biggest quarterly demand drop since the COVID pandemic.

The Iran war “upends our global outlook”, the government-backed agency said, adding that it now expects oil demand to shrink by 80,000 barrels per day in 2026 from last year.

Before the conflict began, the IEA said in February it expected oil demand to rise by 850,000 barrels per day this year, meaning the difference between the pre-war and current estimates is 930,000 barrels a day, or 340 million barrels a year.

That could have a significant impact on the outlook for planet-heating carbon emissions this year.

At an intensity of 434 kg of carbon dioxide per barrel of oil – the estimate used by the US Environmental Protection Agency – the annual reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from oil for 2026, compared with the pre-war forecast, is similar to the amount emitted by the Philippines each year.

Harry Benham, senior advisor at Carbon Tracker, told Climate Home News that he expects at least half of the reduction in oil demand to be permanent because of efficiency gains, behavioural change and faster electrification.

The oil shock is leading to oil being replaced, especially in transport, with electricity and other fuels, just as past oil shocks drove lasting reductions in consumption, he said. “The shock doesn’t delay the transition – it reinforces it,” he added.

Demand takes a hit

While demand for oil has fallen significantly, supplies have fallen even further. Supply in March was 10 million barrels a day less than February, the IEA said, calling it the “largest disruption in history”.

This forecast relies on the assumption that regular deliveries of oil and gas from the Middle East will resume by the middle of the year, the IEA said, although the prospects for this “remain unclear at this stage”.

    Last month, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the CERAWeek oil industry conference that prices were not high enough to lead to permanent reductions in demand for oil, known as demand destruction.

    But the IEA said on Wednesday that “demand destruction will spread as scarcity and higher prices persist”.

    Industries contributing to weaker demand for oil include Asian petrochemical producers, who are cutting production as oil supplies dry up, the report said, while consumers are cutting back on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which is mainly used as a cooking gas in developing countries, the IEA said.

    Flight cancellations caused by the war have dampened demand for oil-based jet fuel, the IEA said. As well as cancellations caused by risk from the conflict itself, airports have warned that fuel shortages could lead to disruption.

    Across the world, governments, businesses and consumers have sought to reduce their oil use after the war. The government of Pakistan has cut the speed limit on its roads, so that people drive at a more fuel-efficient speed, and Laos has encouraged people to work from home to preserve scarce petrol and diesel.

    Nepal’s EV revolution pays off as oil crisis causes pain at the pumps

    Consumers in Bangladesh are seeking electric vehicles (EVs) to avoid fuel queues and, in Nigeria, more people are seeking to replace petrol and diesel generators with solar panels, Climate Home News has reported.

    In the longer term, the European Union is considering cutting taxes on electricity to help it replace fossil fuels and France is promoting EVs and heat pumps.

    IEA urged to help “future-proof” economies

    Meanwhile, the IEA came under fire last week from energy security experts, including former military chiefs, who signed an open letter in which they accused the agency of offering “only a temporary response to turbulent markets”, calling for stronger structural action “to future-proof our economies”.

    They said that besides releasing emergency oil stocks and offering advice on how to reduce oil demand in the short term, the IEA should show countries how to reduce their exposure to volatile oil and gas markets.

    The IEA has also been under pressure from the Trump administration to talk less about the transition away from fossil fuels.

    This article was amended on 15 April 2026 to correct the drop in 2026 forecast oil demand from “nearly a billion” to “nearly a million”

    The post IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day appeared first on Climate Home News.

    IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Iowa Moves to Shield Farmers, Ethanol Plants, From Lawsuits Over Emissions

    Published

    on

    Climate lawsuits are a largely nonexistent threat to farmers in the state, but ethanol producers could benefit from the law.

    DES MOINES, Iowa—Aaron Lehman has many concerns about the fate of Iowa’s farmers. Climate lawsuits aren’t one.

    Iowa Moves to Shield Farmers, Ethanol Plants, From Lawsuits Over Emissions

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com