Booking Holdings closed 2025 with solid financial growth, supported by strong global travel demand. The global travel platform reported solid increases in revenue, bookings, and cash flow during the year.
At the same time, it made further progress toward its net-zero target by 2040. Operational emissions remain sharply lower than pre-pandemic levels, supported by renewable electricity and efficiency gains. As travel demand expands, the company is working to balance business growth with long-term emissions reduction commitments across its value chain.
Booking Holdings reported $26.9 billion in revenue for full-year 2025, up 13% year over year. Gross bookings reached $186.1 billion, a 12% increase compared with 2024. Room nights booked totaled 1.235 billion, rising 8% year over year.
Profitability remained strong. Adjusted EBITDA reached $9.9 billion, up 20%, while the adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 36.9%, compared with 35.0% in 2024. Free cash flow increased 15% to $9.1 billion.
However, net income declined to $5.4 billion, down 8% year over year, reflecting higher expenses and investment costs. Net income margin stood at 20.1%, compared with 24.8% in 2024.

In the fourth quarter alone, Booking generated $6.3 billion in revenue, up 16% year over year. Gross bookings for the quarter reached $43.0 billion, also up 16%. Room nights rose 9% to 285 million.
The results show continued strength in leisure travel and alternative accommodations across major markets.
Diversified Business Drives Growth
Booking Holdings operates several major travel platforms, including Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda, KAYAK, and OpenTable. Its growth in 2025 came from multiple segments. Alternative accommodation options grew. Also, flight bookings and attraction services became more popular.
The company’s global footprint across more than 200 countries provides geographic diversification. This helps reduce exposure to single-market disruptions.
Booking continues to invest in technology and artificial intelligence to improve the user experience. The company is integrating AI tools to personalize travel planning and enhance partner services.
At the same time, cost discipline helped lift margins. The company balanced investments with efficiency measures, supporting its improved adjusted EBITDA margin.
Science-Based Targets Shape the 2040 Roadmap
Alongside financial growth, Booking Holdings continues to advance its climate goals. The company has committed to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040. Its climate targets have been validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).
Booking aims to reduce Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 95% by 2030, compared with a 2019 baseline. These emissions come mainly from office energy use and direct operations.

The company has already made major progress. Operational emissions (Scope 1 and 2) have declined by approximately 85% compared with 2019 levels. This reduction mainly came from using 100% renewable electricity for office operations. It has also improved energy efficiency.
Scope 1 and 2 emissions represent only about 1% of Booking’s total emissions footprint.
The 99% Challenge: Decarbonizing the Value Chain
The vast majority of Booking Holdings’ emissions fall under Scope 3, which includes indirect emissions from its value chain. Scope 3 emissions account for roughly 99% of the company’s total greenhouse gas emissions.

These emissions come from areas such as:
- Purchased goods and services
- Business travel
- Employee commuting
- Capital goods
Reducing Scope 3 emissions is more complex because they depend on third parties. However, Booking has committed to cutting Scope 3 emissions by 50% by 2030 and 90% by 2040, compared with 2019 levels.
The company continues to refine its emissions accounting methods to improve data quality and reporting accuracy. Better data helps identify the largest sources of emissions and target reduction strategies.
Scope 3 reductions will depend on collaboration with partners, suppliers, and travel service providers.
Expanding Sustainable Travel Options
Booking Holdings has also focused on helping travelers make more sustainable choices. Through its platforms, the company highlights accommodations with recognized sustainability certifications. This allows customers to see properties with verified environmental practices.
The company works with partners to improve sustainability standards and reporting transparency. It also collaborates with external organizations to align with global frameworks.
In previous years, Booking set a target for a large share of bookings to come from properties with sustainability certifications. The company keeps adding sustainability to product design and customer info, even as targets change.
These initiatives aim to support lower-carbon travel behavior while maintaining business growth.
Travel and tourism contribute significantly to climate change. Latest estimates show the global travel and tourism sector made up about 7.3% of total greenhouse gas emissions in 2024, down from 8.3% in 2019.
Managing Climate Risks
Booking recognizes that climate change presents operational and financial risks. Extreme weather events, rising temperatures, and water scarcity can affect travel demand and infrastructure. Destinations vulnerable to climate impacts may face disruptions.
The company evaluates physical and transitional climate risks in its long-term planning. It looks at how policy changes, carbon pricing, and sustainability rules might impact operations and partners.
Booking wants to boost resilience by adding climate risk assessments to its strategy. This will help meet global sustainability expectations.
Profit Expansion Meets Emissions Reduction
Booking Holdings’ 2025 results show that strong travel demand can coexist with advancing climate commitments.
Revenue growth of 13% and adjusted EBITDA growth of 20% demonstrate financial strength. At the same time, the company has significantly reduced operational emissions and set bold long-term reduction goals.
Operational emissions are already down sharply. The next phase will focus on value chain decarbonization. This area represents the largest share of its footprint.
Reaching net-zero by 2040 will require continued collaboration with travel suppliers, property owners, airlines, and technology providers.
As global travel rebounds and expands, emissions management will remain a key challenge for the sector.
Can Travel Growth Align With Net-Zero Goals?
Heading into 2026, Booking Holdings appears financially stable and operationally strong, as stated in its guidance. Solid cash flow and margin expansion provide resources for investment and innovation.
Sustainability will likely remain central to the company’s long-term strategy. Meeting Scope 3 targets and maintaining renewable electricity sourcing will be critical milestones.
The company’s performance in 2025 shows that growth and climate strategy are increasingly linked. Investors and customers alike are paying closer attention to both financial returns and environmental responsibility.
If Booking continues to align revenue expansion with emissions reduction, it could strengthen its position as both a leading travel platform and a climate-conscious global company.
- READ MORE: Greening the Aviation: Lufthansa and Airbus Team Up to Cut Business Travel Emissions Using SAF
The post Booking Holdings Posts $26.9B Revenue While Advancing 2040 Net-Zero Goals appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

