Connect with us

Published

on

As global temperatures rise, vast swathes of the global population are experiencing heat extremes that they have never faced before.

In some parts of the world, exposure to extreme heat is breaching survival limits for even the healthiest people. Heat-related deaths have increased rapidly in recent decades.

But the risks of extreme heat are even more acute for certain groups of people. Those most vulnerable include newborns, infants and children, those with preexisting medical conditions, including certain disabilities, the over 65s and workers who work outside or in a high heat indoor setting.

Despite these risks, our new research – published in the International Journal of Biometeorology – shows that vulnerable groups are being overlooked in studies of heat stress.

For early warning systems to be effective during heat extremes, it is crucial that appropriate thresholds are established for those most at risk.

Heat stress metrics

Heat stress is the build-up of body heat generated either internally by muscle use or externally by the environment. Research shows that the risks and impacts of heat stress are rising as the global climate warms.

Certain groups are typically more vulnerable to heat stress either because they are more exposed to heat – such as outdoor workers – or they have a physical limit in their ability to thermoregulate – that is, cool their body down – such as the elderly and young children.

A key metric to quantify heat stress is “wet-bulb globe temperature”. It has a long history as an international standard – originally developed by the US navy in the 1950s to indicate safe heat levels for military training.

Wet-bulb globe temperature has three components:

  1. Wet-bulb temperature, a measure of temperature that takes humidity and wind into account.
  2. Globe temperature, a measure of heat stress from direct sunlight.
  3. Air temperature.

Together, these components indicate a likelihood of an individual experiencing heat stress when specific thresholds are met.

Vulnerable groups overlooked

In our paper, we assess 931 peer-reviewed studies that use wet-bulb globe temperature to investigate heat stress thresholds for different population groups.

We find that the body of literature on wet-bulb globe temperature has grown substantially since the first study was published in December 1957.

The charts below show how those studies are divided by decade and sex (left) and by age group (right).

The number of studies on heat vulnerability, displayed by sex and decade of publication (left) and age groups/categories (right)
The number of studies on heat vulnerability, displayed by sex and decade of publication (left) and age groups/categories (right). In the latter, groups are defined as many (mixed age groups), adult (25 to 55), young adult (18 to 25), child (1 to 12), adolescent (12 to 18), older adult (55 to 65), elderly (65+), neonatal: up to 1 month. Source: Brimicombe et al. (2024)

Of those 931 papers, 257 explored the differences due to sex and the majority focused on males (154).

This highlights a sex-related bias; however, this can somewhat be explained by the split in occupations where, traditionally, males end up in jobs that have clearer links to extreme heat exposure.

Only three of the 257 papers studied pregnant women and only one assessed other aspects of female health.

This is despite pregnant and postpartum women being a particularly vulnerable group. Experts in medicine, human thermal physiology and climate science have found a strong connection between extreme heat exposure and a range of negative birth outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight, cognitive deficits and even stillbirth.

Where the effects of age were considered (in 556 papers), most studies were conducted on adults (443) of 25-55 years of age and younger adults of 18-25 (48).

Very few studies focused on children, with five considering children of between one and five years old, just one focused on newborns up to 28 days old, and no studies of babies between one month and one year old.

For older adults, only three studies considered those 55-65 years old and four of those 65 and above. No studies placed an exclusive focus on elderly and/or older females, although women have a longer life expectancy than men.

Appropriate thresholds

In order to build a successful early warning system for extreme heat, it is necessary to identify appropriate thresholds for when people are at risk. Timely warnings can then help protect vulnerable groups by giving them time to take action.

In 2022, several UN agencies launched an “early warnings for all” initiative. This included a target to ensure that everyone in the world is protected by early warning systems for four types of extreme weather event – including heatwaves – by 2027.

However, there are many barriers to making sure that such a system is effective and properly supported by other policy measures.

One is that the wet-bulb globe temperature threshold proposed by the international standard organisation (specifically, ISO 7243:2017) only allows for different thresholds based on acclimatisation – that is, how much a person is used to their environment.

It takes a healthy individual around two weeks to acclimatise to a new thermal environment and those who are athletic often have a higher heat tolerance. (Although limits do exist, in a similar way to low oxygen at high altitudes.)

As we have described above, there has been a lot of research into appropriate thresholds for different groups of people. However, much of this understanding comes from studies on athletics.

In addition, as we have shown above, vulnerable groups are chronically underrepresented across these studies.

This is illustrated by the charts below, which show the heat thresholds estimated by the studies we have reviewed according to sex (top-left), age (top-right), clothing (bottom-left) and acclimatisation (bottom-right). Each dot represents a heat threshold estimate and the boxes and whiskers indicate the range across all the results.

The charts highlight how more research into thresholds is needed for vulnerable groups, particularly children, the elderly and older adults. For example, research in Europe has shown that elderly women are more likely to die during a heatwave.

The thresholds for heat stress used in studies on the outdoor wet-bulb globe temperature for different categories, namely threshold groups by a) sex, b) age, focusing on different age groups, with multiple age categories, defined by years of age.
The thresholds for heat stress used in studies on the outdoor wet-bulb globe temperature for different categories, namely threshold groups by a) sex, b) age, focusing on different age groups, with multiple age categories, defined by years of age – many (mixed age groups), adult (25 to 55), young adult (18 to 25), child (1 to 12), adolescent (12 to 18), older adult (55 to 65), elderly (65+), (c) type of clothing, and (d) level of acclimatisation. The box and whiskers show the range of heat warning thresholds considered by studies. (The maximum value considered by a study was 47.1 and the minimum value considered by a study was 12.6. The maximum threshold in the ISO is 33C). Source: Brimicombe et al. (2024)

When assessing the reception and response to extreme heat warnings, the perceived threat of danger is the strongest factor in why people do or do not heed them. This means it is even more important to fully understand which groups are most at risk.

By tailoring early warning systems to individuals needs and requirements, effective warnings can promote societal resilience by protecting the most exposed and vulnerable. And targeted heat thresholds are fundamental to this.

The post Guest post: Heat stress thresholds are not designed for vulnerable groups appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Guest post: Heat stress thresholds are not designed for vulnerable groups

Continue Reading

Climate Change

The Farming Industry Has Embraced ‘Precision Agriculture’ and AI, but Critics Question Its Environmental Benefits

Published

on

Why have tech heavyweights, including Google and Microsoft, become so deeply integrated in agriculture? And who benefits from their involvement?

Picture an American farm in your mind.

The Farming Industry Has Embraced ‘Precision Agriculture’ and AI, but Critics Question Its Environmental Benefits

Continue Reading

Climate Change

With Love: Living consciously in nature

Published

on

I fell flat on my backside one afternoon this January and, weirdly, it made me think of you. Okay, I know that takes a bit of unpacking—so let me go back and start at the beginning.

For the last six years, our family has joined with half a dozen others to spend a week or so up at Wangat Lodge, located on a 50-acre subtropical rainforest property around three hours north of Sydney. The accommodation is pretty basic, with no wifi coverage—so time in Wangat really revolves around the bush. You live by the rhythm of the sun and the rain, with the days punctuated by swimming in the river and walking through the forest.

An intrinsic part of Wangat is Dan, the owner and custodian of the place, and the guide on our walks. He talks about time, place, and care with great enthusiasm, but always tenderly and never with sanctimony. “There is no such thing as ‘the same walk’”, is one of Dan’s refrains, because the way he sees it “every day, there is change in the world around you” of plants, animals, water and weather. Dan speaks of Wangat with such evident love, but not covetousness; it is a lightness which includes gentle consciousness that his own obligations arise only because of the historic dispossession of others. He inspires because of how he is.

One of the highlights this year was a river walk with Dan, during which we paddled or waded through most of the route, with only occasional scrambles up the bank. Sometimes the only sensible option is to swim. Among the life around us, we notice large numbers of tadpoles in the water, which is clean enough to drink. Our own tadpoles, the kids in the group, delight in the expedition. I overhear one of the youngest children declaring that she’s having ‘one of the best days ever’. Dan looks content. Part of his mission is to reintroduce children to nature, so that the soles of their feet may learn from the uneven ground, and their muscles from the cool of the water.

These moments are for thankfulness in the life that lives.

It is at the very end of the walk when I overbalance and fall on my arse—and am reminded of the eternal truth that rocks are hard. As I gingerly get up, my youngest daughter looks at me, caught between amusement and concern, and asks me if I’m okay.

I have to think before answering, because yes, physically I’m fine. But I feel too, an underlying sense of discomfort; it is that omnipresent pressure of existential awareness about the scale of suffering and ecological damage now at large in the world, made so much more immediately acute after Bondi; the dissonance that such horrors can somehow exist simultaneously with this small group being alive and happy in this place, on this earth-kissed afternoon.

How is it okay, to be “okay”? What is it to live with conscience in Wangat? Those of us who still have access to time, space, safety and high levels of volition on this planet carry this duality all the time, as our gift and obligation. It is not an easy thing to make sense of; but for me, it speaks to the question of ‘why Greenpeace’? Because the moral and strategic mission-focus of campaigning provides a principled basis for how each of us can bridge that interminable gulf.

The essence of campaigning is to make the world’s state of crisis legible and actionable, by isolating systemic threats to which we can rise and respond credibly, with resources allocated to activity in accordance with strategy. To be part of Greenpeace, whether as an activist, volunteer supporter or staff member, is to find a home for your worries for the world in confidence and faith that together we have the power to do something about it. Together we meet the confusion of the moment with the light of shared purpose and the confidence of direction.

So, it was as I was getting back up again from my tumble and considering my daughter’s question that I thought of you—with gratitude, and with love–-because we cross this bridge all the time, together, everyday; to face the present and the future.

‘Yes, my love’, I say to my daughter, smiling as I get to my feet, “I’m okay”. And I close my eyes and think of a world in which the fires are out, and everywhere, all tadpoles have the conditions of flourishing to be able to grow peacefully into frogs.

Thank you for being a part of Greenpeace.

With love,

David

With Love: Living consciously in nature

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Without Weighing Costs to Public Health, EPA Rolls Back Air Pollution Standards for Coal Plants

Published

on

The federal Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for coal and oil-fired power plants were strengthened during the Biden administration.

Last week, when the Environmental Protection Agency finalized its repeal of tightened 2024 air pollution standards for power plants, the agency claimed the rollback would save $670 million.

Without Weighing Costs to Public Health, EPA Rolls Back Air Pollution Standards for Coal Plants

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com