Australia has one of the worst rates of deforestation in the world and the beef industry is the number one driver of deforestation in Australia. Queensland is the focal point for this deforestation, with about 90% of it due to bulldozing for pasture, primarily for beef cattle. This rampant destruction is devastating for wildlife, resulting in a native animal killed every single second. The environmental impact extends to greenhouse gas emissions, with agricultural deforestation projected to contribute 32 million tonnes of emissions in 2024, or 7% of Australia’s domestic emissions.

A native animal is killed every single second leaving many species, like the Spotted-tail Quoll, under threat.
Image: © Lachlan L. Hall / Greenpeace
The Global Shift to Deforestation-Free Agriculture
Globally, there is a rapid move towards eliminating deforestation and the destruction of natural ecosystems from agricultural supply chains. The EU is implementing stringent deforestation-free import laws, and many companies are adopting Science-Based Targets, committing to be deforestation-free by 2025. This global trend is influencing the finance sector and corporate Australia, including major beef buyers. Aldi, for instance, has pledged to eliminate deforestation and the destruction of any natural ecosystem from its supply chains by 2025. Public pressure campaigns, such as our campaign targeting McDonald’s, are also driving this shift.
The Exposure of the Australian Beef Industry
Australia is a major global producer and the second-largest beef exporter in the world, behind Brazil. Beef cattle farming covers about 50% of Australia’s landmass, which explains the industry’s disproportionate impact on the country’s forests and natural ecosystems. With primary export destinations including China, Japan, South Korea, and the United States, Australia exported $17 billion worth of beef in 2023, making it the nation’s ninth-largest export industry. However, as a significant driver of deforestation, the industry risks losing international and domestic support without rapid change.

Destruction in Queensland, which has the highest rate of deforestation in Australia.
Image: © Paul Hilton / Greenpeace
3 steps to Aussie beef without bulldozers
To make Australia’s beef industry more environmentally sustainable, three key steps are necessary:
1. Strong Deforestation-Free Corporate Commitments:
Australia’s biggest beef buyers need to commit to eliminating deforestation and the destruction of natural ecosystems from their supply chains by the end of 2025. This commitment will send a strong market signal that deforestation is unacceptable. While Aldi has the strongest commitment among the major beef buyers, more needs to be done. Check out our deforestation scorecard to see where companies stand, and join us in urging the CEOs of the big beef buyers to take action.
2. A National Deforestation-Free Verification System:
A significant issue is the lack of sufficient tracking of livestock from their origins to the slaughterhouses, resulting in little accountability in the beef supply chain. Establishing a national verification system that tracks and monitors deforestation in supply chains is crucial. Australia already has one of the best biosecurity systems globally, involving microchipping and tracing livestock. Pairing this with deforestation data and oversight from a multi-stakeholder group, including environmental organisations, could create an effective system. We’re currently lobbying the Federal Government to establish such a system
3. Stronger National Nature Laws:
The Federal Government is currently overhauling Australia’s national nature laws. Tightening regulations around agricultural deforestation will force the industry to change rapidly. Sign our petition to urge the Federal Government to act and email your local MP to call for an end to agricultural deforestation by 2025.
Join the Campaign
By fighting for these solutions, we can ensure a future where Australia’s beef industry continues without devastating our precious forests and wildlife. Join us in advocating for stronger corporate commitments, a national verification system, and robust nature laws. Together, we can achieve beef without bulldozers and protect our environment for generations to come.
Climate Change
California’s Climate Leaders Talk Clean Energy Growing Pains and the War on Iran
Virtual power plants see a renewed push in the legislature to weather the state’s “mid-transition.”
SACRAMENTO—Not long into Ellie Cohen’s opening remarks at the California Climate Policy Summit this week, the crowd erupted in boos—at her request.
California’s Climate Leaders Talk Clean Energy Growing Pains and the War on Iran
Climate Change
Dam Useless: Barriers Prevent a Migratory Fish from Reproducing
The Bronx River is home to obsolete dams. Plans to remove them could boost efforts to restore dwindling river herring populations.
The Bronx River was once a curvy waterway that ran through vast forests and flowed into networks of tidal marshland. For centuries, river herring have swum up the waterway from the East River and the Long Island Sound to lay their eggs.
Dam Useless: Barriers Prevent a Migratory Fish from Reproducing
Climate Change
Fossil Free Zones can be on-ramps to the clean energy transition
Cecilia Requena is a Bolivian senator with Parliamentarians for a Fossil Free Future and Juan Pablo Osornio is engagement and policy director at Earth Insight.
In late April, delegations from dozens of governments will gather in Colombia for the First Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels. Together with the roadmaps announced at November’s UN climate summit in Brazil, which will call on countries to transition away from fossil fuels and halt deforestation by 2030, political will is building to save our most critical natural resources.
Now we need the practical application of where and how this will work – specific places where the line is drawn against new fossil fuel extraction. That is what Fossil Free Zones offer.
What is a Fossil Free Zone?
A Fossil Free Zone is a defined area demarcated by its ecological, biodiversity, or cultural significance, where exploration, extraction, and development of fossil fuels are permanently prohibited. Think tropical rainforests, key biodiversity areas, Indigenous Peoples’ territories, and critical marine ecosystems. They translate the abstract global commitment to transitioning away from fossil fuels into something tangible: a map, a boundary, a legal safeguard.
The stakes for getting this right are enormous. Research shows that oil and gas blocks already overlap with approximately 179 million hectares of tropical moist forests – roughly 21% of the Amazon, Congo Basin, and Southeast Asian forest cover.


Globally, almost 27% of global conventional oil resources overlap with top-priority socio-environmental areas. In 2024 alone, 85% of new oil discoveries were made offshore, frequently overlapping with marine biodiversity hotspots.
Colombia: A model for the world
No country illustrates the possibilities better than Colombia – fittingly, the nation hosting this conference (along with the Netherlands). Last September, Colombia announced a landmark ban on fossil fuel and mining extraction across its entire Amazon region – the world’s first region-wide Fossil Free Zone of its kind.
Colombia’s decision followed in the wake of our new research, which found that developing untapped reserves beneath the country’s forest would generate billions of dollars in stranded assets while doing almost nothing for national energy security. It would, however, threaten 20% of the intact Amazon forest and the territories of nearly 70% of the Indigenous and local communities whose lands overlap with fossil fuel concessions. In most of the Colombian Amazon, the cost of extraction is higher than the cost of conservation.
How a global roadmap can meet the promise to halt deforestation
Other countries are also taking steps in this direction. Mexico has 100 million hectares of similar Safeguard Zones, Guatemala ended oil extraction in the Mayan Biosphere Reserve, and parliamentarians across the Amazon basin have introduced legislation to extend the ban region-wide.
The economic case for leaving fossil fuels in the ground
The fossil fuel endgame – a period of declining global demand as renewable energy scales – means that unconventional and frontier reserves in remote forests are increasingly uncompetitive. They require massive public investment in infrastructure, including roads that themselves become vectors for illegal logging, small-scale mining, and agricultural encroachment. Stranded asset risk is real and growing.
In 2025, wind and solar growth outpaced all new electricity demand, and more than a quarter of all vehicles sold were electric.
For forested nations, there is also an emerging economic logic for protection: intact forests generate jobs and revenue from protected area management, watershed services, and sustainable tourism, while supporting the small-scale agriculture that most rural economies depend on. They also underpin water security for agriculture and energy generation and act as carbon sinks. Over 33 million people are employed directly in the forest sector, and there are more than 1.6 billion small forest farm producers.


Fossil fuel investment amid volatile energy markets
Developing countries with fossil fuel reserves face genuine pressures to develop them – credit ratings, currency stability, social services, and energy security are tied to an ever-growing fossil frontier, particularly in the midst of volatile energy markets.
The conflict in Iran has amplified that volatility, spiking oil prices and giving fossil fuel-dependent governments renewed short-term pressure to expand domestic production – making the case for internationally-backed Fossil Free Zones, paired with real financial support, all the more urgent.
Innovative financial mechanisms like the Tropical Forest Forever Facility – a fund proposed at COP30 that would provide long-term, results-based payments to tropical forest nations to keep forests standing – can shift the economic scales enough to make Fossil Free Zones in high-integrity forests politically viable.
Colombia pledges to exit investment protection system after fossil fuel lawsuits
Industries leading the energy transition – renewable energy developers, green hydrogen producers, sustainable finance institutions, and technology companies with net-zero supply chain commitments – also have a direct stake in the Fossil Free Zone agenda. Moreover, the reputational and legal risks of investments in fossil fuel frontiers are escalating.
Already, 11 banks have applied various levels of financial restrictions to the oil and gas sector in the Amazon. Some of these policies are strong, others are closer to greenwashing, but these commitments prove that banks see the increasing risks.


What should emerge from Colombia conference
Our hope for the upcoming conference in Colombia is that, at a minimum, Fossil Free Zones are uplifted as part of a shared international vision for the energy transition. At best, a coalition of countries commits to include Fossil Free Zones in their national plans and establishes a shared framework with principles to identify new zones and implementation guidance for other countries.
WATCH OUR WEBINAR: Santa Marta – Fossil fuel transition in an unstable world
This is a practical on-ramp for countries that want to align with the global transition but need a concrete, geographically-defined starting point – and as a direct delivery mechanism for the deforestation roadmap, translating a global pledge to halt forest loss into specific action to thwart a real driver of deforestation.
The question is no longer whether fossil fuel extraction will end, but whether that end will be managed or chaotic, putting the planet’s most critical ecosystems in danger. Fossil Free Zones offer a hope of preventing irreversible harm to the forests, marine ecosystems, and Indigenous communities that represent humanity’s best remaining insurance against climate collapse – one territory at a time.
The post Fossil Free Zones can be on-ramps to the clean energy transition appeared first on Climate Home News.
Fossil Free Zones can be on-ramps to the clean energy transition
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
