Connect with us

Published

on

Lina Yassin is a Sudanese climate policy researcher at the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

As New York Climate Week approaches, excitement is building. It is, after all, a crucial moment to generate momentum toward COP30 and to place climate justice at the centre of the global climate agenda.

Yet this year, many of the voices that most need to be heard, those from countries on the frontlines of the climate crisis, those who carry the greatest moral authority in this struggle, will not even be in the room. Not because they lack the will or the expertise to engage, but because US travel bans and visa barriers have barred their entry.

In June this year, President Trump reinstated and expanded a travel ban. It fully bars citizens from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Another seven countries face partial restrictions. In total, nearly 20 countries now face exclusion from the US, and it is no coincidence that many of them are Least Developed Countries (LDCs). These are the very nations on the frontlines of climate breakdown – countries that should not just be in the room, but leading the conversation.

Conditional place at the table

I will not be in New York this time because my passport is on the wrong list. Unfortunately, for those of us carrying low-mobility passports, this kind of exclusion is nothing new. Our access to global spaces is always conditional. We are only allowed in after proving our worth through endless paperwork, interviews, background checks and layers of suspicion. We are treated as potential risks rather than as contributors.

And even when we do everything asked, access is never guaranteed. The travel ban formalises what we already knew: our place at the table is never secure, always dependent on whether those holding power feel comfortable with us being there.

    This year’s ban is not an isolated moment. Earlier in Bonn, at the UN climate negotiations, many developing country delegates were denied visas. Imagine that – people barred from participating in the very forum where they are supposed to defend their countries’ future. This is not just an inconvenience. It is an active silencing of the people most affected by the climate crisis.

    And this matters deeply, because climate justice cannot be treated as an isolated bubble. It cannot be reduced to speeches about inclusivity while, in practice, the most vulnerable are excluded. A just response to climate change must start with equal rights at the table. Without that, all the language of “hearing the most vulnerable” and “centering climate justice” means nothing to us.

    Climate justice can’t be built on exclusion

    Eight years ago, I wrote another op-ed for Climate Home about how Trump’s Muslim Ban at the time meant that I could no longer pursue postgrad studies in the United States. I wrote trying to process what it meant to be told that I was not wanted. Today, eight years later, I am writing again on this theme. The fact that I still have to do this is heartbreaking.

    Ethiopia’s preparedness puts it ahead of Nigeria in bid to host COP32, campaigners say

    New York Climate Week will produce reports, headlines and key messages. But it will do so without many of the people whose lived experiences are the most urgent reminder of why climate justice matters.

    I hope that the organisers and participants will acknowledge this gap. I hope they will recognise that climate justice cannot be built on exclusion, and that real solidarity means fighting to dismantle the barriers that silence the most vulnerable.

    I hope that in a few years, I will not find myself writing these same words for a third time.

    The post Banned from the US: The voices missing at New York Climate Week appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Banned from the US: The voices missing at New York Climate Week

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Greenpeace urges governments to defend international law, as evidence suggests breaches by deep sea mining contractors

    Published

    on

    SYDNEY/FIJI, Monday 9 March 2026 — As the International Seabed Authority (ISA) opens its 31st Session today, Greenpeace International is calling on member states to take firm and swift action if breaches by subsidiaries and subcontractors of The Metals Company (TMC) are established. Evidence compiled and submitted to the ISA’s Secretary General suggests that violations of exploration contracts may have occurred.

    Louisa Casson, Campaigner, Greenpeace International, said: “In July, governments at the ISA sent a clear message: rogue companies trying to sidestep international law will face consequences. Turning that promise into action at this meeting is far more important than rushing through a Mining Code designed to appease corporate interests rather than protect the common good. As delegations from around the world gather today, they must unite and confront the US and TMC’s neo-colonial resource grab and make clear that deep sea mining is a reckless gamble humanity cannot afford.”

    The ISA launched an inquiry at its last Council meeting in July 2025, in response to TMC USA seeking unilateral deep sea mining licences from the Trump administration. If the US administration unilaterally allows mining of the international seabed, it would be considered in violation of international law.

    Greenpeace International has compiled and submitted evidence to the ISA Secretary-General, Leticia Carvalho, to support the ongoing inquiry into deep sea mining contractors. This evidence shows that those supporting these unprecedented rogue efforts to start deep sea mining unilaterally via President Trump could be in breach of their obligations with the ISA.

    The analysis focuses on TMC’s subsidiaries — Nauru Ocean Resources Inc (NORI) and Tonga Offshore Mining Ltd (TOML) — as well as Blue Minerals Jamaica (BMJ), a company linked to Dutch-Swiss offshore engineering firm Allseas, one of TMC’s subcontractors and largest shareholders. The information compiled indicates that their activities may violate core contractual obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). If these breaches are confirmed, NORI and TOML’s exploration contracts, which expire in July 2026 and January 2027 respectively, the ISA should take action, including considering not renewing the contract.

    Letícia Carvalho has recently publicly advocated for governments to finalise a streamlined deep sea mining code this year and has expressed her own concerns with the calls from 40 governments for a moratorium. At a time when rogue actors are attempting to bypass or weaken the international system, establishing rules and regulations that will allow mining to start could mean falling into the trap of international bullies. A Mining Code would legitimise and drive investment into a flagging industry, supporting rogue actor companies like TMC and weakening deterrence against unilateral mining outside the ISA framework.

    Casson added:Rushing to finalise a Mining Code serves the interests of multinational corporations, not the principles of multilateralism. With what we know now, rules to mine the deep sea cannot coexist with ocean protection. Governments are legally obliged to only authorise deep sea mining if it can demonstrably benefit humanity – and that is non-negotiable. As the long list of scientific, environmental and social concerns with this industry keeps growing, what is needed is a clear political signal that the world will not be intimidated into rushing a mining code by unilateral threats and will instead keep moving towards a moratorium on deep sea mining.” 

    —ENDS—

    Key findings from the full briefing:

    • Following TMC USA’s application to mine the international seabed unilaterally, NORI and TOML have amended their agreements to provide payments to Nauru and Tonga, respectively, if US-authorised commercial mining goes ahead. This sets up their participation in a financial mechanism predicated on mining in contradiction to UNCLOS.
    • NORI and TOML have signed intercompany intellectual property and data-sharing agreements with TMC USA, and the data obtained by NORI and TOML under the ISA exploration contracts has been key to facilitating TMC USA’s application under US national regulations.
    • Just a few individuals hold key decision-making roles across the TMC and all relevant subsidiaries, making claims of independent management ungrounded. NORI, TOML, and TMC USA, while legally distinct, are managed as an integrated corporate group with a single, coordinated strategy under the direct control and strategic direction of TMC.

    Greenpeace urges governments to defend international law, as evidence suggests breaches by deep sea mining contractors

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    After a Decade of Missteps, a Texas City Careens Toward a Water-Shortage Catastrophe

    Published

    on

    Officials in Corpus Christi expect a “water emergency” within months and fully run out of water next year. That would halt jet fuel supplies to Texas airports, fuel a surge in gasoline prices and trigger an “economic disaster” without precedent, former officials said.

    CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas—The imminent depletion of water supplies in Corpus Christi threatens to cut off the flow of jet fuel to Texas airports and other oil exports from one of the nation’s largest petroleum ports, triggering potential shockwaves through energy markets in Texas and beyond.

    After a Decade of Missteps, a Texas City Careens Toward a Water-Shortage Catastrophe

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Is the FBI Investigating Environmental Activists?

    Published

    on

    A recent visit by an FBI agent to a climate activist hints at a broadening Trump administration effort to target political opponents.

    NEW YORK CITY—The group in the Brooklyn studio seemed harmless. There was a graduate student, a Yiddish teacher, a hairdresser. Fifteen people had gathered on a Wednesday night for a training offered by Extinction Rebellion NYC and Climate Defiance, two climate activist groups that engage in nonviolent civil disobedience and theatrical protest.

    Is the FBI Investigating Environmental Activists?

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com