Wind Operations is Changing Across the US
Allen and Yolanda discuss operational shifts driven by the IRA bill, focusing on the importance of long-term operational strategies, collaboration, and advanced monitoring solutions.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Intro: [00:00:00] You are listening to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast brought to you by build turbines.com. Learn, train, and be a part of the Clean Energy Revolution. Visit build turbines.com today. Now here’s your hosts, Allen Hall, Joel Saxon, Phil Totaro, and Rosemary Barnes.
Allen Hall: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall in the Queen city of Charlotte, North Carolina, and I have.
Yolanda Padron in Austin, Texas, and Yolanda has been out at a site in West Texas last several days working out some strike tape installations because the, the blade season of Texas is so long and the repair season is so long. Everybody’s really making work and, and maybe even spending a little more money than they thought they were gonna spend this year.
Just to get their turbines righted because it is for us at Weather Guard, it’s still lightning season. There are a lot of storms and the amount [00:01:00] of rain in West Texas is crazy. Flooded roads, uh, on highways still days after rainstorms. That tells you that the amount of rain. It has been a little bit of an unusual year on the, on the wind production side because of the weather.
Right?
Yolanda Padron: Yeah. It’s, it’s been high production for, for a lot of the, that area. It’s definitely, it’s, you start getting all of those drone inspections in and everything. Sometimes I think it’s, it’s worked out pretty great for some of the operators that maybe didn’t have a lot of, uh, planning capabilities in the past.
So then they’re able to come in and actually. Books, some teams to do work even, even though the traditional blade season has passed.
Allen Hall: Oh yeah. Is there gonna be a traditional blade season from here on out? And I think this is where a lot of operators are rethinking, uh, the changes to the IRA bill and the one big beautiful bill aspects is, you know, with the, with the production tax credits sort of waning and, and [00:02:00] wrapping up.
They are going to be putting more emphasis on o and m. And in fact, when we were at Skys specs forums, and I keep bringing this up ’cause it’s such a monumental thing that we were at in Ann Arbor a couple weeks ago. The emphasis has moved from definitely from development to more of operations. But the, the level of complexity there has changed.
Even talking to operators today, and you and I talked to what, 3, 4, 5 different operators in one day. CMS is huge. You, you’re seeing a, just a complete flip on CMS. Everybody’s willing to try something, which is unique, right?
Yolanda Padron: Yeah. I think nobody loves being a Guinea pig, right? Nobody likes staying behind either.
And especially now that you really do need to make sure these blades don’t just last you 10 years before you can repower. They, the team seem to really be focusing a lot more on long-term solutions rather than short term solutions. So it be that, you know, installing Light Lightning diverters be [00:03:00] that installing even just a, a long-term leading edge protection solution instead of a short-term one teams, she seemed to be really looking into.
What the overall opex impact is going to be in the very long term for as long as they can keep the site on, as long as they can keep the permits in, instead of having it be something where you can keep the cost low, low, low, low, low, and then you get another investment and you can repower, and then just keep the cost low, low, low, low, and barely keep the site running.
Allen Hall: We were one of the sites that had probably one of the highest production in, in terms of this particular operator’s fleet, and, and you could actually see that when you were there. But it does come with a consequence, right? Is that when you run turbines as much as you can possibly maintain them, there is some wear and tear that will happen because of the rougher environments that they’re in.
So in order to get that increased capacity factor. You’re gonna have some issues you need to be thinking a little bit broader on. And right now, just because we’ve talked to so many [00:04:00] operators recently, I, I, what are you hearing for like the top three? What are, what are the top three things that operators are doing right now or going after and what should they be doing?
Yolanda Padron: I think something that the operator operators seem to be looking into right now. Mainly what are the main issues that’s going on at my site, you know, and how can I quantify them? How can I make sure that whatever impact they have, I can get rid of it now or as soon as possible. Um, they’re really looking into like what the ROI of a specific solution is.
Um, it like the short-term ROI of a specific solution and the long-term ROI, I think. We were talking about this the other day, right? And having how sometimes you, the pendulum swings a little more towards the financial right. And sometimes the pendulum swings a little bit more towards the engineering.
And I think right now we’re, it seems like we’re being caught in a, in a very strange place where [00:05:00] a lot of the, the engineering emphasis that maybe wasn’t there as much in the past is starting to, to ramp up a little, because you, you need to have that. Information to be able to back up your, your financial, uh, decisions.
Allen Hall: Yeah. The, the business case is being made more and more by engineering and maybe engineering, just getting smarter about it for the longest time. Engineers in wind, in my opinion. Just watch it get from the outside. Would say, technically we need to fix these blades, or technically we need to go after these gear boxes.
Or technically we need to look at these aspects of the generators or inverters, whatever the, whatever the case may be for a particular site. Transformers, yeah, it’s another one. But all of them were more of a technical thing like, yeah, we’re not really getting our maximum out of this piece of equipment and here’s how we make it better.
And the asset managers would really look at that a little. Sideways and say, well, okay, all that’s great technically, but what does it mean to me dollar wise? Now, it seems [00:06:00] like there’s a a lot more asset managers listening to engineering and engineering, translating technical speak into dollars. And I see the pendulum really swinging it back where the asset manager, which do still control the purse strings and rightly so, ’cause engineers are not the best place for that.
However, do, do you, don’t you see that kind of shift to engineering having to look at the numbers and are starting to get the numbers from a variety of sources because they have more data to put together a business case and say, yes, if I spend a hundred thousand here, I’m gonna keep a million later.
That’s a pretty good business case.
Yolanda Padron: Yeah, absolutely. And I think, you know, we mentioned that there’s been a lot of layoffs everywhere. We’ve had a lot of cutting of engineering teams, so you have these people. Who have to really maximize the resources that they have and the time that they invest in specific issues.
Right? So if I have a hundred million dollars issue here and a [00:07:00] $5 million solution here, and then I have a. $1 million issue here with a $1 million solution over here, I’m going to start focusing on that $5 million solution.
Allen Hall: Yeah. Because it really comes down to production at the end of the day. Uh, I know we don’t like to think of it that way, but tournaments need to run.
They need to run as long as they can and be as efficient as they can. So you’re right. I think you think we’re seeing a huge shift in, in that aspect. Here’s, here’s what I see in terms of. Where everybody is putting emphasis and we could tell, ’cause we do talk to the people who sell products in these areas.
Leading edge erosion, a lot of leading edge erosion salespeople going around the United States at the minute, I assume worldwide and offering their solutions and, and right now, Yolanda, I mean you see all this, what are your top two or three leading edge solutions that you’re hearing about?
Yolanda Padron: I think the top solutions I’m hearing of onshore are the L Polytech [00:08:00] tape or role, uh, the Armor Edge, uh, and Han Tech Technos, the Pan on Solutions.
Allen Hall: Yeah, the Pan on Solutions seems to be the incumbent in, in ec uh, having more distribution this year through soccer More. Making great strides there. Uh, the, the shells, uh, are always, especially offshore, but onshore, they’re, they’re tending to get a little more traction than they have. And then the LI, I’ve run into a number of operators this year that were putting on the L from Polytech Tape, which is sort of a.
Onshore solution, uh, to erosion A lot of times in the states where there’s dirt and debris around farms where it can be a little bit rough. Those three, all of those, so far I’ve heard, I’ve heard really good things from
Yolanda Padron: no, I’ve, I’ve heard things as, I’ve heard great things as well about those. I’ve seen great things in the field.
It, I’ve [00:09:00] seen, uh. People within the field really leaning towards one or the other depending on what exactly is in their farm. So a lot of these wind farms have have crop dusting right around there because. Of where it’s built, right? So you have very strong, toxic, toxic chemicals like going into your blades and hitting them at very high wind speeds, or very high tip speeds, right?
And so you have to really take into consideration a more robust solution like the Armour Edge or some sort of shell going into that. In other places, you have a, a pretty good gel coat. You have. Really anything you, you really need and maybe a pain on every once in a while just to make sure you get protected is the only solution you, you’ll really need.
So I think it’s not just a, a site by site, but it’s, you know, you really have to map these out and make sure you get the correct solutions for. [00:10:00] For that specific turbine, depending on where it is in the site.
Allen Hall: Yeah. And the engineers on staff and a lot of these operators have a pretty good sense of what’s causing the erosion.
They’ve had enough sky specs inspections to, to go back and go, uh, that looks like some sort of contamination. Or, yes, we’re next to a farm field and they’re plowing every three or four months. And yeah, it, it, it shows up there and the solutions do vary. Right. And I, I think that’s one of the, there’s not one universal solution.
That’s what operators are telling me. They’re saying. There are some solutions that are great for dirt. There’s some solutions that are great for rain. There’s some solutions that are great for a semens turbine but may not so great for a GE turbine. It does seem to be very specific to turbine model and location,
Yolanda Padron: turbine model, location, what site team you have, and whether that team is.
Worked with your turbine model before, I think are really important things to take into consideration when you’re planning your next campaign.
Allen Hall: And we just talked to some operators going back on the repair scenarios and what you’re gonna be focused on that are looking at root bushings [00:11:00] and the inserts, uh, that are tending to slide around.
And, and obviously we’ve, we’ve talked to Onyx about their solution, which is really good and, and golf. When technology is done in Louisiana, has a solution, and CNC onsite has a solution and we foresee a, a solution. So there’s a couple of good solutions out in the field and I, it looks like operators are, are taking advantage of the technology that’s been developed over the last six months to two years that they’re trialing it or maybe just not even trialing it.
In some cases, they’re making sort of a larger deployment to see. If those technologies can help them save blades, because buying a new blade set is crazy expensive right now.
Yolanda Padron: Yeah, crazy expensive. And the downtime that you get from buying a new blade is also insane. A lot of these OEMs really don’t make turbine blades to keep in storage until somebody needs them.
Right. And so you really, you’re faced with a, a very large [00:12:00] downtime end. Pretty much, I mean, not anything, but a lot of things are a lot cheaper than having to sink in millions of dollars to replace a blade that you could have caught the issue from. From a simple sensor installation.
Allen Hall: Yeah. And then that rolls into general CMSI think, uh, obviously there’s been a lot of CMS solutions.
GE has one out of the factory. Siemens, it sounds like they’re gonna be headed towards one vest just has different things that they do. But the, the amount of CMS going in from the gearbox and drivetrain. That’s becoming almost universally accepted. The question right now I think is with a lot of operators, it leads to a lot of data.
There’s just a flood of data. A lot of that’s going into like a horizon where they can manage that data, but it still, there’s still a lot of data and with the reduction in engineering staff, you have to have some way to go look and address it because a lot of times, at least listening to [00:13:00] engineers complain and if, if you spend a long enough time.
Talking to engineers, they’ll always find a pain point. Like the, the, the question about CMS is, is it telling me the truth all the time? If it sets off an alarm, do I believe it or do I just reset it and keep moving? Are you seeing the same thing from your experience on the operations side? Like there’s just a lot of CMS and it’s great, but with reduced engineering staff, we’re not sure how we’re gonna manage it.
Yolanda Padron: Yeah, definitely. I think it’s a, it’s, it’s a sad issue that’s, that’s facing a lot of the teams. Um. But it is something, you know, you get innovation from struggling, right? So I’m sure a lot of these teams who are running really thin right now, they have so many things that they have to accomplish. They’re going to have to find a way to, to be able to, to actually read all of this data and see what it means and see what it translates to.
In the field and see what if there’s a specific alarm, like what’s the [00:14:00]probability of that alarm actually meaning something important. And I think something that all we’ve talked about a lot is having, it’s going to have to be some sort of collaboration between all these operators, between these OEMs.
Something where everyone just does it for the benefit of the industry. And just kind of put the, the commercial side a little bit. The commercial aspect a little bit to the side and just collaborate with each other, uh, to make sure that, that these things can really be done
Allen Hall: well. I, I want to break right here ’cause I wanna talk about that after we come back.
There does seem to be a shift from OEM technology leading the industry to. Operations operators and owners leading the industry and going after solutions and then telling the OEMs what they want to go do. So after the break, let’s discuss that. Are you worried about unexpected blade root failures and the high cost of repairs?[00:15:00]
Meet eco Pitch by Onyx Insight. The standard in blade root monitoring. Onyx state-of-the-art sensor tracks blade root movement in real time, delivering continuous data to keep your wind farm running smoothly and efficiently. With Eco Pitch, you can catch problems early, saving hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Field tested on over 3000 blades. It’s proven reliability at your fingertips. Choose eco Pitch for peace of mind. Contact Onyx Insight today. To schedule your demo of Eco Pitch and experience the future of blade monitoring. So, Yolanda, we’ve had so many discussions with operators and I, I would say over the last month we’ve talked to more operators than we have in the last year, and I think just because of the IRA bill change, all the operators are looking for an advantage and trying to learn from the industry.
The problem though, I think, is that. There are organizations in the United States and, and broader [00:16:00] world that are focused on operations, but they don’t necessarily bring in outside help. And I’ll, I don’t wanna name them because I don’t want to call ’em out, but there are some that, uh, are very internally focused.
So you as Yolanda, as an operator, and say, I’m an operator. We can go to a conference, we can talk about, we have these problems, but we may not have a solution. Now it does seem like the barriers that were between operators are starting to break down and they’re starting to call one another and find out how operator A fixed this problem so that me operator B can implement it.
Are you seeing more of that now that maybe you saw a year or two ago? Yeah,
Yolanda Padron: definitely. I think, I mean as as small of an industry as this can feel, sometimes there’s always. An opportunity to interact with a lot of the same people. Right. And you, I think there, there was a a point in time where maybe you, you [00:17:00] saw everybody else as, as a competition or everybody in another company as sort of your competition to your company.
But with all of these teams, again running a little bit more lean, you really have no other way out of your problem sometimes than to just. Talking to each other and collaborating and making sure you, you together, you can find a solution to get you to the end of the line instead of just solving everything in a vacuum in the way you can.
You just don’t have any time to do that anymore.
Allen Hall: I think it’s one of the things about the podcast, we always find out when we’re talking to operators and they’ll, they’ll mention a problem they’re having and we’ll say, Hey, go back in the archives. We’ve talked to somebody who has a solution for that.
Like, oh, really? That’s interesting. And then they, you know, they can make the connection and, and start to help out their fleet. But now I think that would happen less in terms of, unless Joel and I were actually initiating that conversation, [00:18:00] uh, but now it seems a little more proactive, right. That, uh. If there is money to spend, it does seem like the, the purse strings have loosened a little bit in terms of getting the fleet up and, and that, and that’s sort of twofold.
One is that you hear a lot of operators selling assets to investment groups. That that seems to be a really smart move at this point to try to get a little cash in the bank, uh, uh, if you want, develop more. And, and two, like, well, if I’m gonna keep this asset. I wanted to run as efficiently I can and, and maybe some day somebody will throw me an offer.
You know, mark Zuckerberg will show up and wanna build a data center at my site. So I, I ought to be able to get as, maximize my value out of this thing. That’s really changing the dynamic in, in terms of whether an operator reaches out to somebody. Right. And I, and I wanna hear your thoughts of like how in internally, ’cause you’ve been on the other side of the wall, you, you’ve seen the, the good side, not the, not the supply side.
Uh. Is there restrictions within an, an organization where you couldn’t call [00:19:00] your quote unquote developer competitor? Or is it like, Hey, if I see my competitor at a conference, we can, uh, have a donut together, a coffee together? It’s not a big deal. Where, where were we six months ago, a year ago, and where do you think we are now?
Yolanda Padron: A year ago or so? There was a lot of emphasis on, you know, give people the information they need to know both internally. Externally. Right. And so everyone is a little bit siloed. It was great for some reasons, it wasn’t great for some other reasons, right? But it really didn’t foster the innovation that we’re seeing now, and I, it really didn’t give you the opportunity to go out or even.
Think about going out and talking to your next door neighbor to, to see if, if that was an issue, at least not on, like, outside of the site level. Now, I think there, there were a few months, at least in the States, [00:20:00] right, where we just didn’t know what was going to happen. And everybody was a little bit stalled because you didn’t know what direction to run to.
And I think now, like you said, a lot of people living towards the data centers, the investor groups and everything, you’re able to see that first off, teams are getting a little bit, a lot smarter, right? Like the investor groups are getting a lot smarter and asking the right questions. Now that maybe they wouldn’t be asking three years ago.
And second of all, you’re, you’re starting to see just, just the idea that we all want this industry to survive and we we’re all here, we all believe in it. So getting us all to, to just talk about the very common issues that we’re seeing because there’s, as with everything, right, there’s always going to be something and.
Even if you, if you have a large fleet, if you have a small fleet, there’s a lot of issues that are common [00:21:00] within the same operators, within the same blade type. And so you, you’re able to just by talking to the guy next door, you’re able to see. What a, a solution actually looks like. So what’s been tried before, what hasn’t been tried before, you can really brainstorm ideas with each other and it’s, it’s honestly really exciting as an engineer to see that just come to fruition in the, these past few months.
Allen Hall: So in light of that, and as we get to conference mode and so. November, December, kinda get into December, then went into, uh, the winter time, whether in February, March tend to be big conference times. I, I, 1:00 AM questioning whether a lot of engineers and operators are gonna show up to these things in force and that like they just don’t have the money to do it.
And they’re gonna put travel [00:22:00] restrictions on. The mother thought is that, well, they need to go find solutions. Where are they gonna find solutions at? I mean, obviously you can use AI and go through the uptime database on YouTube. You can pretty much find any solution. But if you wanna show up at a conference and talk to somebody in person, you’re going to have to travel.
So I’m really curious what you think the the, the, the late winter early spring conferences are gonna be filled with. Is it gonna be operators or is it gonna be just suppliers looking at one another?
Yolanda Padron: I think it’ll be a little bit of a, of a mix of both. Right. You know, you’re trying to save money as an operator, right?
And sometimes you might not get the approval to go and spend money and travel to a conference, but you also have a host of issues that sometimes that’s the only way, that’s the only way that you’re going to be able to find someone who can solve them, right? There’s great groups online like e-cig where operators can talk to each [00:23:00] other and it’s, it’s great.
But it’s, it’s also great to actually be able to, to talk to some of the experts that may, sure, they may be trying to sell you a solution, but they can also be really great consultants for the problem that you are having, regardless of whether your solution fits in with them or not.
Allen Hall: Yeah. And I, I’ve noticed, uh, a little bit of a shift here, uh, maybe just because we’re in that supplier business to wind and aerospace, is that.
The unique vendor items that would help wind operators operate more efficiently, that have been around a couple years, have been vetted and, but there’s still a lot of newcomers to the marketplace. And I could name five of them off the top of my head. Uh, but at this point it’s kind of a little bit too late, right?
And so if, if you don’t have case studies, if you don’t have, uh, operators that would swear by your system, whatever that is. It’s gonna be really hard to [00:24:00] penetrate that market. And in some ways I think that’s good because now when an operator talks to somebody, they should go, do you have a case study? Do have you, what’s the business case for this?
Who’s, who else has done it? And if the, that this lowers the threshold in which you can act, particularly with asset managers. The asset managers first gonna ask you is. Well, who else has done it? We don’t wanna be the Guinea pig. The Guinea pig days are over. I, I think. And, but at the same token, there’s still a lot of big players that are trying to push into certain marketplaces, sensing that there’s, uh, maybe a little bit of blood in the water, uh, that they could gain market share.
Where do you think that sits right now and having a lot of vendors come to your door and try to sell you things over the last couple of years? If
Yolanda Padron: your face is solving a whole host of issues, you don’t have enough money to solve most of them. And so the last thing I wanna do as an operator is give somebody the opportunity to mess up on my watch.
[00:25:00] Right? And so by having those case studies, by having somebody else already be the Guinea pig, by being, by being able to show me that you’ve solved this, you’ve. Gotten a solution for the problem I have in the environment that I have. It is key for me to say, okay, perfect. You’ve got this. I can work on something else.
Allen Hall: That’s, that’s interesting. So are you looking more, if obviously you work for a large operator, are you looking for someone to sort of project manage, uh, and upgrade to your project? So let, let me, lemme just give you the example. So if I have a CMS system and I, uh. Proven operators who love my thing, but I I’m gonna go sell it to another operator to de-risk it.
Is it now, unlike in the past, in the past, you give it to an operator, and operator to project manage it, and they would oversee it. Do you think that we’ve transitioned away from that now because the operators have less [00:26:00]engineering staff, they have less capability to do it, that now they’re asking the, the supplier, the vendor.
To not only provide the technology, but to project manage it and to show that it actually works and maybe have to eat some of the cost to install it and to do that oversight that they wouldn’t have done a year ago.
Yolanda Padron: Yeah, definitely. Especially for something as on a trial basis. I think you, you don’t, I mentioned whole host of issues, not a lot of money, not a lot of time, right.
Not a lot of staff. If I am. Sitting at an office in Austin and I know I have an issue and I can hire somebody to, to do a trial and solve that issue. I really don’t want to also have to go and project, manage the, the trial and sit at the site and try to get signal while I’m, I’m doing something else and just multitasking and not really doing anything perfectly, you know?
And so. [00:27:00] As an an aftermarket product provider, I think it’s really important to also be able to project manage your solution or the installation of your solution in the time that it’s being trialed to. Of course, it’s really important to give the operator much visibility as they want to see, uh, because you, you don’t wanna be left in the dark either.
You’re not going to just. Hand the keys to the kingdom of, to whoever knocks on your door. Right? But it’s, it’s really important to be able to, to, to be someone that the operator can trust.
Allen Hall: And I wanna take this to another segment, uh, after the break because I think that same approach is happening with full service agreements.
Said, operators are now getting more project management oversight of what actually is happening in the full surface agreement, so let’s talk about that when we get back. Don’t let blade damage catch you off guard OGs. Ping sensors [00:28:00] detect issues before they become expensive, time consuming problems. From ice buildup and lightning strikes to pitch misalignment in internal blade cracks.
eLog Ping has you covered The cutting edge sensors are easy to install, giving you the power to stop damage before it’s too late. Visit eLog ping.com and take control of your turbine’s health today. Okay, Yoland. Full service agreements. And we have talked to countless numbers of operators more recently that have full service agreements.
And maybe that was the preference over the last couple of years. ’cause the farms seem to be obviously less than five years old. And, and they’re also at the moment talking about extending those full service agreements, so maybe going another five years. But the, the hands-off approach to the FSA is changing.
I, I, we had talked to. Just today, at least two operators that are saying we need to have shadow monitoring, or [00:29:00] we need to be looking into RCAs that have been published, or we need to go dig into the manuals for the wind turbine. It’s not it, it’s not just a trust but verify anymore. It’s like verify, verify, verify.
Maybe a little bit of trust if it works. Uh, are you sensing the same thing and, and what’s really driving that?
Yolanda Padron: I think. Initially when a lot of these full service agreements, long-term service agreements were signed on, it was with the idea that we have this site, we’ll keep it on for 10 years, we’ll repower it, everything will be perfect.
It doesn’t matter what they do because we have these contractual limits to how much money they go over. They go under production will be protected. The business case is there. It’s great. At the end of the full service agreement, we’ll repower, we’ll just sign another one on and it’ll be fine. Hands off.
The OEM knows what they’re doing. I think [00:30:00] now that we’re reaching a lot of the end of these full service agreements and we’re reaching the end of the PTCs, and we know that we’re going to have to keep these projects on for longer. And have them be in a good enough shape to still generate money and not just lose money to everybody in the short and long term.
It’s you. You really have to start picking out the different contractual obligations to be able to see, okay, well do I actually as. An operator know what this means, and if I do, are they complying contractually with what they’re supposed to be complying with? Right. And then taking it a step further now that we talked about how everybody’s entering a little bit into a more collaborative state, you’re noticing a lot of the problems that people are having and you’re able to see that it’s okay, so here’s all of the contractual obligations, but here are all of the [00:31:00] other things that we need to make sure.
Our turbines are taken care of to be able to get through that threshold and to be able to make these projects last and generate money or generate energy as long as, as long as possible.
Allen Hall: Well, and this came up when a Slack discussion between Rosemary and I the other day, which is kind of an odd thing because we caught on a little bit of a Slack rant, but it had to do with resistance checks of the LPS, and you think, well, that’s.
You know, that’s really the basic thing, right? How hard is that? You just, it’s an ome or check. Uh, but rosemary is pointing out like the, the, the manuals for the turbine say in some turbines, this is a specific turbine, so you need to measure the resistance of the LPS every two years and under a full service agreement.
The OEM wasn’t doing. Yet when they had problems, it was on the operator to go fix it. So it, it turned into this really odd [00:32:00] discussion of, well, wait a minute, if the full service agreement means that the operator is taking control of it and they’re not even following their own instructions, how is the operator responsible for that?
That doesn’t, that doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. But I, I think that has been the case for a number of years. And today we were talking to another operator in a sort of a similar field saying. We’re gonna hit maximum payout for, from the O eem on on the full service agreement. So we’re gonna keep capping that every year, and the OEM is fine with it.
So we, we always hit those max limits, you know, what do you do after that?
Yolanda Padron: And it’s tricky from a site level, right? Because you have these full service agreements, you don’t necessarily have the staff to actually be able to. Climb the tower with these OEMs and make sure that they do everything they’re supposed to be doing.
And in some of these contracts, you won’t even have a stipulation that says, give me the reports to, in that case, the, the LPS testing. [00:33:00] Right. And so it, it becomes a, a tricky, a tricky environment. ’cause you, you have these. You have this relationship within OEM, right? And you have to, to, you have to keep that relationship going, especially for the sake of your projects.
But it’s also a bit of a, of a strange point to find yourself where it’s like, I don’t distrust you, but please give me a reason to trust you. You know? Um, and so it does become really tricky when it’s something that’s. Both when it’s something that’s stated in the contract explicitly and they don’t have any documentation for, so it gives you a bit of a reason to, to distrust them, but also when it’s an a very known issue that they either didn’t flag or they flagged and while burying it into something else, and so you don’t [00:34:00] necessarily.
Have a, a good understanding of, okay, well if we’re managing this together, you know, if we’re in this together, why wouldn’t I want to know about this potential issue that’s going on in my turbine?
Allen Hall: Is this going to change turbine supply agreements and FSA contracts? Because the more I talk to Yolanda’s of the world.
The more I realize they become contract lawyers and less engineers that they’re searching through. And maybe that’s the, the advantage of AI is they can kind of be a contract lawyer with some help from ai, but to, to help understand what their, um, the operator has to do or what they’re obligated to go look for, to check the boxes so they could get a payout from the OEM.
In relationship to, uh, you know, just maximizing profits. And, and on some level, some of that’s gonna come from the OEM. Are we turning engineers into contract lawyers?
Yolanda Padron: [00:35:00] We’re definitely upholding a, a, a stronger relationship between the engineers and the legal teams within the operators, right? And so I think I’ve, I definitely noticed a lot more questions coming over from the legal teams.
While, while I was on that side, right? And so it was a lot of, okay, what can we do in the long term for new contracts? And what can we do to make sure that this is explicitly stated or what can we negotiate? But I am also noticing a lot of pushback from the OEMs. And it doesn’t just happen in when, um, but a lot of pushback from the OEMs and maybe shortening that period from which they’re, they’re liable.
And so instead of having it be a 20 year, 15 year full service agreement, maybe shortening it to, to 10 years, to five years, doing it little by little, which is also another, another point of [00:36:00] distrust, right. Unfortunately,
Allen Hall: it, it is become a little more combative, I think, and the contracts are gonna get thicker over the next six.
Months to a year, uh, because the engineers are getting smarter and they know what to ask. And because development and operation and maintenance are getting closer and closer together, they’re probably sharing an office right now where they weren’t even in the same building. And consolidation forces, uh, new neighbors to occur.
But I, I, I don’t see the industry necessarily, uh, being tanked. Right? So I think this all gets back to where is the industry growing right now? Since you’ve been out on site and much closer to it than I have. Uh, my feeling, my feeling is, is like, yeah, we’re going this through this little rough patch and everybody is, there’s a lot of good engineers here.
Be careful because you put good engineers, you put ’em under stress, things happen and all of a sudden wind energy gets even better. Are you seen as sort of the same thing or you, or you is just like all, all hands on deck? [00:37:00]We’re in crisis mode.
Yolanda Padron: I think we were definitely in crisis mode earlier this year.
Uh, you know, but now I think a lot of, a lot of teams, and I’m seeing it, we’re seeing it through different operators, large and small. It’s a lot more, it’s just a lot more collaborative. If, if you’re looking at the repair teams coming in, you’re looking at the owners, the operators, you’re looking at the asset managers, the engineers.
Everyone just really wants to make it work and find a solution and, you know. Just work on everything together. I think there’s definitely been a lot more open discussions than I saw in the past and a lot more availability of teams to talk and, and, and teams really wanting to find solutions to a lot of these issues.
Like you said, a group of engineers sometimes can be a little bit dangerous in the sense that. [00:38:00] They’re, they’re going to find a, a very creative solution to an issue. Um, but that’s, I don’t know. It’s a, it’s an exciting time, I think, to, to be in this industry and, and just to, to see how we can all work together.
Allen Hall: Yeah. If you can survive the adversity, you get honed, having been through a number of aerospace ups and downs over the years, one thing that we’ve learned is that. Um, the reliability of airplanes. I know people will disagree with me with this, but the reliability of airplanes have gone up quite a bit, and the reliability of turbines is about to do the same thing.
You’re gonna see fewer models being built. You’re gonna see a lot more focus on the design and the certification and validation phase of turbines along with operators checking. Uh, and, and one of those happened today where an operator said We’re, we’re checking blades as they show up on site. Yeah, two years ago that was unheard of.
You couldn’t convince [00:39:00] anybody to do that. And it was a, the unique operator, typically European that would do that, and Americans didn’t wanna do that at all. But we’re, we’re seeing this really dynamic shift. So, although I am panicked and truly I am, because I think the industry. Is going to be, uh, you know, it’s gonna make or break right?
It’s renewables. Solar and wind plus battery are gonna be the future. Already are the future in sort of a sense. Once you get over this little bit of rough patch and get organized, look out, I, I think wind and solar and battery are going to be going gangbusters. The economy’s got a, in interest, rates have to come down a little bit to make it a little more profitable.
But man, I think the future looks great.
Yolanda Padron: Yeah, I agree. It’s a really exciting time to be here.
Allen Hall: That wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas. We’d love to hear from you. Reach out to us on LinkedIn and don’t forget to subscribe. So if you never miss an episode, [00:40:00] and if you found value in today’s conversation, please leave us a review.
It helps other wind energy professionals discover the show and we will see you here. Next week on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.
https://weatherguardwind.com/wind-operations/
Renewable Energy
Danish Renewables Push in Australia, Nearthlab Does Defense
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Danish Renewables Push in Australia, Nearthlab Does Defense
Denmark’s royal trade mission brings 54 companies to Australia’s renewables market. Plus the UK opens CFD allocation round eight for up to 18 offshore wind farms, and wind tech startups weigh focus against diversification into defense.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast brought to you by Strike Tape, protecting thousands of wind turbines from lightning damage worldwide. Visit strike tape.com And now your hosts.
Allen Hall: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m here with Yolanda Padron, Rosemary Barnes at Matthews Stead, and we start off. On the Danish trip to Australia, 54 Danish companies traveled to Australia alongside King Frederick II and Queen Mary. Uh, over the past week, most work in the renewable energy and green construction businesses that traveled along several signed agreements during the trip.
Denmark sees Australia as a growth market, and Rosemary is tied to royalty here. Loosely that Queen Mary is actually from Tasmania, much like Rosemary. [00:01:00] So there is possibly a line to the throne, the Danish throne for Rosemary.
Rosemary Barnes: My dad’s from Tasmania. I, I live in Canberra, but I was, the whole five years I was living in Denmark, I kept waiting for Princess.
She was Princess Mary at that point, but Princess Mary to get in touch with her phone number, catch up. You know, Australians have moved to Denmark. Never happened. And now I see that they’ve come to Australia. And do you think that Mary reached out and got in touch with me? No, she didn’t. So I continue, continue to be disappointed in, in Queen Mary.
Matthew Stead: Maybe she’s waiting for you, Rosie.
Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, she could be waiting for me to reach out. That’s true.
Allen Hall: But I clearly, Australia is a growth market. Denmark sees it. I know there’s been a number of Danish companies in Australia over the last two, three years, or con companies from all over the world have been down to Australia, realizing that the growth of renewables is gonna be big because Australia is targeting 82% renewables by 2030.
Uh, and right now it’s about 50% renewables, which is [00:02:00] remarkable by the way, that connection to Denmark. Is only going to grow, especially with the relationship with Queen Mary to the area. What are some of the growth areas that Denmark can walk into in Australia right now, Matthew?
Matthew Stead: I mean, obviously the proposed offshore wind is a, is a big thing.
So, um, once that gets up and running, obviously the Danish technology will come in there. Um, but, but also, you know, through vest have been here forever. Uh, Siemens, gaa, you know, there’s a strong Danish connection there. Um, so. Yeah, I, I think it’s already, already, already really strong. And, um, obviously having the, the queen, the Danish queen, um, yeah.
Ties in with all of that.
Allen Hall: Is it a reciprocal agreement that Australians can do work in Denmark?
Rosemary Barnes: I don’t think, it’s not any sort of like free trade agreement, is it? It’s just some individual, I dunno how much we’ve, we’ve got to [00:03:00]teach Denmark, although there are some good Australian technologies, like maybe not building wind turbines themselves, but there are some good technologies like here, logic’s Ping, uh, Australian developed the ping part of it anyway.
And then also, you know, I think some, some future manufacturing methods, uh, doing some exciting things here in Australia. Also, it’s not that hard to move to Denmark if you, um, like when I moved there, all I needed to get a Visa was a, a job offer. That was a certain, I, I don’t think it, I don’t, I don’t remember exactly if it was the type of job or if it was the salary, but you know, like you’re not gonna get a job offer.
Like working part-time at a bar isn’t gonna be enough to get you a, a working visa in Denmark. But certainly. Any engineers, um, you can, if you get a good engineering position offered to you in Denmark, it’s not hard for the company to make that happen. So I don’t know that we need, we don’t, we don’t really need it made that much easier for us [00:04:00] to get over there.
Allen Hall: Is it difficult to get a work permit in Australia if you’re from Denmark?
Rosemary Barnes: Yes and no. It’s not like I would so love to be hiring my XLM colleagues to come. I know that I’d moved to Australia too. Some of them, it’s, it’s not super duper easy. Um. It’s not impossible. And uh, if people are young enough, it’s a bit easier.
But, um, it’s, it’s definitely possible, but it’s not, it’s not straightforward. It’s quite expensive and lengthy process.
Matthew Stead: You know, if they can fund a fund, um, themselves with a couple of million dollars, that’ll make it easier.
Rosemary Barnes: It’s definitely beyond my capabilities as a small company of like four, four people to be able to, um, sponsor someone.
But I have had, um, actually. Most, maybe. Yeah. Every single employee actually that I’ve had has been, has non, not an Australian citizen, but they’ve all had visas for other reasons. You know, either because they came over with a partner who, um, was an unskilled working visa or because they did a master’s [00:05:00] here and then got a, um, a, yeah, after that got permanent residency through the, you know, the, there’s a pretty established pathway after studying to be able to get permanent residency.
Definitely appreciate that there is so much, um, international talent that’s willing to come to Australia, but just yeah, unfortunately any, any random skilled person, you, it’s not, it’s not easy for a small company to bring them over.
Matthew Stead: Rosie, would you recommend Australians to go to Denmark to learn about the wind industry and then, and come back again like you did?
Rosemary Barnes: I recommend that they do that in 2016 when I did it. Um, so everyone who’s got a time machine. Hop, hop in, hop in your time machine and go, go do that. I mean, it’s, uh, I was looking back through, um, photos, uh, of my time there recently and was just, uh, like thinking about how much work I did and the amount of time that I spent like in, in production is like I got in my.
Four years that I was working for lm, I had at least 10 years worth of experience. And I mean there were [00:06:00] some long, long weeks, but I’m not sure that Denmark’s the right place now because for LM there’s nearly no engineering left in Denmark and certainly not doing the cool, new, exciting technologies that they were while I was there.
So that’s not the go Vestas is still doing a fair bit. But you know, we talked recently about the Vestas CO wanting to, wanting to move somewhere with more favorable. Taxation of CEOs salaries. So, you know, maybe that’s not continuing. So I definitely recommend moving to another part of the world early on in your career while you’ve still got enough energy to, to, to like really, really hard work.
Um, but I dunno that Denmark is, is the right place anymore. There’s not that much manufacturing left Now.
Based on your experience in both Denmark and Australia, how likely do you think that any of these companies that are coming in. To Australia will do any r and d with data from Australia for all of these wind technologies that they’re bringing.
Rosemary Barnes: I, I think that there’s some interest in that. I haven’t heard [00:07:00] Danish companies specifically. I have heard a few little inklings of US companies who are interested and I think that that makes a lot of sense because the US was a much more attractive environment for wind energy technologies until a couple of years ago.
So there’s a lot of companies that got partway and now are frustrated and I think that Australia seems quite attractive to them. So that’s where I’ve heard people interested, maybe British as well. Um, the Denmark Danish companies would do well. Like any company, um, that’s trying to develop a technology related to wind energy would, um, do really well to come try and develop in Australia because, you know, like, um, we’re so short staffed or like for expert staff.
Things are really spread out. Costs are very high. Um, things wear out faster. Like we just have more operational problems here. So, you know, when you’re putting a business case together, you need to, um, you know, an environment where you are. The alternative of just doing everything manually is [00:08:00]far more expensive here, and it takes far longer so you can get a much more positive business case, um, in Australia, like earlier than you could somewhere else.
So I think that that makes it really. Really like perfect place to develop technologies. Um, yeah, but I don’t think everybody realizes that yet. But I do see some, some people starting to,
Matthew Stead: and I’m adding to what you’re saying, Rosie, when I first started in wind, um, back in 2012, um, I got great reception from Denmark.
Actually, I probably got the most. Positive responses to my outreach from Denmark. So, um, I, at that point in time, you know, it is a little bit before 2016, but, um, um, um, I, you know, I found really positive engagement and willingness to be open to new technologies. So that was my experience
Allen Hall: as Wind energy professionals.
Staying informed is crucial, and let’s face it difficult. That’s why the Uptime podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine. [00:09:00] PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need.
Don’t miss out. Visit PES wind.com today. The UK government announced contracts for difference allocation round eight, which will open in July of this year. This follows AR seven in January, which secured 8.4 gigawatts of offshore wind. The largest UK CFD procurement ever and renewable UK says up to 18 offshore wind farms could compete for this AR eight round now.
The amount of wind going in offshore in the UK is astonishing. Uh, AR eight. I haven’t seen any numbers yet of what they think the total gigawatts will be, but it has to be somewhere around the eight range just to keep up with the [00:10:00] expected rate, uh, to meet their environmental targets and electricity targets in the uk.
This is changing the way wind is developed in Europe, especially with the UK changing its tariffs and eliminating tariffs on wind turbine parts and components that come into the country. That is going to really improve the economics of wind turbines in the uk. Plus turn out a lot of European countries and companies to to feed the UK energy goals.
Is this the right move in, in terms of the government approach? Because a lot of, uh, other auctions that have happened up in Germany all the way up into Scandinavia have not had such success as this recent UK round. Is their model just a little bit different? And maybe the UK approach is, is the winning method with the the CFDs.
Rosemary Barnes: We have some in Australia too. The A [00:11:00] CT Australian Capital Territory where I live has the same thing and, um, for at least several years. Recently, I think most years recently we’ve had our electricity prices in Canberra have been reduced while in the rest of Australia they’ve gone up. It doesn’t always happen that way.
Um, it depends on, yeah, how expensive. Electricity was compared to normal. But you know, like when the gas, uh, shock was happening and pushing up electricity prices everywhere, it didn’t affect Canberra very much because we already have PPAs for a hundred percent of our electricity from clean sources. So,
Allen Hall: but isn’t that the goal at the end of the day to get.
Some levelized pricing, which is the allocation rounds are doing, is they’re getting levelized pricing over a fixed period, so you know what your electricity is going to cost you. None of this up and down, like with the gas market in the United States and elsewhere.
Rosemary Barnes: My understanding is that it’s the most crucial aspect of that is certainty, so that new projects can get financing.[00:12:00]
It’s not actually about it being a, like, whether it’s a subsidy or a payment is not as important as, like, it’s not that that renewable electricity is too expensive and the government needs to subsidize it. It’s that the bank needs to know how, how much you’re gonna get for the electricity that you generate, um, in order to fuel Okay, to lend it to you.
And I mean, you can understand why, like, think about. As, um, batteries enter the electricity grid, you, you know, the pricing, the market movements throughout a day are really starting to change. We used to have, you know, like big spikes in price every evening as a lot of gas generators came on. ’cause they’re expensive to run.
But now we’re needing less and less of that as we add more batteries. And, you know, people know these. Trends are generally happening, but not exactly. So how can you forecast what your revenue is going to be? Um, if you’re lending billions of dollars to a project, then you want to know that your person you’re lending to is gonna be able to, to pay you back, which they, they can’t if the revenue goes through the floor.
So, yeah, my [00:13:00] understanding is that’s, that’s what it’s really for, is to provide the certainty. It’s, it’s like a bit outdated to refer to it as a subsidy. Um, ’cause it’s not always a subsidy. Sometimes it’s the opposite. But what’s really needed is like knowing how much you’re gonna get for the product that you are delivering.
I think it makes sense. I just think that like if there’s all this, all the changes that are coming down the pipeline for the uk, it’s a little bit difficult to actually pinpoint where that price is gonna be. Like a sweet spot for all parties involved. Um. Which I think is something that we saw on the PPA side a lot in the US a few years ago.
Rosemary Barnes: They had issues in the UK as well, like a couple of auctions ago. Um, they set the price way too low and I mean, they were told leading up to it, no one can deliver a project at this cost and then nobody bid. And it was, it was a real shame because, you know, like it set them back on, you know, that there’s no projects entered the pipeline, um, in that year as a result.
But it’s also what’s interesting to [00:14:00] me is that it’s a different price for different. Types of project. So, you know, onshore wind has a, a different safety price than a, um, offshore wind. And fixed offshore wind has a very different price from floating offshore. Solar’s different. They also have special, uh, price for tidal energy.
And that to me is a really interesting thing because who is looking at the UK’s energy mix and saying, yep, title energy needs to be part of this, and we we’re happy to pay, you know, 2, 3, 4 times whatever it is, more. For that than for offshore wind. It’s, um, that, that’s interesting to me. How, how they’ve come up with, with the Yeah, like how the mix is going to look.
I mean, they don’t control it precisely. It’s not like they say we are gonna have exactly this many gigawatts for offshore wind and exactly this many gigawatts for solar farms. But they do have, um, different prices and different technologies that are targeted.
Matthew Stead: Seems like it really relates really well to the energy [00:15:00]security as well.
You know, an extra eight gigawatt here, extra eight gigawatt there. I mean, that can only help with energy security, which is obviously a massive topic. I’m not sure how the newspapers has been coping in the last week or so in the us but over here it’s all about rationing of fuel. It’s all about queues at the pump.
So energy security is, is definitely a huge topic.
Rosemary Barnes: You wanna know where there isn’t a queue. In my driveway when I plug my car into the, the outlet in my garage. It’s been a really, really fun time to be a smug EV owner. I’ve been, um, reveling in it. Yeah. Really, really, really enjoying, uh. And Joan, but I also do think like it’s gonna last, like we, because we still talk about the oil crisis in the 1970s, right?
Like that, uh, we, uh, people overreacted and then reverted for the most part pretty quickly after that. With Denmark being one exception, they, they went all in on when consistently after that. Um, but [00:16:00] you know, like this, even if it’s only a few weeks long, this little shock is going to. Make people think, okay, oh, I was super worried that I might have to spend 20 minutes refueling on a road trip instead of 10 minutes.
Um, but actually remember that time when I couldn’t even get petrol at all and I had to spend yeah, like half an hour lining up because everyone was freaking out and. Uh, I wasn’t sure if I was even gonna be able to get to work the next week because the Australian government only thinks we need 30 days worth of, um, of oil in reserve.
Uh, I, I think that it’s, it’s got to help EV sales and then. The EV sales is only one part of it because you need then also, you know, security of electricity generation. And I mean, in Australia we’ve got our own coal, so we’re not, um, probably ever going to be able to not generate electricity. But, um, renewables is a, is a huge part of that as well, being able to, you know, have cheap, cheap electricity all the time.
So I, I do think that. It, it’s got to be, you [00:17:00] know, helping some of these technologies move, move ahead a little bit faster now.
Matthew Stead: Yeah, and I also heard that, uh, the UK is sort of patting themselves on the bat for, uh, actually, you know, transitioning and, you know, securing their own, um, energy supply and not being as reliant as some other countries on imports of, of energy.
Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. I mean, we’ve had so many opportunities to learn that lesson over the last few years. Right. So. Anybody that just, um, relaxes after this and says, yep, okay, we’re all good. To go back to relying a hundred percent on, on gas is, you know, like, really. Really going to big lengths to nod to not futureproof themselves from the next one.
I do. Do we could, would anybody believe that this is the last time that we’re gonna see, uh, a shock like this? I mean, it will happen definitely. Again,
Matthew Stead: rather embarrassing, but actually currently I own approximately six EVs.
Allen Hall: It sounds like a lot. Matthew,
Rosemary Barnes: you’ll have people beating down your door. Share.
Share the love around. We need, it
Allen Hall: should give taxi rides. [00:18:00] Ubers
Matthew Stead: in 2026. I wanna sell, I wanna sell three of them. So this is just. I’m just so happy.
Rosemary Barnes: So message ’em on LinkedIn if you need an ev. Now we’re running classified ads in the uptime When new podcast
Allen Hall: are they? BMW electrified? BMWs
Matthew Stead: no one’s. One’s BMW.
Um, another one is, uh, Austin 10. From 1947,
Allen Hall: this is an ad.
Matthew Stead: The other one’s in Nissan Leaf, uh, NISO leaf with about 16,000 Ks on the clock.
Rosemary Barnes: But the first two you converted yourself.
Matthew Stead: Yeah,
Allen Hall: we can reach out to Matthew on LinkedIn and he will sell you an electric vehicle. He’s in Adelaide and there’s plenty of people listening to the podcast in Adelaide and all around Australia.
Honestly, he, he will deliver. If asked, so Matthew Stead, S-T-E-A-D on LinkedIn.
Matthew Stead: The BMW that I converted is a 2 0 2, um, from 19 in the the seventies. And, uh, actually BMW um, converted the same car to an electric vehicle for the Munich [00:19:00] Olympics. So yeah, all I did was, um, recreated what. BMW had done back in 1972.
Allen Hall: Delamination and bottomline. Failures and blades are difficult problems to detect early. These hidden issues can cost you millions in repairs and lost energy production. C-I-C-N-D-T are specialists to detect these critical flaws before they become expensive burdens. Their non-destructive test technology penetrates deep to blade materials to find voids and cracks.
Traditional inspections, completely. Miss C-I-C-N-D-T Maps. Every critical defect delivers actionable reports and provides support to get your blades. Back in service, so visit cic ndt.com because catching blade problems early will save you millions.
Well, south Korean Drone Company Earth Lab built its vision AI [00:20:00]through wind turbine inspections, and I’ve seen hundreds of those in the states. A $10 million defense export deal in 2025 shifted revenue from 80% inspections to. A much larger defense share. Now they have a, a pretty sizable deal, obviously in the Middle East right now, where they’re using their drone technology to be involved in the defense sector.
And North Lab I think got driven to that just because, uh, some of their business in the United States didn’t turn out properly the way they expected it to, although they had. Really great technology. In every conference I would attend with Ner lab, like, uh, and they would explain what they were doing. At one point, they were probably three or four years ahead on the, doing your own drone inspections with the little drone and you just buy their software and it would just, it would go up and take pictures of your wind turbine.
Didn’t need a separate [00:21:00] pilot. It, it made all things a lot simpler, but that did never seem to catch on. But the technology is there and North Lab does have good engineering teams to develop drone technology. One of the things about this article, which I, I saw the other day, is that North Labs is thinking about their technology in a broader sense.
That they’re not just focused on wind turbine inspections. And we see companies that are only tied to wind quite often. The struggle when wind slows down like it’s doing right now, where an Earth Lab is thinking about the problem a little bit differently and saying, I have this technology. It solves a bunch of problems.
Maybe we ought to explore those other problem areas and see if we could generate some revenue. And clearly they have. Is that good advice for the wind industry in terms of technology companies is not to just focus on wind, but to think about solutions for adjacent industries? Does that just broaden the portfolio enough where?
It keeps your, [00:22:00] it keeps your company viable for longer periods of time.
Matthew Stead: This is a huge topic for us because, um, you know, our technologies can be applied to, you know, rail mining defense, you know, so we’ve, we’ve got sensors which can instrument a whole range of things. Like, you know, we can listen for a conveyor belt when it’s failing.
We can measure the ice. On the platform next to a railway line, we can measure ice on an aircraft. Um, you know, with our sensors we can do so much. Um, and um, what we’ve decided is that we need to really conquer. Wind in a nice way, as in, you know, actually help the wind industry first. So we really need to, um, you know, focus there.
But, you know, we, we’ve all always been sort of dragged into other industries. Um, but, you know, I think being a technology startup is all about focus. Um, but, you know, revenue is hard. Um, you know, gaining traction is hard. The industry [00:23:00] is hard. Um, so I can see why it might be attractive to, to look at other, other verticals.
Um, yeah, so it’s, it’s a, it’s, it’s a reality of a technology startup, unfortunately, that you need to look for other applications for your tech. And, and the other thing is, you know, obviously if we can sell our sensors. Into say, mining or, or rail or whatever. Then it can lower the cost and then, you know, that benefits wind as well.
Allen Hall: Well, there’s other technology developments can happen in those other industries you could bring into wind makes both avenues possible. Yeah. A lot of industries are gonna benefit from the technology that has been evolved from wind turbines growth into other industries. But it works both ways and it just adds complexity to the business.
But to me it’s complexity you have to take on.
Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, I’ve worked with a bunch of startups through my career and I’m trying to think of even one that hasn’t had a defense project at some point. It’s very, very common for development, like, um, [00:24:00]technologies that are in development. Is a very appealing avenue to get funds because, you know, defense spends a lot of, a lot of money on developing new technologies.
I’m sure that’s true in every country, not just Australia. Um, and they’re also prepared to, like, if you’ve got a capability that they want, they are like, you don’t, it’s not so commercially cutthroat, you know, like they are prepared to pay a lot for something that, um, has unique capabilities. So I do see that that is incredibly attractive to startups, but I really like what Matt said when he said that as a startup you’ve gotta stay focused because that is what the startups that I have worked with in the past nine, outta 10 of them have done the opposite.
They’re just like trying to grab any grant that they think that they could possibly, you know, um, apply for. Then they win it and then now all of a sudden they’ve got a project in a direction that is not. Taking them to their actual business. It’s, you know, it’s not step on the way towards their bus achieving their business goals.
Um, and it’s like, [00:25:00] what is the startup for? Are you trying to commercialize a technology or find out if, if it’s not possible and stop? Or are you trying to just keep on working on this as long as possible? And I think that, like, honestly, nine outta 10 of the startups that I’ve worked with, it’s the the latter where they just want to keep on doing cool stuff.
Then yeah. Grabbing any, any grant that you can to continue working on that. And a lot of them are defense. Um, makes a lot of sense. But I, I do think that, you know, you’ve got to be goal oriented, keep your eyes on the prize and, um, yeah, like Matt said, say focus if you wanna succeed as a startup,
Allen Hall: you think that’s a difference between grants and actual business?
I agree with you, Rosemary. When you get hooked into a grant that has a particular outcome and you tend to deviate from what the market. Once, because you’re not listening to the market when you’re going through this grant process, but if you’re in a second business area, it may make sense just because you have a customer, you’re learning from that experience.
A lot of things between wind and the other industries are similar in [00:26:00]terms of the way they’re structured, the demands, the expectations, the. It’s, it’s close.
Rosemary Barnes: Grants are amazing when it’s the right grant, and you shouldn’t choose a grant for the sake of getting the money. You should choose it because it helps you achieve something that you wanted to achieve anyway.
Um, I think that that’s what you’ve gotta, gotta consider. Um, and yeah, definitely don’t turn down free money if it’s available to help you, you know, get to where you need to get, but don’t deviate on. A bunch of side quests just because you can get funding for that.
Matthew Stead: I think half the battle is that, uh, half the challenge of commercialization is actually the industry.
So half, half the challenge is the technology and r and d and making stuff, but the other half is actually knowing the industry, knowing how to price it, knowing the people, knowing where to sell it, you know, knowing the return on investment. So every time you go into a new market, you might think, oh yeah, I’ll just reapply what I’ve already learned.
But that’s, that’s. Definitely not true. So your rail is completely different from [00:27:00] wind. Um, in terms of the actual market, the tech, the tech might be the same, the same for, you know, aerospace.
Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. I see that a lot with companies that are trying to take a, a technology that they have from another area and try and bring it into wind.
And people are always shocked at. At how different, um, wind energy is. I mean, in terms of the physical operating environment, that’s a, a shock for most companies to start with. It’s like, like in several aspects, it wouldn’t be a more harsh operating environment than, you know, sticking something in or on a wind turbine blade and expecting it to last without maintenance for 20, 30 years.
Um, but then also just the way that the, the market works. But it’s interesting that you say 50 50, it’s half about the technology. Do you reckon it’s even half? I, I have come to believe that the technology is like, yeah, like really understanding the problem is and, and knowing that there is a need for a solution.
Is the vast majority of the way there, there are so many good engineers in the world that they will find, find the solution if they know exactly what problem they should be solving. [00:28:00] I, I reckon it’s less than 50%. I don’t know about 10%, but, um, certainly I don’t think it’s 50 50.
Matthew Stead: Yeah. Maybe it depends on what, what stage of development it is and, you know, what, what maturity level you’re at, perhaps.
Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. I mean, your company started. From a, um, you, you didn’t just think, Hey, I want, you know, I know a lot about noise. I wonder what technology I can develop with this. You, you started from, Hey, we’ve got a, a, a problem that, uh, I don’t wanna, you know, um, tell your origin story for you, but you started with a, a problem and a potential solution and then, you know, went from there.
Right? So,
Matthew Stead: yeah, Bre, you know, I, I think B would be happy for me to say his name, Bre, basically throughout a challenge saying. But, you know, technicians can hear, um, blade damage. So, you know, it should be really simple and easy to make a machine to do the same as what a human can do.
Rosemary Barnes: And it was simple and easy, right?
Matthew Stead: Ah, yeah. It was so easy. Look, look at all that, all that gray hair.
Allen Hall: Well, I think that’s the trouble, right? Is that [00:29:00] if you want to be tied to an industry, hopefully you hit it during a peak time. Because there are ebbs and flows to every economy about every seven years. There’s always something cataclysmic that happens.
You just don’t wanna be in that down cycle. You want to be in the upcycle and have something ready to go. When the upcycle hits, you’ll see a lot of businesses do that. In the aerospace, you see it quite a bit that they’ll kind of go dormant and then when they feel like the, the economy is going to boom, they’ll ramp up operations real quick and, and try to make their money while the kidding is good.
Then slow it down when it’s not. They have taken a, a more longer term perspective on it. Large businesses can do that. ’cause usually they’re stockpiling cash to, to manage that. Small businesses don’t usually have the cash flow to get over those, uh, lean times. And that’s the trouble. I, I think a lot of companies that I know, in fact.
Rosemary and I are working on a project and a couple of names of companies that were in [00:30:00] Wind two, three years ago popped up and I thought they had such great technology and the business model was right. It just hit a rough patch. That’s all it was, and that if you revive that technology a year from now, it would still be applicable.
You could still sell that product. It’s just trying to manage the cash flow. It’s hard because I, and back to Rosemary’s point. How much of it is the technology? Uh, and I, I say 10%, and I think that’s roughly right from my experience. A lot of it is everything else. Managing the books, managing your risks, people, uh, all that manufacturing, right, all quality, all every, all that’s involved.
And it’s, unless you do it, you don’t realize it. It’s hard to see it unless you’re on the inside. You know, the inside. You think every minute is some other. Major calamity that you have to manage. If you don’t manage it right, you may not make it out the other [00:31:00] side. That’s what small businesses are all about.
But it’s, that’s what makes it so hard.
Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. I know that at Parlo we’re spending a lot more effort on understanding the problems that people need solved, um, rather than developing solutions, which has been a bit of a tough thing for me to. Kind of, uh, stick to because, uh, you know, I’m an engineer. I’ve developed products my whole career and that I, I love tinkering and, you know, like making things work and doing things that haven’t been done before.
But I, I, I do think that there is a real, real need for, um, understanding the problem really well, understanding, um, what solutions are available and, and fitting them together. I think that that is actually a really, um, a, a really needed part of the, you know, the whole wind energy ecosystem.
Allen Hall: We had a listener reach out from Japan, Sini Kajima, who was a city counselor in one of the cities, in obviously in Japan, who was a regular listener and.
He wrote in [00:32:00] about some of the wind turbine installations that are going on in sort of northern western Japan. They’ve installed some eight megawatt turbines about a mile, 1.6 kilometers offshore, and that’s creating a lot of concern for the local residents there. Those are big turbines, and they’re talking about using 15 megawatt turbines to do something similar and.
As, uh, advocate for, uh, the, the city he’s advocating, uh, a 10 kilometer minimum setback in the national diet in Japan. You’re gonna see a lot more of this come up, I think. And the pictures that was sent along with it is pretty, um, eye-opening in that you got this really big turbine, really close to shore.
Are we going to put setbacks [00:33:00] in as, uh, a regulation or law in some of these territories, like especially Northern Japan where there is great wind resources, amazing wind resources, but at the same time, there’s a lot of people who live there that will like to have some view of the ocean, not just turbines in the water right off the coastline.
This is not just a Japanese problem, but it does seem to be a, a big problem ’cause of the, the way the Continental shelf is around Japan, it drops up pretty quick.
Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, exactly. It’s not a specific Japanese problem, and I mean, in most cases there’s development approvals and people have plenty of opportunity to express their displeasure at where turbines are cited.
But for Japan, it wouldn’t be as simple as saying, okay, we just increase the offset dis distance by a little bit because you increase the, I’m assuming these turbines are cited already as far out as they can be while still being fixed bottom. And if you wanted to push them further away, then you move to floating and you double or triple the cost, [00:34:00] which Japan is looking into floating offshore wind a lot.
Um, but Japan. Has no, has no easy options. I mean, Japan likes electricity as much as every other country does. They don’t want to rely on nuclear as much as they have been, which is, you know, probably, at least to a certain extent, understandable. They don’t have great solar resources. I mean, they have some, um, and they could do more.
They don’t have good onshore wind opportunities. They have geothermal potential, but they don’t like that so much because their, um, NAL hot springs are, you know, a very important tourism industry and very important culturally. So they’re worried about doing anything that would mess that up. The offshore wind solution, this particular environment haven’t seen, it doesn’t sound like the best situated project, but take any other option that they’ve got for generating electricity in Japan and it has.
Probably equal disadvantages. I just think that they have a, a hard problem and [00:35:00] have to choose which compromise they wanna make.
Allen Hall: Mr. Kuma brings up a couple of points here that. There’s about 150 residents that are at risk of insomnia from the wind turbine noise, and they’re concerned about the migratory zones for protected wildlife.
In this case, geese about five kilometers offshore.
Rosemary Barnes: Then there might be birds that are affected, and if they are, they can use technologies to spot the birds. Stop the turbines. Like there’s, there’s, you know. Dozens of success stories, um, related to birds and wind turbines. That’s, that’s a solved problem.
The noise, I mean, how far away are they? Matt’s the noise expert. Like how, how far away from a wind turbine do you have to be before you can even hear it over the wind noise?
Matthew Stead: Uh, the wind turbine noise is not gonna be an issue.
Allen Hall: So then it comes down to sight lines. And Japan has some of the most beautiful coastline in the world.
Rosemary Barnes: I mean, I’m not gonna tell someone that they should, like looking at wind turbines, like I would also rather not look at a wind turbine if I could be looking at an ocean view or a mountain view or whatever. But any energy project would [00:36:00] be nicer if it wasn’t there in the first place. Like, you know, there’s not like a beautiful coal power plant to look at.
There’s not a beautiful transmission line to look at. There’s not a beautiful petrol pump, um, to look at. Like, none of none. None of these things are like beautiful technologies that we enjoy interacting with on our daily lives, but we prefer to, you know, have the trade off of having that infrastructure.
And trade off for the, the benefits that it brings. And, um, you know, there’s, in that sense, there’s nothing different about renewable energy technologies. It’s different, different trade offs, but they’re always gonna be there.
Allen Hall: That wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas, we’d love to hear from you.
Reach out to us on Linked. And don’t forget to subscribe, so you never miss an episode. And if you’ve found value in today’s conversation, please leave us a review. It really helps other wind energy professionals discover the show for Rosie, Yolanda and Matthew, I’m Alan Hall, and we’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy [00:37:00] Podcast.
Renewable Energy
Disinformation: The Currency of the Trump Administration
As we’re all aware, humankind carries around a cognitive bias in the form of seeking out information that confirms what we already believe, and the author of the meme at left has created a textbook example.
Each line conveys a deeply misleading concept about the political left.
Having said this, we live in a time in which disinformation surrounds us at every turn. It’s an industry, just like banking, IT, and manufacturing.
My favorite: “riots and chaos.” lol
Renewable Energy
Assessing Trump’s Sanity
If you still think that Trump is sane and an honest servant of the American people, even after all this, you have something profoundly wrong with you.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy5 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
