The lead story on the long-running CBS show “60 Minutes” tonight proposed to answer how is possible that the rest of the developed world, as well as communist dictatorships like China, offer their citizens and visitors the opportunity to travel around the land speeds of hundreds of miles per hour, where such projects in the U.S. have never gotten close even the feeblest level of success.
They imply that the answer lies mainly in government mismanagement, outrageous over-promises for political purposes, and various forms of malfeasance.
In the process of creating 2GreenEnergy, I coincidentally tripped across a story that explains this far more convincingly.
I happened to interview a very bright and dedicated young man in the Texas state legislature about 20 years ago, who told me that he and his team had done a great deal of research and legal work surrounding connecting Dallas, Austin, Houston, and San Antonio with highspeed rail, and had offered their plans to the public for comment.
One of the first comments came in the form of a phone call he received from Herb Kelleher, then-CEO of Southwest Airlines, which operated out of airports in those four cities. He said, “Normally, tickets between any of these cities are priced at $80 each. If you drive your first spike, I’ll reduce that price to $8. Perhaps with free parking. Let’s see how that works out for you.”
What I inferred from the interview I conducted with the young, perhaps naive Texan who was bold enough to propose low-carbon mass transportation to the Lone Star state, was this: money and power talk here, and nothing else matters.
Yet that’s not true elsewhere around the globe.
Had Kelleher publicly taken this position in China and pushed after it, he would have likely been executed by firing squad. While no one wants to see the threat of violence as public policy, we all must admit that the Chinese are quite effective in carrying out their plans, regardless of what those plans might be.
In Europe and the rest of the OECD nations, the situation is, fortunately, far more nuanced and less savage. People are highly educated, and they understand the need for decarbonizing their electric grid and transportation sectors. Having some billionaire jackass strong-arm their culture would not have enjoyed any success there either.
Many things in these parts of the world of the world get done simply because they are right, as mystifying as that seems to us in the U.S.
Renewable Energy
Ørsted Finishes Drone Trial, Iberdrola Exits South Korea
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Ørsted Finishes Drone Trial, Iberdrola Exits South Korea
Allen covers Ørsted’s Hornsea 2 drone trial, the DeepWind test site, Germany’s proposed land rent cap, and Iberdrola’s Korea exit.
The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast is brought to you by Weather Guard Lightning Tech, creators of the StrikeTape Ultra LPS retrofit. Subscribe to Uptime’s Substack newsletter. And check out Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” Youtube channel. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Renewable Energy
A Few Idiots Believe the Left Really IS Radical
The vast majority of Americans have liberal views. We favor a woman’s right to choose abortion, high-quality public education, affordable healthcare, clear air and water, the use of science in policymaking, equal rights for minority ethnicities and religions, and efforts to trim the enormous gap between rich and poor.
It would be very interesting to know what percentage of U.S. voters believe that liberals hate America, that we believe our country “is fundamentally evil and the only remedy is destroying our nation with mass migration (sic).”
Trump’s approval rating is about 30%, and a few percent of that is the amoral super-rich. So, possibly it’s in the high 20s.
But aren’t there at least some MAGA folks who would concede that educated people don’t necessarily hate America? My mother lived on a steady diet of Fox News, but even she had respect for Bernie Sanders, about whom she said, “I admire his sincerity, misguided though it is.”
An Important Republican Position: The Left Really IS “Radical”–But Who Believes This?
Renewable Energy
There Is a Third Option
Whoa. Let’s take a step back. Is it really either A or B?
You could on the side of the morons, those incapable of any level of critical thinking, like the author of the meme here.
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy12 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Climate Change2 years agoAnalysis: China’s CO2 falls 1% in Q2 2024 in first quarterly drop since Covid-19
