Nickel’s importance in the transition to clean energy has skyrocketed, driving demand and prices to new heights. As a key component in EV batteries, nickel enhances energy density and storage capacity, leading to longer-lasting batteries and more efficient vehicles. While the world is adopting greener technologies, the demand for nickel will grow exponentially. Thus, global mining giants are driving the transition by focusing on sustainable nickel production even with rising nickel prices.
Let’s check out the top 3 nickel news making headlines in June.
1. Indonesian Nickel Giant Eyes 2025 Listing, Enters Talks with Glencore
Indonesian nickel company PT Ceria Nugraha Indotama plans to launch an IPO in the first half of 2025 and is currently negotiating Ceriaa stake sale to Glencore PLC ahead of the listing. Media reports say that Ceria aims to construct an $8 billion nickel complex, featuring 11 processing plants, including two high-pressure acid leaching (HPAL) plants, to produce nickel products for electric vehicle batteries.
This collaboration aims to secure significant investments and strategic partnerships that will strengthen the firm’s foothold in the global nickel market.
Image: Ceria’s nickel exploration demography

source: PT Ceria
Strategic Partnership with Glencore
Ceria known for its extensive nickel reserves and production capabilities, sees Glencore as a pivotal partner. Glencore’s expertise in mining and commodities trading could provide crucial support in terms of technology, logistics, and global market access. The talks focus on potential joint ventures, long-term supply agreements, and investment opportunities that could enhance the Indonesian company’s operational efficiency and market reach.
Additionally, Glencore is also negotiating to participate in developing Ceria’s first HPAL plant in Southeast Sulawesi, which aims to produce over 146,000 MTs of mixed hydroxide precipitate.
Preparing for a Major IPO
The planned initial public offering (IPO) in 2025 is set to be one of the most significant listings in the nickel sector. By going public, the Ceria aims to raise substantial capital to expand its mining operations, invest in new technologies, and meet the growing global demand for nickel, a critical component in EV batteries and renewable energy technologies.
Market Dynamics and Growth Prospects
The Indonesian company’s strategic move to partner with Glencore and pursue a public listing aligns with the market’s bullish outlook on nickel. The firm’s robust resource base, coupled with Glencore’s global reach, positions it well to capitalize on these favorable market conditions.
Future Outlook
Ceria’s proactive steps in securing strategic partnerships and preparing for a public listing demonstrate its commitment to becoming a key player in this evolving market. The outcome of the ongoing talks with Glencore will be crucial in shaping the company’s future and its ability to meet the increasing global demand for nickel.
This anticipated collaboration and the forthcoming IPO not only highlight the company’s growth ambitions but also underscore Indonesia’s significant role in the global nickel supply chain. Investors and industry watchers will be keenly observing the developments as the 2025 listing approaches, marking a crucial moment for the company and the nickel industry at large.
2. Premium Nickel Resources Upsizes Equity Financing to C$27.5 Million for Botswana Projects
Premium Nickel Resources Ltd. (PNRL), the Canada-based mineral exploration and development company is pioneering in discovering and advancing high-quality nickel, copper, cobalt, and platinum group metals (Ni-Cu-Co-PGM) resources.
In a recent development, PNRL increased its non-brokered equity financing to C$27.5 million ($20 million) for its Botswana projects. Initially announced on June 5 at C$15 million ($10.9 million), the upsizing reflects strong interest from existing shareholders. The original plan was to issue approximately 19.2 million units; the revised plan includes about 35.3 million units.
Each unit, priced at C$0.78, comprises one common share and one common share purchase warrant. Holders of these warrants can acquire an additional common share for C$1.10 within 60 months.
Selebi and Selkirk Nickel-Copper Mines
Premium Nickel’s portfolio includes two fully permitted redevelopment projects for nickel, copper, and cobalt mines in Botswana: the Selebi mine, formerly owned by BCL and Tati’s former Selkirk mine.
The Selebi mine, which opened in 1980, operated for 36 years producing nickel and copper until it was placed on care and maintenance in 2016. It features two shafts: the 1,140-meter Selebi shaft and the 970-meter Selebi North shaft. Selebi North was in production from 1990 to 2016, also yielding nickel and copper.
The Selkirk nickel-copper mine started production in 1989 and operated until 2002. It has a historical resource estimate of 165.3 million tonnes, grading 0.28% nickel and 0.24% copper, based on a cut-off grade of 0.15% nickel.

3. Electra Battery Materials: North America’s Sole Cobalt and Nickel Refinery Secures C$5 Million from Canadian Govt. to Fuel Battery Materials Recycling Technology
Electra Battery Materials announced that it has secured C$5 million in funding from the Canadian government to develop its proprietary battery materials recycling technology.
Located north of Toronto, Ontario, Electra is building North America’s only cobalt sulfate refinery as part of a multiphase initiative to onshore refining capabilities for cathode materials. The company’s primary goal is to secure the capital necessary to recommission and expand its cobalt refinery. Subsequently, it aims to supply recycled battery materials and battery-grade nickel for the electric vehicle market.
Successful Battery Materials Recycling Demonstration
In 2023, Electra successfully operated a demonstration plant for battery materials recycling at its Ontario refinery complex. The plant processed over 40 Ts of end-of-life battery scrap, known as “black mass”. It produced high-quality nickel, cobalt, and lithium products. This program is considered the first plant-scale recycling of black mass material in North America. It marks the first domestic production of a nickel-cobalt mixed hydroxide precipitate product.
Electra is now accelerating the next phase of its recycling project. The company aims to demonstrate continuously that the hydrometallurgical black mass process is scalable, profitable, and can be implemented at other locations.
source: Electra
Government Support and Economic Impact
The Canadian government has committed C$5 million ($3.6 million) to the project through Natural Resources Canada’s Critical Minerals Research, Development, and Demonstration program. This project will be based at Electra’s fully permitted property in Temiskaming Shores, approximately five hours north of Toronto.
Electra CEO Trent Mell commented,
“Today’s funding announcement signals the Canadian government’s ongoing commitment to creating a strong, sustainable EV supply chain. While recycling critical minerals is part of our strategy, we remain focused on constructing our cobalt sulfate refinery and will update the market with funding developments for restarting construction.”
Notably, Jonathan Wilkinson, Canada’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, made an important statement,
“This funding will enhance mineral and energy security, create jobs, and support economic opportunities, contributing to a cleaner Canada and a prosperous, sustainable economy for everyone.”
The announcement was made in Sudbury, alongside a similar funding announcement for the Mining Innovation Rehabilitation and Applied Research Corp, which also received C$5 million.
- FURTHER READING: Nickel 28 Capital Ousts CEO Anthony Milewski and President Justin Cochrane in Leadership Purge Over Misconduct (carboncredits.com)
The post Top 3 Nickel Stories You Can’t Miss appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

