Buying carbon offsets is typically associated with balancing your carbon footprint. By financing a carbon emissions reduction, removal, or avoidance — such as capturing methane from a landfill or reducing logging activity so forests can sequester more carbon — you can help offset the impact of your existing emissions. However, the benefits of carbon offsets extend far beyond the impact on your own greenhouse gas emissions accounting.
These projects often deliver a range of social and environmental co-benefits that help the local communities where these projects operate. Granted, not all carbon projects help local communities, particularly those that are created without consulting local stakeholders. However, carbon credit buyers can look for projects that are transparent on community involvement and ideally find ones with Benefit Sharing Agreements (BSAs).
Here, we’ll examine some of the top ways that supporting transparent, inclusive carbon projects can benefit local communities:
Economic Benefits of Carbon Offsets
Carbon offsets are considered a form of carbon financing, as the money spent purchasing carbon offsets helps fund the carbon project. In fact, a marker of a high-quality carbon offset project is that the money generated from selling carbon credits makes the whole project viable.
This funding from the voluntary carbon market can then create direct and indirect economic benefits for local communities, such as through job creation and adding revenue to local economies.
A good example of this can be seen with the Klawock Heenya Improved Forest Management Project, where Indigenous Alaskans operate as the majority landowner through the Klawock Heenya Corporation (KHC). These local owners have equity in the company, and one of their goals is to develop a sustainable economy that creates opportunities for both community members and shareholders.
Some carbon projects have direct revenue-sharing agreements with local communities, even for those not involved with project operations, while others involve more indirect revenue benefits, such as if higher wages prompt more local spending.
Some projects also create economic benefits by lowering local costs. For example, some landfill gas capture projects not only prevent methane from entering the atmosphere but also generate renewable energy, which can lower local utility bills.
Terrapass offers carbon credits across a broad range of project types, such as Reforestation, REDD+, and Landfill Gas Capture. You can support a mix of projects and their associated benefits with a monthly subscription of carbon credits for just $8.50 per employee that offsets what many businesses emit, while also providing associated benefits to local communities in North America, South America and/or Asia.
Non-Carbon Environmental Benefits of Carbon Offsets
As the name suggests, the core benefit of carbon offsets is that one offset equals one metric ton of carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions avoided/reduced/removed, which helps address one of the top drivers of climate change. Yet this benefit also tends to coincide with other environmental benefits to local ecosystems.
For example, soil carbon credit projects improve soil health, such as by facilitating increased microbial activity. These richer soils can then retain more moisture, which could help reduce flooding risk and mitigate the effects of drought locally.
Also, a more biodiverse soil environment below ground generally supports greater biodiversity above ground. Farmers can more easily grow a variety of crops that also have environmental benefits like feeding pollinators. That then contributes to a positive cycle, whereby more pollinators enable more plant growth beyond the farms where these carbon projects take place. In turn, this improved plant growth can contribute to cleaner local air.
Health Benefits of Carbon Offsets
Carbon offsets also tend to create health benefits, often in connection with their environmental impact.
For example, offset projects that improve local air quality, such as through improved forest management (IFM), can then positively affect local residents’ health. Similarly, IFM tends to also support cleaner water, as increasing tree cover can expand the ability of trees to filter pollutants from storm runoff before it enters local waterways.
There can also be mental health and recreational benefits, such as by preserving opportunities for people to hike and swim in forests and lakes.
Other types of carbon offset projects, like renewable energy projects, can also add health benefits, such as by removing systems that run on fossil fuels and harm indoor air quality.
Also, ones like soil carbon projects can create nutritional benefits for local communities, as healthier soil can improve food security and nutrient density.
Our online carbon offset customers support the Terrapass Global Portfolio, which includes a diverse mix of projects spanning North America, Asia, and South America. These project types, such as Reforestation, Orphan Oil Well Closure, and Residential Solar Installation, provide many associated benefits, such as to the health and economies of the areas where the projects are located.
Businesses can also work with our team of sustainability experts to develop a custom carbon offset program based on your goals and values.
Social Benefits of Carbon Offsets
The social benefits of carbon offsets overlap with areas like food and economic security, but these projects can also support a wide range of other social goals, like gender equality, cultural preservation, and peaceful societies.
These may be lofty goals that require more than just carbon offsets, but these projects can provide positive steps in the right direction.
For example, a conservation project could provide a win-win solution for a government that may be trying to expand its economy and local communities that want to preserve their ancestral lands. Provided that the project is managed in a way that respects local traditions while providing a stable revenue stream, that could help avoid land disputes and civil unrest.
Moreover, projects with BSAs may include provisions to fund local education, which can support a more inclusive society, such as if it gives more young girls access to education in developing regions.
One example of a project with broad-based social goals is the Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve Project, which focuses on preserving tropical peat swamp forest in Indonesia, rather than converting the land into palm oil estates. As such, the project not only prevents GHG emissions from this conversion but supports all 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by funding a wide range of initiatives, like building libraries, training community fire brigades, and distributing solar generators to village community centers.
Fund Carbon Projects That Align With Your Goals
As these examples of co-benefits show, buying carbon offsets gives you substantial ability to make a positive impact on the world, beyond the direct climate benefit of offsetting emissions.
Terrapass supports a broad range of carbon projects that you can explore to see how these align with specific SDGs and benefit local communities. From there, you might choose to purchase a carbon offset subscription that funds a mix of projects with broad co-benefits. Or, businesses with more specific corporate sustainability goals can work with our team to develop custom carbon offset programs.
By working with our team of sustainability experts, you can balance your carbon footprint while supporting positive outcomes in communities around the world. Reach out to see how you can expand your impact with high-quality carbon offsets.
Ready to Support Carbon Projects?
Offset your carbon footprint while helping local communities thrive.
Explore our carbon offset portfolio
or connect with our sustainability experts to build a custom offset program that aligns with your goals.
The post How the Benefits of Carbon Offsets Extend to Local Communities appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
