Mars, the global company behind famous brands like M&M’s, Snickers, and Pedigree, has announced a major new initiative: a $250 million Sustainability Investment Fund. The fund supports innovations in agriculture, ingredients, and packaging. It focuses on areas that have the biggest impact on Mars’ environmental footprint and carbon emissions.
Mars is also working on its climate goals through the “Sustainable in a Generation” plan. The aim is to cut emissions in half by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050. Here’s how the fund fits into Mars’s sustainability journey—and why it matters for the food and consumer goods sector.
Why Mars Is Betting Big on Sustainability
Mars has tied up to 2,000 senior leaders’ compensation to emission reductions, showing strong internal accountability. But much of its carbon footprint—over 70%—comes from purchased goods and services like farming, animal feed, and materials.
Thus, the new fund will invest in the following areas to address those emission sources:
- Advanced Agriculture,
- Innovative Ingredients, and
- Next‑Gen Packaging
These focus areas target Mars’s main emissions hotspots. They aim to speed up solutions that go beyond traditional carbon offsets.
Here is how the fund will drive systemic change in the company’s quest for sustainability.
Modern Farming Practices
Mars will provide digital tools for farmers. These tools will help track fertilizer use, monitor soil health, and boost yields. They will also aid in reducing emissions. Remote sensing and satellites will help fight deforestation. They also improve traceability, which is important for sourcing ingredients.
Low‑Carbon Ingredients
The fund will finance innovation in plant-based proteins and raw materials. Shifting from animal-based inputs can significantly reduce emissions, water use, and supply‑chain risk.
Circular Packaging
Packaging improvements include replacing flexible plastics with compostable or recyclable alternatives. Mars has already achieved meaningful shifts and now seeks to support emerging materials at scale.
All these help the company advance its path to net zero by 2050.

A Net-Zero Game Plan Backed by Real Numbers
Mars has made strides in its emission reduction and net-zero goals. It cut greenhouse gas emissions by 16.4% since 2015. At the same time, revenue rose by 69%, hitting $55 billion in 2024. That includes a 1.9% drop in 2024 alone, as seen in the chart below.
By 2030, Mars aims to cut emissions by 50% throughout its entire value chain—Scopes 1, 2, and 3. The company will also integrate sustainability into executive performance.

The company also achieved several milestones in its net-zero journey, including:
- Transitioned 58% of its operations to renewable electricity, aiming for 100% by 2040.
- Made 64% of consumer packaging recyclable, reusable, or compostable.
- Launched climate-smart agriculture projects in 29 countries, across 60+ partnerships, including protecting 8,000 ha of forest in palm oil supply chains.
CEO Poul Weihrauch said during the launch of the sustainability investment fund,
“I’m pleased to see our continued ability to decouple our business growth from our carbon footprint while simultaneously investing in innovation and getting behind start-ups that will be creating new solutions and advance breakthroughs to help companies address resilience challenges. These are important areas to make meaningful progress in helping us to reduce exposure to future environmental risks, and eventually, turn it into profit and competitive advantage.”
This change marks a major step in blending scale with sustainability. Moreover, the company is buying high-quality carbon removal credits to offset emissions it cannot eliminate directly. These credits support carbon-neutral products like the Mars Bar. They help projects that remove CO₂ from the air, like reforestation and soil carbon efforts. The credits are verified by trusted standards, including the Gold Standard and Verra.
Mars views carbon removals as a key tool in its Net Zero by 2050 strategy. This is especially true for tough sectors like agriculture. The company invests in projects like the €150 million Livelihoods Carbon Fund 3. This fund supports nature-based carbon removal and helps develop communities.
Beyond Carbon: Mars’s Broader ESG Mission
Mars goes beyond carbon. Its reef restoration initiative has received over $10 million since 2020, deploying innovative “Reef Stars” in 12 countries to boost coral recovery.
The company also works on water stewardship and farmer livelihoods, aiming to help 30% of suppliers earn a living income by 2027. Some rice projects in Thailand increased yields by up to 43% while cutting water use by over 40%.
More notably, Mars ties 20% of executive pay to emissions progress. This makes sustainability a key part of its corporate culture.
Market Momentum Meets Mission-Driven Investment
Mars’s Sustainability Fund comes at a time when global demand for sustainable solutions is rapidly growing. The sustainable packaging market, a key focus area for Mars, is experiencing significant expansion. The market is expected to rise from $292.7 billion in 2024 to USD 423.6 billion by 2029, growing at a compound annual rate of 7.7%.
Additionally, over 54% of U.S. consumers now choose eco-friendly packaging. Also, 90% prefer brands that use it. Mars’s move towards sustainable materials matches what consumers want and where the market is heading.

The fund also taps into expanding carbon credit markets, particularly in agriculture, forestry, and land use (AFOLU). The market could rise from $5.8 billion in 2024 to $7.5 billion in 2025. This shows a nearly 29% annual growth rate. By 2029, it could hit $20.8 billion.

Carbon farming—which aligns with Mars’s agricultural footprint—could generate as much as $13.7 billion in credits annually by 2050. These trends suggest that innovative ag-focused investments may yield strong returns while advancing climate impact.
On the broader carbon removal front, the market is set to rise from about $733 million in 2024 to nearly $2.85 billion by 2034. This shows a projected growth rate of 14.5% each year. As Mars supports sustainable farming and packaging technologies, these markets offer both environmental value and long-term economic opportunity.
Why This Matters to Industry and Investors
Mars is a major player in food and pet care, including snack favorites and pet nutrition. Its investments set sector-wide signals on value-chain decarbonization, sustainable sourcing, and packaging evolution.
The fund’s 250 million-dollar commitment matches the scale already seen in clean agriculture and materials innovation. It provides early funding for innovative solutions. This way, it links financial success to environmental performance.
Investors should note Mars’s strong execution: a 16% emissions cut amid significant growth shows ambitious goals are feasible.
Mars’s Sustainability Investment Fund marks a strategic leap beyond internal emissions cuts. It tackles systemic issues—agriculture, packaging, ingredients—using innovative solutions.
As consumer goods and agriculture industries face climate pressures, Mars offers a model of responsible leadership. It funds future technologies and places sustainability at its core. This shows that profitable growth and caring for the planet can go hand-in-hand.
The post Mars Invests $250M in Sustainable Innovations to Boost Net Zero Journey appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

