S&P Global and JPMorgan’s blockchain division, Kinexys, launched a pilot to tokenize carbon credits. They aim to use blockchain and smart contracts to improve voluntary carbon markets (VCMs), make them more transparent, trustworthy, and liquid.
Their initiative is important because the global carbon credit market is worth about $933 billion in 2025, and can grow to over $16 trillion by 2034. This move could unlock major climate finance opportunities by tackling key issues that have held the market back.
From Blocks to Credits: The Digital Carbon Evolution
The voluntary carbon credit market is worth about $4.04 billion in 2024. It could grow to $24 billion by 2030 with an annual growth rate over 35%. However, this market has many flaws. Multiple registries make it hard to compare credits.

Transparency issues continue to raise concerns about fraud and double-counting—when the same carbon credit gets sold or claimed more than once—in carbon markets. Ghost credits, which are fake reductions, hurt market integrity. Overstated impact claims and double-counting also damage investor confidence, as shown in the chart below.

Estimates show that in 2021, hundreds of millions of tonnes of CO₂ equivalent credits faced issues. As the market grows, this number could rise significantly. To improve transparency, organizations are using blockchain tracking and better verification. These efforts aim to cut risks as the VCM grows. By 2030, analysts expect trade around 1.5 billion tonnes of CO₂ equivalent.
Low liquidity turns off big investors. Plus, no central exchange or standard contracts splits the market. This limits growth and makes it hard for institutions to join in.
These weaknesses undermine trust and prevent big capital from entering the market. By tokenizing credits, S&P and JPMorgan aim to fix these problems and transform carbon credits into reliable digital assets.
How Tokenization Changes the Game
The joint pilot combines the Environmental Registry from S&P Global Commodity Insights with JPMorgan’s Kinexys blockchain platform. Together, they can turn carbon credits into digital tokens. These tokens are stored on an unchangeable ledger that everyone can access.
This system performs the following:
- Standardizes credits across different projects—such as reforestation or direct air capture—to make them comparable.
- It ensures transparency by permanently logging the issuance, transfers, and retirement of each credit. This helps tackle fraud and double-counting issues that have affected the market.
- Enables smart contracts that automate tasks. For example, credits retire when purchased, which cuts transaction times from months to minutes.
- Enables cross-chain transfers, which lets tokens move smoothly between platforms and registries. It boosts interoperability and market depth.

Tokenized credits can act more like stocks or bonds by solving issues of fragmentation, trust, and liquidity. This makes them tradable, verifiable, and scalable.
In the JPMorgan and S&P Global partnership, tokenized carbon credits can move more easily between companies, countries, and investors. This allows credits to be part of new climate-related financial products. Examples are tokens that show a share in a reforestation project or investments in carbon removal tech.
By making carbon markets more efficient and trustworthy, tokenization could attract more money into projects that fight climate change. This is a vital step as demand for high-quality, verifiable credits continues to outpace supply.
- RELATED: The Energy Debate: How Bitcoin Mining, Blockchain, and Cryptocurrency Shape Our Carbon Future
JPMorgan and S&P Global’s Pilot Program
JPMorgan launched this pilot with Kinexys, its blockchain arm. Kinexys, once called Onyx, has handled over $1.5 trillion in transactions since 2015. This shows it can support large finance systems.
The bank teamed up with S&P Global Commodity Insights and top registries: EcoRegistry and the International Carbon Registry. This partnership aims to get real carbon credit data and test how well blockchain can track credits from issuance to retirement.
Keerthi Moudgal, Head of Product at Kinexys Digital Assets, Kinexys by J.P. Morgan, noted:
“The voluntary carbon market is primed for innovation, and we’re eager to collaborate with participants to develop and implement new blockchain technology. Our shared aim is to establish standardized infrastructure that enhances information and price transparency, paving the way for financial innovation and increased market liquidity.”
Why This Deal Matters for Investors and the Environment
This new digital approach to carbon credits matters for both financial markets and climate action. For investors, tokenization creates a new asset class that is transparent, secure, and easy to trade.
Investors can now track where their money goes and how it helps reduce emissions. It also helps diversify portfolios with climate-related assets. These assets might gain value as climate rules become stricter.
For the environment, a more transparent and accessible carbon market means more funding can go to projects like forest restoration, clean energy, and carbon removal. Notably, removal credits are expected to account for 35% of the voluntary carbon market by 2030.

When it’s easier to see that these projects provide real climate benefits, trust grows. Then, participation increases too. This is crucial for helping companies, especially in tough-to-decarbonize sectors, meet their climate goals effectively.
What This Means for Carbon Trading’s Future
Despite the promise of improving trust and market growth, this pilot still needs to tackle key challenges:
- Regulatory alignment: Different regions (e.g., EU vs. U.S.) have distinct rules on carbon accounting and tokenized assets. Global standards are still being developed. This uncertainty in regulations is a barrier to widespread adoption.
- Integration with existing systems: The tokenized model must link to current registries, such as Verra and Gold Standard. This connection prevents isolation and ensures market-wide interoperability.
- Market adoption: Tokenized credits need backing from investors, corporates, and funds. Without demand, liquidity may remain low, even as the voluntary market is projected to grow fivefold by 2030.
- Avoiding hype cycles: Blockchain projects risk attracting speculative investment. Tokenized carbon must demonstrate real value, not bubble-like behavior.
JPMorgan and S&P aim to resolve these by proving the approach in the coming months. Their success could set a global template for carbon finance.
Together, they are pioneering an important innovation to address transparency, trust, and liquidity problems in voluntary carbon markets. They aim to mix registry data with blockchain tech to create a secure, programmable, and tradable asset for climate financing.
The post S&P Global and JPMorgan Partner to Tokenize Carbon Credits appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

