The European Commission (EC) recently proposed a bold climate target: reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040 compared to 1990 levels. For the first time, the plan allows up to 3% of this reduction to come from international carbon credits. This marks a major shift in EU climate strategy—blending domestic action with global cooperation.
Ambitious Goal with New Flexibility: A Shift in the EU’s Climate Strategy
Under the EU’s original plans, all emission cuts had to occur within its borders. Now, the EU will permit a limited share of high-quality international carbon credits, starting in 2036, and no more than 3% of the total 90% target by 2040. This allows the bloc to maintain ambition while offering economic and technical ease for industries under stress.
In announcing the proposal, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called it “a clear, pragmatic and realistic” step. Officials say that allowing member states some flexibility sends a good message. This approach benefits both local industries and global climate partners.
The Commission states that with the new proposed target, the EU is:
“…sending a signal to the global community: it will stay the course on climate change, deliver the Paris Agreement and continue engaging with partner countries to reduce global emissions.”
How the New Framework Works
The new EU climate plan aims to cut net greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040, based on 1990 levels. This target includes direct emission cuts, domestic carbon removals, and the use of carbon credits. However, the plan strictly limits the role of international carbon credits.

Starting in 2036, the EU will allow up to 3% of the 90% reduction goal to be met using carbon credits from outside the EU. These credits must meet high-quality standards and undergo transparent monitoring.
SEE MORE: International Carbon Credits Back on the Table? EU’s Climate Goal Gets a Twist
Most emissions reductions need to happen in Europe. This can be done by:
- Improving energy efficiency,
- Expanding clean energy,
- Capturing and storing carbon, and
- Using sustainable land management practices.
Carbon removal methods—whether through planting trees, improving soil health, or using new technologies—will also play a role. These efforts are already being tracked through the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS). It will also govern how domestic carbon removals are counted.
The framework focuses on internal solutions first. It looks at international carbon offsets only after. This way, the EU aims to cut emissions at home before using credits from other countries.
Why Include Carbon Credits?
Ministers from Germany and Poland said the 90% target could hurt the manufacturing, transport, and heating sectors. A 3% international offset helps ease this pressure. It allows the EU to buy emission reductions from projects in developing countries. These projects include forest conservation and cleaner cookstoves.
Supporters see this as a win-win, mixing ambition with resilience. But, scientific advisers warn that these credits might slow down home-grown clean energy efforts. They cautioned: it “might divert resources” if misused.
The Credit Tug-of-War: Flexibility vs. Integrity
The shift has sparked a heated debate. Supporters say carbon credits offer economic flexibility for EU industries. This helps them manage costs and still meet climate goals. The chart below shows the traded volume of voluntary credits that entities used in offsetting emissions.

Moreover, the credits can provide important funding for emission-reduction projects in developing countries. This helps build global cooperation and solidarity in the fight against climate change.
However, critics warn that past reliance on carbon credits has not always resulted in real emissions cuts. Some projects have been poorly monitored, or overestimated their climate benefits.
They worry that if the EU relies too much on credits, it could slow down important actions at home. This includes growing renewable energy and updating infrastructure.
Scientists and environmental groups stress the need for strict rules. They warn that low-quality or unverified credits can harm public trust. This, in turn, can slow real climate progress.
Colin Roche, from the Friends of the Earth Europe, remarked:
“The European Commission will try to portray this as an ambitious step forward, but the reality is we are fast running out of room to achieve the Paris agreement. This target is in line neither with climate science nor with climate justice.”
To address these concerns, the European Commission plans to introduce a set of EU-wide rules in 2026. These rules will aim to ensure that carbon credits are transparent, traceable to their origin, and meet strong integrity standards. This step helps stop greenwashing. It also ensures that using credits really supports the EU’s climate goals, not just in theory, but in real life.
To prevent abuse, the Commission plans to propose EU-wide rules in 2026, ensuring transparency, clear origins, and high integrity.
What This Means for EU Policy and Global Climate Action
These reforms set the stage for mid-term climate planning ahead of the EU’s 2035 submission under the Paris Agreement, which is due by September.
By promoting a 90% target with a 2036–2040 credit window, the EU signals both ambition and realism. Yet it also underscores that pure domestic reductions remain unpopular among some Member States. Denmark’s climate minister urged not to “stall the green transition” despite pressures for flexibility.
This shift may also impact the EU’s global image. Compared with slower-moving nations, the EU positions itself as a climate leader. However, critics worry that lean credit use could be seen as avoiding internal responsibilities.
For international carbon markets, the EU’s plan is a major boost, potentially adding 140 million tonnes worth of demand by 2040. But sluggish rollout and tight standards may limit near-term impact.
Eyes on 2026: Rules, Votes, and What to Watch
Looking forward, here are some major things to watch as the region continues with this new proposal:
- Approval Process: The proposal needs approval from the European Parliament and all 27 EU Member States.
- Credit Rules by 2026: Watch for legislation defining which offset projects meet EU standards—no shortcuts.
- Member State Limits: Key actions may focus on how countries use credits, for example, in transport versus energy.
- Future Targets: The 2040 rule will guide the EU’s 2035 climate pledge and set the course toward net-zero by 2050.
- Industry Response: Some businesses may welcome flexibility with stricter emissions. Others might push for deeper cuts at home.
The EU’s new law is a compromise that balances ambition with adaptability: maintaining momentum while giving industries breathing room. Critics caution that credits must not replace hard-fought investment in domestic clean infrastructure. Ensuring strong governance and transparent carbon credit standards will be key to aligning the EU’s high-level goals with on-the-ground climate action.
As the EU prepares to finalize the law and set its 2035 target, one message is clear: global cooperation will count—but so will cutting emissions at home.
- READ MORE: Europe’s Corporate Giants, STOXX 50, Commit to Offset Over 80 Million Tonnes of CO₂ by 2030
The post EU Bets on Carbon Credits: Bold 2040 Climate Target Adds Global Twist appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
What is a life cycle assessment, and why does it matter?
Most businesses have a clear picture of what happens inside their own operations. They track energy consumption, manage waste, and monitor the emissions produced on-site. What they often cannot see is everything that happens before a product reaches their facility, and everything that happens after it leaves.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Texas-Based EnergyX’s Project Lonestar™ Signals a Turning Point for U.S. Lithium Supply
Energy Exploration Technologies, Inc. (EnergyX), led by CEO Teague Egan, has moved the United States closer to building a reliable domestic lithium supply chain. The company recently commissioned its Project Lonestar™ lithium demonstration facility in Texas, marking a key milestone in scaling direct lithium extraction (DLE) technologies.
This development comes at a time when lithium demand is rising sharply due to electric vehicles and energy storage systems. At the same time, the U.S. remains heavily dependent on foreign processing, particularly from China.
- According to the US import data and Lithium import data of the USA, the total value of US lithium imports reached $432.36 million in 2024, a 9% decline from the previous year.
- The total value of US lithium imports (cells & batteries) accounted for $205.29 million in the first 6 months of 2025.

Against this backdrop, EnergyX’s progress offers both technological validation and strategic value.
From Concept to Reality: How Project Lonestar™ Works
Project Lonestar™ is EnergyX’s first major lithium project in the United States and its second globally. The demonstration plant, located in the Smackover region spanning Texas and Arkansas, is now operational and uses industrial-grade systems rather than small pilot equipment.
- The facility produces around 250 metric tons per year of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).
While this output is modest compared to global supply, its importance lies in proving that EnergyX’s proprietary GET-Lit™ technology can efficiently extract lithium from brine. The plant processes locally sourced Smackover brine, a resource that has historically been underutilized despite its lithium potential.

Unlike traditional lithium production, which often relies on hard-rock mining or evaporation ponds, DLE technology directly extracts lithium from brine using advanced filtration and chemical processes. This reduces production time and may lower environmental impact.
- More importantly, the Lonestar™ plant can supply 5 to 25 tons of battery-grade lithium samples to customers.
This allows battery manufacturers to test and validate the material before committing to large-scale supply agreements.

Scaling Up: From Demonstration to Commercial Production
The demonstration plant is only the first phase of a much larger plan. EnergyX aims to scale Project Lonestar™ into a full commercial operation capable of producing 50,000 tonnes of LCE annually across two phases.
- The first phase alone targets 12,500 tonnes per year, which would already place it among the more significant lithium producers in the U.S.
- Significantly, the company has invested approximately $30 million in the demonstration facility, supported in part by a $5 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy.
- For the full-scale project, EnergyX estimates total capital expenditure at around $1.05 billion.
Cost metrics suggest strong economic potential. The company estimates capital costs at roughly $21,000 per tonne of capacity and operating costs near $3,750 per tonne. If these figures hold at scale, the project could compete effectively with global lithium producers, particularly in a market where cost efficiency is becoming increasingly important.
Teague Egan, Founder & CEO of EnergyX, said,
“Bringing the biggest integrated DLE lithium demonstration plant online in the United States is a foundational milestone for EnergyX and for U.S. domestic lithium production in general. This facility not only validates the performance of our technology on an industrial scale under real-world conditions, but also establishes EnergyX as the lowest cost producer in the U.S. Ultimately this benefits all our customers who need large volumes of lithium for EV and ESS applications, as well as any lithium resource owners looking to implement best-in-class DLE technology whom we are happy to license to.”
Breaking the Bottleneck: Why U.S. Refining Matters
One of the biggest challenges facing the U.S. lithium sector is not resource availability but refining capacity. While lithium deposits exist across the country, most battery-grade lithium chemicals are processed overseas.
China dominates this segment, controlling roughly 70 to 75 percent of global lithium chemical conversion capacity. This concentration creates a structural dependency. Even when lithium is mined in the U.S. or allied countries, it is often shipped abroad for processing before returning as battery materials.
Project Lonestar™ directly addresses this gap. By integrating extraction and refining into a single domestic operation, EnergyX is working to build a complete “brine-to-battery” value chain within the United States. This approach could reduce reliance on foreign processing and improve supply chain resilience.
U.S. Senator Ted Cruz highlighted the project’s importance, noting that domestic lithium production supports both energy security and defense readiness, particularly for applications in advanced battery systems.
- CHECK: LIVE LITHIUM PRICES
The Current Landscape: Limited Supply, Big Ambitions
Investment is flowing into regions such as Nevada, North Carolina, and Arkansas. If even a portion of these reserves is converted into production, the U.S. could significantly reduce its reliance on imported lithium.
Active Resources and Future Potential
At present, U.S. lithium production remains relatively small. The only active large-scale operation is the Silver Peak Mine in Nevada, which produces between 5,000 and 10,000 tonnes of LCE annually, depending on market conditions.
However, several projects are in development that could significantly expand capacity. The Thacker Pass project, for example, is expected to produce around 40,000 tonnes per year in its first phase once operational later in the decade.
In addition, brine-based developments in the Smackover region aim to produce tens of thousands of tonnes annually, with long-term plans exceeding 100,000 tonnes across multiple sites.
These projects indicate a shift from a niche domestic industry to a more substantial production base. Still, timelines remain uncertain due to regulatory and financial challenges.

Demand Surge: Batteries Drive the Lithium Boom
The urgency to expand lithium production is driven by rapid growth in battery demand. Electric vehicles, renewable energy storage, and grid modernization are all increasing lithium consumption.
According to S&P Global, U.S. lithium demand is expected to grow at an average rate of 40 percent annually between 2024 and 2029. Canada is projected to see even faster growth, albeit from a smaller base, with demand rising by around 74 percent per year over the same period.
Globally, battery capacity is forecast to approach 4 terawatt-hours by 2030. This expansion highlights lithium’s central role in the clean energy transition. Without sufficient supply, battery production—and by extension, EV adoption—could face constraints.

Why Progress Takes Time
Turning lithium reserves into operational mines and processing facilities is not straightforward. Projects often face long permitting timelines, environmental scrutiny, and legal challenges. Financing can also be difficult, especially in a volatile commodity market.
Local opposition can further complicate development, particularly in areas with high environmental concerns. These factors can delay projects by several years, slowing the pace of expansion.
To address these barriers, the U.S. government is increasing its involvement through funding, policy support, and efforts to streamline permitting. The Department of Energy’s backing of EnergyX reflects a broader strategy to accelerate domestic critical mineral development.
Conclusion: A Strategic Shift in Motion
Project Lonestar™ represents a meaningful step toward reshaping the U.S. lithium landscape. By proving the viability of direct lithium extraction at an industrial scale, EnergyX has laid the groundwork for larger, commercially viable operations.
The project also aligns with national priorities around energy security, supply chain resilience, and clean energy transition. While challenges remain, the combination of technological innovation, government support, and rising demand creates a strong foundation for growth.
As the world moves toward electrification, lithium will remain at the center of the transition. Projects like Lonestar™ show that the United States is beginning to close the gap between resource potential and real-world production—one facility at a time.
The post Texas-Based EnergyX’s Project Lonestar™ Signals a Turning Point for U.S. Lithium Supply appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Canada Doles Out Almost C$29M for CCUS and Renewables as Clean Energy Market Surges
Canada has pledged nearly C$29 million ($21.6 million) to support carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) and renewable energy projects. The funding aims to back new technologies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and make clean energy more competitive. This commitment was announced by the Canadian government in late March 2026 as part of ongoing efforts to meet climate goals.
The investment is small compared with Canada’s larger climate budget. But it signals continued federal support for emerging technologies and deployment of clean energy solutions. CCUS is one of several tools that nations are using to curb emissions while keeping energy supplies stable.
What Canada Is Funding? Inside the C$29M Clean Tech Bet
The C$29 million pledge covers a mix of CCUS and renewable energy efforts. It is intended for 12 projects that capture carbon dioxide (CO₂) from industrial emissions. It also supports systems that convert captured CO₂ into usable products or store it underground so it cannot enter the atmosphere.
The Honourable Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, said:
“Canada is scaling up clean energy while strengthening our electricity grid and responsibly growing our conventional energy industry — because competitiveness means doing more than one thing at the same time. We are investing to provide reliable, affordable and clean power across the country that will propel our economic growth, protect affordability for Canadian families and make Canada a low-risk, low-cost, low-carbon energy superpower.”
Carbon capture refers to systems that trap CO₂ from power plants and factories before it is released. The captured gas can be stored deep underground or used in industrial processes, such as making building materials or fuels. Utilization means finding commercial uses for captured CO₂ so that it has economic as well as environmental value.
Renewable energy projects in Canada focus on expanding wind, solar, hydro, and other low‑carbon power sources. As of 2024, about 79 % of Canada’s electricity generation came from low‑carbon sources, with hydropower alone accounting for roughly 55 %. The rest comes from wind, solar, and nuclear energy.
Carbon Capture’s Strategic Role in Net Zero
Canada has a strong track record in CCUS deployment. Several large‑scale facilities already operate in the country, especially in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
For example, the Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project in Alberta captures about one million tonnes of CO₂ per year and stores it deep underground.

Canadian CCUS technology accounts for a notable share of planned global capacity. Canadian projects represent about 11.5 % of planned CCUS storage capacity worldwide.
Notably, Canada’s carbon capture capacity could increase from about 4.4 million tonnes of CO₂ per year to 16.3 million tonnes annually by 2030. However, much larger growth is still necessary to meet net-zero targets by 2050.
CCUS is considered critical for reducing emissions from hard‑to‑decarbonize sectors like heavy industry and oil and gas. It also plays an important role in achieving Canada’s long‑term climate targets, including net-zero emissions by 2050. In these scenarios, CCUS helps bridge gaps that electrification and renewables alone cannot fill.
Canada’s Energy Innovation Program (EIP) is designed to speed up the development of clean energy technologies while keeping the energy system reliable and affordable. It supports early-stage research and development in CCUS.
The program also funds renewable energy demonstration projects that test new ways to generate and integrate clean power, especially those with local benefits. In addition, EIP promotes innovation in electricity systems by supporting new approaches to smart grid regulation and capacity building.
A Power Mix Already Going Green
Renewable energy is another core part of Canada’s climate strategy. Over the last decade, installed renewable capacity has grown steadily. Between 2014 and 2024, Canada’s total renewable energy capacity increased from about 89,773 MW to 110,470 MW.
The federal government has supported renewable projects through multiple funding programs. Earlier initiatives included a $964‑million investment targeting wind, solar, storage, hydro, and other renewable technologies.
Canada has also set decarbonization targets tied to renewables. The country aims for net‑zero electricity by 2035, which supports a broader economy‑wide goal of net‑zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

CCUS and Renewables on a Global Rise
Investment in CCUS and renewable energy is rising globally. According to industry forecasts, the global clean energy market — including wind, solar, energy storage, and CCUS — is expected to continue strong growth through 2030 as countries push toward climate targets.
For CCUS specifically, analysts project that global installed capacity could grow fivefold by 2030 as more projects move from demonstration to full deployment. Canada is among several countries with mature CCUS infrastructure and planned expansions.

Renewables continue to be the fastest‑growing energy source globally. International agencies like the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) project that renewable capacity will keep expanding rapidly through the end of the decade, driven by falling technology costs and climate commitments.
The Roadblocks to Scaling Clean Tech
While CCUS has potential, it also faces hurdles. Costs are high, and the technologies are still emerging at scale. Critics argue that CCUS has historically underperformed in some early projects, and that a significant amount of captured CO₂ is used in enhanced oil recovery rather than stored permanently.
Some stakeholders also warn that public funds for CCUS must be carefully targeted to avoid subsidizing continued fossil fuel use rather than meaningful emission cuts. Despite these concerns, many policymakers see CCUS as an essential component of climate strategy if Canada is to meet its 2030 and 2050 goals.
Renewable energy projects also face challenges, including grid integration, siting barriers, and supply chain constraints for equipment like turbines and solar panels. However, continued funding and clear policy signals tend to reduce these barriers over time as markets mature.
Cutting Emissions While Keeping Energy Stable
Canada’s C$29 million commitment fits into a broader pattern of public funding aimed at accelerating clean energy and decarbonization technologies. Larger federal efforts, such as the Net Zero Accelerator Initiative, provide billions of dollars over multiple years for clean tech, including CCUS deployment and industrial decarbonization.
The CCUS market is evolving from pilot projects to commercial opportunities. Meanwhile, renewable energy continues its growth as a mainstream power source. Together, these developments support Canada’s long‑term climate and economic goals.
As the global energy landscape changes, investments in both CCUS and renewables help reduce emissions, create jobs, and build resilience in a low‑carbon economy. Canada’s latest funding pledge reinforces its ongoing role in these key markets.
- READ MORE: Canada Approves First Uranium Mine in 20 Years as Tech Giants Eye Nuclear Fuel for AI Power
The post Canada Doles Out Almost C$29M for CCUS and Renewables as Clean Energy Market Surges appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy5 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits




