Connect with us

Published

on

Cheeky chubby babies, I love ‘em. I have had the great pleasure of being around some littles this past year. I have a 7 month old great niece and 3 of my bonus daughters have babies under 13 months. I also have young friends who have made a difficult decision to not bring children into the world as it is and is on trajectory to become.

It is a radical act of hope to bring a child into this world right now.

So for the life of me I cannot understand why we who make decisions can’t or won’t make decisions that center the children. And their children. And their children in turn, out seven generations as the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) philosophy mandates. Why aren’t we considering the impacts seven generations out as we lead our families, communities, states and nations in decisions small and grand every single day? How can we reconcile our hopes and dreams for our babies with our decision to continue to burn fossil fuels, engage in war, and collect stuff we do not need?

A UNICEF report from 2024 finds that climate change is endangering children’s health at every stage of development and consolidates growing evidence of climate change’s effects on children’s health, identifying six major hazards: extreme heat, droughts, wildfires, floods, air pollution and ecosystem changes. Climate-related displacement is a major concern. Over the past six years, weather-related disasters caused 43.1 million internal displacements of children, averaging about 20,000 daily. A warming world is intensifying infectious diseases like malaria and dengue.

The report is not an easy read — more than an inconvenient truth for anyone with a heart. Just like the reality of the tragedy experienced at Annunciation School here in Minneapolis earlier this month. Deeply unsettling and disturbing. But are either shocking enough to move us to action?

Here in the USA, we have increased giveaways to the fossil fuel industry by over $4 billion per year. Those funds could provide nutrition to 3 million families through SNAP. $4 billion in funding for early childhood education (ECE) could significantly expand access to high-quality programs for millions of children, leading to long-term benefits like improved academic performance, increased adult productivity, and higher earnings for parents. $4 billion could significantly improve the quality of public education for our k-12 learners. 54 million households could install solar panels with those funds.

Our children, all of them, the whole world of children, deserve a future. They bear absolutely zero responsibility for the making of the climate crisis. They have zero responsibility for the lack of safety in their schools and communities. But they suffer because we have put profits before people, profits before children.

It really doesn’t have to be this way. We know what we could and should do. So I ask again, are we ready to figure it out for the children? Because we are, and we need you to join us.

Susan Phillips

Susan Phillips
Executive Director

Photo credit: Asian Development Bank

The post Can we just figure it out for the children? Or for the Babies appeared first on Climate Generation.

Can we just figure it out for the children? Or for the Babies

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Greenpeace urges governments to defend international law, as evidence suggests breaches by deep sea mining contractors

Published

on

SYDNEY/FIJI, Monday 9 March 2026 — As the International Seabed Authority (ISA) opens its 31st Session today, Greenpeace International is calling on member states to take firm and swift action if breaches by subsidiaries and subcontractors of The Metals Company (TMC) are established. Evidence compiled and submitted to the ISA’s Secretary General suggests that violations of exploration contracts may have occurred.

Louisa Casson, Campaigner, Greenpeace International, said: “In July, governments at the ISA sent a clear message: rogue companies trying to sidestep international law will face consequences. Turning that promise into action at this meeting is far more important than rushing through a Mining Code designed to appease corporate interests rather than protect the common good. As delegations from around the world gather today, they must unite and confront the US and TMC’s neo-colonial resource grab and make clear that deep sea mining is a reckless gamble humanity cannot afford.”

The ISA launched an inquiry at its last Council meeting in July 2025, in response to TMC USA seeking unilateral deep sea mining licences from the Trump administration. If the US administration unilaterally allows mining of the international seabed, it would be considered in violation of international law.

Greenpeace International has compiled and submitted evidence to the ISA Secretary-General, Leticia Carvalho, to support the ongoing inquiry into deep sea mining contractors. This evidence shows that those supporting these unprecedented rogue efforts to start deep sea mining unilaterally via President Trump could be in breach of their obligations with the ISA.

The analysis focuses on TMC’s subsidiaries — Nauru Ocean Resources Inc (NORI) and Tonga Offshore Mining Ltd (TOML) — as well as Blue Minerals Jamaica (BMJ), a company linked to Dutch-Swiss offshore engineering firm Allseas, one of TMC’s subcontractors and largest shareholders. The information compiled indicates that their activities may violate core contractual obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). If these breaches are confirmed, NORI and TOML’s exploration contracts, which expire in July 2026 and January 2027 respectively, the ISA should take action, including considering not renewing the contract.

Letícia Carvalho has recently publicly advocated for governments to finalise a streamlined deep sea mining code this year and has expressed her own concerns with the calls from 40 governments for a moratorium. At a time when rogue actors are attempting to bypass or weaken the international system, establishing rules and regulations that will allow mining to start could mean falling into the trap of international bullies. A Mining Code would legitimise and drive investment into a flagging industry, supporting rogue actor companies like TMC and weakening deterrence against unilateral mining outside the ISA framework.

Casson added:Rushing to finalise a Mining Code serves the interests of multinational corporations, not the principles of multilateralism. With what we know now, rules to mine the deep sea cannot coexist with ocean protection. Governments are legally obliged to only authorise deep sea mining if it can demonstrably benefit humanity – and that is non-negotiable. As the long list of scientific, environmental and social concerns with this industry keeps growing, what is needed is a clear political signal that the world will not be intimidated into rushing a mining code by unilateral threats and will instead keep moving towards a moratorium on deep sea mining.” 

—ENDS—

Key findings from the full briefing:

  • Following TMC USA’s application to mine the international seabed unilaterally, NORI and TOML have amended their agreements to provide payments to Nauru and Tonga, respectively, if US-authorised commercial mining goes ahead. This sets up their participation in a financial mechanism predicated on mining in contradiction to UNCLOS.
  • NORI and TOML have signed intercompany intellectual property and data-sharing agreements with TMC USA, and the data obtained by NORI and TOML under the ISA exploration contracts has been key to facilitating TMC USA’s application under US national regulations.
  • Just a few individuals hold key decision-making roles across the TMC and all relevant subsidiaries, making claims of independent management ungrounded. NORI, TOML, and TMC USA, while legally distinct, are managed as an integrated corporate group with a single, coordinated strategy under the direct control and strategic direction of TMC.

Greenpeace urges governments to defend international law, as evidence suggests breaches by deep sea mining contractors

Continue Reading

Climate Change

After a Decade of Missteps, a Texas City Careens Toward a Water-Shortage Catastrophe

Published

on

Officials in Corpus Christi expect a “water emergency” within months and fully run out of water next year. That would halt jet fuel supplies to Texas airports, fuel a surge in gasoline prices and trigger an “economic disaster” without precedent, former officials said.

CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas—The imminent depletion of water supplies in Corpus Christi threatens to cut off the flow of jet fuel to Texas airports and other oil exports from one of the nation’s largest petroleum ports, triggering potential shockwaves through energy markets in Texas and beyond.

After a Decade of Missteps, a Texas City Careens Toward a Water-Shortage Catastrophe

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Is the FBI Investigating Environmental Activists?

Published

on

A recent visit by an FBI agent to a climate activist hints at a broadening Trump administration effort to target political opponents.

NEW YORK CITY—The group in the Brooklyn studio seemed harmless. There was a graduate student, a Yiddish teacher, a hairdresser. Fifteen people had gathered on a Wednesday night for a training offered by Extinction Rebellion NYC and Climate Defiance, two climate activist groups that engage in nonviolent civil disobedience and theatrical protest.

Is the FBI Investigating Environmental Activists?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com