Connect with us

Published

on

Mere moments before the final hearing in Georgia Power’s “October surprise” IRP Update, yet another surprise: the Public Interest Advocacy (PIA) Staff of the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) filed a proposed “Stipulation” — a settlement purported to “resolve all the issues in this Docket.”  This was a dubious maneuver both in terms of due process as well as the content of the agreement itself.

Initial reactions that I heard about the “Stip” ranged from “dumpster fire” to “fossil fuel bonanza” (which I really like, BTW). My own initial reaction was that the Stipulation “reeks” — it reeks of methane — because that’s the primary fuel for this resource portfolio. Worse yet, there’s even some coal and some oil envisioned in the plan. The Stipulation approves all that and, adding insult to injury, the Stipulation even removes a token amount of new solar (200 MW) that Georgia Power had initially proposed.

SACE and other intervening parties had arrived to the hearing room that day (March 27) prepared to cross examine Georgia Power witnesses on their Rebuttal testimony. With this 11th-hour pivot, the PSC Chairman agreed to supply printed copies of said agreement and afforded parties an insufficient 20 minutes to digest it before resuming the hearing.

Of course, since only Georgia Power witnesses were on the stand, there was no opportunity to cross-examine PIA Staff on why they felt compelled to settle the case. The stip included approval of items that PIA Staff’s own witnesses testified against just a few weeks ago. That is perhaps the most perplexing thing.

PIA Staff witnesses had made a strong case in the prior hearing that capacity from the three proposed combustion turbines (CTs) at Plant Yates is not necessary until 2029. And Georgia Power has already drafted a Request for Proposal (RFP) to invite competitive bids of capacity resources for that time period. That RFP is scheduled to go out next month (May 10). So PIA Staff’s own  recommendation was “that the Commission deny the Company’s request for certification of the Yates Combustion Turbine (“CT”) Units 8, 9, and 10.” And that instead those units “should be bid into the 2029 – 2031 capacity RFP to determine whether this capacity is least-cost and the most reliable compared to other options.”

That recommendation made complete sense. However, the PIA Staff subsequently negotiated the stip with Georgia Power that approves the Yates CTs. Again, procedurally, the parties did not have an opportunity to cross-examine PIA Staff on their about-face. And since this cohort of the Public Service Commission staff is supposed to represent the “public interest,” many of us are struggling to understand why it would be in the public interest to let Georgia Power bypass the ordinary competitive procurement processes and commission these 45-year assets. Those units will go into ratebase and Georgia Power will earn Return on Equity on them every month despite the fact that Georgia Power witnesses acknowledged they will only run less than 1/10th of the time.

We’re also left to wonder why it’s in the public interest to even further increase Georgia Power customers’ vulnerability to fuel price volatility. The proposed CTs at Plant Yates would be dual-fuel to not only burn fossil gas (methane) but could also burn fuel oil. This expanded resource portfolio (if approved) would take Georgia Power’s share of generation from fossil-gas to a full 50%. Georgia Power is already over-reliant on fossil gas at 48%.

And lest we forget, it was the spike in fossil gas prices in 2022 that caused the biggest increase in customer bills in recent years.  A typical residential customer using 1,000 kWh per month is now paying an average of $15.90 more per month ($190 more per year) to cover the fuel cost. Fuel oil costs tend to be higher than fossil gas, and those costs are also passed onto customers. Since the availability of fossil gas can be unreliable and lead to blackouts, having fuel oil as a backup can improve reliability but further exacerbate costs. 

The fuel cost increase referenced above is in addition to the multiple rate increases already experienced as well as those already locked and loaded in the chamber. For example, the long-delayed and preposterously over-budget Plant Vogtle Unit 4 reached full output last week. So brace yourself; that puts us within just a couple months of customers receiving another shock with typical residential bills increasing again by another 6%.

SACE filed our final brief in the docket April 4. It elaborates more on other aspects of the Stipulation and puts forth a single recommendation:

  • SACE recommends that the Commission defer decision on the Plant Yates combustion turbines (8-10) until the full IRP next year (2025 IRP).  The Company can bid these units into the All-Source Capacity Request for Proposal (RFP) that is presently drafted and scheduled to be issued next month (May 10, 2024).  The competitiveness of these units can be duly considered against other bids to assure least-cost resources are selected for the 2025 IRP.

A clean energy advocacy organization can’t sit idly by and let Georgia pursue more dirty fossil-fueled energy — particularly if it’s not absolutely necessary. If PIA Staff isn’t going to honor its own witness testimony, then we will.

On a related note, a bill (SB 457) passed the Georgia Senate at the end of February that would have reinstated a Consumer’s Utility Counsel — an office that most other states have but was disbanded in Georgia in 2008.  This Counsel would have the legal authority and duty to represent consumer interests. After crossing over to the Georgia House of Representatives, that bill did not get scheduled for a committee vote and will need to be reintroduced next session. The concessions made by PIA Staff in this IRP settlement illuminate why having the Consumer’s Utility Counsel is critical.

The post Georgia Power “October surprise” IRP Update appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

Georgia Power “October surprise” IRP Update

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

New Jersey’s Electricity Rate Crisis Is A Perfect Storm for Wind Energy

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

New Jersey’s Electricity Rate Crisis Is A Perfect Storm for Wind Energy

New Jersey ratepayers received an unwelcome surprise in June 2024 when electricity rates jumped between 17 and 20 percent virtually overnight. But behind the dramatic increase is a much larger story about the challenges facing renewable energy deployment, grid modernization, and the future of power generation across the PJM Interconnection region—one that has significant implications for the wind energy industry.

According to Kyle Mason, Associate Planner at the Regional Plan Association, the rate spike stems from record high prices in PJM’s annual capacity auction, which secures power for peak grid loads. PJM operates the grid for New Jersey and 12 other states, covering over 60 million people. The capacity market’s unprecedented pricing “trickled down to increased electricity rates for New Jersey rate payers,” Mason explained.

Listen to the interview here

Old Grid, New Demands

“We have a very old grid, and we’re trying to update it in real time,” said RPA’s Robert Freudenberg – while bringing more energy onto the system. “It’s like trying to build the plane while you’re flying it.”

Freudenberg, Vice President of the Energy & Environment Program at RPA, described the crisis as a convergence of multiple factors: the grid’s age presents challenges, the interconnection process has slowed dramatically, and demand is skyrocketing.

The interconnection queue process, which once took a few years, now stretches across many years. According to Mason, as of April of last year, over 200 gigawatts of projects sat waiting for study in the interconnection queue, with approximately 98 percent comprising solar, wind (both onshore and offshore), and storage. Even if only half of those projects eventually come online, Mason noted, “it would markedly improve the rate situation.”

Unprecedented Demand Growth

The energy demand situation is compounded by explosive load growth, driven largely by artificial intelligence and data centers. Mason noted that current projections show load growth reaching five percent annually—levels, he said, “we have not seen…since air conditionings were invented.”

These aren’t small facilities. “The industry is seeing massive, massive expansion of data centers,” Mason said. “Not just small data centers that we saw expand during the years leading up to the dot-com bubble, but rather these massive hundred-plus megawatt data centers,” primarily concentrated in Northern Virginia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Ohio.

By 2030, data centers alone could account for 10 to 12 percent of electricity demand on the PJM grid—a staggering figure that underscores the urgency of bringing new generation capacity online quickly.

Offshore Wind “Ideal Solution” for Energy Island

New Jersey, the most densely populated state in the country, uses more energy than it produces. Thanks to that distinction and its geographic constraints, it’s referred to as an “energy island”- where wind represents an ideal solution for large scale generation.

The state had plans for approximately five gigawatts of offshore wind capacity, including the 1,100-megawatt Ocean Wind project, which has since been abandoned. Federal policy shifts have further complicated the landscape, effectively putting offshore wind development on ice across the region.

Freudenberg pointed to the South Fork Wind farm off Long Island as proof of concept.

“If you look at the data from that, [South Fork] is performing very well. It’s reliable,” he said, noting it put a thousand people to work and stabilized rates for customers.

Grid Reliability Challenges

Adding another layer of complexity, PJM recently implemented stricter reliability rules that dramatically reduced the amount of generation qualifying as reliable.

“The buffer dropped from about 16 gigawatts of supposedly reliable energy sources to about 500 megawatts when the reliability requirements were issued,” Weather Guard Lightning Tech CEO and Uptime Podcast host Allen Hall notes in the interview.

“Many fossil fuel plants face reliability concerns during extreme weather events, extreme cold events,” Mason explained. That made the older plants ineligible to enter PJM’s capacity market under the new rules. That caveat simultaneously removes baseload capacity while renewable projects remain stuck in the interconnection queue.

New Jersey's Electricity Rate Crisis Is A Perfect Storm for Wind Energy

Is PJM’s Progress Too Little, Too Late?

PJM has made some progress addressing interconnection challenges. Working with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the grid operator implemented a new cluster study process that prioritizes projects on a “first ready to serve basis” rather than first-come, first-serve. Mason reported they’ve already studied over 40 gigawatts of energy, “and that’s starting to get built,” Mason said.

“But there’s the question of whether that can outpace the rising demand,” he said.

On transmission infrastructure—a critical bottleneck for wind energy—the average timeline to build high voltage transmission lines stretches to 10 years. Mason noted projects face “years and years just to get the materials to build power plants, and then 10 years with permitting costs and supply chain issues and permitting timelines to build the transmission wires.”

Policy Recommendations: States to Lead the Way

Despite federal headwinds, Freudenberg urged states to maintain momentum on offshore wind.

“States need to keep the charge on for offshore wind. They need to keep the fire burning for it,” he said, recommending that states prepare transmission infrastructure and work with developers so projects can move forward quickly when federal policy shifts.

New Jersey has taken some positive steps, recently announcing its Garden State Energy Storage Program that targets over two gigawatts of storage capacity and releasing grid modernization standards for utilities.

Of course, when utilities are required to modernize, rate payers usually foot (most of) the bill. Still, having an available, reliable energy supply is the first order of business.

For wind energy operators and stakeholders, the New Jersey situation illustrates both the critical need for renewable generation and the complex policy, infrastructure, and market challenges that must be navigated to deliver it.

As Freudenberg summarized: “The ingredients here are so good for offshore wind. Everything… the proximity, the wind speeds. All we have to do is build those things and connect them into our grid and we’ve got a lot of power.”

The question is whether policy will allow that to happen before the grid crisis deepens further. We’ll be watching closely!

Listen to the full interview with Allen Hall, Joel Saxum, Kyle Mason and Robert Freudenberg here and subscribe to Uptime Tech News, our free weekly newsletter, today!

Image: PJM https://www.pjm.com/-/media/DotCom/about-pjm/pjm-zones.pdf

https://weatherguardwind.com/could-wind-energy-reduce-new-jersey-electricity-rates/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Chopin — Music that Inspires

Published

on

There’s a story behind the piece below, Chopin’s “Heroic” Polonaise, performed by Vladimir Horowitz, the pianist most people deem to be the world’s top interpreter of Chopin.

Frederic Chopin was born in 1810 near Warsaw, Poland, and was known as a child prodigy as a pianist and composer by the time he was six or seven.

Russia had long ruled Poland, but in the 1820s, Russian rule grew more arbitrary, and secret societies were formed by Polish intellectuals in several cities to plot an insurrection. In November 1830, Polish troops in Warsaw rose in revolt.

Chopin moved to Paris shortly after his 22nd birthday, where he would spend the rest of his life composing, teaching, and concertizing, but his love for his native land remained fierce.

But what could he do? Chopin was a small and sickly person, barely five feet tall, perhaps 90 pounds in weight. He certainly couldn’t be a physical part of an uprising, but he could inspire his native Poles with his compositions.

There are a few good examples of his works along these lines, but the Heroic polonaise stands by itself. When I hear it, a single word comes to fore: bravery.

Enjoy, and don’t be embarrassed if you have goosebumps.

Chopin — Music that Inspires

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Doing What’s “Right” Is More Controversial than it Seems

Published

on

Some of us are looking for a single, simple statement to encapsulate what is going so wrong in America today, and perhaps it relates to what Aristotle says at left here.

Even the MAGA folks think that what they’re doing is “right.”  By this I mean white supremacy, mass deportation of immigrants (with or without due process), the rejection of science, and so forth.

Doing What’s “Right” Is More Controversial than it Seems

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com