Engie, the world’s largest independent power producer, has made a significant commitment to sustainability by pre-ordering 5 million tons of nature-based carbon removals from Catona Climate, a climate finance company.
This move is part of Engie’s strategy to meet its Net Zero target by 2045. It also represents a major investment in nature-based solutions, which are becoming crucial for climate change mitigation.
A Major Deal for High-Quality Climate Solutions
The recent reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have highlighted the necessity of scaling up carbon removal methods to achieve climate goals. The latest IPCC report emphasizes nature-based solutions, which can remove at least 3 gigatons of CO2 annually by 2030.
Traditionally, efforts focused on technological solutions for carbon capture. However, nature-based solutions are also gaining traction due to their additional environmental benefits, as evidenced in recent Xpansiv report.
Engie’s partnership with Catona Climate reflects a broader industry trend toward integrating ecosystem restoration projects into corporate carbon strategies. This shift highlights the growing recognition of carbon removal alongside direct emission reductions in achieving net zero emissions.
Engie’s pre-order aligns with these findings and marks a significant step up from its previous smaller-scale carbon offset projects. However, scaling these projects faces several challenges, including complexities related to impacts on local communities and balancing carbon sequestration with other environmental benefits.
This is where Catona Climate’s solutions come in.
Based in California, Catona Climate funds high-impact, nature-based projects through carbon removal purchases. These projects are aligned with science-based targets and focus on regenerative land management, reforestation, and combating deforestation.
The climate finance company sources, invests, and monitors these projects, offering businesses a portfolio of high-quality climate solutions. By creating clear demand signals, Catona aims to de-risk carbon investments and accelerate the development of high-quality climate solutions.
A Growing Trend of Nature-Based Carbon Removal
The agreement enables Engie to secure carbon removal credits from multiple projects at fixed prices, offering financial stability and predictability. Under the partnership, the carbon removal credits will be issued between 2030 and 2039, with Engie having the flexibility to source from multiple projects at locked-in pricing.
Jérôme Malka, a member of Engie’s Executive Committee, emphasized the shared commitment to quality and impact between Engie and Catona. He further highlighted the benefits of this deal, saying that:
“Collaborating with Catona to address residual emissions was a natural fit given our alignment on quality and impact, and our shared commitment to supporting projects that not only remove carbon, but also provide meaningful benefits to local ecosystems and communities.”
Tate Mill, CEO of Catona Climate, stressed the importance of the partnership with Engie to drive capital and expand nature-based projects.
“Those signals help us de-risk carbon investments and drive more capital through our trusted network of project developers to accelerate the development of nature-based carbon removal solutions so critical to turning the tide on climate change.”
Engie’s collaboration with Catona is a key component of its strategy to decarbonize clients’ operations and achieve net zero. Here are the other major operational levers of action the company is undertaking.

What’s Inside Engie’s Ambitious Net Zero Goal?
Engie is committed to a bold decarbonization strategy, aiming to achieve net zero across its three scopes. In 2023, the Group’s carbon emissions totaled 158 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent, a significant reduction of 39% from 2017’s 260 million tonnes.

The French power company’s roadmap sets a goal to cut all emissions by at least 90% between 2017 and 2045, with the remaining 10% to be neutralized. The company’s 2030 decarbonization trajectory, certified as “well below 2°C” by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi), involves four main goals to reduce emissions. These include:
- 59% reduction in energy production emissions (scopes 1 and 3),
- 34% decrease in emissions from gas sales (scope 3),
- 66% reduction in carbon intensity from energy production (scope 1) and consumption (scope 2), and
- 56% cut in the carbon intensity of energy sales (scopes 1 and 3).

To achieve these targets, the power company is adopting several key strategies:
- Phase Out Coal: The Group plans to completely eliminate coal by 2025 in Europe and by 2027 globally.
- Expand Renewable Energy: ENGIE aims for renewables (solar, onshore, and offshore wind) to comprise 58% of its electricity generation mix by 2030, boosting production capacity by 50 GW by 2025, reaching 80 GW by 2030. Additionally, 10 GW of battery storage capacity will be installed, mainly in Europe and the US, to enhance the flexibility of the energy mix.
- Increase Green Gases: The biomethane production capacity is targeted to reach 10 TWh/year in Europe by 2030, with an injection capacity of 50 TWh/year across ENGIE’s networks. Green hydrogen is also a crucial component, with a goal of producing 4 GW by electrolysis by 2030, supported by a 700km transport network and 1 TWh storage capacity.
Notably, the Group aims to manage 30 TWh/year of decarbonized hydrogen and establish over 100 hydrogen refueling stations.
Finally, Engie commits to a program to reduce carbon emissions, targeting 45 million tons of CO2 eq. avoided each year. Part of this goal is investing in 5 million tons of carbon credits, which what the company just did.
Engie’s pre-order from Catona represents a step towards achieving its net zero goal by 2045. This collaboration aims not only to reduce carbon emissions but also to support local ecosystems and communities, ensuring the long-term viability of nature-based carbon removal solutions.
The post Engie Buys 5 Million Tons of Nature-Based Carbon Credits for Net Zero appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

