Connect with us

Published

on

As it is my first COP, I walked in with quite the optimism, the hope that I would see some new things. And though I did, simultaneously the same framework I had long recognized replicated itself in front of me.

The false carpet floors sat three inches above concrete, Indigenous Peoples and Afrodescendant panels were drowned out by larger Global North pavilions; the space was treated more like a resume booster than a place for real engagement. Too many spoke about climate only through rose colored glasses, praising false solutions propped up by the oil and agriculture lobbyists.There were just over 1,900 fossil fuel and big agriculture executives/ lobbyists in attendance at this year’s COP according to an investigation by The Guardian and DeSmog.

And so I realized something: the global climate conversation is unique from the one happening in the United States, but the variable of difference lies not in exploitation, not in silence, but in the sheer magnitude of individuals. The scale shifts, but the pattern remains.

The rain bellowed at the Indigenous Peoples pavilion amid the demand for the recognition of Afrodescendants and the need for a constituency. Someone called it Thundercats, and the bellow felt like Mother Nature calling out. Here, in the mouth of the Amazon, she called out to us again and again. In Week One the door fell, and territories rose; that movement carried momentum straight into Week Two. My optimism had not faded, but the next battles played out consecutively around me.

The whispers of justice broke like the rain, yet some walked shielded from it, untouched, without a single furrow in their brow.

The United States was apparently absent, yet its impacts and obligations rang through nearly every conversation. And although the United States did not seem to wish to be here, the civil society members from the US stood their ground. We, the civil society, understand the delay the US has caused on justice, the harm multiplied by its shadow, and the obligation grossed by its inadequate and cruel inaction.

Then the panel began, and the Afrodescendant demand for UNFCCC recognition was spoken again. Fire flickered and spread near the pavilions. And in our fervor, we escaped into cramped hallways, and I held a hand tight. Thunder boomed again. This time she gave no warning; she simply let it ring. Videos poured in, and what we could not see became undeniable.

The plastic ceilings and cardboard went as fast as they were produced, and the outside came in. The impermanent build was at war with the soil beneath it; and there was a reckoning for all who walked upon her. Water sprinkled from above with her bellowing reminder, perhaps her reflection of how insufficient the action inside remained.

“More than 300 Big Agriculture Lobbyists Have Taken Part in COP30, Investigation Finds.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 18 Nov. 2025, www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/18/big-agriculture-lobbyists-cop30-climate-summit.

Erika Yamada, Melissa Gómez Hernández. “Afro-Descendant Peoples Seek Climate Justice on the Global Stage.” Ford Foundation, 14 Oct. 2025, www.fordfoundation.org/news-and-stories/stories/afro-descendant-peoples-seek-climate-justice-on-the-global-stage/.

___

Gemma Gutierrez is a Youth Advisor to the GoodPower (formally Action for the Climate Emergency) Board and a member of its Youth Advisory Board. Born and raised in Milwaukee, WI, in a tight-knit Mexican community, she learned early the power of words, connection, and collective action. Her work spans climate justice, civic engagement, and immigrant rights through organizations such as Sunrise, Voces de la Frontera, and CUNY’s Environmental Justice Working Group. From voter mobilization in the 2020 election to research on flooding and urban equity, Gemma is committed to linking climate justice and finance to a broader vision of global liberation.

The post Reflecting on COP30 appeared first on Climate Generation.

Reflecting on COP30

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Iran Energy Shock Tests Limits of Trump’s Vision of US Energy Dominance

Published

on

Consumers remain vulnerable to price spikes despite record domestic oil and gas production. But experts doubt the crisis will boost clean energy, absent strong policy.

In President Donald Trump’s telling, the United States has fuel enough to hover above the chaos that his attack on Iran has triggered in global energy markets.

Iran Energy Shock Tests Limits of Trump’s Vision of US Energy Dominance

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Unpacking Trump’s Use of Emergency Powers to Prop Up Coal

Published

on

A World War II-era policy is stopping old coal plants from closing, despite high costs and the wishes of their owners.

At one time, the U.S. electricity grid ran mostly on coal.

Unpacking Trump’s Use of Emergency Powers to Prop Up Coal

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Italy pushes coal exit back after gas prices rise

Published

on

Italy has delayed the permanent closure of its four coal-fired power plants to 2038, after the war in the Middle East caused the cost of producing electricity from gas to spike.

The government inserted the measure into a broader bill aimed at addressing the energy crisis. Parliament approved the legislation on Wednesday after the government tied it to a confidence vote, meaning that losing the vote would see the right-wing coalition government collapse.

The decision marks a climbdown from a pledge first made under centre-left Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni in 2017 to phase out coal by 2025 on the mainland and by 2028 on the island of Sardinia.

The Mediterranean island’s 1.5 million people remain heavily dependent on coal for electricity due to limited grid connections with the European mainland and a slow rollout of renewable energy.

Riccardo Molinari, a member of Parliament for the governing coalition Lega party, which championed the amendment, said the plants could be kept open as a “strategic reserve”, which can be turned on if needed.

“Unnecessary” decision

But analysts say the practical impact of the move is likely to be limited. Luca Bergamaschi, executive director of Italian climate think tank ECCO, described the extension as “largely symbolic”.

“Keeping them open will not materially affect electricity prices, which are driven by gas – for most hours of the day – and EU market rules,” he told Climate Home News. “The decision sends a negative signal but we don’t expect any meaningful impact on prices or emissions, which shows how unnecessary this is”.

    Coal has already been largely phased out of Italy’s power mix. Generation from coal has fallen over 90% since 2012 and accounted for less than 2% of electricity production last year, almost entirely in Sardinia.

    In 2024, Italy got about half of its electricity from gas and half from clean sources like hydropower, solar and wind.

    Coal plants on stand-by

    Italy has four coal-fired power plants left but only two, both in Sardinia, are still producing electricity.

    The other two are run by the country’s largest utility Enel, in Brindisi and Civitavecchia. They were shut down at the end of last year after they became uneconomic.

    The company had planned to begin decommissioning them, but the government intervened at the last minute, requiring them to remain on standby in case of an energy crisis.

    Gilberto Pichetto Fratin, Italy’s Minister of Environment and Energy Security, said at the end of March that these two power plants could be switched back on “right away, with a government decree”.

    “If the price of gas exceeds 70 euros per megawatt hour, producing with coal would be convenient,” he told Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.

    European gas prices spiked to just below that level in mid-March as the Iran war escalated, but have since come down to around 50 euros per megawatt hour.

    Coal surge in Asia

    Italy’s move comes amid a broader, though limited, shift back towards coal in some parts of the world as countries respond to restricted gas supply. Germany slightly increased coal-fired generation in March and has considered reactivating idle plants as a precaution.

    Outside Europe, the trend has been more pronounced. Several Asian countries heavily exposed to disruptions in Gulf gas supplies have increased coal use.

    Nepal’s EV revolution pays off as oil crisis causes pain at the pumps

    Japan has allowed its coal power plants to operate at a higher rate to reduce the need for liquified natural gas (LNG). Bangladesh, Thailand and the Philippines have also increased electricity generation from coal since the start of the conflict in the Middle East.

    But analysis from Zero Carbon Analytics suggested that producing electricity from solar is cheaper than coal in most south-east Asian countries.

    “Energy security in Southeast Asia will not come from switching between fossil fuels,” Amy Kong added. “It will come from reducing dependence on them altogether.”

    The post Italy pushes coal exit back after gas prices rise appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Italy pushes coal exit back after gas prices rise

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com