A new coalition of major global companies has launched an effort to fix how the world measures and reports carbon emissions. The group, called Carbon Measures, includes BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP), ExxonMobil, and Banco Santander. They aim to build a clear and dependable global system. It will track carbon emissions in various industries and supply chains.
The coalition wants to solve the long-standing issue of “double counting.” This happens when several organizations claim the same emissions or reductions. It will also create new standards for measuring carbon intensity at the product level, from electricity and steel to cement and fuels.
The Need for Better Carbon Accounting
Carbon accounting measures greenhouse gas emissions. It’s essential for corporate climate action. Yet, many experts say current systems are weak and inconsistent.
Recent studies show that most corporate carbon data lacks accuracy. Less than 16% of carbon credits show real emission cuts, based on multiple independent reviews. Other reports show that over half of companies misreport or underreport their Scope 3 emissions. These emissions come from suppliers, customers, and logistics.
Even with growing corporate climate pledges, global emissions hit a record 37.4 billion metric tons in 2024, up 1.1% from the previous year. The gap between reported progress and real emissions continues to widen. This makes reliable data more important than ever.
Carbon Measures wants to address this problem by using verified data and financial-style rules. If it works, the coalition might change how companies, investors, and regulators see carbon performance.
How Carbon Measures Works
The coalition plans to design a ledger-based accounting system modeled on financial reporting. Each emission entry will be tracked and verified to prevent overlap or duplication. The approach takes ideas from finance. It uses consistent documentation, audits, and clear transparency standards.
Amy Brachio, the CEO and former global sustainability head at EY, says the new system will make carbon data clear, comparable, and precise. Her leadership brings over 30 years of experience in corporate sustainability and accounting systems. She said:
“For decades, precise and comparable data has been something of a holy grail in emissions tracking. Carbon Measures wants to build a system that unleashes competition, investment, and faster emissions reduction.”
The organization will start by developing standards for carbon intensity in major industrial sectors, such as:
-
Electricity and energy generation
-
Steel and cement production
-
Chemicals and fuels
These sectors are major greenhouse gas emitters. They account for nearly 70% of global industrial emissions. Consistent metrics could greatly impact the world’s decarbonization goals.
Industry Leaders Join Forces: Who’s Backing the Plan
Carbon Measures has attracted companies from across energy, finance, and manufacturing. Founding members are ADNOC, Air Liquide, BASF, Bayer, Honeywell, Linde, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, NextEra Energy, Nucor, and Vale.
ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods said that better data will help the industry manage emissions more effectively, saying:
“If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it. A standard carbon accounting system will create a foundation for fair competition and effective climate action.”
Banco Santander’s Executive Chair Ana Botín added that the framework aims to make carbon reporting globally comparable.
The group includes both financial institutions and industrial companies. This mix shows how broad the impact of carbon measurement has grown.
For investors, accurate emissions data is now part of assessing financial risk. Manufacturers may face market access issues. More countries are adding carbon border taxes and product labeling rules.
A Booming Market for Carbon Truth
Carbon Measures launches at a time when both regulation and demand for transparency are rising. The carbon accounting software market is set to rise from $18 billion in 2024 to over $100 billion by 2032. This growth shows how companies feel the pressure to track and report accurately.

The compliance carbon credit market, which has government regulations, was valued at around $113 billion in 2024. It could grow to over $500 billion by 2030, based on industry estimates.

Despite these investments, inconsistencies in carbon tracking have limited real progress. Many offsets used by firms have failed verification tests. For example, research found that only about 11% of forestry offsets delivered the emission cuts they claimed. Such findings have weakened confidence in voluntary carbon markets.
Carbon Measures seeks to rebuild that trust. The group aims to help investors and regulators by blending financial accuracy with science-based metrics. This way, they can tell real emission reductions from exaggerated claims.
The Hard Road to a Global Carbon Standard
Building a global standard will not be easy. Carbon data is complex, and each company collects it differently. Many developing countries also lack the technology or infrastructure for detailed measurement.
To succeed, Carbon Measures must:
-
Align with existing frameworks like the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and the Science-Based Targets initiative.
-
Ensure independent verification to maintain data credibility.
-
Encourage participation from both the private and public sectors to avoid fragmented systems.
The group is expected to release its first set of draft standards in 2026, starting with the power and steel industries. Analysts say regulators will closely watch the coalition’s progress. They are preparing new climate disclosure laws.
Another challenge lies in data integration. Companies must track emissions throughout long global supply chains. These chains often include hundreds of smaller suppliers. This requires advanced digital tools, including blockchain systems and artificial intelligence. They ensure traceability from raw materials to finished products.
Toward Transparent and Comparable Carbon Data
If Carbon Measures succeeds, it could redefine how the world values carbon performance. Clear, verifiable data could direct trillions of dollars toward clean technologies and efficient production.
Reliable accounting helps companies avoid accusations of “greenwashing.” This means they won’t make false or exaggerated environmental claims. It may also enable regulators to design better carbon pricing systems, linking policy and data more effectively.
Experts believe this kind of market transparency could speed up the global energy transition. The International Energy Agency says we need over $4 trillion each year for clean energy to hit net zero by 2050. Accurate carbon data can help guide where that money goes.

As global supply chains decarbonize, accurate tracking will become a competitive advantage. Investors and consumers increasingly prefer companies that can show measurable and verified progress.
Carbon Measures, backed by some of the world’s largest firms, signals that carbon accounting is moving from theory to execution. It shows that data — not just pledges — will define the next phase of corporate climate action.
The post BlackRock, ExxonMobil Lead New Global Coalition to Fix Carbon Accounting appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

