Anton and I have just brought CTD cast number 45 to light. While we are once again shaking freshly tapped bottles with great enthusiasm, I think I can make out question marks in Jamileh’s expression as she smiles good morning to us. That’s what everyone here seems to be thinking: 45 CTD casts already? And many of them in the same place? Why all this? We should know the water once we’ve “measured” it, right? Well, somehow we do.
“Our” CTD, which biologists prefer to call a “water sampler”, is moved out of the side of the hangar, lowered and in the basic version measures Conductivity (salinity), Temperature and pressure (Depth) quasi continuously (at 24 Hz), ideally down to the seafloor. In addition, oxygen and fluorescence are measured, which makes it possible to estimate biological productivity (see previous blog entries by Nicole and Manfred). As an addition, water samples can be taken at various depths using the 24 Niskin bottles (Manfred is by far our best customer in this respect). For oceanographers, however, the continuous measurements of temperature and salinity are of crucial importance, as they allow us to see how stable the water is stratified, for example, or to deduce the origin of the water masses and geostrophic currents. This is important information that forms the framework conditions that strongly influence the local ecosystem. In order to achieve maximum precision in the physical measurements, I take water samples myself “only” to calibrate the oxygen and salinity sensors later, but not to analyze the suspicious living beings in it.
Most of the deployments to date have been close to shore at a depth of about 1500 meters. The following figure shows one of our precious deeper profiles down to a depth of almost 3300 meters. Here, the top 100 meters form the so-called “mixed layer”, in which all measured variables are well mixed by the wind. We observe that the depth of this surface layer varies, but is generally comparatively thick – as is typical for the winter months at these latitudes. At our first station, the mixed layer depth was even around 200m! Temperature (red), salt (blue), oxygen (yellow) and chlorophyll (green) draw practically vertical lines in the diagram. Interestingly, a maximum of chlorophyll often forms exactly at or below the surface layer, which serves as an indicator for the presence of phytoplankton (see Nicole’s and Manfred’s blog entry on “Micro-Creatures”). Although phytoplankton is basically autotrophic, i.e. dependent on sunlight, it can survive in this rather deep layer with very little sunlight. One reason for this is the increased nutrient content in deeper layers.
In addition, the pycnocline directly below the mixed layer forms a strong physical barrier to vertical mixing and can practically “trap” organisms that cannot actively swim themselves. The pycnocline is the layer in which the density of the water increases very rapidly with depth (here due to the temperature gradient). These layers contain a wide range of temperature and salt contents and are also called Central Waters. To identify water masses, temperatures and salinities are plotted against each other in a so-called “T-S diagram” (as shown in Figure 4). In our example, you can clearly see that the water around Madeira consists largely of Eastern North Atlantic Central Water (ENACW). This water mass dominates the pycnocline in the large North Atlantic Gyre and is significantly more saline than in the South Atlantic (see Eastern South Atlantic Central Water). In our profile number 41 (Figure 3), however, something else catches the eye. At around 1100m, there is a nose with a significantly higher salinity, which does not seem to match the linear Central Water. The influence of the Mediterranean Water (MW) is noticeable here, which has a particularly high salt content due to the predominantly high evaporation and low precipitation in the Mediterranean region.
Due to this high salt content, it manifests itself at greater depths, typically around 1100m to 1200m, despite the warm temperatures. However, we can also see in the T-S diagram that the Mediterranean water in the south of Madeira is already somewhat more mixed, i.e. less warm and saline than directly at the outflow of the Mediterranean. Even further down, which we can observe particularly well at our deeper CTD stations around 3000m, resides the famous North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW). This is formed by, for instance, deep convection in the North Atlantic and plays a central role in global thermohaline circulation and climate dynamics. Although constituting deep water, it is comparatively “young” and therefore rich in oxygen (we like to say “well ventilated”) and forms a contrast to the oxygen minimum, which we observe here around Madeira at around 800-900 meters. This minimum zone is formed by respiration of the sunken organic material, e.g. from the sunlight-dependent phytoplankton in the uppermost ~150 meters. Compared to the large known oxygen minimum zones in the subtropical eastern Atlantic and Pacific, however, there is still comparatively abundant oxygen.
Now, we know the profile of a single CTD station a little better. Basically, this one is actually fairly representative of the other 44, so the question of why Anton and I keep “driving CTDs” like madmen remains unanswered. However, if we take a closer look, we can see that the temperature and salinity profiles are not completely “smooth”. In fact, we discover small wavelike deviations. Measurement inaccuracies? No. It is internal waves that bring “life” to the profiles. Internal waves can occur in any stratified medium, i.e. fluids in which the density is not constant. There are two restoring forces that act on internal waves in the ocean: Gravity and the Coriolis force. The main drivers of internal waves are the tides (such as ebb and flow), closely followed by wind. We know that internal waves play a crucial role in energy transport in the ocean. Like ordinary surface waves, internal waves can also break. When they do, mixing takes place. This in turn can transport nutrients and thereby influence biological productivity. The interaction of internal waves with topography (i.e. islands such as Madeira) and currents is very complex and not yet fully understood. By using a large number of stations at different times (and tidal stages), we obtain a better spatial and temporal resolution of the internal wave field and improve our understanding. That’s also why we are fans of so-called “yo-yo CTDs”. Just like a real yo-yo, we move the CTD up and down several times in direct succession at one and the same location.
In the figure above, we have plotted six directly consecutive profiles of a “CTD yo-yo” on top of each other. You can see that the profiles deviate more from each other at some depths and not at others (nodal points). The most impressive influence is exerted by internal waves on the mixed layer depth, which can vary by several tens of meters within minutes.
There is a particular thrill when the “Eddy hunt” is called for. That sounds more martial than it is meant to be. Eddies are oceanic vortices that reach a diameter of about 50 km around Madeira, interact with topography (islands) and internal waves and are known to have an impact on biodiversity. They develop over a period of days/weeks and are unfortunately hardly predictable. Therefore, we check satellite and model data for the region daily to identify a possible feature and, if possible, sample in situ with Merian. Strong eddies can generate a signal in sea level, surface temperatures and chlorophyll, recognizable via satellites. Our colleagues from the Oceanographic Institute of Madeira are helping us on site by providing the regional satellite and model data (see https://oomdata.arditi.pt/msm126/). Overall, it is impressive how well the collaboration on board and beyond works! One “eddy hunt” has already taken place on the night of February 13-14. However, the satellite signal was weak, and accordingly we were unable to detect a strong, coherent eddy In Situ with our shipboard ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler, which measures ocean currents down to a depth of almost 1000m). (Side note: However, another exciting feature (presumably a strong internal wave) was identified in the surface layer, which we are now analyzing.)
In one of the following contributions, we want to prove to you that our beloved CTD is something very special in purely “objective” terms thanks to sophisticated tuning, including high-resolution camera systems. Then we’ll explain why Anton, although he’s not a physical oceanographer, also likes to drive “CTD yo-yos” and there will finally be photos of aquatic animals again!
Greetings from on board RV MARIA S. MERIAN,
Marco Schulz und Anton Theileis
After a slight delay of the Maria S. Merian caused by late-arriving containers our research cruise MSM142 finally got underway. By last Tuesday (24.03.2026), the full scientific team had arrived in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland, and the ship reached port on Wednesday (25.03.2026) morning. That same day, scientists and technicians moved on board and immediately began preparations, assembling and testing our instruments. Although the mornings on Wednesday and Thursday were grey and overcast, the afternoons cleared up beautifully. This gave us valuable time to organize equipment on deck and store empty boxes back into the containers before departure.
Given the forecast of harsh conditions outside the fjord, we carried out the mandatory safety drill while still in harbour. This included practicing emergency procedures and boarding the lifeboat. After completing border control, we were finally ready to leave Nuuk. We set sail on March 27th, heading into the Labrador Sea to begin our mission. Even before starting scientific operations, we tested the setup for deploying our gliders without releasing them during the transit out of the fjord. Once we reached open waters, we were met by high waves the following morning. For some on board, this was their first experience under such rough sea conditions. Seasickness quickly became a challenge for a few, while scientific work had to be temporarily postponed due to the strong winds and sea conditions. Together with the crew, we discussed how best to adapt our measurement plans to the given weather conditions. On March 29th, we were finally able to begin our scientific program with the first CTD deployment. A CTD is an instrument used to measure conductivity, temperature, and depth, which are key parameters for understanding ocean structure.
During the following night, we continued with additional CTD stations and successfully recovered two moorings: DSOW 3 and DSOW 4, located south of Greenland. These moorings carry instruments at various depths that measure velocity, temperature, and salinity. DSOW 4 was redeployed on the same day, while DSOW 3 followed the next day. In addition, the bottles attached to the CTD’s rosette can be used to collect water samples from any desired depth. These samples can be used, for example, to determine the oxygen content, nutrient levels, and organic matter.
Both are part of the OSNAP array, a network of moorings spanning the subpolar North Atlantic. On these moorings are a few instruments, for example microcats which measure temperature, pressure and salinity.
We then conducted around 25 CTD stations spaced approximately 3 nautical miles apart across an Irminger ring identified from satellite data. This high-resolution sampling was necessary to capture the structure of an Irminger Ring, which had a radius of about 12 km wide.
The days leading up to April 2nd were marked by very rough weather conditions. Life on board became both challenging and, at times, unintentionally entertaining sliding chairs were not uncommon. During the night from April 1st to April 2nd, winds reached 11 Beaufort with gusts up to 65 knots, forcing us to pause our measurements. Fortunately, conditions improved by morning, allowing us to resume our work. As well as with the help of the crew we had to adapt to the harsh weather conditions to continue our scientific work. On the 3rd of April, we were able to deploy a few gliders and one float. An ocean glider is an autonomous underwater Vehicle, which you can steer remotely and send to different locations, while it is measuring oceanographic key parameters.
This research cruise focuses on understanding small-scale processes in the ocean and their connection to the spring bloom, an essential phase in marine ecosystem in subpolar regions. Despite the challenging start, we have already gathered valuable data and look forward to the weeks ahead in the Labrador Sea.
Despite their dramatic name, false killer whales aren’t an orca species. These animals are dolphins—members of the same extended family as the iconic “killer whale” (Orcinus orca). Compared to their namesake counterparts, these marine mammals are far less well-known than our ocean’s iconic orcas.
Let’s dive in and take a closer look at false killer whales—one of the ocean’s most social, yet lesser-known dolphin species.
Appearance and anatomy
False killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) are among the largest members of the dolphin family (Delphinidae). Adults can grow up to 20 feet long and weigh between 1,500 and 3,000 pounds, though some individuals have been recorded weighing even more. For comparison, that’s roughly double the size of a bottlenose dolphin—and slightly larger than a typical sedan.
These animals are incredibly powerful swimmers with long, torpedo-shaped bodies that help them move efficiently through the open ocean in search of prey. Their skull structure is what earned them their name, as their head shape closely resembles that of orcas. With broad, rounded heads, muscular jaws and large cone-shaped teeth, early scientists were fascinated by the similarities between these two marine mammal species.
Although their heads may look somewhat like those of orcas, there are several ways to distinguish false killer whales from their larger namesake counterparts.
One of the most noticeable differences has to do with their coloration. While orcas are known for their iconic black-and-white pattern with paler underbellies, alternatively, false killer whales are typically a uniform dark gray to black in color—almost as if a small orca decided to roll around in the dirt. If you’ve ever seen the animated Disney classic 101 Dalmatians, the difference is a bit like when the puppies roll in soot to disguise themselves as labradors instead of showing their usual black-and-white spots.
Their teeth also present a differentiator. The scientific name Pseudorca crassidens translates almost literally to “thick-toothed false orca,” a nod to their sturdy, cone-shaped teeth that help these animals capture prey. Orcas tend to have more robust, bulbous heads, while false killer whales appear slightly narrower and more streamlined.
Behavior and diet
False killer whales are both highly efficient hunters and deeply social animals. It’s not unusual to see them hunting together both in small pods and larger groups as they pursue prey like fish and squid.
Scientists have even observed false killer whales sharing food with each other, a behavior that is very unusual for marine mammals. While some dolphin and whale species work together to pursue prey, they rarely actively share food. The sharing of food among false killer whales spotlights the strong social bonds within their pods. Researchers believe these tight-knit social connections help false killer whales thrive in offshore environments where they’re always on the move.
Maintaining these close bonds and coordinating successful hunts requires constant effective communication, and this is where false killer whales excel. Like other dolphins, they produce a variety of sounds like whistles and clicks to stay connected with their pod and locate prey using echolocation. In the deep offshore waters where they live, sound often becomes more important than sight, since sound travels much farther underwater than light.
Where they live
False killer whales are highly migratory and travel long distances throughout tropical and subtropical waters around the world. They prefer deeper waters far offshore, and this pelagic lifestyle can make them more difficult for scientists to study than many coastal dolphin species.
However, there are a few places where researchers have been able to learn more about them—including the waters surrounding the Hawaiian Islands.
Scientists have identified three distinct groups of false killer whales in and around Hawaii, but one well-studied group stays close to the main Hawaiian Islands year-round. Unfortunately, researchers estimate that only about 140 individuals remained in 2022, with populations expected to decline without action to protect them. This is exactly why this group is listed as endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and is considered one of the most vulnerable marine mammal populations in U.S. waters.
Never Miss An Update
Sign up for Ocean Conservancy text messages today.
Current threats to survival
False killer whales are currently listed as Near Threatened on the IUCN Red List. From climate change-induced ocean acidification and harmful algal blooms to marine debris and fishing bycatch, false killer whales face the same mounting pressures that are impacting marine ecosystems around the world. As their prey becomes scarce due to increasing threats, populations of top predators like these decline, serving as a powerful signal that the ocean’s overall health is in critical need of protection.
Here at Ocean Conservancy, we’re working daily to confront these threats head-on and protect the ecosystems and wildlife we all cherish so dearly. But we can’t do it without you. Support from ocean lovers is what powers our work to protect our ocean, and right now, our planet needs all the help it can get. Visit Ocean Conservancy’s Action Center today and join our movement to create a better future for our ocean, forever and for everyone.
The post All About False Killer Whales appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.
https://oceanconservancy.org/blog/2026/03/31/false-killer-whales/
A lot has happened in the meantime: I became an Associate Professor at the University of Southern Denmark, we all lived through the Corona period, then slowly adjusted to the post‑pandemic stability, only to find ourselves again in turbulent political times. I am now affiliated with the Marine Research Center in Kerteminde, a beautiful coastal town on the island of Fyn. My plan is to share small updates on my research and activities every now and then. So let’s start with yesterday’s sampling trip for benthic phytoplankton, carried out by my colleague, Prof. Kazumasa Oguri. The sampling will help prepare for the first‑semester bachelor students who will join his small but fascinating project. This project is all about the benthic diatoms that form dense, photosynthetic communities on tidal‑flat sediments. Their daytime oxygen production enriches the sediment surface and allows oxygen to penetrate deeper, supporting diverse organisms that rely on aerobic respiration. The project will explore how oxygen distribution and oxygen production/consumption in sediments change under different light conditions (day, night, sunrise/sunset). The team will incubate benthic diatom communities in jars and measure oxygen profiles using an oxygen imaging system under controlled light regimes.
Yesterday, we visited several potential sampling sites where students can carry out their fieldwork. I encourage all PIs in our group to define at least one small project related to Kerteminde Fjord, where our laboratories are located. Over time, I hope we can build a more integrated dataset describing the marine and coastal ecosystems of the area.
Another activity currently in preparation is a project on marine invasive species in Kerteminde, which will feed into a course I will run in July and a master’s thesis project. More will come later.
Let’s hope for a more continuous blog from here on, keeping track of our activities, with or without jellyfish!
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits