Australia has one of the worst rates of deforestation in the world and the beef industry is the number one driver of deforestation in Australia. Queensland is the focal point for this deforestation, with about 90% of it due to bulldozing for pasture, primarily for beef cattle. This rampant destruction is devastating for wildlife, resulting in a native animal killed every single second. The environmental impact extends to greenhouse gas emissions, with agricultural deforestation projected to contribute 32 million tonnes of emissions in 2024, or 7% of Australia’s domestic emissions.

A native animal is killed every single second leaving many species, like the Spotted-tail Quoll, under threat.
Image: © Lachlan L. Hall / Greenpeace
The Global Shift to Deforestation-Free Agriculture
Globally, there is a rapid move towards eliminating deforestation and the destruction of natural ecosystems from agricultural supply chains. The EU is implementing stringent deforestation-free import laws, and many companies are adopting Science-Based Targets, committing to be deforestation-free by 2025. This global trend is influencing the finance sector and corporate Australia, including major beef buyers. Aldi, for instance, has pledged to eliminate deforestation and the destruction of any natural ecosystem from its supply chains by 2025. Public pressure campaigns, such as our campaign targeting McDonald’s, are also driving this shift.
The Exposure of the Australian Beef Industry
Australia is a major global producer and the second-largest beef exporter in the world, behind Brazil. Beef cattle farming covers about 50% of Australia’s landmass, which explains the industry’s disproportionate impact on the country’s forests and natural ecosystems. With primary export destinations including China, Japan, South Korea, and the United States, Australia exported $17 billion worth of beef in 2023, making it the nation’s ninth-largest export industry. However, as a significant driver of deforestation, the industry risks losing international and domestic support without rapid change.

Destruction in Queensland, which has the highest rate of deforestation in Australia.
Image: © Paul Hilton / Greenpeace
3 steps to Aussie beef without bulldozers
To make Australia’s beef industry more environmentally sustainable, three key steps are necessary:
1. Strong Deforestation-Free Corporate Commitments:
Australia’s biggest beef buyers need to commit to eliminating deforestation and the destruction of natural ecosystems from their supply chains by the end of 2025. This commitment will send a strong market signal that deforestation is unacceptable. While Aldi has the strongest commitment among the major beef buyers, more needs to be done. Check out our deforestation scorecard to see where companies stand, and join us in urging the CEOs of the big beef buyers to take action.
2. A National Deforestation-Free Verification System:
A significant issue is the lack of sufficient tracking of livestock from their origins to the slaughterhouses, resulting in little accountability in the beef supply chain. Establishing a national verification system that tracks and monitors deforestation in supply chains is crucial. Australia already has one of the best biosecurity systems globally, involving microchipping and tracing livestock. Pairing this with deforestation data and oversight from a multi-stakeholder group, including environmental organisations, could create an effective system. We’re currently lobbying the Federal Government to establish such a system
3. Stronger National Nature Laws:
The Federal Government is currently overhauling Australia’s national nature laws. Tightening regulations around agricultural deforestation will force the industry to change rapidly. Sign our petition to urge the Federal Government to act and email your local MP to call for an end to agricultural deforestation by 2025.
Join the Campaign
By fighting for these solutions, we can ensure a future where Australia’s beef industry continues without devastating our precious forests and wildlife. Join us in advocating for stronger corporate commitments, a national verification system, and robust nature laws. Together, we can achieve beef without bulldozers and protect our environment for generations to come.
Climate Change
Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule
The Trump EPA’s repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding revokes the agency’s authority to regulate climate pollution. Environmental activists are mourning the loss while vowing to resurrect it.
A procession of mourners representing sea level rise, melting permafrost, ecocide and other climate calamities grieved the demise of a groundbreaking climate rule outside the Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 9 headquarters in downtown San Francisco on Tuesday.
Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule
Climate Change
IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day
Global oil demand is expected to be almost one million barrels per day less than was forecast before the Iran war, as shortages and soaring costs prompt drastic cutbacks by consumers and businesses, a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Wednesday.
With the closure of the Strait of Hormuz choking off supplies and keeping prices high, less oil is being used to make products such as jet fuel, LPG cooking gas and petrochemicals, the Paris-based IEA said in its monthly oil report, forecasting the biggest quarterly demand drop since the COVID pandemic.
The Iran war “upends our global outlook”, the government-backed agency said, adding that it now expects oil demand to shrink by 80,000 barrels per day in 2026 from last year.
Before the conflict began, the IEA said in February it expected oil demand to rise by 850,000 barrels per day this year, meaning the difference between the pre-war and current estimates is 930,000 barrels a day, or 340 million barrels a year.
That could have a significant impact on the outlook for planet-heating carbon emissions this year.
At an intensity of 434 kg of carbon dioxide per barrel of oil – the estimate used by the US Environmental Protection Agency – the annual reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from oil for 2026, compared with the pre-war forecast, is similar to the amount emitted by the Philippines each year.
Harry Benham, senior advisor at Carbon Tracker, told Climate Home News that he expects at least half of the reduction in oil demand to be permanent because of efficiency gains, behavioural change and faster electrification.
The oil shock is leading to oil being replaced, especially in transport, with electricity and other fuels, just as past oil shocks drove lasting reductions in consumption, he said. “The shock doesn’t delay the transition – it reinforces it,” he added.
Demand takes a hit
While demand for oil has fallen significantly, supplies have fallen even further. Supply in March was 10 million barrels a day less than February, the IEA said, calling it the “largest disruption in history”.
This forecast relies on the assumption that regular deliveries of oil and gas from the Middle East will resume by the middle of the year, the IEA said, although the prospects for this “remain unclear at this stage”.
Last month, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the CERAWeek oil industry conference that prices were not high enough to lead to permanent reductions in demand for oil, known as demand destruction.
But the IEA said on Wednesday that “demand destruction will spread as scarcity and higher prices persist”.
Industries contributing to weaker demand for oil include Asian petrochemical producers, who are cutting production as oil supplies dry up, the report said, while consumers are cutting back on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which is mainly used as a cooking gas in developing countries, the IEA said.
Flight cancellations caused by the war have dampened demand for oil-based jet fuel, the IEA said. As well as cancellations caused by risk from the conflict itself, airports have warned that fuel shortages could lead to disruption.
Across the world, governments, businesses and consumers have sought to reduce their oil use after the war. The government of Pakistan has cut the speed limit on its roads, so that people drive at a more fuel-efficient speed, and Laos has encouraged people to work from home to preserve scarce petrol and diesel.
Nepal’s EV revolution pays off as oil crisis causes pain at the pumps
Consumers in Bangladesh are seeking electric vehicles (EVs) to avoid fuel queues and, in Nigeria, more people are seeking to replace petrol and diesel generators with solar panels, Climate Home News has reported.
In the longer term, the European Union is considering cutting taxes on electricity to help it replace fossil fuels and France is promoting EVs and heat pumps.
IEA urged to help “future-proof” economies
Meanwhile, the IEA came under fire last week from energy security experts, including former military chiefs, who signed an open letter in which they accused the agency of offering “only a temporary response to turbulent markets”, calling for stronger structural action “to future-proof our economies”.
They said that besides releasing emergency oil stocks and offering advice on how to reduce oil demand in the short term, the IEA should show countries how to reduce their exposure to volatile oil and gas markets.
The IEA has also been under pressure from the Trump administration to talk less about the transition away from fossil fuels.
This article was amended on 15 April 2026 to correct the drop in 2026 forecast oil demand from “nearly a billion” to “nearly a million”
The post IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day appeared first on Climate Home News.
IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day
Climate Change
Iowa Moves to Shield Farmers, Ethanol Plants, From Lawsuits Over Emissions
Climate lawsuits are a largely nonexistent threat to farmers in the state, but ethanol producers could benefit from the law.
DES MOINES, Iowa—Aaron Lehman has many concerns about the fate of Iowa’s farmers. Climate lawsuits aren’t one.
Iowa Moves to Shield Farmers, Ethanol Plants, From Lawsuits Over Emissions
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits



