If you’re feeling discouraged about the challenges facing environmental progress, you’re not alone. In several aspects, we are increasingly feeling the effects of climate change while confidence in the ability of government to reduce climate change is fading. Policy changes also affect individuals’ abilities to take climate action.
For example, the $7,500 tax credit for buying new electric vehicles (EVs) and $4,000 credit for used EVs expired at the end of September. Similarly, major tax credits for renewable energy and energy efficiency initiatives stemming from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act are also expiring, including some personal credits being phased out at the end of 2025 and some business credits expiring over the next couple years.
The loss of financial incentives could make it more expensive for individuals and businesses to reduce their environmental footprints. At the same time, energy bills could collectively rise, with less construction of new renewable power generation — lower supply, combined with rising demand such as from AI data centers, could lead to higher prices, as many analyses show.
While these changes affect momentum toward reducing carbon emissions, that doesn’t mean that you’re powerless. Focusing on what you can control still leaves you with a lot of levers to pull in your personal life or for your business.
Here are three of the best and most affordable ways to reduce your environmental impact:
1. Audit Your Energy Efficiency
Despite the loss of some financial incentives, there’s still likely some low-hanging fruit you can pick.
The average American spends $2,000 per year for home energy, yet about 10%-20% of that — $200-$400 — could be wasted due to drafts, air leaks, and outdated HVAC systems, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
For a similar price — averaging $437, according to Angi —you could get a professional home energy audit, and you still have until the end of the year to claim a tax credit for up to 30% of the cost of this service.
This audit can help you identify where you’re wasting energy and guide improvements that will pay off for years to come. Even if net savings take a few years, your immediate environmental impact begins as soon as you reduce energy usage.
In doing so, you can find ways you’re wasting energy and make home improvements that increase your efficiency for years to come. That can lower your energy bills and save money in the long run. Even if it takes a few years to see net savings, after accounting for the cost of the audit and any upgrades you make, you can make an immediate environmental impact by reducing your energy usage.
Research also suggests that your home energy upgrades can influence your neighbors. So, you might be able to make more impact in your community than you realize.
Use our carbon footprint calculator to estimate your home energy, driving, and travel emissions.
2. Buy or Lease an EV Anyway
The loss of EV tax credits does directly affect their affordability, but you shouldn’t assume that makes these cars too expensive for you.
Because EVs tend to have much lower fuel and maintenance costs, even a higher initial purchase price might be worth it to you.
An analysis by Vincentric found that 24 out of 54 EVs analyzed had a lower five-year total cost of ownership than comparable gas-powered cars. Yet only five of those 54 EVs qualified for the $7,500 tax credit anyway. So, even with the credit expiring, there are likely plenty of EVs that still save you money overall.
Also, keep in mind that many EV buyers want the latest technology, such as extended battery range. If that’s less important to you, and you primarily want a car for getting around town more efficiently, then you might be able to find a great deal on a used EV.
That could become increasingly feasible as car manufacturers release new EV models and previous leaseholders turn in their two- or three-year-old cars for new ones.
Taking a road trip? You can soften the climate impact of your travel with simple solutions like Terrapass’s EcoTourist bundle.
3. Buy Carbon Offsets
Rather than only focusing on external climate developments, we can start by looking at our own carbon footprints and make a positive impact by purchasing carbon offsets.
Purchasing carbon offsets doesn’t cancel out your emissions, but it does help balance the negative impact of things like flying or driving a gas-powered vehicle. When you buy carbon offsets, your money goes toward projects that remove or reduce carbon emissions, such as by avoiding deforestation or capturing methane from landfills.
The funding from carbon offsets helps make these projects possible, and they often have co-benefits like providing job opportunities in disadvantaged communities and improving biodiversity.
Keep in mind that carbon offsets help you take responsibility for your environmental impact at the individual level. It’s not that you expect your carbon offset purchase to immediately solve a complex problem like climate change, but you can take control over your own footprint.
Moreover, if you’re trying to mitigate your carbon footprint, buying carbon offsets might align better with your budget than bigger sustainability steps that require a few years of planning. For example, you might not have the cash to buy an EV today, and high interest rates might make taking out a loan for a new car impractical. Yet you might have room in your budget for around $20-$30 per month in carbon offset purchases to compensate for the emissions you have now as you work to reduce them over time.
To balance the majority of your family’s emissions, for instance, you could enroll on Terrapass’s Carbon Balanced Living Plan. A couple with one car that takes up to five regional or one international flight per year per household could buy a Carbon Balanced Living Plan subscription for $25.67/month.
To get a sense of what it would take to balance most of your emissions, you can use Terrapass’s carbon footprint calculator. From there, you can figure out the cost of this balancing via carbon offset purchases.
Final Thoughts
It’s not a perfect solution, and it would be great if individuals, businesses, and government were all moving in the same direction toward mitigating climate change. Short of that, however, focusing on what you can control and taking positive steps can help.
Small steps whether that’s auditing your home, switching to an EV, or offsetting emissions can collectively add up to big impact over time.
Take action today, starting with what’s in your control.
Get Started on Your Sustainability Journey
The post 3 Affordable Ways to Help the Environment Within Your Control appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
