A recent US Supreme Court decision upheld a key environmental protection rule limiting climate pollution from power plants, sending a message to utilities nationwide that they need to actively decarbonize their power generation plans.
The Supreme Court’s decision was to deny the response to a request from fossil fuel companies, electric utility companies, and their allies to stay or put a temporary stop on the power plant carbon limits finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) earlier this year.
The Clean Power Plan, a power plant climate rule enacted by the Obama administration, was ultimately halted by a similar stay request granted by the Supreme Court in 2016. The new power plant carbon rules, which survived the recent stay request, may be more legally durable than their predecessors.

Although the new carbon rules have been in effect since their proposal last year, utility companies all over the Southeast have flouted their existence, acting wishfully as if they simply don’t exist or will be struck down by the courts before compliance deadlines arrive. Duke, TVA, Santee Cooper, and Dominion Energy are all in the process of planning and/or building new large gas plants that will collectively cost billions of dollars to be compliant with the new EPA rules — billions of dollars that the utilities would ultimately stick on ratepayers.
The Court’s decision should send a clear signal to utilities that the new power plant carbon rules won’t necessarily go down the same path as the Clean Power Plan, and that utilities need to plan for decarbonizing, not recklessly committing billions of ratepayers’ dollars to large polluting gas projects that will violate the new standards.
This ruling also highlights the significance of the current election for our ability to quickly decarbonize the electric sector. The EPA, which is in charge of creating and enforcing the power plant rules, will be run by the next president. Supreme Court justices are chosen by the President and confirmed by the Senate, which will revisit these rules to determine their legislative success.
The next stop for the power plant climate rules is further litigation in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, and depending on the outcome, potentially back to the Supreme Court to decide the merits of the case.
Featured image credit Architect of the Capitol.
The post Key Pollution Limits Pass Crucial First Test appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
Renewable Energy
When You’re Addressing Idiots You Can Get Away with a Lot
At left we have John Fetterman talking to people so stupid they’ll believe that it would have been wrong for the British colonists to oppose King George III in the late 18th Century, or for the people of Germany and Italy in the 1930s to stand up against Hitler and Mussolini. What about the people in today’s dictatorships, i.e., the people in Russia, China, North Korea, or any of the other 50+ authoritarian regimes around the world?
Morons tend to agree with the loudest, most aggressive voice of nationalism, regardless of how little sense it makes.
It’s a great moment of opportunity for Fetterman.
Renewable Energy
Carl Sagan and the Suppression of Uncomfortable Ideas
Seminal astrophysicist Carl Sagan explains why uncomfortable ideas may be banned in religion, they must not be shunned in science.
This is an important concept in American life today, as conspiracy theorists are convinced that climate change denial cannot be considered in scientific circles.
I happened to bring this up in my interview with Dr. V. Ramanathan of the Scripps Institution, who has been amassing data on global warming since the 1970s. He laughed, and explained, “If I could prove that human activity was not causing temperatures to rise, I’d be be one of the wealthiest and most famous scientists in world history.”
Renewable Energy
We Came Incredible Close to Averting the Disaster that Is Donald Trump
As suggested at left, a great deal of the hardship that has befallen the U.S. was simply bad luck. Al Gore came within a whisker of victory in 2000, a win that would have forever changed the course of our nation in terms of energy policy, education, healthcare, and international affairs.
If Bernie had become the 2016 nominee, we wouldn’t have had Hillary Clinton telling our country’s most mean-spirited and least-educated people that they were “deplorables,” ushering a criminal sociopath into the White House.
We Came Incredible Close to Averting the Disaster that Is Donald Trump
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy1 year agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Climate Change2 years agoAnalysis: China’s CO2 falls 1% in Q2 2024 in first quarterly drop since Covid-19
-
Climate Change1 year ago嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
