Disseminated on behalf of SolarBank Corporation.
SolarBank Corporation (NASDAQ: SUUN; Cboe CA: SUNN, FSE: GY2) has announced a major step forward in the development of its 7.2 MW DC ground-mount solar power project, known as the North Main Project, in Wyoming County, New York. The project has finished the Coordinated Electric System Interconnection Review (CESIR). This important step allows the company to move forward with the permitting process.
SolarBank Corporation is an independent renewable and clean energy project developer and owner. It specializes in distributed and community solar projects across Canada and the United States.
The company develops solar, Battery Energy Storage System (BESS), and EV Charging projects. These facilities supply electricity to utilities, commercial, industrial, municipal, and residential off-takers.
SolarBank has a development pipeline exceeding one gigawatt. It has successfully developed renewable energy projects with a combined capacity of over 100 megawatts.
After securing the needed permits and funding for North Main, SolarBank plans to start building the community solar project. This project will provide clean energy to around 850 homes. The project should also qualify for incentives from the NYSERDA NY-Sun Program. This will help its financial and operational success.
Bringing Affordable Clean Energy to Communities
Community solar projects like North Main play a crucial role in the transition to renewable energy. Community solar is different from traditional rooftop solar. It lets both renters and homeowners enjoy solar power benefits. They don’t need to install panels on their properties.
Moreover, participants can subscribe to the project. They will receive credits on their electricity bills. This lowers their energy costs and supports renewable energy growth.
Current Market Landscape and Growth Projections
As of June 2024, the United States has about 7.87 gigawatts (GW) of community solar capacity. This capacity is spread across 44 states and the District of Columbia.
In the third quarter of 2024, the community solar segment installed 291 megawatts direct current (MWdc). This is a 12% increase compared to the same period in the previous year. This growth underscores the sector’s resilience and expanding appeal.

Looking ahead, the U.S. Department of Energy has set an ambitious target to achieve 25 GW of community solar capacity by 2025. This was a target of the prior Federal administration but most community solar projects are developed with the support of state and local governments. The Coalition for Community Solar Access expects the U.S. to exceed 30 GW of community solar by 2030. This shows strong growth potential for the sector.
Wood Mackenzie forecasts that the national community solar market will grow at an average rate of 5% annually through 2026. However, a subsequent average annual contraction of 11% is anticipated through 2029. This shows that near-term growth is strong. Yet, long-term sustainability may need strategic actions and policy support.
SolarBank is focusing on community solar, aiming to provide clean, affordable energy to thousands of homes. This initiative supports the company’s mission to speed up renewable energy use in North America.
A Strong Partnership with Solar Simplified
SolarBank has teamed up with Solar Simplified. They are a leading provider of services for community solar programs. They focus on customer acquisition, enrollment, and management.
Solar Simplified works with SolarBank to make sure community solar projects are fully signed up. This way, they can boost revenue right from the start.
Solar Simplified takes care of all customer operations. This lets SolarBank focus on growing its renewable energy portfolio and launching more projects each year.
Overcoming Challenges in Solar Development
The North Main Project is a big step forward, but challenges still exist for large-scale solar projects. The project depends on three key steps:
- getting a community solar contract,
- obtaining permits, and
- securing third-party financing.
Also, changing government incentives and policies about solar power can affect how financially sound future projects will be.
Navigating the US-China Solar Trade Landscape
The solar industry has been heavily affected by U.S.-China trade tensions, with President Donald Trump issuing an executive order on February 1, 2025 imposing a 10% tariff on imports from China, which has since doubled to 20%. This move builds on former President Joe Biden’s tariff hikes from 25% to 50%, effective January 1, 2025, bringing total duties on Chinese solar polysilicon, wafers, and cells to 70%.
China dominates the global solar panel supply chain, producing over 80% of the world’s photovoltaic (PV) modules. Dependence on Chinese imports has led to increased costs and supply chain challenges for many U.S. solar developers.

However, SolarBank has positioned itself to mitigate the effects of these trade disputes. By prioritizing domestic manufacturing, SolarBank not only avoids tariff-related cost fluctuations but also contributes to strengthening the U.S. solar supply chain.
In an exclusive interview, SolarBank’s CEO Dr. Richard Lu emphasized the company’s edge on this matter, stating:
“We want to do our part to “Make America Great Again”. Solar energy is the power that we can deliver at a low cost in a timely manner, and we want to use “Made in the USA” solar panels to achieve our strategic goal. The Made in the USA panels demonstrate our commitment to supporting domestic production for the clean and renewable energy industry. For the sector, it will enable the industry to meet its demand with domestic supplies.”
SolarBank is dedicated to growing renewable energy in North America with the following project pipeline. It uses its skills in solar, battery storage, and EV charging projects to meet this goal.

Innovative Projects and Market Expansion
SolarBank is committed to innovation. It has teamed up with Viridi to turn a landfill in Buffalo, New York, into a solar farm. This project will have a capacity of 3.06 MW and include a 1.2 MWh battery energy storage system.
This project shows the company’s commitment to turning unused sites into renewable energy sources. It provides clean energy to the community and helps tackle environmental issues.
SolarBank is also planning a move into the growing data center market. This market is expected to hit $395 billion by 2030. Using its renewable energy expertise, the company plans to create and partner on data centers. This will help meet the industry’s huge energy needs with scalable and eco-friendly solutions.
SolarBank’s commitment to renewable energy continues to drive meaningful progress in the community solar sector. The North Main Project and other new developments are helping the company expand clean energy access and support sustainable infrastructure across North America. SolarBank leads the way to a cleaner energy future through partnerships, expanding markets, and tackling industry challenges.
This report contains forward-looking information. Please refer to the SolarBank press releases entitled “SolarBank Provides Update on 7.2 MW North Main Project in Wyoming County, New York.”; “SolarBank Partners with Viridi on Combined 3.06 MW Solar and 1.2 MWH Battery Energy Storage Project Located in Buffalo, New York.”; and “SolarBank Announces 2024 Highlights”.
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post SolarBank Moves Forward with 7.2 MW North Main Community Solar Project in New York appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

