Connect with us

Published

on

Two weeks before Brazil hosts the COP30 summit in the Amazon city of Belém, its state-run oil firm Petrobras has been granted a licence to explore for oil in an offshore block in the mouth of the Amazon River, a move criticised by campaigners as undermining the country’s climate leadership.

After five years of discussions, Brazil’s government approved an environmental permit for Petrobras to drill an exploratory oil well in block FZA-M-59 in the Foz do Amazonas Basin, in Amapá state.

The offshore site is 540 kilometres from the mouth of the Amazon River, near the border with Guyana. As Climate Home News previously reported, almost 20% – 5.3 billion barrels of oil equivalent – of global oil reserves identified between 2022 and 2024 are located in the Amazon, primarily along South America’s northern coast between Guyana and Suriname.

    The licence for block FZA-M-59 was earlier denied in 2023, when experts at environmental agency Ibama concluded that Petrobras had failed to present a solid impact mitigation and emergency response plan. But after the company made adjustments, it said on Monday it had been given permission to proceed.

    The company said the drilling is expected to start right away and last around five months, adding that no oil will be produced for now.

    Observatório do Clima, a coalition of Brazilian climate groups, said it is planning to challenge the decision in court and “denounce the illegalities and technical failures in the licensing process” in a bid to render the licence null and void.

    Suely Araújo, the network’s coordinator of public policies, described the issuance of the license as “a double sabotage”.

    “On the one hand, the Brazilian government acts against humanity by stimulating further fossil expansion, contradicting science and betting on more global warming. On the other hand, it hinders COP30 itself, whose most important delivery needs to be the implementation of the determination to phase out fossil fuels,” she said.

    Ilan Zugman, Latin America and Caribbean Director at climate campaign 350.org, said that “authorising new oil licenses in the Amazon is not just a historic mistake – it’s doubling down on a model that has already failed”, adding that it produces profits for a few but can bring violence for locals.

    “Brazil must take real climate leadership and break the cycle of extraction that has led us to the current climate crisis,” he said.

    Brazilian energy ministry defends decision

    Announcing the decision to grant the licence, Brazil’s Minister of Mines and Energy Alexandre Silveira said the oil in the Equatorial Margin region “represents the future of our energy sovereignty”.

    He said Brazil had made “a firm and technical defence” to ensure that exploitation “is done with full environmental responsibility, within the highest international standards, and with concrete benefits for Brazilians and Brazilians”.

    The Amazon rainforest emerges as the new global oil frontier  

    The ministry said in a press release that the FZA-M-59 block “has the potential to open a new exploratory frontier”, with the activity expected to generate more than 300,000 direct and indirect jobs, strengthen the local economy and boost royalty revenues.

    Silveira also argued that Brazil’s oil “is one of the most sustainable in the world, with one of the smallest carbon footprints per barrel produced”, ahead of countries such as Canada, the UK and Russia.

    ICJ warns on state support for fossil fuels

    Campaigners said that the decision goes against recent rulings by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which reinforce countries’ commitments to protect the climate.

    In a landmark advisory opinion issue in July, the ICJ mentioned granting fossil fuel exploration licenses as one example of state policies that could constitute “an internationally wrongful act”.

    The International Energy Agency, meanwhile, has said that no new fossil fuel projects are needed if global emissions are to fall to net zero by 2050 in line with limiting warming to 1.5C, as governments said they would aim to do under the Paris Agreement.

    Carlos Nobre, co-chair of the Amazon Scientific Panel, warned that ignoring such advice could see global warming hit 2C, threatening to push the Amazon rainforest across an irreversible tipping point.

    “Beyond eliminating all deforestation, degradation and fires in the Amazon, it is urgent to reduce all fossil fuel emissions. There is no justification for any new oil exploration. On the contrary, rapidly phasing out existing fossil fuel operations is essential,” he said.

    A mixed area of fields and Amazon rainforest is burning uncontrollably, while nearby residents attempt to contain the flames. (Photo by Gustavo Basso/NurPhoto)

    A mixed area of fields and Amazon rainforest is burning uncontrollably, while nearby residents attempt to contain the flames. (Photo by Gustavo Basso/NurPhoto)

    Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazil’s president, backs oil exploration in the country – already the world’s eighth-largest producer – arguing that the profits could be used to finance the transition to clean energy. “I dream of a day when we no longer need fossil fuels, but that day is still far away. Humanity will depend on them for a long time,” he said in a speech back in February in Pará, the state that will host COP30.

    After the licence was approved, Clara Junger, campaign coordinator for Brazil at the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, refuted Lula’s perspective. “This decision undermines commitments to the energy transition and puts communities, ecosystems, and the planet at risk. Contrary to official claims, oil revenues contribute almost nothing to the transition – only 0.06%,” she said in a statement.

    Banks pour billions into Amazon oil and gas

    Back in 2023, at COP28 in Dubai, countries agreed to “transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems”. Earlier this year, Brazil’s Environment Minister Marina Silva suggested COP30 could result in a roadmap to guide a “planned and just transition” to end fossil fuels, although there has been little advance since.

    Livia Duarte, a congresswoman from Pará State, said a global agreement to phase out fossil fuels is needed, especially in the Amazon. “Corporate profit should never take precedence over life on the planet. Granting a license in Block FZA-M-59, in the Amazon River estuary basin, is a dangerous choice for Brazil,” she added.

    Brazilian activists vow to fight Amazon oil auction in court, hail ‘partial victory’ over unsold blocks

    On Tuesday, new data published in the Banks vs. the Amazon scorecard, showed that Brazilian and international banks have extended an additional $2 billion in direct financing for Amazon oil and gas projects – including to Petrobras – since the beginning of 2024. 

    In a statement, green group Stand.earth said that by financing these projects, “banks are fuelling both the climate crisis and the destruction of the Amazon, instead of backing the just energy transition urgently needed”. It called on them to implement Amazon oil and gas financing exclusion policies to protect Indigenous communities and “help avert Amazon’s imminent tipping point”.

    The post Ahead of COP30, Brazil grants Petrobras a licence to drill for oil in Amazon region appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Ahead of COP30, Brazil grants Petrobras a licence to drill for oil in Amazon region

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    The Land Came First

    Published

    on

    An older teaching about land acknowledgement

    As I have come to understand the spirit and intention of land acknowledgement, I often return to fond memories of my grandmother and her words of wisdom. She taught that the health of the places we call home comes first, because the wellbeing of the people depends on it.

    In her teaching, land acknowledgement began with the land. Long before it became a paragraph read at the start of a meeting, it was a way of recognizing a homeland: its waters, its species, its seasons, and the spirit that revealed whether the place was well.

    Her teaching echoes a practice found across many Indigenous Nations. Haudenosaunee gatherings, for example, have long opened with the Ohén:ton Karihwatéhkwen, the Thanksgiving Address, often translated as “the words that come before all else.” The speaker greets and gives thanks to the people, the earth, the waters, the plants, the animals, the winds, the sun, the moon and the stars. Only after everything that sustains life has been acknowledged does the gathering turn to its own business.

    That order changes what an acknowledgement is for. Its purpose was to share the story of a place with neighbours and to draw them into the work of tending it. People entered the story second, as the ones responsible for what had just been named.

    Understood this way, an acknowledgement does more than open a meeting. It asks us to reconsider where we stand, and what we owe the ground beneath us.

    Nations among nations

    In her teaching, people are one nation among many. The salmon are a nation. So are the cedars, the bison, the medicine plants, and the pollinators. Each belongs to a place, carries its own responsibilities, and offers gifts no other nation can give.

    This idea of kinship runs through many Indigenous philosophies. The phrase “all my relations,” heard in ceremonies and gatherings across Turtle Island, is a reminder that family extends beyond people to the animals, plants, waters and lands that make life possible. Some Indigenous languages carry the same understanding in their grammar, speaking of many plants, animals and natural forces as living beings rather than objects.

    Sovereignty, understood through this relationship, is a kind of standing more than a form of control. Each nation belongs fully to its place and carries its share of that place’s life. No nation thrives alone, and none thrives by taking over the whole.

    The land is also the source of instruction. Over generations, people watched how a river valley or a stretch of prairie kept itself well: who arrived when, who fed whom, and how much could be taken before the giving stopped. In my grandmother’s telling, those observations became instructions, and those instructions helped shape law and protocol. They guided when to harvest, where to camp, how to enter a neighbour’s territory, and what was owed in return.

    Indigenous legal scholars today often describe this as law that comes from the land itself, learned by watching how living systems sustain one another. A plainer name for it is knowing how to live somewhere.

    The host and the guest

    One of the clearest teachings in this understanding of the world is the relationship between host and guest. My grandmother invited us to recognize that relationship in the lives of plants and animals.

    A host prepares the place before anyone arrives. A beaver family dams a stream, and the pond becomes a home for fish, frogs, birds and plants. A fallen tree becomes a nurse log, feeding the next generation of seedlings as it returns to the soil.

    A host offers first. A flowering plant sets out nectar. A berry bush ripens fruit. These provisions come in their own season, not whenever a visitor happens to want them.

    A host also makes its presence known. Birdsong, scent and the marks left along a trail tell newcomers that a place is already inhabited. The visitor does not arrive in an empty world.

    The guest has responsibilities too. A guest attends to the season and to what the place can offer. A guest does not assume that everything within reach is theirs to take. A guest leaves something that helps sustain the relationship.

    A bee takes nectar and carries pollen. Read through this teaching, that exchange offers an image of visiting well: receiving a gift while helping the host continue its life.

    Many Indigenous harvesting protocols carry the same ethic into daily practice: ask before taking, take only what is needed, offer thanks, and leave enough for others and for the plant or animal to recover.

    None of this suggests that every relationship in nature is peaceful or generous. These are ways of seeing responsibilities that people can learn to carry.

    Everyone is both

    No being is only a host or only a guest.

    A tree makes room for other life while depending on soil, water, sunlight, fungi, and relationships beyond itself. People, too, may welcome others into their homes while remaining dependent on the larger homeland that sustains them.

    The distinction between host and guest is therefore about roles, not ranks. Everyone receives. Everyone has something to give.

    The question is whether the exchange sustains the place.

    A visitor who takes without restraint leaves less for those who come next. A host who neglects the place has less to offer. Both have responsibilities, and neither can fulfil them alone.

    This is the heart of reciprocity, a principle found across Indigenous philosophies: relationships stay healthy when gifts move in both directions. The Haudenosaunee teaching of the seventh generation extends that exchange across time, asking that decisions made today leave the place well for those not yet born.

    Mutual benefit begins here, with the recognition that different beings carry different gifts and obligations.

    What people carry forward

    My grandmother’s teaching connects these relationships to the ways people meet their neighbours.

    The host prepares a place, offers food and rest, and explains where the visitor has arrived. The guest makes themselves known, explains why they have come, listens to the terms of the visit, and brings something in return. The gift may be material. It may also be labour, knowledge, news, or a commitment to help.

    Nations around the Great Lakes carried this ethic into treaty. The Dish with One Spoon, an agreement among the Haudenosaunee, Anishinaabe and allied Nations, describes shared hunting grounds as a single dish. Everyone eats from it with one spoon, takes only what they need, leaves enough for others, and keeps the dish clean. The Two Row Wampum, between the Haudenosaunee and European newcomers, shows two vessels travelling side by side on the same river, each keeping its own ways and neither steering the other.

    In this understanding, acknowledgement is more than naming the people associated with a territory. It is learning enough about a homeland to behave responsibly within it.

    Whose home is this? What sustains it? What laws and agreements guide our presence? What can we receive, and what must we return?

    These questions make acknowledgement a relationship rather than a recital.

    They also make it diplomatic. A guest who recognizes the host’s homeland recognizes that they have entered a place with its own relationships and responsibilities. A host who welcomes the guest makes room for an encounter governed by those relationships.

    Neither arrives without standing. Neither arrives without obligations.

    Beginning with place

    I write from the shores of the Bay of Quinte. Here, the teaching asks me to begin with the water, the shoreline, and the life they sustain. Before I describe myself, I must attend to where I am.

    That does not make people or history less important. It places them within the homeland that gives them meaning. The people, their laws, their agreements, and their responsibilities all belong to the place.

    In a time of longer fire seasons, troubled waters, and uncertainty about what the next season will bring, this teaching asks something difficult and useful of us: pay attention before you speak.

    An acknowledgement cannot tell the story of a place if the speaker has stopped noticing it.

    The land came first. Beginning there again means learning to name what sustains us, and accepting that what sustains us also asks something of us.

    By Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

    Photo by Andrik Langfield on Unsplash

    The post The Land Came First appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

    The Land Came First

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Analysis: Fossil-fuel CO2 emissions set to dip in 2026 as Iran conflict hits oil use

    Published

    on

    Article Contents

    Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuels and cement are projected to fall by around 0.4% in 2026 to 38.2bn tonnes of CO2 (GtCO2), according to new figures from the Global Carbon Project.

    This guest post is by:

    • <