bright curiously danced beneath my eyes
new documents and bracketed language¹
quick feet pacing the halls

yet somehow I knew this place before
I knew their eyes, I saw their denial
the false solidarity and solutions
wondering if the fabric walls had birthed them
populating the minds of many

Thunderbirds² boomed, a fire roared
The plastic ceilings and cardboard
went as fast as they were produced,
and the outside came in.

The impermanent build at war
with the soil beneath
a reckoning of all that walked upon her.

Water sprinkled from above
she bellowed a reminder

suits no longer stood on soapboxes,
and we moved as fast as policy decisions
away from the flames

but yet the insistence of momentum
the hands I held
proof that amidst the collapse
the work of the determined endures

the night came,
and the moon hung high
rewritten passages became press
and new alliances emerged

and the sun rose again
eyes full of a new light
the seeing kind
the unwavering hopeful

¹ Bracketed language: conditional offer where a party proposes a settlement range
² Thunderbirds: An Ojibwe traditional spirit – responsible for thunder

___

Gemma Gutierrez is a Youth Advisor to the GoodPower (formally Action for the Climate Emergency) Board and a member of its Youth Advisory Board. Born and raised in Milwaukee, WI, in a tight-knit Mexican community, she learned early the power of words, connection, and collective action. Her work spans climate justice, civic engagement, and immigrant rights through organizations such as Sunrise, Voces de la Frontera, and CUNY’s Environmental Justice Working Group. From voter mobilization in the 2020 election to research on flooding and urban equity, Gemma is committed to linking climate justice and finance to a broader vision of global liberation.

The post Bright curiously danced beneath my eyes: COP30 reflections appeared first on Climate Generation.

Bright curiously danced beneath my eyes: COP30 reflections

As it is my first COP, I walked in with quite the optimism, the hope that I would see some new things. And though I did, simultaneously the same framework I had long recognized replicated itself in front of me.

The false carpet floors sat three inches above concrete, Indigenous Peoples and Afrodescendant panels were drowned out by larger Global North pavilions; the space was treated more like a resume booster than a place for real engagement. Too many spoke about climate only through rose colored glasses, praising false solutions propped up by the oil and agriculture lobbyists.There were just over 1,900 fossil fuel and big agriculture executives/ lobbyists in attendance at this year’s COP according to an investigation by The Guardian and DeSmog.

And so I realized something: the global climate conversation is unique from the one happening in the United States, but the variable of difference lies not in exploitation, not in silence, but in the sheer magnitude of individuals. The scale shifts, but the pattern remains.

The rain bellowed at the Indigenous Peoples pavilion amid the demand for the recognition of Afrodescendants and the need for a constituency. Someone called it Thundercats, and the bellow felt like Mother Nature calling out. Here, in the mouth of the Amazon, she called out to us again and again. In Week One the door fell, and territories rose; that movement carried momentum straight into Week Two. My optimism had not faded, but the next battles played out consecutively around me.

The whispers of justice broke like the rain, yet some walked shielded from it, untouched, without a single furrow in their brow.

The United States was apparently absent, yet its impacts and obligations rang through nearly every conversation. And although the United States did not seem to wish to be here, the civil society members from the US stood their ground. We, the civil society, understand the delay the US has caused on justice, the harm multiplied by its shadow, and the obligation grossed by its inadequate and cruel inaction.

Then the panel began, and the Afrodescendant demand for UNFCCC recognition was spoken again. Fire flickered and spread near the pavilions. And in our fervor, we escaped into cramped hallways, and I held a hand tight. Thunder boomed again. This time she gave no warning; she simply let it ring. Videos poured in, and what we could not see became undeniable.

The plastic ceilings and cardboard went as fast as they were produced, and the outside came in. The impermanent build was at war with the soil beneath it; and there was a reckoning for all who walked upon her. Water sprinkled from above with her bellowing reminder, perhaps her reflection of how insufficient the action inside remained.

“More than 300 Big Agriculture Lobbyists Have Taken Part in COP30, Investigation Finds.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 18 Nov. 2025, www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/18/big-agriculture-lobbyists-cop30-climate-summit.

Erika Yamada, Melissa Gómez Hernández. “Afro-Descendant Peoples Seek Climate Justice on the Global Stage.” Ford Foundation, 14 Oct. 2025, www.fordfoundation.org/news-and-stories/stories/afro-descendant-peoples-seek-climate-justice-on-the-global-stage/.

___

Gemma Gutierrez is a Youth Advisor to the GoodPower (formally Action for the Climate Emergency) Board and a member of its Youth Advisory Board. Born and raised in Milwaukee, WI, in a tight-knit Mexican community, she learned early the power of words, connection, and collective action. Her work spans climate justice, civic engagement, and immigrant rights through organizations such as Sunrise, Voces de la Frontera, and CUNY’s Environmental Justice Working Group. From voter mobilization in the 2020 election to research on flooding and urban equity, Gemma is committed to linking climate justice and finance to a broader vision of global liberation.

The post Reflecting on COP30 appeared first on Climate Generation.

Reflecting on COP30

Tanzania, a fossil gas producer that led African nations at COP30, urged African ministers to position themselves against transitioning away from fossil fuels ahead of critical negotiations in the final week of the summit, according to a document seen by Climate Home News.

The recommendation was part of a four-page presentation dated November 15 – the halfway point of COP30 – and delivered by Tanzania’s lead negotiator during a briefing on the just transition work programme as calls for the inclusion of a fossil fuel roadmap in the conference’s main outcome were gathering speed.

The powerpoint advised African countries to maintain a position against transitioning away from fossil fuels, while also ensuring that a call for universal energy access was included in the text.

Richard Muyungi – who chaired the 54-strong African group of countries at COP30 – told Climate Home News on November 14 that the group had yet to coordinate their views on a potential fossil fuel transition roadmap, but would do so if developments at COP30 required it. He added that Africa should not be forced or pushed towards a trajectory that threatens to undermine its development agenda.

Nonetheless, two African countries publicly stated during COP30 that they supported a transition roadmap, suggesting that they did not agree with the approach proposed by the African Group. A formal group position was not declared openly during the summit.

“Pathetic” to tell Africa to transition

Explicit references to phasing out fossil fuels were axed from the final “Global Mutirão” decision in the Belém “political package”, following strong pushback from oil and gas-producing nations led by Gulf states. But questions remained over the role of African countries, with The Guardian suggesting that Tanzania’s Richard Muyungi, chair of the African Group of Negotiators (AGN), told a closed-door meeting that the continent’s 54 countries aligned with Arab Group nations on the issue.

Muyungi did not confirm this alignment publicly, telling Climate Home News that the AGN had not been consulted by the COP30 presidency on fossil fuels. He added that, as many African nations have only just started tapping their oil and gas reserves, “how do you tell them to transition away when they have just discovered it [fossil fuel]?”

The AGN chair stressed that what Africa needs is energy access for the over 600 million people who currently lack electricity and 900 million others without clean cooking. He added that it would “really be pathetic” if Africa were told by other countries to transition away from fossil fuels. “Ours is a transition away from wood and charcoal to electricity,” he said.

Tanzania boasts vast gas reserves, some of which are expected to be auctioned off in a long-awaited new licensing round, and relies on the fossil fuel for over two-thirds of its electricity. Tanzania is also involved in the controversial 1,443-kilometer East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), which aims to carry crude oil extracted from fields under development near Uganda’s Lake Albert to the Tanga port in Tanzania for export to international markets.

Muyungi said the continent could get cheap electricity from gas and “nobody can tell us to transition away from gas because this is our survival now”.

“Our economy will not move if somebody tells us to move away from gas because it is part of the fossil fuels – we cannot accept [that],” he told Climate Home News.

African nations split over fossil fuel roadmap

Before negotiations kicked off in Belém, some African leaders called for careful consideration of any attempt to transition away from fossil fuels. Ghana’s environment minister Emmanuel Armah-Kofi Buah said that “to deny Africa the strategic use of these [natural] resources is to deny our right to develop, to light our homes and to power industries”.

As the idea of a fossil fuel transition roadmap unexpectedly became a priority for the COP30 talks following strong calls by Brazil’s president and environment minister, the divergent positions of African nations started to surface, making it hard for them to form a common stance.

Kenya and Sierra Leone, which overwhelmingly rely on clean energy sources, publicly supported the roadmap, joining a group of more than 80 countries to call for its inclusion in the final Mutirao decision.

Speaking at a press conference two days before the close of COP30, Jiwoh Abdulai, Sierra Leone’s minister of environment and climate change, said moving away from fossil fuels is not just a climate issue but an economic issue.

“We need to treat this with urgency, moving away from fossil fuels that are driving the increase in temperature,” he said, adding that “it has to be just and equitable especially for countries in Africa”.

Nigeria, Africa’s largest oil producer, took a more critical stance, saying it would not support any process that would lead to its “sudden economic contraction and heightened social instability”. In a speech during the closing plenary, a Nigerian government official said “a successful transition cannot be imposed” but should be a deliberate process that is nationally determined and supported by international cooperation.

Missed opportunity for Africa

While the final Mutirao decision did not reference fossil fuel transition roadmaps in any form, the Brazilian presidency promised to create a voluntary one outside of the UN climate process over the next year. The process is expected to gain support from other countries such as Colombia, which will host the first conference on the issue in April.

“We know some of you had greater ambition for some of the issues at hand,” COP30 president André Corrêa do Lago told the COP30closing plenary. “I will try not to disappoint you.”

What was decided at COP30 on fossil fuels and adaptation?

Experts said that, by not coming out in support of the fossil fuel roadmap, most African countries missed an opportunity to bring their energy access and finance demands into the centre of the talks.

Tengi George-Ikoli, Nigeria manager at the Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI), said that rather than seeing it as a risk, Africa could have leveraged the opportunity to shape how the transition unfolds and ensure it does not happen in a way “that could cause more economic instability”, but is made into “a global pathway that is equitable, inclusive, and just”.

But the lack of collaboration around a roadmap meant that Africa lost a chance “for that collective voice” to influence a pathway that considers energy access needs, market volatility, and the vulnerability of oil-dependent economies, she said.

Finance at the centre

The scepticism around the roadmap resulted from a lack of clarity, one observer who asked for anonymity told Climate Home News. He said African nations saw the roadmap as a Brazilian initiative that they first came across in Belém, so “there was limited understanding of what this roadmap was about”.

NRGI’s George-Ikoli said that, while it was not clear what the roadmap would entail, African countries became more fixated on that instead of recognising the opportunity. “We might have gone too far into thinking that this roadmap may not be good for us and interpreting it to mean a number of things, not recognising that there’s an opportunity we can leverage now if we’re keen at the start and demand strongly.”

Financial and technological support must be at the centre of this, Sierra Leonean minister Abdulai said. He noted that Africa still needs to grow its economies but also wants to be part of the climate solution because “to us, climate action and economic growth are not mutually exclusive”.

The anonymous observer echoed the same, saying “any roadmap without finance will just remain a roadmap to nowhere”, adding that African countries also did not want to commit to something that they are not going to be able to afford to implement.

Seble Samuel, head of Africa campaigns and advocacy at the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, said any roadmap needs to have clear accountability measures so that “it is not a smokescreen for continued failures on the means of implementation [finance]”. “That ultimately gaslights the Global South, especially those facing the biggest barriers to transition – like African nations,” she added.

George-Ikoli said Africa “can still leverage” the COP30 presidency roadmap to define, on their own terms, what a just transition must look like.

The coming year, she added, must be used to build a collective African position so the continent arrives at the next COP prepared and ready “to place its issues heightened on the agenda”.

The post Tanzania pushed African nations to oppose fossil fuel transition at COP30 appeared first on Climate Home News.

Tanzania pushed African nations to oppose fossil fuel transition at COP30