Cement is one of the most widely used construction materials in the world, but its production is a major source of carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions. Holcim, a global leader in building materials, is working to change this. The company has officially launched the OLYMPUS project in Milaki, Greece. This project uses advanced carbon capture technology to reduce emissions and aims to set a new standard for the cement industry.
This big move in sustainable building aims to create a modern carbon capture plant. It will make 2 million tons of near-zero cement by 2029. Backed by the Heracles Group, the project plans to reduce CO₂ emissions significantly. It will also create over 1,000 jobs, benefiting both the environment and the local economy.
What Is the OLYMPUS Project Trying to Achieve?
Traditional cement production heavily impacts the planet, releasing about 8% of global CO₂ emissions. This is because making cement involves heating limestone at very high temperatures. This releases a large amount of carbon dioxide into the air.
Holcim wants to change this with its OLYMPUS project. The new plant in Milaki will use advanced carbon capture technology. Its goal is to produce 2 million tons of near-zero cement each year starting in 2029. This means that the cement made at the site will have very low carbon emissions compared to traditional cement.
The project supports the European Union’s wider target of reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. It also backs the EU’s Clean Industrial Deal, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across industries. Holcim’s initiative will do more than meet environmental goals. It will also create job opportunities for local economies during the entire project lifecycle.
Miljan Gutovic, CEO Holcim Group said:
“Holcim is on course to make near-zero cement and concrete a reality at scale this decade, as the leading partner for sustainable construction. The OLYMPUS project in Greece is one of our seven large-scale, European Union-supported carbon capture, utilisation, and storage projects that are setting the Clean Industrial Deal in motion. Together, these will enable Holcim to offer over 8 million tpy of near-zero cement across Europe by 2030.”
How Carbon Capture Works at OLYMPUS
The OLYMPUS plant will use two cutting-edge systems: OxyCalciner and Cryocap™ FG. These technologies trap carbon dioxide from cement production and store or reuse it. Together, they can capture about 1 million tons of CO₂ per year at full capacity. This significantly lowers harmful emissions from the cement-making process.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an approach recognized by experts and policy leaders as essential to fighting climate change. The European Union sees CCS as a key part of its strategy to decarbonize industries like cement, steel, and chemicals.
Holcim’s adoption of CCS also reflects a growing trend in the construction sector to adopt cleaner, tech-driven practices. Producing 2 million tons of near-zero cement each year helps lower emissions in construction. This supports countries in reaching climate goals and cutting pollution from buildings.
Along with its environmental goals, the plant will have a strong economic impact. The effort will require an investment of €400 million, including €125 million from the EU Innovation Fund.
Moreover, it will bring over 1,000 construction jobs and over 100 long-term roles once operations begin. The plant will support hundreds of families and strengthen the local economy.
This initiative is also a big part of Holcim’s commitment to decarbonize its operations and reach its net zero goal.
Holcim’s Net Zero Journey: Progress and Initiatives
Holcim has committed to becoming a net-zero company by 2050, with a clear, science-based roadmap aligned with the 1.5°C climate goal validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). The company’s net-zero strategy covers all greenhouse gas emissions across its value chain, including:
- Scope 1 (direct emissions), Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased energy), and Scope 3 (other indirect emissions such as those from supply chains and product use).

Key Targets and Progress:
- Near-term goals: Holcim aims to reduce gross Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 26.2% per ton of cementitious materials by 2030 (from a 2018 baseline) and Scope 3 emissions by 25.1% per ton of purchased clinker and cement by 2030 (from a 2020 baseline).
- Long-term goals: By 2050, Holcim targets a 95% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions and a 90% reduction in absolute Scope 3 emissions.

The company has already made progress, reducing its CO₂ emissions intensity per ton of product and increasing its use of alternative and renewable fuels.
Major Emission Reduction Initiatives:
Holcim’s net-zero journey is driven by several initiatives:
Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS): Holcim plans to invest CHF 2 billion by 2030 in CCUS technologies, aiming to capture over 5 million tons of CO₂ annually and produce 8 million tons of net-zero cement per year. Projects like OLYMPUS in Greece and GO4ZERO in Belgium exemplify this commitment.
Alternative Fuels and Raw Materials: The company is replacing fossil fuels with biomass and other waste-derived fuels in its cement kilns, reducing reliance on carbon-intensive energy sources.
Low-Carbon Products: Holcim offers green concrete (ECOPact) and green cement (ECOPlanet), which have significantly lower carbon footprints than traditional products. These products enable customers to reduce their own emissions in construction projects.
Circular Economy and Recycling: Holcim is a world leader in recycling construction and demolition waste, having recycled 6.8 million tons in 2022 and targeting 10 million tons by 2025. This reduces the need for virgin raw materials and lowers overall emissions.
Smart Design and Digital Innovation: Technologies such as 3D printing allow Holcim to build with up to 70% less material without compromising performance, further reducing embodied carbon in construction.
Holcim’s net-zero journey combines ambitious targets, significant investments in carbon capture and renewable energy, innovative low-carbon products, and circular economy practices. These initiatives show measurable progress and a comprehensive plan to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.
What Do the Market Trends Show for Cement and Carbon Capture?
The global demand for cement is expected to rise due to urbanization and infrastructure development. However, this growth presents challenges for reducing emissions. Without changes in production methods, CO₂ emissions from cement could reach 3.8 gigatons in 2050. CCUS technologies can reduce life cycle CO₂ emissions from cement production by nearly 70%.

The market for carbon capture is growing rapidly. The experts predict that global CCS market could reach $7.5 billion by 2026, with an annual growth rate of 25.2%. Governments want greener industry practices.
Thus, the demand for cleaner materials and emissions technology is rising. Projects like OLYMPUS prove that we can cut emissions significantly. They can also shape future policies and boost investments in green technologies.
Adopting CCUS technologies requires significant investment. The cost of cement is expected to rise from $90–$130 per ton today to at least $160–$240 by 2050 as carbon capture systems are integrated.
Major producers are still investing in CCUS, despite the costs. Successful projects like Holcim’s OLYMPUS can boost innovation and encourage more adoption in the industry.
Setting an Example for the Construction Industry
Holcim’s OLYMPUS project shows that it is possible to produce cement with much lower emissions using current technology. By investing in carbon capture and producing near-zero cement, Holcim is setting a benchmark for the global construction market.
This effort helps meet climate goals. It also boosts the local economy and sets an example for the global construction industry. As demand for cement rises, projects like OLYMPUS prove that it would be possible to build a cleaner, more sustainable future for people and the planet.
The post Concrete Change: Holcim Launches €400 Million OLYMPUS Project for Near-Zero Cement appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

