Mattias Söderberg is global climate lead at Danish NGO DanChurchAid
Developing countries are set to need hundreds of billions of dollars a year to adapt to climate change but, at the moment, developed countries are providing them with just tens of billions of dollars.
One solution to this ‘adaptation gap’ is a levy on premium flyers—covering business class, first class, and private jet travel. This represents one of the fairest and most politically feasible ways to mobilize new public finance for adaptation and loss and damage.
This would be a ‘polluter-pays’ approach, as business and first-class travel are 3-4 times more polluting than economy flights and private jets travel is up to 14 times more polluting.
This approach would also minimise negative economic impacts, for example on countries which rely on aviation or tourism. Premium air travel has what economists call inelastic demand – wealthy travellers can afford a modest levy so will keep flying.
Such a tax would also be extremely popular, with polling carried out in both developed and developing countries showing around three-quarters of people support more taxes on wealthier airline passengers.
If implemented globally, such a levy could raise an estimated $34 billion annually – enough to double current levels of adaptation finance, which stood at $26 billion in 2023.
While not all revenues would flow to international funds (some would remain in national budgets), even a share directed toward global adaptation efforts could unlock billions in predictable finance.
If a portion of proceeds from a national levy is allocated for the Adaptation Fund and the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage—two mechanisms central to rebuilding trust and supporting vulnerable communities, that would make a big difference.
Coalition set sights on taxing luxury air travel to fund climate action
The Adaptation Fund, in particular, has a proven record of transparent, effective, and locally led action – helping communities build flood defences, protect water supplies, and strengthen livelihoods. Tripling its resources through such levies would be a tangible step toward closing the adaptation gap and delivering on the promise of balanced climate finance.
We no longer need to debate whether adaptation, and loss and damage finance are urgent—it is. The question now is whether countries will seize the practical, fair solutions available to them.
Governments are already moving behind this idea. France, Spain and six other nations are already members of a Premium Flyers Solidarity Coalition – launched at the Finance for Development summit earlier this year.
By joining this coalition at COP30, other governments can turn a decade-old idea into reality and turn promises into delivery. The world’s most vulnerable communities have waited long enough. COP30 is the moment to act—and to make luxury emissions work for lifesaving finance
The post Let’s tax luxury air travel to fund climate adaptation and loss and damage appeared first on Climate Home News.
Let’s tax luxury air travel to fund climate adaptation and loss and damage
Climate Change
Severe Exposure to ‘Forever Chemicals’ During Pregnancy Could Lead to Childhood Asthma
A new Swedish study focuses on very high levels of PFAS exposure in drinking water.
Exposure to “forever chemicals” during pregnancy could increase the risk of childhood asthma, according to new research from Sweden.
Severe Exposure to ‘Forever Chemicals’ During Pregnancy Could Lead to Childhood Asthma
Climate Change
Iran Energy Shock Tests Limits of Trump’s Vision of US Energy Dominance
Consumers remain vulnerable to price spikes despite record domestic oil and gas production. But experts doubt the crisis will boost clean energy, absent strong policy.
In President Donald Trump’s telling, the United States has fuel enough to hover above the chaos that his attack on Iran has triggered in global energy markets.
Iran Energy Shock Tests Limits of Trump’s Vision of US Energy Dominance
Climate Change
Unpacking Trump’s Use of Emergency Powers to Prop Up Coal
A World War II-era policy is stopping old coal plants from closing, despite high costs and the wishes of their owners.
At one time, the U.S. electricity grid ran mostly on coal.
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
