Ferrari has signed a ten-year agreement with Shell to purchase renewable electricity. The deal will provide 650 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of clean power through 2034. This is enough to cover nearly half of the energy needs at Ferrari’s main production plant in Maranello, Italy.
The plant uses around 130 GWh of electricity each year. The remaining electricity will be supplied through additional renewable energy and certificates.
The agreement is part of Ferrari’s plan to reduce carbon emissions and shift toward cleaner energy in its operations. Davide Abate, Chief Industrial Officer at Ferrari, remarked:
“This agreement represents a further step forward in our journey towards decarbonizing the Maranello plant. The collaboration with Shell Energy Italia to supply renewable energy represents a concrete contribution to our goal of reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by at least 90% in absolute terms by 2030.”
For Shell, the deal demonstrates its growing role in supplying green power to large industrial customers. The oil giant is also increasing the scale of its renewable power generation. The electricity for Ferrari will come from a dedicated solar plant located in Italy, which improves supply reliability.
Gianluca Formenti, CEO of Shell Energy Italia, noted:
“In line with our strategy of producing more energy with fewer emissions, this agreement is a tangible example of our commitment to providing energy solutions to support our customers and partners in achieving their decarbonization goals.”
What are the Key Features of the Deal?
The PPA, or power purchase agreement, will deliver renewable electricity for ten years. Shell will provide most of the energy directly from a dedicated plant. The remainder will come from renewable energy certificates (RECs). These certificates allow Ferrari to claim that its energy consumption is backed by clean power, even if the electricity does not flow directly from the plant.
This combination ensures that Ferrari’s operations in Italy rely heavily on renewable sources. By securing long-term renewable energy, the luxury carmaker reduces its exposure to volatile energy prices.
The PPA includes fixed-pricing elements. This helps Ferrari avoid sudden jumps in energy costs. It also strengthens its ability to meet climate targets for carbon emissions.
The deal covers:
- 650 GWh of electricity from renewable sources over 10 years.
- Nearly 50% of Ferrari’s energy needs at Maranello.
- Additional RECs and green power to cover the remaining electricity use.
Ferrari’s Carbon Reduction Goals and Renewable Energy Strategy
Ferrari has committed to reducing Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 90% by 2030. Scope 1 emissions come from Ferrari’s direct activities. This includes heating, production equipment, and company vehicles. Scope 2 emissions come from purchased electricity. Below are the ways the company uses to achieve its 2030 carbon neutrality goal.

The automaker reported several thousand metric tons of CO₂-equivalent emissions from operations in recent years. Progress has already begun as energy systems switch to cleaner power.
Switching to renewable electricity helps Ferrari cut Scope 2 emissions. The company has also invested in efficiency measures to reduce energy use across its facilities.
Moreover, it aims to streamline operations. They want to keep producing high-performance cars while using less energy overall. The company says some efficiency projects can reduce factory electricity use by 10–15% over time.
In recent years, Ferrari has been working on its energy mix. In 2024, it shut down a gas-fired trigeneration plant at Maranello. This plant had generated electricity, heat, and cooling from natural gas. By closing it, Ferrari reduced fossil fuel use and emissions.
However, the chart below shows that while Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions show a gradual reduction, the total emissions show a steady increase. This is mostly due to growth in the company’s value chain activities.

Scope 3 emissions—mainly from the supply chain, purchased goods, and product use—are the dominant source, over 90%, and consistently drive the company’s total footprint.
Fueling Renewable Energy Expansion
The Italian luxury sports carmaker is expanding its use of solar energy. It plans to increase photovoltaic (PV) capacity to around 10 megawatts peak (MWp) by 2030. Solar panels are installed on factory rooftops and other company-owned spaces. These panels already cover part of the factory’s daytime electricity consumption.
The company also partnered with Enel X to create a Renewable Energy Community (REC). This community lets nearby businesses, residents, and public institutions use clean power from Ferrari’s solar installations. It helps spread the benefits of renewable energy beyond Ferrari itself. The community has dozens of participants and supports local energy independence.
Ferrari has invested in energy-efficient transformers and storage systems. These upgrades improve the efficiency of electricity use and reduce energy waste. Combined with the new PPA, Ferrari’s approach is designed to achieve both emissions reduction and cost stability.
Offsetting the Unavoidable: Ferrari’s Carbon Credit Strategy
Ferrari tackles residual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. They support certified carbon avoidance projects by buying carbon avoidance credits. By using this method with direct emission cuts, the company reached carbon neutrality for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in 2021, 2022, and 2023 across all its operations.
In 2024, Ferrari cancelled 77,691 metric tons of CO₂-equivalent carbon credits. These credits came from the Sustainability Community Project in Canada. They were certified by the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) – Verra. This project combines over 800 carbon-reduction micro-projects from SMEs, municipalities, and NGOs. It includes more than 1,000 buildings in Quebec.

The goal is to reach up to 10,000 customer facilities in a sustainable community. The GHG reductions come from activities such as improved energy efficiency, waste diversion, and fuel switching.
Also, Ferrari partners with ClimateSeed. This ensures that the projects follow strict environmental, social, and financial standards. The company hasn’t developed its own GHG removal or storage projects yet. However, it adjusts its carbon credit purchases each year. This helps offset unavoidable emissions and meet its carbon neutrality goals.
Industry Implications: Luxury Cars Join the Clean Energy Race
This deal reflects a growing trend among manufacturers in Europe. Companies are signing long-term renewable energy deals. This helps them cut emissions and stabilize energy costs.
For automakers, energy use is becoming an important part of environmental responsibility. Reducing emissions is not just about electric or hybrid cars. It also depends on how factories are powered.
Other car manufacturers are also pursuing renewable energy. BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Porsche have all made deals to source clean power for major facilities. Ferrari’s agreement shows that luxury car makers are now also integrating renewable energy into their main operations.
Driving Forward: A Sustainable Shift for Ferrari
Ferrari’s renewable energy agreement with Shell is expected to have a lasting impact on its operations. It ensures a stable supply of clean energy and supports broader climate goals. It also ensures alignment between how Ferrari builds cars and the electric models it plans to sell in the future.
The partnership also strengthens Shell’s position in providing renewable solutions to industrial clients. It shows that legacy energy companies can play a role in helping others transition to cleaner power.
As Italy and other European countries aim to increase renewable energy use, long-term agreements like this one may become more common. Companies can benefit from cost predictability, emission reductions, and support for their sustainability goals.
The post Ferrari and Shell Sign Renewable Energy Deal, Powering Ferrari’s Carbon Neutrality by 2030 Goal appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

