Published

9 months ago

April 1, 2025

Alice Rush

Oil and gas pipelines are everywhere and nowhere. They hide in plain sight, buried and marked above ground only by a mown right-of-way and the periodic yellow post or mile marker. Because they are not highly visible like transmission lines or power plants, they typically aren’t given much thought — unless a pipeline easement touches your own property.

Pipeline accidents — leaks, spills, and explosions — hold attention for a few news cycles and then fade away. The claims by pipeline operators are usually along the lines of “this was a rare event, and we have safeguards to keep it from happening again.” But according to a FracTracker analysis of oil and gas pipeline incidents reported between 2010 and 2023, a fire erupts every 4.2 days, an explosion occurs every 12.2 days, a person is killed in one of these incidents every 29 days, and an injury is reported every 6.5 days. During this time period, there were 2,955 incidents reported just along methane gas gathering, transmission, and distribution lines, resulting in 149 fatalities and 697 injuries.

So, these events truly are not so rare after all. Yet, we continue to add more and more miles of dangerous new pipelines every year.

SACE’s new paper: “A Pipeline of Problems”

Below is an overview of a few of the new and proposed pipeline projects in North Carolina, Tennessee, and South Carolina. SACE’s new paper “A Pipeline of Problems” goes deeper into the topics of pipeline risk classifications, proximity to homes and daycares, pipeline construction failures, pipeline exposure above ground, geologic risk such as earthquakes and landslides, and the impact climate change is having on East Coast rain events and pipeline safety. All of these issues lead us to the question: Why are we still building pipelines?

A Sampling of New Pipeline Projects in the Southeast

First, let’s inventory some of the recent fossil gas pipeline projects impacting the Carolinas and Tennessee and fueling Southeastern utilities’ planned gas plant buildout. The biggest that has been completed to date is the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP), which stops just shy of North Carolina. This brand new 42-inch pipeline is 303 miles and traverses very steep, mountainous terrain (including the Appalachian Trail), transporting fracked Marcellus and Utica shale gas via West Virginia and Virginia to the massive Williams Transcontinental pipeline (Transco).

Source: EIA maps

Transco dates back to 1949 and consists of three to four pipelines stretching from the Gulf of Mexico up the East Coast. Traditionally, this pipeline ran south to north, but it now has increasing bi-directional capability in order to deliver Marcellus and Utica shale gas to the south. The MVP entered service on June 14, 2024, 10 years after first filing initial plans at the Federal Energy and Regulatory Commission (FERC). MVP is a “greenfield” pipeline, meaning that it traverses land that previously did not have existing pipeline infrastructure.

Source: https://www.mvpsouthgate.com/maps/

MVP Southgate

In North Carolina, the MVP has announced plans to build an additional 31 miles of 30-inch pipeline, called MVP Southgate, starting from the MVP mainline end at Transco in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, and proceeding into Rockingham County, North Carolina (see map below). This proposed pipeline has been publicly planned since 2019, but MVP announced a scope change and has been granted an extension by FERC to begin service by June 18, 2026, though new route details were only filed on February 3, 2025.

Enbridge T15 Reliability Project

Another North Carolina pipeline project is the Enbridge T15 Reliability Project. This 45-mile project would parallel the existing 63-year-old Enbridge T15 pipeline (which starts at the Transco pipeline in Rockingham County and proceeds into Person County) to the proposed new Duke Energy Progress 2,720 MW fossil gas plant in Person County.

Enbridge T15 project map

Cumberland Pipeline and Ridgeline Expansion Pipeline

In Tennessee, there are currently three proposed pipelines in the works to fuel new TVA gas plants: 1) the EQT Cumberland Pipeline (first map below) will be 32 miles of greenfield pipeline construction, 2) the ETNG Ridgeline Expansion (second map below) will be 122 miles of new pipeline that will parallel the existing Line 3100 that was built in 1949 and is currently owned by Enbridge/ETNG, and 3) a Kinder Morgan pipeline that is still in early planning stages that would supply TVA’s proposed Cheatham gas plant.

Cumberland Pipeline. Map Source: https://www.kindermorgan.com/Operations/Projects/cumberland-project

Ridgeline Expansion Project. Map source: https://www.enbridge.com/projects-and-infrastructure/projects/ridgeline-expansion-project/project-map

Dominion Riverneck to Kingsburg

In South Carolina, Dominion is proposing a 15-mile pipeline, Riverneck to Kingsburg, paralleling part of the existing gas network called Carolina Gas Transmission (owned by Berkshire Hathaway) along the Pee Dee River. In addition, Dominion and Santee Cooper are discussing the need for a new greenfield pipeline branching off of the Kinder Morgan/SONAT gas system in Georgia to serve a proposed gas plant at Canadys in the Lowcountry.

Source: River Neck – Kingsburg Project (SC) | Dominion Energy

Transco Southeast Supply Enhancement Project

Transco itself has a major expansion project called the Southeast Supply Enhancement Project in the works that would add 50 miles of new pipeline segments in Virginia and North Carolina, as well as compressor station upgrades in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, to push more gas through that system. This increased capacity (1.6 million dekatherms per day) will enable additional projects, such as the T15, to serve the proposed utility gas plant build-out in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.

Source: https://www.williams.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2024/12/image.png

Kinder Morgan, which owns a large gas pipeline network called SONAT that services Georgia and South Carolina, has announced a similar 1.3-million dekatherms per day expansion project called the Kinder Morgan South System Expansion 4.

In short, the proposed Southeast utility gas plant buildout is causing a frenzy of pipeline projects. This necessitates examining safety issues framed within our particular Southeastern proposed pipeline projects. There are terrific resources available nationally, such as those maintained by the Pipeline Safety Trust, but we look particularly at Southeastern issues and examples, such as landslide risks made real by Hurricane Helene.

Read our white paper, “A Pipeline of Problems,” to learn more about the risks pipelines pose for our Southeastern communities and families.

The post A Pipeline of Problems appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

A Pipeline of Problems

Renewable Energy

Raw Stupidity: Yet One More Reason that Trump Must Go

Published

16 hours ago

December 13, 2025

Alice Rush

From the Huffington Post:

A senior FBI officer struggled to answer basic questions about antifa, despite characterizing the organization as “the most immediate violent threat” the US faces.

At a House Committee on Homeland Security hearing on Thursday, Michael Glasheen, operations director of the national security branch of the FBI, said he agreed with President Donald Trump that antifa is one of the greatest national security threats to the country.

The answer, of course, is that “Antifa” is a concept, not an organization. It refers to anyone who is against fascism. It has no headquarters, no leaders, and no members.

Now, it is true that people with these views can be violent. When my father led a crew of his fellow anti-fascists, flying a B-17 bomber in World War 2, they completed 29 successful missions, destroying Nazi oil refineries. Were Nazi soldiers killed in the process? I never asked him that, and he probably didn’t know, as they were flying at 29,000 feet, but it seems extremely unlikely that no one died.

In peacetime, we antifa people are non-violent. We may be marching for BLM, or encouraging the use of science in policymaking, or expressing our view that the United States should not have a king.

The FBI must understand this; they must be saying this purely to placate Trump. No one can be that stupid.

Raw Stupidity: Yet One More Reason that Trump Must Go

Renewable Energy

Hydrokinetics Gone Awry

Published

1 day ago

December 12, 2025

Alice Rush

When I came across the meme at left, I was instantly reminded of a guy who called me from Baltimore, MD about 15 years ago, anxious for me to hunt up investors in an invention he had created. I was having a hard time understanding the concept he was describing, and so he told me, “Think of it as a river in a box.”

“Ah! Now I get it. You have a box full of standing water. You add energy to it to get it moving, and then our extract energy from the moving water. And you think that you can extract more energy than you put into it.”

“Yes!” he said excitedly.

I calmly told him that this violates the laws of physics, specifically the first and second laws of thermodynamics, but he wasn’t “having it.” I wished him a pleasant good night and asked him to let me know when he had built a working prototype.

I’m still hoping to hear from him again.

Hydrokinetics Gone Awry

Renewable Energy

Benefits of Solar Power Solution in Manufacturing Facilities

Published

2 days ago

December 12, 2025

Alice Rush

In today’s dynamic manufacturing world, energy is more than just a utility; it’s the spark that keeps production running. Industrial facilities, powered by massive engines and heavy machinery, often operate 24/7, driving output but also consuming enormous amounts of electricity.

The issues? Soaring energy costs and a growing environmental footprint.

Sometimes it’s like a cycle that often feels impossible to break, but what if your facility could draw energy from a cleaner, more reliable, and cost-effective energy source?

Yes, you heard it right, and that’s where solar power comes in!

As electricity prices continue to rise and corporate sustainability goals become more pressing, manufacturers are rethinking how they power their commercial operations.

Therefore, solar energy is emerging as a game-changing solution, offering reliability, long-term savings, and a sustainable path forward for the Australian manufacturing industry.

In this blog, we’ll explore how manufacturers are successfully implementing solar power, featuring real-world case studies from Cyanergy that highlight both the business advantages and environmental impact.

So, let’s explore how solar energy can help your manufacturing facility reduce costs and enhance efficiency, achieving long-term sustainability.

In this blog post:

Why Solar Energy Is Essential for Modern Manufacturing Facilities?

In Australia, manufacturing facilities typically have large roof or yard footprints, significant and relatively
stable electrical loads, including lighting, motors, HVAC, and other machinery. So, the energy used every day is
enormous.

By harnessing the sun’s energy, factories can significantly cut operating
costs, reduce carbon emissions, and gain greater control over long-term energy stability.

Beyond the environmental benefits, solar power also strengthens a company’s competitive edge and brand reputation in
an increasingly eco-conscious market.

Here we’ve penned down the importance of solar power in the manufacturing industry:

Energy cost mitigation

So, how solar energy reduces manufacturing costs in Australia?

With electricity prices rising and energy market volatility increasing, incorporating solar energy offers a
way to
reduce grid dependency and lower utility costs in the long term.

Ensure Operational Continuity & Resilience

Solar panel systems, when paired
with
battery storage, can help smooth peak energy demand, reduce grid dependence, and improve functioning
time.

Promote Sustainability and Brand Value

In larger industries, many manufacturers are under pressure from customers, regulators, investors, and
internal
stakeholders to reduce
their carbon footprint.

Solar helps them to achieve energy freedom, powering businesses with a sustainable energy source.

Increase Asset value & ROI

Solar systems, when sized appropriately and properly optimised, can deliver payback in a few years and
continue to
provide savings thereafter.

According to Cyanergy’s capability statement, we delivered a 490
kW system that generated 752 MWh for a manufacturing client, with a 37-month payback period.

This shows that industrial-scale solar can deliver real, practical results for manufacturers.

Now, let’s examine solar power solutions for manufacturing facilities, case studies, and best practices to ensure a
clear understanding.

Case Studies from Cyanergy: Real-World Manufacturing Success in Australia!

In this part of the blog, we have selected three examples from Cyanergy to illustrate how manufacturing facilities are utilising solar energy.

These are not generic installations; these are production-oriented businesses taking real steps across different states of Australia.

1. Uniplas Mouldings International – Wetherill Park, NSW

Project Overview

System size: 490 kW solar system installed in staged phases
Investment: AUD $591,823.71.
Annual generation: 752 MWh
Yearly energy costs before solar: approximately $647,000.
After solar: $456K, which is approximately 55% of the previous
Payback period: 37 months

Why it matters

For Uniplas, a large industrial manufacturer, the solar system not only significantly reduces their operating energy
costs, but the payback of just over 3 years means that the return on investment is also attractive for the
business.

The staged approach also allowed them to access multiple subsidies and implement the project rapidly; for example,
the first stage of 200 kW was completed in four weeks.

This clearly shows how manufacturing operations can incorporate
solar without any significant disruption.

2. AC Laser – Thomastown, VIC

Project Overview

System size: 99.45 kW
Annual generation: 141.75 MWh
Annual electricity cost before solar: $79,000.
After solar: $38,160, a reduction of more than 50%
Payback period: 26 months

Why it matters

This is a smaller-scale manufacturing facility compared to Uniplas, yet the results are impressive: a more than 50%
cost reduction and a shorter payback period.

This shows that not only large-scale commercial properties but also mid-sized manufacturing operations can benefit
from solar, not just large ones.

Insights Gained from the Case

Don’t wait until your business is huge, as size is scalable.
The solar system’s size aligned well with the manufacturing load, saving thousands of dollars.
Rapid ROI shows manufacturing facilities can justify solar as a capital investment for their business.

3. Specialised (Cycling-Industry manufacturer) – Port Melbourne, VIC

Project Overview

System size: 39.6 kW
Annual generation: 47.32 MWh
Electricity cost before solar: $26,720; after solar: $17,770
Payback period: 45 months

Why it matters

Although smaller, this project depicts that solar energy is a viable option for manufacturing across various sizes
and sectors, even in facilities with a relatively small carbon footprint.

The case emphasises sustainability as a business value and how solar can support brand positioning as well as cost
savings.

Major Takeaways

Solar supports both cost and branding sustainability
goals.
Even medium-sized systems can provide meaningful savings.
The ROI
generated must be viewed in terms of both financial and reputational benefits for any
business, whether it’s large or small.

Is Now the Right Time for Manufacturers to Transition to Solar Energy?

After knowing the numerous benefits of solar solutions, you may be tempted to go solar. However, transitioning from
traditional energy sources to solar energy comes with a cost.

From government
incentives to long-term cost savings, the financial case for solar energy is compelling.

Still wondering, is it time for businesses to go solar? Here’s why you should act now:

Electricity prices continue to rise in many markets, strengthening the return on investment for solar
energy.
Many governments and utilities offer incentives, favourable tariffs, or rebates
for industrial solar projects.
Day by day, the pressure for sustainability reporting and corporate social responsibility (CSR) is
intensifying. Manufacturing facilities with high energy loads are often subject to inspection.
Technology costs have fallen recently, making solar panels and inverters
more affordable than ever and reducing payback time.
With the right sizing and execution, the solar system becomes a long-term asset that pays for itself,
releasing capital for other manufacturing investments.

Best Practices for Manufacturing Facilities Considering Solar

Solar can be a powerful game-changer for manufacturing companies and large commercial buildings when implemented correctly.

But that doesn’t mean it’s as easy as flipping the switch.

Therefore, before investing in Solar power, ensure you understand every step that leads to real savings and sustainable success for your business.

1. Conduct a detailed energy assessment & align solar to load

Before installation, it is essential to understand your manufacturing facility’s energy usage patterns, including the peak usage limit, daily load curves, and seasonal variations.

The better the match between system size, orientation, and actual usage, the higher the yield and the quicker the payback.

At Cyanergy, we provide a customised design based on site analysis.

2. Use staging or modular deployment

If you have a large manufacturing site, you may benefit from staging the solar solution in phases.

For example, in Uniplas’s case, the installation was divided into three stages. This enables access to multiple subsidies, enhances cash flow, and mitigates the risk of disruption.

3. Optimise your system size & measure consumption rate

Over-sizing or under-sizing can both cause significant loss in a business. Therefore, the design should minimise waste and maximise the use of solar energy on-site.

As in AC Laser’s mid-sized facility, a 99 kW system fits their load and delivers huge savings.

4. Check your rooftop or plant infrastructure

Is your rooftop compatible with solar panel installation?

For manufacturing facilities, factors such as roof strength, shading, orientation, structural constraints, and maintenance access are crucial.

Ensure the facility can support panels, inverters, wiring, and monitoring systems without compromising building aesthetics.

5. Perform regular monitoring & performance tracking

Everything requires a certain amount of care and maintenance to function properly over time. The story is the same for a solar panel system.

Real-time monitoring allows you to spot performance issues, shading effects, degradation, and inverter downtime.

Cyanergy emphasises continuous monitoring post-installation.

6. Research on financial modelling & payback analysis

When going for solar, always calculate realistic payback periods, ensure system cost fits within capital budgets,

You should also check the available incentives, tax benefits, payback time, and how to stack several rebates for maximum savings.

For example, many Cyanergy projects offer a 2–4 year payback, with several solar rebates that can be combined with the VEU Rebate.

7. Align with sustainability and your brand strategy

In manufacturing factories, incorporating solar energy can be a substantial component of a broader sustainability strategy. Why?

Solar reduces your dependency on harmful fossil fuels, cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

It positions your brand and promotes your business, demonstrating corporate responsibility and improving stakeholder perception.

8. Maintenance & lifecycle planning

Solar systems require periodic maintenance, inverter replacements, cleaning, and monitoring.

So, manufacturing facilities should incorporate service arrangements into their design. Plan for system longevity, degradation, and eventual replacement or upgrade to ensure optimal performance.

9. Consider adding Battery storage

Even though optional, integrating battery storage or demand management can enhance value by enabling peak shaving, reducing demand charges, and storing excess energy for nighttime use or during grid outages.

10. Engage stakeholders and minimise disruption

In manufacturing, you can’t easily stop production. Plan your solar installation during low-production periods, coordinate with your team, and prioritise safety to minimise downtime.

Final Notes: Ready To Take The Next Step?

For manufacturing facilities, solar power isn’t just about being eco-friendly; it’s a smart business move for Australians. Cyanergy’s case studies showed that even large manufacturers can achieve paybacks of 2–4 years, reduce costs, lower emissions, and enhance brand value.

With proper planning, energy assessment, correct system sizing, phased installation, and active monitoring, solar can deliver lasting benefits.

So, if rising energy bills or sustainability goals are on your radar, it’s time to view solar energy as an innovative manufacturing solution, apart from just a renewable energy source.

Reach out to Cyanergy, conduct an energy audit, and engage a solar specialist with manufacturing experience today. Cyanergy is here to help!