On December 19, Li-FT Power Ltd. (LIFT) announced that it had signed a definitive agreement with North Arrow Minerals Inc. to acquire three lithium projects in Northwest Territories, Canada. In this deal, LIFT will now fully own the DeStaffany, LDG, and Mackay Lithium Projects. In exchange, North Arrow will receive 250,000 common shares of LIFT.
The deal also includes the transfer of reclamation bonds, ensuring responsible environmental practices. However, regulatory approvals are pending for the transaction to close.
Francis MacDonald, CEO and Director of Li-FT Power, commented,
“The acquisition of North Arrow’s lithium portfolio further positions LIFT as the leading lithium exploration company in the Northwest Territories. The DeStaffany Project is located close to our BET and Echo pegmatites which creates synergies from a logistical standpoint, as well as increases the overall resource base for the eastern sector of the Yellowknife Pegmatite Province. The LDG and Mackay properties give LIFT a foothold in an emerging spodumene district located near the Diavik and Ekati diamond mines and provide long-term upside for the Company. We will continue to seek out accretive acquisitions within the Northwest Territories, especially around our existing resource base.”

Li-FT’s Commitment to Lithium Exploration
Li-FT focuses on acquiring and developing lithium projects in Canada, including its flagship Yellowknife Lithium Project, located in the Northwest Territories. In addition to this flagship venture, LIFT owns three early-stage exploration properties in Quebec, which show strong potential for uncovering buried lithium pegmatites.
- READ MORE:
- Li-FT Power Reveals Initial Mineral Resource of 50.4 Million Tonnes at Yellowknife Lithium Project
- Li-FT Power Secures $21 Million Through Strategic Private Placement
The company also manages the Cali Project in the Northwest Territories located within the Little Nahanni Pegmatite Group.
A MESSAGE FROM Li-FT POWER LTD.
This content was reviewed and approved by Li-FT Power Ltd. and is being disseminated on behalf of CarbonCredits.com.
Exploring Hard Rock Lithium Deposits in Canada.

Lithium, one of the most essential ingredients in the production of batteries, lithium powers some of our most important devices. As you may already know, it will also be one of the hottest resources in the coming decade. And one of the fastest-developing North American lithium juniors is Li-FT Power Ltd (TXSV: LIFT | OTCQX: LIFFF | FRA: WS0).
Moving on, let’s deep dive into these 3 lithium projects acquired by LIFT POWER.
1. The DeStaffany Lithium Project
The DeStaffany lithium property spans 1,843 hectares along the north-central shore of Great Slave Lake in the Northwest Territories. It lies just 18 kilometers northeast of the Nechalacho mine and 115 kilometers east of Yellowknife.
The property hosts two significant pegmatites—Moose 1 and Moose 2—rich in lithium, tantalum, and niobium. While these pegmatites were explored in the 1940s for tantalum and niobium, their lithium potential remains largely unexplored. Recent discoveries of additional pegmatites by North Arrow highlight further opportunities on the property.
The Moose pegmatites are located within just 1 kilometer from Great Slave Lake. This property benefits from accessibility via Yellowknife and Hay River throughout the year. LIFT plans to advance the project through mapping, sampling, and prospecting. The next phase will focus on preparing for initial drilling to assess the spodumene pegmatites further.
Moose 1 Pegmatite
The Moose 1 pegmatite stretches 370 meters, with widths ranging from 4.5 to 6 meters and a maximum of 11 meters. Although drilling has never been conducted, historical channel sampling in 2009 revealed spodumene mineralization with lithium levels of 1.5% Li2O over 7.5 meters.
Moose 2 Pegmatite
The mining potential of Moose 2 is promising. It has been mapped over a 450-meter strike length and measures up to 30 meters wide. Bulk sampling in the 1940s and 1950s focused on tantalum and niobium, producing concentrates, but its lithium content remains untapped. Spodumene mineralization is widespread, with lithium grades of up to 1.98% Li2O identified along a 250-meter stretch.
The DeStaffany Lithium Project has been blessed with abundant resources and has a strategic location. These advantages contribute significantly to LIFT’s growing portfolio.

2. The LDG Project
The LDG Project, covering 8,600 hectares is located near Rio Tinto’s Diavik diamond mine. Early exploration has identified ten spodumene pegmatites, with two having outcropping dimensions up to 20 meters wide and 400 meters long. The till-covered terrain offers favorable conditions for discovering buried lithium deposits.
3. The Mackay Project
The Mackay Project, spanning 8,661 hectares, lies south of the Diavik diamond mine. Two spodumene-rich areas have been identified. The MK1 site features pegmatite dykes with lithium grades of up to 3.74% Li2O from grab samples. Meanwhile, the MK3 site includes a 130-meter pegmatite exposure with grades reaching 5.25% Li2O. These findings highlight the high lithium potential of the region.

Experienced Oversight
The lithium miner significantly highlighted that all technical details in this update were reviewed by Dr. Ron Voordouw, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101 standards. This ensures that the information meets absolute professional and regulatory standards.
North Arrow Driving Exploration Success with Global Expertise
Based in Vancouver, BC, North Arrow Minerals is an exploration company primarily focused on advancing the Kraaipan Gold Project in Botswana. It also explores the diamond potential in the Naujaat (NU), Pikoo (SK), and Loki (NWT) projects.
The company’s leadership team, including its management, board of directors, and advisors, brings extensive and proven expertise in global exploration and mining. Kenneth Armstrong, P.Geo. (NWT/NU, ON), serves as North Arrow’s President and CEO, overseeing exploration programs. He is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101 and ensures all projects adhere to industry standards.
He expressed his opinion on this deal as well, noting,
“We are pleased to proceed with this transaction as it provides North Arrow with exposure to the continued evaluation of these NWT lithium properties as well as Li-FT’s advanced Yellowknife Lithium Project while allowing our team to focus on exploration of the Kraaipan Gold Project in Botswana, where geophysical surveys, geochemical baseline analyses, and target evaluation are currently underway.”
With these strategic moves, Li-FT strengthens its position in Canada’s growing lithium market, paving the way for sustainable energy solutions.
- MUST READ: The Lithium Paradox: Price Plummet, Supply Surge, and Demand Dip – What’s Happening Now?
- RELATED: Live Lithium prices
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: LIFT.
Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post Li-FT Power Strikes Deal with North Arrow Minerals to Expand Lithium Portfolio in Canada’s Northwest Territories appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

