Global climate tech funding and deals hit a 4-year low in Q3 2024, per CB Insights’ State of Climate Tech Report. The decline in financial backing comes despite growing urgency around climate action and the push to commercialize technologies that can help mitigate climate change.
As seen below, the funding for the quarter totaled only $4.8 billion, the lowest since 2020. The same goes for the number of deals, which reached only 461 in the said quarter.

Here are the other key climate tech trends we uncovered from the report.
Regional Disparities in Funding Trends
While global funding has dropped, the US and Europe have managed to grow median deal sizes due to government support. Both regions continue to advance climate tech through substantial grants, loans, and other funding mechanisms. These have somewhat offset the broader slowdown in venture capital (VC) interest.

On the other hand, China has taken a different approach: government subsidies for clean energy have been reduced this year, contributing to a cooling of investor enthusiasm in the climate sector. This shift is particularly notable, as China had previously been a significant player in cleantech innovation and adoption.
A Focus on Early-Stage Innovations
Across major economies, government funds are increasingly flowing into early-stage climate tech ventures, particularly those nearing commercialization. In the US, significant federal support has been directed toward advanced technologies such as nuclear fusion and direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide, both of which promise groundbreaking ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at scale.
The US Department of Energy has led in funding these emerging technologies, recognizing their potential for long-term impact on global climate targets.
Why Climate Tech Funding is Declining
This funding slowdown reflects multiple challenges. Investors face high interest rates and economic uncertainties, which have impacted the willingness to fund high-risk projects typical in climate tech.
Additionally, some tech investors are refocusing on sectors with quicker returns. The reduction in VC enthusiasm, particularly in markets like China, has also been tied to shifting political and regulatory priorities, which in turn affects international investor confidence.
In response to these challenges, governments in the US, Europe, and other regions are providing targeted funding to keep innovation in climate tech moving forward. By supporting early-stage technologies through grants and loan programs, governments are working to ensure that promising but capital-intensive projects, such as fusion energy and DAC, have a chance to mature and reach commercial viability.
The emphasis on early-stage innovation signals a shift toward investing in technologies that, though not yet ready for widespread deployment, hold the potential for transformative impact on emissions reduction and energy transition efforts.
According to the CB Insights Report, here are the top three equity deals in Q3 and what these companies are doing in the sector.
Fourth Partner Energy: Leading India’s Solar Revolution
Location: India
Round Amount: $275 Million
Fourth Partner Energy is a trailblazer in India’s renewable energy sector, focusing on delivering sustainable, solar-based power solutions to businesses. Founded in 2010, the company has installed over 700 MW of solar capacity, positioning itself as one of India’s top solar energy providers.
The company operates across 20+ states in India, with a diverse portfolio that spans rooftop, ground-mount, and utility-scale solar installations. Fourth Partner Energy has successfully executed more than 1,000 projects, with over 600 clients from various sectors, including manufacturing, retail, and education.
Through innovative financing models, the company has helped clients reduce their energy bills by up to 40%, while also contributing to India’s green energy goals. With an ongoing commitment to sustainability, the company plans to reach 2 GW of installed capacity by 2025.
Below are the climate tech company’s major milestones at a glance:

Key Initiatives:
- 700 MW of installed solar capacity
- Goal to reach 2 GW of installed capacity by 2025
- Achieving 40% energy savings for clients on average
With its innovative approach and growing portfolio, Fourth Partner Energy is set to be a significant force in India’s renewable energy future.
Altana AI: Revolutionizing Supply Chains with Artificial Intelligence
Location: United States
Round Amount: $200 Million
Altana AI is transforming global supply chains by leveraging artificial intelligence to drive efficiency, sustainability, and transparency. Founded in 2018, the company’s AI-driven platform helps businesses map, analyze, and optimize supply chain operations with a focus on minimizing environmental impact and reducing waste.
The climate tech company’s platform uses advanced machine learning and big data to provide real-time insights into supply chain networks, identifying inefficiencies and enabling smarter decision-making.
Here’s a glimpse of its dashboard:

Altana AI serves industries ranging from manufacturing to retail, providing tools that help companies track carbon footprints, manage risks, and enhance sustainability efforts.
By using AI, the company empowers organizations to reduce emissions, cut costs, and achieve better supply chain resilience.
Key Highlights:
- Raised over $250 million in funding
- Serves global Fortune 500 companies in multiple industries
- Helps reduce carbon emissions by 20% on average across supply chains
- Provides real-time data insights and predictive analytics for supply chain optimization
Altana AI’s cutting-edge approach to AI-powered supply chain optimization is enabling businesses to make smarter, more sustainable decisions. With an eye on the future, the company continues to lead the charge in using technology to create a greener, more efficient global economy.
Twelve: Transforming CO2 into a Resource for the Future
Location: United States
Round Amount: $200 Million
Twelve is at the forefront of the fight against climate change by transforming carbon dioxide (CO2) into valuable products through its revolutionary technology. Launched in 2020, the company is developing a groundbreaking process that captures CO2 and converts it into clean, sustainable products like chemicals, fuels, and building materials, which can help industries reduce their carbon emissions and reliance on fossil fuels.
Twelve’s carbon transformation technology uses renewable energy to turn CO2 into useful commodities at scale, with the potential to reduce millions of tons of CO2 annually. The company’s efforts align with global net-zero targets that enable industries to meet their climate goals while maintaining economic growth.

Twelve’s innovative approach has garnered significant attention, raising over $330 million in funding from leading investors and forming partnerships with top corporations committed to a carbon-free future.
Major Achievements:
- $330 million raised in funding to date
- Partnership with BMW and Microsoft to scale CO2-to-product technology
- Potential to reduce millions of tons of CO2 annually
- Focused on delivering a net-zero emissions future
As the company continues to scale its operations, Twelve is playing a key role in advancing a circular economy and enabling industries to decarbonize at an unprecedented scale.
The post Climate Tech Funding Hits a 4-Year Low: Who Gets the Top Equity Deals in Q3? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

