Google has signed a long-term agreement with renewable energy company Ormat Technologies to bring new geothermal power to its data centers in Nevada, U.S.A. The deal could deliver up to 150 megawatts (MW) of electricity from geothermal sources under a special tariff program.
Ormat will develop a portfolio of geothermal projects across Nevada. These projects are set to come online between 2028 and 2030. Once operational, the electricity will support Google’s growing digital infrastructure.
The guide for this arrangement is NV Energy’s Clean Transition Tariff (CTT), a utility program designed to let large energy users buy new clean power while covering costs without shifting them to other customers.
The contract will begin when the first project starts commercial operation. It will run for 15 years beyond the final project’s completion, creating a long-term revenue stream for Ormat and a stable source of clean energy for Google.
Why Geothermal Delivers 24/7 Clean Baseload Power
Geothermal energy uses heat from deep underground to generate electricity. It can run 24 hours a day, unlike solar or wind, which depend on sunlight or wind. This makes it a baseload power source — always available. That feature is critical for data centers, which require constant electricity.
Ormat is one of the world’s longest-standing geothermal power companies. It designs, builds, and runs plants that convert heat into electricity. Its global portfolio includes nearly 1,700 MW of capacity, with about 1,310 MW in geothermal and solar generation and 385 MW in energy storage.
Here’s how Ormat’s geothermal process works:
In recent years, the tech industry has shown rising interest in geothermal energy. Some operators, including Google, have already signed smaller geothermal power deals in other regions. For example, Google previously secured a 10 MW geothermal PPA in Taiwan and a separate arrangement to procure 115 MW of geothermal power from Fervo Energy in Nevada.
AI’s Energy Appetite and the Need for Clean Power
Data centers consume large amounts of electricity. They house computers that run search engines, Artificial Intelligence (AI), cloud services, and other digital tools. As digital activities grow, so does demand for power.
AI and advanced computing drive particularly strong electricity use. Without reliable clean energy sources like geothermal, data centers often depend on fossil fuels or intermittent renewables that don’t run continuously.

By partnering with Ormat, Google ensures a reliable, carbon-free power supply to meet its needs and reduce its environmental footprint. The new geothermal portfolio is expected to scale with future energy demand from AI and cloud computing workloads.
The Clean Transition Tariff (CTT) model used in this deal is designed so that Google pays full costs for its electricity. This limits cost impacts for other utility customers while enabling investment in new clean generation.
The Ormat–Google Deal: A 150MW Bet on Long-Term Clean Power
The Ormat–Google agreement covers up to 150 MW of geothermal capacity. To put that in context:
- 150 MW can power tens of thousands of homes if it were used for residential consumption.
- For data centers, it represents a meaningful share of electricity demand, especially as AI services expand.
The projects will ramp up over time. The first facilities are expected to start operating by 2028, with additional capacity coming online through 2030. This flexible build-out allows Ormat to expand the portfolio site by site.
The long-term nature of the contract, with a 15-year term after the final project completes, gives both Ormat and Google forecasting clarity. It assures stable revenue for Ormat and long-duration clean power for Google.
From Climate Pledges to Policy-Backed Power Deals
Google has long pledged to reduce its carbon footprint. It aims to operate on carbon-free energy 24/7 by 2030 across all its data centers and offices. This new geothermal deal aligns with that goal by adding dispatchable clean energy to its power mix.

Geothermal energy can play a key role in meeting this aim because it provides baseload power that complements other renewables like wind and solar. Together, these sources help tech firms reach net-zero goals more reliably.
On the policy side, the extension of federal geothermal tax credits under U.S. law strengthens the economics of geothermal development. Programs such as the Oil and Gas Geothermal Tax Credit (OGBTC) and incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) have expanded support for geothermal and other clean technologies.
The Clean Transition Tariff is another policy signal. It creates a scalable structure that utilities in other U.S. markets might adopt. This could help large users, not just Google, secure new clean generation that aligns with climate and reliability goals.
- MUST READ: TotalEnergies and Google’s 1 GW Solar Deal Signals a New Phase in the Data Center Energy Race
Tech Giants Turn to Deep Earth Energy
The Ormat–Google deal fits a broader industry trend. As demand for reliable, low-carbon power grows, more tech and cloud companies seek direct ties to physical clean energy projects.
Tech giants signed 14 geothermal PPAs totaling 635 MW in 2025 alone, up 3x from 2024. Data centers now drive 60% of new geothermal capacity, targeting 120 GW by 2050, per DOE’s forecast.

One example is Switch, a major data center operator that signed a 20-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Ormat to supply about 13 MW of geothermal power from the Salt Wells plant in Nevada. That agreement begins energy deliveries around 2030, contingent on upgrades to the facility.
Switch’s PPA also includes an option to add roughly 7 MW of solar PV to support the geothermal site’s auxiliary needs. This hybrid approach supports stability and broader sustainability objectives.
Other tech giants are exploring geothermal and other firm clean energy sources, recognizing that intermittent renewables alone cannot supply constant power for large computing loads. Key deals are:
- Google-Fervo: 115 MW enhanced geothermal (Nevada, online 2026) via NV Energy CTT—Ormat deal doubles Google’s NV commitment.
- Microsoft-ENEL: 120 MW Hellisheidi (Iceland, operational 2026)—world’s largest geothermal data center link.
- Google-Taiwan: 10 MW PPA (operational).
These moves underline a broader shift toward long-term, grid-connected clean power strategies. Grid-tied PPAs signal seismic shift: tech won’t wait for battery breakthroughs.
For Google, geothermal unlocks 24/7 carbon-free baseload when it needs it online: 2028, matching the NV data center expansion phase.
A Blueprint for Future Clean Power Partnerships
The Ormat–Google geothermal deal could serve as a model for future clean power partnerships. If the Nevada Public Utilities Commission approves the agreement in late 2026, the structure may be replicated in other states.
Developers may use similar portfolio PPAs to build geothermal and other clean energy projects. Utilities and policymakers may also adopt clean transition tariffs or flexible frameworks that allow large users to co-finance new clean generation.
For Google, securing scalable clean power helps future-proof data centers against rising energy demand from AI and cloud services. For Ormat, the deal provides long-term revenue and validates its strategy to expand geothermal capacity.
Geothermal energy, once a niche clean source, is gaining traction as a firm, reliable part of the renewable mix. And as digital infrastructure grows, deals like this one show how deep underground heat can power the next wave of cloud and AI computing sustainably.
The post Google Taps Earth’s Heat in 150MW Geothermal Deal with Ormat Technologies to Power Data Centers appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

