SolarBank Corporation (NASDAQ: SUUN) has announced a significant deal with Qcells, a subsidiary of South Korea’s Hanwha Solutions. Qcells, through an affiliate, has entered into agreements to purchase four solar power projects in upstate New York.
These ground mount projects—Gainesville, Hardie, Rice Road, and Hwy 28 are under development and have a combined capacity of 25.577 MW. The total value of the sale and the engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreements amounts to approximately $49.5 million.
SolarBank Brings Solar Access to Everyone
SolarBank developed the sites and has successfully passed the Coordinated Electric System Interconnection Review (CESIR). This confirms their feasibility for connection to the local electricity grid.
The projects will now progress as individual solar installations under engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreements with Qcells, having manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Malaysia, and South Korea. The company serves customers in the utility, commercial, government, and residential markets with reliable clean energy solutions and long-term partnerships.
The company also plans to manage the projects through an operations and maintenance contract after completing construction. Once operational, the projects will serve as community solar systems, allowing multiple people to benefit from a shared solar energy system without installing panels on their homes.
Source: SolarBank
In an exclusive discussion with CarbonCredits, Dr.Richard Lu, CEO of SolarBank expressed his thoughts and the deal’s impact on the general community and the U.S. at large.
Read on…
CC: What inspired SolarBank to partner with Qcells for these community solar projects?
Dr. Richard: As the SUUN will always shine, we want to do our part to “Make America Great Again”. Solar energy is the power that we can deliver at a low cost in a timely manner, and we want to use “Made in the USA” solar panels to achieve our strategic goal.
CC: How will “Made in the USA” equipment for these projects impact both SolarBank and the broader clean energy sector?
Dr. Richard: For Solarbank, the Made in the USA panels demonstrate our commitment to supporting domestic production for the clean and renewable energy industry. For the sector, it will enable the industry to meet its demand with domestic supplies.
CC: Any challenges you foresee during the EPC phases of these four solar projects? If Yes, how SolarBank plans to address them?
Dr. Richard: We have every confidence to deliver these 4 solar projects as the EPC using domestic solar panels. We have completed initial designs with the “Made in the USA” solar panels and we did not encounter any engineering issues. We have started site mobilization and will work with our long-term construction crews on these projects.
CC: What are SolarBank’s long-term goals in supporting the development of community solar projects and clean energy goals of America?
Dr. Richard: As demand for clean and renewable energy grows across general society, commercial, industrial, and especially digital economy—SolarBank is playing a key role in meeting this demand in the USA. Community solar enables more than 50% of Americans to enjoy clean and renewable energy at a lower cost, without having to install solar panels on the roof of their houses, if they live in a house.
Moving on, SolarBank further highlighted the many benefits of community solar projects.
- These solar panels will feed clean energy into the local electricity grid.
- Renters and homeowners who subscribe to the program can earn credits on their electricity bills based on the solar energy generated.
- This setup will help save and bring environmental benefits to dozens or even hundreds of participants, depending on the size of the project.
These projects are expected to qualify for incentives under the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) NY-Sun Program. This initiative supports renewable energy adoption and helps make solar power more affordable to communities.
North American Growth Strategy: Development + EPC + O&M + IPP
Source: SolarBank
Navigating the Potential Risks to Development
While the deal is promising certain risks remain. The press release revealed that developing these projects requires obtaining permits and securing financing for Qcells. Changes in government policies or reductions in solar incentives could also affect future project viability.
Qcells will make payments for the purchase and construction costs in stages. If Qcells cannot secure financing, SolarBank is obligated to reacquire the projects, retaining an initial payment as compensation. Essentially, SolarBank plans to retain an operations and maintenance contract for these projects after construction. This move will ensure continued involvement in their operation and enjoy long-term success.
Jin Han, Corporate Officer, Head of Distributed Energy at Qcells North America has affirmed this deal by noting,
“At Qcells, we are dedicated to delivering clean, affordable energy solutions to communities nationwide and around the globe. With a commitment of nearly $2.8 billion, we are working hard to onshore production of the solar supply chain from ingots and wafers to cells and finished panels. Each step we take strengthens domestic solar manufacturing, drives the clean energy transition, and brings us closer to a sustainable future for all.”
SolarBank Shares Surge 11% After $49.5M Qcells Deal
According to S&P Global SolarBank shares rose on Monday following the company’s announcement of selling its solar projects for $49.5 million. The stock gained 11%, reaching its highest at $2.66.

source: Yahoo Finance
Thus, this collaboration between SolarBank and Qcells is pivotal for advancing renewable energy in New York while supporting U.S.-based solar manufacturing. And we hope it Makes America Great Again!
The post SolarBank’s $49.5M Qcells Deal Accelerates U.S. Solar Growth – Exclusive Interview with CEO Dr. Richard Lu appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

