The headline here is taken from this article in Bloomberg.
Two quick points:
Jamie Diamond, chairman and CEO of JP Morgan Chase, leads a company that, since the adoption of the Paris agreement, has sat at the top of the list of fossil fuel bankers, financing $434 billion from 2016 through 2022. Liberals have very little respect for him and his political suggestions, considering that his status has a multibillionaire derives from his lust for baking our planet.
Nikki Haley may be less repugnant than Trump insofar as she is not, at least apparently, a criminal sociopath. But as a member of the Republican party, her values are so completely loathsome that it’s hard to imagine her garnering any support from liberals.
https://www.2greenenergy.com/2023/11/29/jamie-dimon-urges-even-liberals-to-back-nikki-haley-as-alternative-to-trump/
Renewable Energy
Where Tax Money Should Go
At left is a question typical of a Republican moron. Might someone say, “No, taxes don’t need to be spent on things that serve our interests?”
The question, of course, is what actually does serve our interests.
Believe it or not, there are people in countries on this planet who think that tax money serves their interest if it goes to creating a healthier, happier, better educated, more humane society.
These are the same countries that tax rich people heavily, where attaining a net worth of hundreds of billions of dollars is extremely difficult–probably impossible. But those nations don’t have homeless veterans living in the street and presidents who are rapists and convicted felons.
Renewable Energy
Do We Need More Fallacious Hate Speech?
Unfortunately, there are tens of millions of morons who believe hateful garage like this.
The average 10-year-old can understand that we can BOTH protect our citizens while obeying the U.S. Constitution and international law when it comes to treating the undocumented legally and humanely.
Again, this is what is called the logical fallacy of the “false dichotomy.” Only idiots believe we have to choose one over the other.
Renewable Energy
A Reader Asks: Should Energy Companies be Held Liable for Climate Change?
I would say that the regulations on energy (and transportation) companies should be sufficient to put pressure on them to phase out fossil fuels and decarbonize in favor of renewables and nuclear.
A Reader Asks: Should Energy Companies be Held Liable for Climate Change?
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
